Bitcoin Forum
May 09, 2024, 10:05:14 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 »
441  Local / 日本語 (Japanese) / Re: 雑談スレ on: January 31, 2018, 03:17:04 PM
日本語スレッドで新規登録者が一気に増えている気がしますね。
最近のニュースで参入者が増えたのでしょうか。
現在どの程度の割合にまで暗号通貨が広まっているのか気になりますね。
442  Local / 日本語 (Japanese) / Re: Meritについて on: January 31, 2018, 03:07:30 PM
インターフェイスを下の画像のようにしたらもっとわかりやすくなると思うんですが、
こういった要望はMetaスレッドに貼って開発チームが投稿を見つけてくれるのを待っていればよいのでしょうか?

現状では、

・sMerit保有数は +Merit をクリックしたときしか確認できない
・sMerit保有数が0.5のときには四捨五入されて0と表示される
・sMerit保有数が0のユーザーはそもそも +Merit のリンクが表示されない(sMeritを得た後使い切って0になった場合は表示される)

といった点が分かりにくいので、下の画像のようにすれば大体解決すると思います。
sMerit保有数はメールアドレスのように本人にだけ見えることを想定しています。

なるほど。良いアイデアですね!
うーん。スレッドに貼るか、theymosに直接PMを送るのが手っ取り早いかと思います。
theymosは運が良ければ2週間くらいで返信してくれますよ笑
ありがとうございます。
Metaスレでは好意的な反応も結構ありましたが、流れが早いのですぐ埋没しますね。
theymosにPMを送ったので、返信が来るか待ってみます。
443  Other / Meta / Re: Merit interface improvement proposal on: January 30, 2018, 04:05:40 PM
I don't think this will happen, for two reasons:
1. The number of sMerits someone has isn't supposed to be public information, as it will lead to begging.
2. sMerit stands for "spendable Merit". 0.5 sMerit isn't spendable, so it shouldn't be shown.
I agree to this showing spendable merit to the public might lead to begging which is kinda unethical in this forum better enhance the profile feature that when we click the "merit" icon it will show the remaining spendable merit at least it is not publicly shown and owner can check it right away.

Right, I suggested sMerit balance should be only visible for the account holder, not for public, see OP:

Of course a user's sMerit balance should be visible only by him/herself, otherwise people might rush to people who have a large number of sMerits.
[EDIT: so sMerit balance should be still hidden from other accounts just like email address.]

and see also the above posts by Vod and me after the one you quoted.
444  Local / 日本語 (Japanese) / Re: 日本語 (Japanese) on: January 30, 2018, 01:58:27 PM
edindinさんのブログ記事を見て来ましたという方が非常に多いですね、有益な情報を発信されていると思います。
新規登録者の方が参入して日本語スレッドが盛り上がっていくのはうれしいですね。

edindinさんが記事を執筆された時点から日本語スレッドは成長し独立スレッドとなり、現在では個々のトピックごとに専門のスレッドがあります。
edindinさんのブログ記事に掲載されているリンクはこちらのスレッドですが、まずは日本語スレッド一覧をご覧ください。

日本語スレッド一覧
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=252.0

専門のスレッドとしては、まず以下をおすすめします。

Newbieの人がひたすら書き込むスレ
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2718478.0

初心者サポート
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2718545.0

エアドロップに興味をお持ちの方も多いと思いますが、以下のスレッドで情報が共有されていますのでご覧ください。

エアドロップ情報
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2719235.0

ランクやメリットなどBitcointalkの仕組みについてはこちらをご覧ください。

フォーラムランク/ポジション/バッジについて
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2721669.0

Meritについて
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2827915.0
445  Other / Meta / Re: Merit & new rank requirements on: January 30, 2018, 01:21:25 PM
I think it would be more convenient if one could check his/her sMerit balance at Profile page and under the name at his/her post, which, however, should be visible only for the account holder just like email address to avoid people rush to rich-sMerit holder.

The following images are what I have in mind, the left one is the current interface, the right one is my proposal:

Profile page
https://imgur.com/qbHYTeE


Each post
https://imgur.com/e0eIeEc

Excellent idea! It should be taken into consideration by devs.
Thanks!  I hope the developer team find my post and like it.  It would be very simple and yet efficient change for the Merit system.
446  Other / Meta / Re: Merit interface improvement proposal on: January 30, 2018, 01:13:50 PM
I would like to hear from developer team what they think, should I just wait for them to find my post or could I contact someone responsible for this stuff directly?
Since there are many Merit posts recently, I was afraid they couldn't have time to check my post.
447  Local / 日本語 (Japanese) / Re: Meritについて on: January 30, 2018, 01:05:23 PM
インターフェイスを下の画像のようにしたらもっとわかりやすくなると思うんですが、
こういった要望はMetaスレッドに貼って開発チームが投稿を見つけてくれるのを待っていればよいのでしょうか?

現状では、

・sMerit保有数は +Merit をクリックしたときしか確認できない
・sMerit保有数が0.5のときには四捨五入されて0と表示される
・sMerit保有数が0のユーザーはそもそも +Merit のリンクが表示されない(sMeritを得た後使い切って0になった場合は表示される)

といった点が分かりにくいので、下の画像のようにすれば大体解決すると思います。
sMerit保有数はメールアドレスのように本人にだけ見えることを想定しています。

448  Local / 日本語 (Japanese) / Re: 日本語 (Japanese) on: January 30, 2018, 01:50:54 AM
みなさんは5chコインについてどう思われてます?

将来性とかあると思われますか・

というかICOは完売するんだろうか

2chのmonaコインがmoonしましたからね
第2のmonaをねらってるんじゃないですか?
monaも2年ぐらい前は3円ぐらいでうろうろしてましたから。
何があるかわかりませんね。
確かに何があるかはわかりませんが、現状ではまだ優良とはいいがたいと思います。
日本発コインは盛り上がると強いですからね。
私はMonaや5chとはまた雰囲気の違うKotoも応援しているんですが、みなさんどう思われますか?
449  Other / Meta / Re: Merit & new rank requirements on: January 30, 2018, 01:46:23 AM
I think it would be more convenient if one could check his/her sMerit balance at Profile page and under the name at his/her post, which, however, should be visible only for the account holder just like email address to avoid people rush to rich-sMerit holder.

The following images are what I have in mind, the left one is the current interface, the right one is my proposal:

Profile page
https://imgur.com/qbHYTeE


Each post
https://imgur.com/e0eIeEc

450  Other / Meta / Re: Merit interface improvement proposal on: January 30, 2018, 01:30:57 AM
1. The number of sMerits someone has isn't supposed to be public information, as it will lead to begging.

You could show it just to the account holder, like email address.
Right, that's what I was trying to say in the OP, but maybe it was not written in a sufficiently clear manner.
Will edit a bit.
451  Other / Meta / Re: Merit interface improvement proposal on: January 30, 2018, 01:28:47 AM
Nice suggestion you got there. I like the most is the fact that you can now see how much sMerit you can spend without leaving the thread or opening another tab.

Although the "why do i have 0 sMerit when i received 1 merit" is (i'm sorry to say this) common sense, they're the kind of people who do not read and think or too lazy to think and read. These are the very reason why merit system was implemented.

For those people, try and think for a moment, the minimum sMerit you can give is 1 (have anyone tried giving 0.5? If so please correct me) and 0.5 is not 1, therefore i cannot give 1 sMerit if i have only 1 Merit. Same goes with every other odd numbers(1,3,5,7,9, and so on).
Thanks, I think the above interface would make the Merit system more accessible and easy to use.

I think no one tries to give 0.5 sMerit, but what I was trying to say was that some people confuse when they click +Merit link and see 0 sMerit, when they actually have 0.5 sMerit, while as you say some people already understand the system.

Another point is that in the current system +Merit link doesn't appear if you have 0 Merit and 0 sMerit. 
So it is a little bit hard for Newbies to know the existence of sMerit.
[I will add this point in the OP.]
452  Other / Meta / Merit interface improvement proposal on: January 29, 2018, 04:45:22 PM
Current issue

Currently you can check your sMerit balance only when you try to send sMerit to someone's post by clicking the +Merit link for the post.
Another issue for small-number sMerit holder is the sMerit balance is rounded off and you can't check if you have 0.5 sMerit.
Furthermore, it does not seem to be well-recognized in the community that the minimum unit for sMerit is 0.5 [EDIT: while sendable minimum unit is 1], or even the difference between Merit and sMerit.

[EDIT:
Another point is that in the current system +Merit link doesn't appear if you have 0 Merit and 0 sMerit, which makes Newbies and Jr. Members a little bit hard to know the existence of sMerit.
Of course if people read the theymos' post carefully they understand the system, but it's also true that some people are confusing, so I tried to think about how the interface could be improved.]

These issues prevent smooth Merit/sMerit circulation.

Proposal

I think one can solve these issues by improving the interface, specifically, by

1) introducing sMerit balance to Profile page and under the name at one's post,
2) making 0.5 sMerit visible there.

The new interface requires minimal effort to implement, resolves the above issues, and also answers repeated questions such as "how to check my sMerit", "why I can't send sMerit", "why I have 0 sMerit when I received 1 Merit" etc.

Of course a user's sMerit balance should be visible only by him/herself, otherwise people might rush to people who have a large number of sMerits.
[EDIT: so sMerit balance should be still hidden from other accounts just like email address.]

The following images are what I have in mind, the left one is the current interface, the right one is my proposal:
[EDIT: highlighted in images that only the account holder can check the sMerit balance]

Profile page
https://i.imgur.com/DEXVxNH


Each post
https://i.imgur.com/5DZ7nwN
453  Local / 日本語 (Japanese) / Re: Ledger Nano Sの安全な入手方法 on: January 29, 2018, 03:49:29 PM
Ledger公式か、正規代理店からがよいと思います。
正規代理店の一覧については私の過去の投稿でリンクを貼りましたのでご参考までに引用します。
EARTH SHIPは一覧に載っているので大丈夫だと思いますよ。

Ledger Nano Sは公式から購入できれば一番安いですが、在庫切れの状態で次の入荷は3月だそうです。
国内正規代理店ですが、Ledgerの公式ページに一覧があります。

日本の正規代理店一覧
https://www.ledgerwallet.com/retailers#japan

この一覧の中で、割高にはなりますが、まだ在庫がある代理店があります。

株式会社EARTH SHIP
https://hardwarewallet-japan.com/product/ledger-nano-s/

LANGREY INC.
https://myhardwarewallet.com/

BC TRANSPORT
https://shop.bctransport.tokyo/

一覧のリンクから調べた限り他の正規代理店は在庫切れのようでしたが見落としもあるかもしれませんので、
ご自身でも確認し納得してから購入してください。
454  Other / Meta / Re: Merit & new rank requirements on: January 29, 2018, 06:30:11 AM
Just a little tip for people sending merit: If you click the browser back button immediately after sending merit you will send it again. Unless you intend to merit the same post twice, close the window after sending.
I didn't know that, I would send you Merit if I had sMerit, but thank you for sharing information!

I merited you 2 tokens of sMerit now you should have 1 sMerit to give.
Wow, thank you!  I merited the post, clicked browser back button and indeed my sMerit was correctly used.
455  Other / Meta / Re: Merit & new rank requirements on: January 29, 2018, 06:13:52 AM
Just a little tip for people sending merit: If you click the browser back button immediately after sending merit you will send it again. Unless you intend to merit the same post twice, close the window after sending.
I didn't know that, I would send you Merit if I had sMerit, but thank you for sharing information!
456  Local / 日本語 (Japanese) / Re: 日本語 (Japanese) on: January 29, 2018, 03:05:21 AM
Airdropって結構配布されないものなんだね。
申請と受け取った回数を確認してなかったけど、確かに8割ぐらいしか貰ってない気がする Shocked
エアドロップはこちらにアカウント持っててランクがあればもらえるものなのですか??初心者ですいません。
8割もらっていたらかなり効率いいほうだと思いますよ。
詐欺が多くなってきたので私は最近エアドロップから距離を置いています・・・。

エアドロップはランク関係なしにもらえるものも多いですよ。
こちらの専用スレッドに情報がありますのでご覧ください。
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2719235.0
457  Local / 日本語 (Japanese) / Re: Meritについて on: January 28, 2018, 01:03:09 PM
とても有益な投稿ありがとうございます。sMeritを送らせて頂きました。

ありがとうございます。
徐々に情報が広まっていくといいですね。

sMerit供給者のことは話題にのぼりませんが、日本語コミュニティでsMerit発行者の権利を獲得できると、コミュニティの発展に非常にいいと思います。
上記のスレッドで、日本語の投稿を10個集めたら審査されるのか、どのランク以上が条件なのか、質問してみましたが、今のところ返信はありません。

「ある程度確立したユーザー」「過去の履歴も見る」が条件なので私のような新参者には縁のない話ですが・・・
高ランカーの方々にはぜひ一度応募を検討していただけたらと思います。

現状ではsMerit発行者になると一人当たり平均で毎月185のsMeritが与えられるそうです。

Each source has a different limit per 30 days. The current average is 185, and in total up to 8125 merit could be created per month.
458  Other / Meta / Re: Merit & new rank requirements on: January 28, 2018, 12:21:54 PM
What if I want to send points to someone that really deserve it but I don't have enough "balance"!!
If you found good quality posts but you do not have sufficient sMerit, I recommend you to apply for merit source:

Certain users are designated as "merit sources". They can create new merit out of nothing, up to a limited number per month (which differs per source). I will not be posting a definitive list of merit sources (so that people don't bug them too much), though you'll soon figure out who they are if you pay attention.

[Abbreviated]

If you want to be a merit source:

 1. Be a somewhat established member.
 2. Collect TEN posts written in the last couple of months that have not received nearly enough merit for how good they are, and post quotes for them all in a new Meta thread.
 3. We will take a look at your history and maybe make you a source.

I am especially eager to have merit sources in sub-communities such as the local sections.
459  Other / Meta / Re: Merit & new rank requirements on: January 28, 2018, 04:48:04 AM
Right, you should edit your post appropriately to quote ilpipita's post and my post.

So do you
Forum rules
~
quote pyramids
~

I have quoted at the start, this is not plagiarism at all, sometimes too many quotes looks bad and is not easy to read. This is why I said that answer is to find few posts above and then added when in hurry....

Just wanted to help. If somebody fills bad and thinks this is plagiat please delete this posts.

I meant nothing bad. Look at my sooner posts I always quote. But this time it looks bad as I said before.

I understand what you guys mean, and it is good to hear from you that you did not mean anything bad, but I still think it would be good to quote the original posts, and I do not think just quoting our two posts makes your post difficult to read.
In particular after introduction of Merit system people (maybe including me) are sensitive.
In any case this discussion itself may be wasting the board, I do not claim more but hope you get my point.
* To avoid a long quote I replaced some part by ~.
460  Other / Meta / Re: Merit & new rank requirements on: January 28, 2018, 04:20:26 AM
~

If you read few sooner posts you will find all your answers.

In a hurry? Here you are:

The answer is:
1. When you give someone 4 sendable merits (sMerits). The one will have more 4 merits and 2 sendable merits which they can send to others or send them back to you.
2. You can get merits from others and you will also get sMerits which equal 50% of the total merits you received.

Merit
- You obtain Merit when someone sends it to your post.  
- Merit not decrease unless demerit system is introduced in future.

sMerit
- For each 1 Merit you obtained, you also obtain 0.5 sMerit at the same time.
- When you send Merit to someone, you spend 1 sMerit (but your Merit does not decrease).
- Finally they ``reserve the right to decay unused sMerit in the future'' so it is recommended to use sMerit rather than keep it.




What is this? Are you serious?
You tried plagirising my thread without quoting. Your account is under risk of permanent ban from moderators and admin, you know that? You are extremely brave. If you want more merits, please compose your own thread and get free merits from others.

~
The answer is:
1. When you give someone 4 sendable merits (sMerits). The one will have more 4 merits, and 2 sendable merits which they can send to others or send them back to you.
2. You can get merits from others and you will also get sMerits which equals 50% of the total merits you received.

Meriting me if you like my thread.

Right, I am sorry to see this kind of plagiarism to collect Merit in an unfair way,
which conflicts the original purpose to introduce the Merit system to improve the average quality of posts.
wwzsocki, you should edit your post appropriately to quote ilpipita's post as well as my post below.

There are Merit and sMerit, the former of which is related to rank up, but not the latter one.
The rules are as follows:

Merit
- You obtain Merit when someone sends it to your post.  
- Merit does not decease unless demerit system is introduced in future.

sMerit
- For each 1 Merit you obtained, you also obtain 0.5 sMerit at the same time.
- When you send Merit to someone's post by clicking "+Merit" link for each post, you spend 1 sMerit (but your Merit does not decrease).
- Finally they ``reserve the right to decay unused sMerit in the future'' so it is recommended to use sMerit rather than keep it.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!