This should definitely give it a nice boost. Hope to see a nice (and hopefully continuos) upward swing - I keep seeing it grow a little, then dump, grow a little than dump. Hoping for some stability.
|
|
|
Wanted to learn - this company dead already? Somehow there aren't enough news about her. And when bounty the company will end? And what collecting at the company if it isn't dead? Tables with awards - empty it is simple.
Check their website and Twitter feed. This project is FAR from dead, they're in ICO full swing. Bounties will end when the ICO is complete.
|
|
|
The main problem as I see it, is that the majority of people in the crypto space have no idea how long it takes to develop a project, and start screaming if a single milestone is missed on a roadmap, or if their latest investment hasn't x2+ in two days. They have completely unrealistic expectations.
|
|
|
Project looks very professional. Joined the airdrop and will be keeping a close eye on developments. Break a leg as they say in show biz.
|
|
|
What do you think should be done? These days bitcoins are not given directly in campaign but tokens are given and very less campaign give bitcoins purely. What would you do?campaign or trading?
There's nothing to stop you doing both. Bounties don't necessarily add a lot of workload - especially signature campaigns. If you're already active on BTT and Twitter, signature campaigns, airdrops and Twitter campaigns are a no brainer. I take the barstool approach, i.e. three legs. Mine, Trade and Bounties.
|
|
|
Airdrop has started!
Not to knock your project, but appropriating DC and Warner Brothers branding/imagery is a risky strategy. They've been known to sue for millions for lesser infringements, and they have a wide international network.
|
|
|
Once you take out the scams (let's face it, there are a lot of them), the reality is that 90% of startups fail, whether they're crypto based or not makes no difference. It's been well documented for years, so to say it like it's something unique to ICOs and cryptocurrencies is a little disingenuous. Institutional and angel investors understand the risks vs. rewards. The only difference in the crypto space is that you have a lot of amateur investors that don't understand the risks, or how long it takes to get a product/project to market. 90% of ALL startups fail: https://www.forbes.com/sites/neilpatel/2015/01/16/90-of-startups-will-fail-heres-what-you-need-to-know-about-the-10/#4578dd4c6679
|
|
|
Can it kill the Crypto Kitties platform? Someone please say yes Sick of crypto kitties slowing down the Ethereum network and causing gas fees to go up. Can't even get Geth/Mist to synch properly now because of the bloat.
|
|
|
I feel your pain mate. I haven't had a good night's sleep in years - apart from the occasional trips back to France or out in the English countryside. So far, I think the US has the worst noise pollution of anywhere I've been.
|
|
|
Regurgitating old news doesn't help, but Ryan did post an update last week (here's the link again incase anyone missed it: http://theryanfelton.com/clearing-the-air/), that in my mind at least buys him/the team more time. As mentioned in the post, they (the company) have not dumped their tokens, in a pump and dump move as many have suggested. You can check their balance here: https://etherscan.io/token/0x17fd666fa0784885fa1afec8ac624d9b7e72b752?a=0x40508C24cc4575346bC9e8591bd7bA7969eE01a1Products take time to get off the ground, and I agree with his point that you don't want to give your deep pocketed competitors insight into what you're building until you're ready to strike - or they'll just out spend and engineer you. All good things come to he who waits. Rome wan't built in a day; neither can a software platform.
|
|
|
The concept of AML Bitcoin sounds interesting, but there are a few troubling things that I dont understand:
For starters, when the ICO is over and the coin is launched, how would such a coin be traded, say at Bittrex and other exchanges if all participants, all coin holders has to comply with AML requirements before they can hold the tokens, being traded on, say Bittrex exchange would eliminate the AML for those traders who just goes directly to, for example, bittrex with a BTC, ETH, etc and directly trades it for an AML Bitcoin, then uses the very same AML Bitcoin to buy something online by sending those AML Bitcoins directly from Bittrex wallet exchange to the vendor accepting the AML Bitcoin. On this example transaction there would be no AML data attached on that specific transaction and coins that were sent directly from the Bittrex online wallet to the vendor's wallet.
So, how is that problem solved, they can't possibly think that Bittrex would be performing AML for users who wants to trade AML Bitcoins, Bittrex would just decide not to add this coin than to undergo such a problematic and tedious major design/code change to house the AML Bitcoins on their exchange. Same for Poloniex, Kraken, etc.
So, the path of least resistance would be for all the exchanges simply to not list AML Bitcoin. So, okay all exchanges do not list AML Bitcoins in orders to preserve the purity of the AML requirements within AML Bitcoins, so how exactly would the price appreciate if user's would be able to trade this coin. Maybe an AML compliant exchange is created, possibly called AML Exchange where this coin is finally listed there to be traded with a handful of currency pairs (AML/BTC, AML/ETH, AML/LTC, etc). Now imagine this: AML Bitcoins listed on one exchange with AML requirements set, users have to undergo a series of AML procedures before becoming a member there, that in itself would have fewer members, perhaps not everyone from all countries would be eligible to become a member of said exchange which means that trading volume would be low.
Current ICO price is: $1.00 in light of the projections I have said I really dont see price appreciating by some high factor, in fact the price could go below ICO levels and possibly stay there for a very long time.
You pose some good questions, especially regarding wallet usage - or lack there of. That said, legally compliant exchanges already impose varying degrees of AML/KYC compliance (especially ones dealing with US customers), limiting the weekly withdrawals based on the level of identification. A number of governments are getting stricter, and will/or do require cross referencing, and tax reporting - which will play well into AML Bitcoin's pre-vetted ecosystem. Also, as the restrictions tighten, VCEs (Virtual Currency Exchanges) that are not compliant/listing non-AML cryptos could be denied banking.
|
|
|
Good idea making this list OP. Not only scam ICO's but scam airdrops would be a good addition to it also. Out of the many airdrops i have applied for i received almost nothing from the majority of them which makes most of them scams also. They are actively phishing peoples names and wallet addresses so they can email us scam attempts to try and obtain all of our MEW private keys. I hope ion the future a lot of these scammers end up getting arrested and serve some serious jail time.
Please feel free to add any obvious scams to the list, be they ICOs or airdrops. I've noticed a lot of "airdrops" that require a donation/processing fee, which isn't really an airdrop in my mind. I've updated the thread title to include airdrops too.
|
|
|
What's the difference between you and KYC.legal?
KYC.legal is building a KYC verification platform. AML Bitcoin is an AML certified cryptocurrency, so very different in nature. I'm a little apprehensive of KYC.legal's business model. It requires a person coming to meet you (in person), which could a) lead to fraud/theft/potential attacks (as people let strangers into their offices/homes), and b) requires a global network of verifiers. There's also no mention of cross-referencing against international databases on their site.
|
|
|
Appreciate the positive feedback guys. Please participate in the thread and keep it active. Scammers are going to kill the decentralized nature of cryptocurrency. Regulators are increasingly imposing restrictions limiting ICO participation to institutional investors, making it impossible for people like us to participate. If we can help each other avoid unnecessary risk and educate newcomers, we may be able to self-regulate and get governments to ease up a bit.
|
|
|
Aside from BTC and ETH, I'd say..
TIO (Trade.io) [still in ICO stage] Quantstamp PowerLedger Golem OmiseGO Rialto
Listed in order of potential growth.
|
|
|
Just found another one... Monetary Trading Networkhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2539323.0;topicseenThese guys aren't even trying. No website, no team, no whitepaper, just a discord and slack channel where you can find out where to send 0.002 ETH or 0.0005 BTC in order to join their "Airdrop". I highly recommend steering clear.
|
|
|
Where's the website, team listing, whitepaper, or any kind of details? You can't expect people to send money when you're providing nothing - not even a smart contract address.
|
|
|
With exchange-traded bitcoin futures almost here, cryptocurrencies are becoming popular mainstream investment instruments in the eyes of many. As such, every trading and investing service must give its clients exposure to bitcoin in order to stay relevant. The latest company to jump on the bandwagon is Yahoo, offering its users new ways to track their cryptfolios.
Could you post a link to the article)s) you found about this? There's so much coverage over the last few days, it's getting hard to find the needles in the haystack
|
|
|
Here's another suspicious one... House Pandahttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2489546.0;topicseen They claim to be incubated by NVIDIA as part of the NVDIA Inception Program, but provide no links to news announcements, or blogs on the NVIDIA inception site. They are not listed on the Inception member list, and have so far not responded to my requests for proof. Instead responding with threats. Their sites contains several links talking about the potential returns of ICOs, the world's top supercomputers, etc. but none of them mention House Panda, they're just general industry news. I even offered to invest if they could prove me wrong, so far nada.
|
|
|
|