Theymos, can you add another infographic which I created a while ago to the above list? I tried to make a more graphical and intuitive inforgraphic to help people understand the system easily. |
|
|
|
自分が投稿した中では『Minexcoin』の翻訳スレ、CosplayTokenの日本語アナウンス/バウンティスレと全滅してますね・・・
ちょっと見ない間にANN系スレッドが削除されてたんですね。 子ボードを作ってほしいものですが・・・。 削除によりPost数が減る話が出ていますが、署名キャンペーンの条件である週ごとのPost数は前の週の値からの差でカウントされているのでしょうか？ CosplayTokenの署名キャンペーンは毎週10個の投稿を条件としていますが、例えば先週Post数100で今回のような削除によりPost数95に減った場合、その週は15個の投稿をしないと条件を満たしたことにならないのでしょうか？ 他のバウンティは分かりませんが、私が行っているCosplay Tokneであれば週毎に計算を行っているので問題ありません。 勿論計算が行われる前に削除された分はカウントされませんが、基本的に一度与えたステークスが失効するという事はありません(禁止行為を行った場合は除く) ご回答いただきありがとうございます。そろそろステークス計算のタイミングだったので疑問に思っていました。しかし仮にステークス計算の直前にこのような大規模削除が行われた場合には対処のしようがありませんね・・・ |
|
|
|
自分が投稿した中では『Minexcoin』の翻訳スレ、CosplayTokenの日本語アナウンス/バウンティスレと全滅してますね・・・
ちょっと見ない間にANN系スレッドが削除されてたんですね。 子ボードを作ってほしいものですが・・・。 削除によりPost数が減る話が出ていますが、署名キャンペーンの条件である週ごとのPost数は前の週の値からの差でカウントされているのでしょうか？ CosplayTokenの署名キャンペーンは毎週10個の投稿を条件としていますが、例えば先週Post数100で今回のような削除によりPost数95に減った場合、その週は15個の投稿をしないと条件を満たしたことにならないのでしょうか？ |
|
|
|
|
Posts like "Joined", "Interesting", "Support", or other simple one word are most likely regarded as a spam by mod, even if the thread required to post something as a condition for airdrop.
|
|
|
|
|
Interesting, it would be good to hear about your criteria to choose those 5 bounties. I am not against your choice, just interested in how you chose them.
|
|
|
|
モデレーターとかが居れば必要に応じて有用なスレッドをピン(Sticky)付けて上に固定しておけるんですどねぇ
theymosにPMを送っても「まだ規模が小さいからグローバルモデレーターが居れば十分！」の一点張りで…
重要なスレッドをピン留めできれば便利なんですけれどね。小規模であることは確かなので仕方ないのかもしれませんが。手作りですがまとめスレッドを作って対処するしかないですね。 |
|
|
|
|
Googleフォームを使ったあるエアドロップなのですが、注意書きに
「ファイルをアップロードしてこのフォームを送信すると、Google アカウントに関連付けられた名前と写真が記録されます。」
と書かれています。他のGoogleフォームを使ったエアドロップのときにはこのような注意書きはなかったと思うのですが、こちらからファイルをアップするときのみ名前と写真が記録されるのでしょうか？これまで読み飛ばしてしまっていた可能性もありますが・・・
|
|
|
|
Nice thread, the merit system was introduced less than 2 months ago and it is not easy for Newbies to understand it. I made an infographic about the forum for Newbies, hope it is useful: |
|
|
|
Welcome to the forum, I would suggest you start from reading this thread Unofficial list of (official) Bitcointalk.org rules, guidelines, FAQ https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0and read stickies in each section before you post something there. |
|
|
|
|
目次なので上にあったほうが便利ですかね。
たまにbumpしてみます。
|
|
|
|
I already put a table with signature features, if you want, I can make another table like the one you posted.
Your table is fine but one thing I noticed is that there is actually a limit for number of characters: Member: Links allowed. Max 4000 characters.I added your and the others infographics, updated links and update a new format!
Great, that would be helpful especially for Newbies. |
|
|
|
Although I agree that we need more Merit sources, it can't necessarily be concluded from this. Many users * distributed Merits to their alt-accounts, and this should end when their initial free Merits dry up. * From the Top-merited users, recent merit, many users have red trust for Merit trading (from the first 10: 452: pitipawn, 283: RichDaniel, 251: saulzaents and 151: niknik1966), and many are suspected to have traded Merit (such as Chachacoin17). It's even more suspicious if they stop getting new Merit right after they've reached the rank requirement. Yes a certain percentage should be abuses, and I was trying to extract some rule to distinguish them. In addition to focusing on the transaction with precisely necessary amount for rank up, and red trust, the pitipawn's merit history provides another rule; almost all the threads s/he was merited are "(Deleted/Off-limits/Ignored)". I have no idea how easy that is to write a script to spot,
At this moment these rules are checked by human, maybe there is some nice way to code. |
|
|
|
Updated. Please tell me what other informations you would like to see.
This is nice summary. It would be good to include some infographic of the system as well. Below is an infographic I created and posted here: To be fair, there are several infographic by other users ( paxmao's infographic, ibminer's infographic, 8Habits's infographic, JetSet11's infographic, zentdex's infographic, alia_armelle's infographic ) but in my infographic I tried to make the logic more graphical and intuitive. Also, it would be informative to include the following table by roslinpl: Lesson 1: Forum's signature styling rules RANK
| LINKS
| STYLING
| BOLD LETTERS
| ITALICIZED
| UNDERLINED
| TABLES
| MAX. CHARS.
| Newbies
| no
| no
| no
| yes
| yes
| no
| 50
| Jr. Members
| no
| no
| no
| yes
| yes
| no
| 150
| Members
| yes
| no
| no
| yes
| yes
| no
| 4000
| Full Members
| yes
| font color, font face
| yes
| yes
| yes
| no
| 4000
| Sr. Members
| yes
| yes (without 'glow')
| yes
| yes
| yes
| yes
| 4000
| Hero/Legendary.Members
| yes
| yes
| yes
| yes
| yes
| yes
| 4000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simple idea
I think it is a good idea to list up your best posts you want people to see more at the Personal Text area, like mines in the left.
Advantages
The list of best posts is very simple and has practical advantages from several point of view.
1. It reduces your time to advertise your best posts.
I have seen many merit giving away threads, and indeed, after making good quality posts you are proud of, people spend a certain amount of time to advertise them.
Advertisements are sometimes posted not only merit giving away threads, but also other threads.
Clearly, this is the opposite direction of the original idea of the introduction of the merit system to reduce spam and to improve the average quality of posts.
By listing up them at the Personal Text ara, you can save such advertisement time for learning crypto more from the forum.
2. You can get the best information more easily.
When you find a good quality post, you may want to check that user's history to see his/her previous posts with the same good quality.
If that user is listing up his/her best posts, it is much easier to obtain the best information that suits your preference.
3. It reduces merit sources' time to look for good quality posts.
While I am not a merit source, I can imagine that they have been having huge efforts to look for good quality posts which deserve merits.
The number of threads giving away merit also suggests that it is hard for them to find out good quality posts.
If everyone put the list of best posts, it would reduce their time substantially and they can reach good quality posts more easily.
Why Personal Text area?
Of course, since before the introduction of the merit system, some members have already been making use of their signature areas to show links to their best posts or website etc.
In principle you can do the same thing, and put your list of best posts in the signature area with links.
However, people like me who want to participate signature campaign may not list their best posts in the signature area.
So I think the Personal Text area is the best place to show the list.
Currently, at Personal Text area, you can write down 50 characters without link.
In future it would be more useful if dev could enable link at the Personal Text area.
|
|
|
|
Merit制導入から1ヶ月以上経ち、日本語ボードでもMeritの話をよく見かけるようになりましたので、システムに関する情報をアップデートしました。主な追記箇所は赤字の[New]で示してあります。
ちょっとだけ改善されたようですねー Meritに関しての詳しいアップデートありがとうございます もうsMeritないので送れないですがｗ メリットが改善との事ですが、どちらに情報をアップデートだ出ているのでしょうか？ 探しましたが、見当たりませんので、申し訳ありませんが、どんなところが改善されたのか、教えていただけないでしょか。 私が知る限りMerit制導入後の変更点は、 ・当初"+Merit"のリンクを押した時にMerit送信ページにそのまま移動するという仕様が、新しいウィンドウ（orタブ）で開くようになった ・Meritの統計の項目に返信のランキングが追加された それ以外にもマイナーチェンジがあったのかもしれませんが、私は他には知りませんね。 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
