Did you guys already started to search for projects that could be listed on your platform? Did you do some research on what's the demand for such a platform as scientificcoin might be?
Yes, of course. At the moment we are using projects from the Novosibirsk research center. In future, thanks to our partnerships/communities, we will bring projects from all around the world That's good. So the platform won't be empty as soon as you will launch it. Do you already have some partnerships from outside of Russia? When they launch it they need to have at leats a few projetc to invest in them because otherwise the platform doesn't have any use and its not worthy to launch it. Yep, it's comparable to a gaming console launch. You need a strong game that is available at launch to boost the sales. Here you need a few great projects that will attract users. Yes indeed. Just to get an impression, what kind of projects from the Novosibirsk research center can we expect at platform launch? Well, Health Monitor was a project we picked from our current basket :-) |
|
|
|
Did you guys already started to search for projects that could be listed on your platform? Did you do some research on what's the demand for such a platform as scientificcoin might be?
Yes, of course. At the moment we are using projects from the Novosibirsk research center. In future, thanks to our partnerships/communities, we will bring projects from all around the world That's good. So the platform won't be empty as soon as you will launch it. Do you already have some partnerships from outside of Russia? When they launch it they need to have at leats a few projetc to invest in them because otherwise the platform doesn't have any use and its not worthy to launch it. Yep, it's comparable to a gaming console launch. You need a strong game that is available at launch to boost the sales. Here you need a few great projects that will attract users. I completely agree with the above statement.. if you are launching a framework but have no applications on it to launch you will have a hard time getting adoption rate up. History has proved that when you can launch something and have 1 good backer, it will make all the difference. Hello, as already stated, we will have several projects in Feb 19 (official platform release). |
|
|
|
Any other updates like partnership and progress ? it seems quite for a while
Hello, at the moment we are focused on: a) keep developing www.scientificcoin.comb) launching www.hireascientist.comc) getting ready for the Las Vegas Blockshow event Las Vegas Blockshow event, what are the details of the event? I will stay in Las Vegas for half a month in August. It's the event organized by Coindesk. You can find all the information here: https://blockshow.com/ |
|
|
|
Any other updates like partnership and progress ? it seems quite for a while
Hello, at the moment we are focused on: a) keep developing www.scientificcoin.comb) launching www.hireascientist.comc) getting ready for the Las Vegas Blockshow event Hiring a scientist sounds interesting. Will it be integrated into scientificcoin in any way? participants will have to hold SNcoin for around 10$ |
|
|
|
Any other updates like partnership and progress ? it seems quite for a while
Hello, at the moment we are focused on: a) keep developing www.scientificcoin.comb) launching www.hireascientist.comc) getting ready for the Las Vegas Blockshow event |
|
|
|
Did you guys already started to search for projects that could be listed on your platform? Did you do some research on what's the demand for such a platform as scientificcoin might be?
Yes, of course. At the moment we are using projects from the Novosibirsk research center. In future, thanks to our partnerships/communities, we will bring projects from all around the world |
|
|
|
[ Has there been any collaborations or partnership with scientific communities and organizations? I think it will boost the project if the team got any of those partnerships.
That is what they are planing for if you look at their presentation. But partnership, would like to know if they have any I haven't found any information regarding any partnerships on the website, so I guess they are still to get them in the future. I am also looking for any information with the partnerships with other science related companies because it will be a great and revolutionary project if they will find a good and reliable partners. On the other side, a crowfunding platform doesn't require many partnerships. The most important thing for them is to attract projects, so they do need a strong marketing campaign. But partnerships with other reliable companies can be a great asset to the project to attract more customers and investors. Collaboration and integration with other companies will play an important role to their success. I think that some kind of agreement with some scientific community or organization is essential for the success of the project. Yeah, you are absolutely right. Most of the customers and investors are looking for a great and strong project team and that includes the partnerships. Big part of the project will achieve by the help of those associate or colleagues. I think it would be good for the project if the team could take part in some scientific events like conferences or some seminars, maybe do some presentations. It's in our plans! By the way, we have already done in Siberia (Novosibirsk research center) |
|
|
|
Good to see that dev is regularly checking the thread and answering community questions. It should be sth normal but unfortunately a lot of projects abandon their thread after a short while. Hopefully, the team stays active and responsive.
We try our best (it's also a good exercise to see if we can answer any questions providing all details)  |
|
|
|
I just hope that the team does not loose the focus on the other success project Health Monitor.. because for me it's strange that a still running program (evenin early stage) can make room for a second project launch?
Unless the master team handed the previous project over to the ones developing it all and arranging the marketing..
In that case.. go guys ! let's make this one reach the same level of interest in the community as health monitor has !
Hi, about Health Monitor: a) 10 vending machines are almost ready b) we worked hard to make the product better c) going to market very soon We can't lost the focus on it.... we want to make money from our investment too That's great! I am glad that the Health Monitor project is developing. but unfortunately,I noticed that projects that are engaged in the development of science are more difficult to attract the attention of users and investors. you guys have a lot of work to do! It may seem difficult to attract investors but when it rolls out and is proven to be viable and working, be ready for a surge of investments on the line.  I think the success of this project is a bit tied to health monitor as well. if you guys can get the machines to market , then that will be proof that you can run a business. Can you explain in a sentence or two what Healthmonitor is about? you can watch here: www.healthmonitor.proit's an innovative machine for the non-invasive diagnostics of several diseases. |
|
|
|
I just hope that the team does not loose the focus on the other success project Health Monitor.. because for me it's strange that a still running program (evenin early stage) can make room for a second project launch?
Unless the master team handed the previous project over to the ones developing it all and arranging the marketing..
In that case.. go guys ! let's make this one reach the same level of interest in the community as health monitor has !
Hi, about Health Monitor: a) 10 vending machines are almost ready b) we worked hard to make the product better c) going to market very soon We can't lost the focus on it.... we want to make money from our investment too That's great! I am glad that the Health Monitor project is developing. but unfortunately,I noticed that projects that are engaged in the development of science are more difficult to attract the attention of users and investors. you guys have a lot of work to do! That's what you would expect in a profit seeking environment. Science is just not as easy to be hyped as other things that people know more about. More risks, potentially more rewards. With our tools, we think we can reduce investors risks |
|
|
|
I just hope that the team does not loose the focus on the other success project Health Monitor.. because for me it's strange that a still running program (evenin early stage) can make room for a second project launch?
Unless the master team handed the previous project over to the ones developing it all and arranging the marketing..
In that case.. go guys ! let's make this one reach the same level of interest in the community as health monitor has !
Hi, about Health Monitor: a) 10 vending machines are almost ready b) we worked hard to make the product better c) going to market very soon We can't lost the focus on it.... we want to make money from our investment too That's great! I am glad that the Health Monitor project is developing. but unfortunately,I noticed that projects that are engaged in the development of science are more difficult to attract the attention of users and investors. you guys have a lot of work to do! Yes, but we are not worried :-) |
|
|
|
I thought I read somewhere health monitor is not doing well ?
Why? We promised dividends by Jan 19 and we are still on track. Also, we keep receiving requests from entrepreneurs all around the world interested in our technology |
|
|
|
Yet I do not understand how each project will be able to run its ICO on your platform
It's pretty straightforward: as a project owner, you can create your own smart contract (picking from many templates) and start to raise money. In addition, your project will be listed on our platform ranked by several factors couldn't they just use existing fundraising platforms ? or this one is specially designed for research project ? Our platform specifically target science and we provided some tools to facilitate the funding like the mathematical algorithm developed for rate science projects |
|
|
|
I just hope that the team does not loose the focus on the other success project Health Monitor.. because for me it's strange that a still running program (evenin early stage) can make room for a second project launch?
Unless the master team handed the previous project over to the ones developing it all and arranging the marketing..
In that case.. go guys ! let's make this one reach the same level of interest in the community as health monitor has !
Hi, about Health Monitor: a) 10 vending machines are almost ready b) we worked hard to make the product better c) going to market very soon We can't lost the focus on it.... we want to make money from our investment too |
|
|
|
I do not even know, many scientific projects simply by definition do not bring money, and those that will bring it are no longer scientific projects, and they have already found investors.
There is a lot of logic in this, but there are exceptions to the rules. If to present this is a scientific project with a patent, then it can make a profit. The question that they want to make with the money is not transparent, which means that a normal rating from investors is unlikely to get  usually is so but maybe this project can be an exception, and combine both the scientific part and the profit, and succeed on all fronts, just hope... We want to help investors to focus on profitable projects and scientists to raise money (more and faster than usual). Probably, yes, most of the funded projects will already have some sort of patents (as we did last year, as a test with www.healthmonitor.pro) |
|
|
|
Yet I do not understand how each project will be able to run its ICO on your platform
It's pretty straightforward: as a project owner, you can create your own smart contract (picking from many templates) and start to raise money. In addition, your project will be listed on our platform ranked by several factors |
|
|
|
I do not even know, many scientific projects simply by definition do not bring money, and those that will bring it are no longer scientific projects, and they have already found investors.
There is a lot of logic in this, but there are exceptions to the rules. If to present this is a scientific project with a patent, then it can make a profit. The question that they want to make with the money is not transparent, which means that a normal rating from investors is unlikely to get Hello, what you mean with "is not transparent"? |
|
|
|
To clarify previous conversations: Initially, we will accept only ETH because it's easier. In the second stage, we will be accepting also BTC and all the major coins: FIAT is an option in place because, frankly, it's difficult to think a world without FIAT (at the moment) Keeping FIAT with respect to other coins is a good choice as people still need a bridge for FIAT to crypto transition. Not a lot of ICO's have the FIAT option, mostly because in this space it's easier to contribute with ETH. I think it is a good sign nevertheless. It could attract more people. This is what crypto needs. Yes, also it's only a transition since, later, we will move to a proprietary blockchain Anyway, as I stated before, we will only let funding projects via ETH I think that is a good idea because that way people outside crypto world can join the project. my comment was edited: an "initially" was missing Fair enough, ETH is fine at the beginning. I think most people know how to use ETH because of the ERC20 tokens. Yes, also it's only a transition since, later, we will move to a proprietary blockchain |
|
|
|
To clarify previous conversations: Initially, we will accept only ETH because it's easier. In the second stage, we will be accepting also BTC and all the major coins: FIAT is an option in place because, frankly, it's difficult to think a world without FIAT (at the moment) Keeping FIAT with respect to other coins is a good choice as people still need a bridge for FIAT to crypto transition. Not a lot of ICO's have the FIAT option, mostly because in this space it's easier to contribute with ETH. I think it is a good sign nevertheless. It could attract more people. This is what crypto needs. Anyway, as I stated before, we will only let funding projects via ETH I think that is a good idea because that way people outside crypto world can join the project. my comment was edited: an "initially" was missing |
|
|
|
To clarify previous conversations: Initially, we will accept only ETH because it's easier. In the second stage, we will be accepting also BTC and all the major coins: FIAT is an option in place because, frankly, it's difficult to think a world without FIAT (at the moment) Keeping FIAT with respect to other coins is a good choice as people still need a bridge for FIAT to crypto transition. Not a lot of ICO's have the FIAT option, mostly because in this space it's easier to contribute with ETH. I think it is a good sign nevertheless. It could attract more people. This is what crypto needs. Anyway, initially, as I stated before, we will only let funding projects via ETH |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
