Its clearly stated as 2% all over the OP. Why would you think 10%??

They said that maybe will be higher finally because they don't want to distribute all the coins to 6 persons. But I understood it will be always lower than 10% for free.

Edit: "all the investors will get >90% of the coin, because we will decide the %free depending of the results of the ICO, but 90% minimum will be for investors. "

We will send a press release to all known bitcoin media.

If you make that statement singular, instead of plural, You would be absolutely spot on indeed.

OK I saw 31000 blocks, 400 coins. http://shadow.cash/

How many coins will be distributed among those who opted for signature?

And only 280 users with over 100 coins. But those appear to be staking users. According to my calculations 12,352,120 coins were issued in the PoW and about half of those are appearing on the block explorer, so I guess half the coins aren't staking.

But being about half of that half is held by a dozen or so people, there is no way for these coins to be distributed without a major dump. So I'll wait!

You forgot about Bitshares AGS, which also wasn't on an exchange and I believed raised over 5k BTC.  That was when BTC was closer to $1k.  There are a bunch of other off-exchange ICOs that raised a lot of funds. I think Crypti raised 750 btc.

The 2 highest earning by miles right there are the ones not on an exchange , so the logic of an IPO being limited because it wasn't on an exchange , when the top 2 IPO's in crypto history to make the most ever were not on exchanges.................... logic flawed

The reasons that i have already mentioned..........Most complex criteria for signed up and investing in the IPO, even maidsafe and ethereum were easy as hell compared to this coin, this reduces the amount of investors just like the reason bitcoin hasn't been adopted is because its not easy to use

The fact they said we would see some examples and demos of some of the features of the casino and we haven't seen anything yet

The reward structure is batshit crazy ......investing in the IPO at the beginning of the IPO gives you more than 100% more than if you invest at the end......now i agree early investors should get an advantage but 100%+ is taking the piss, now only that , but the suggestion of selling coins on an exchange which would make it impossible to use the berg stake and create unfair distribution of berg stake , while also giving investors right from the start and even bigger benefit. like 150% . Yes this is also a reason to putting people off investing

Advertisement wasn't exactly amazing, except a facebook page that was most likely paid followers

There was hardly any advertising compared to other well known IPO coins

All these small things prevent the amount of people who see it and are aware of the project or want to invest thus lowering the total amount that people will invest

How many more pages of "here is an idea , lets put it on an exchange for 5 days"

"you can't do that it completely ignores berg stake one of the main features of the coin, it doesn't make sense"

"i will offer no solution what soever to what has just been said, here is my idea :but lets put it on an exchange for 5 days"

How do you propose this?

Either

A . Destory all the berg stake connected to the addresses when selling on bter because you cannot transfer them - this doesn't work it gives breakout over 50% control of all future earnings for the coin.

B. They keep the coins - Even worse

C. they some how manage to set up an agreement with bter to allow people to transfer address which would be an incredible amount of fucking around which no exchange is likely to do.


The berg stake is what prevents your idea for being simple and turning into something more complex and a huge waste of time .

Can we please stop using the stupid logic that the IPO was a fail because it wasn't on an exchange, i know some people are very simple minded and see that because recently bitbay made thousands in a few days that it is all about being on an exchange, But it is a proven fact that it is possible to get 50 times more BTC while not being sold on an exchange.

There are 20 different reasons all causing the lack of funds that were collected and a few big reasons like nothing to actually see .

Will ZK effectively end all competing privacy-centric altcoins (purely from an anon-tech standpoint)?  

I guess what I am trying to ask is this:  Is ZK the holy-grail of anonymity?  And will it leave all other currently available anon-tech (such as DRK, XMR, XC, etc) obsolete, inferior, & nonsensical to use?

They said that maybe will be higher finally because they don't want to distribute all the coins to 6 persons. But I understood it will be always lower than 10% for free.

Edit: "all the investors will get >90% of the coin, because we will decide the %free depending of the results of the ICO, but 90% minimum will be for investors. "

Hi, how many shares will be provided to everyone fore signature campaign?

What does this mean?

You would have to trust the seller so I'm not sure how that would work.  Besides, even if Breakoutgaming turns out to be just a mediocre, poorly run gaming site, our Bergstake will be many times more valuable then the price we paid for it.

First things first I guess, let's get this project launched.

bitkey shit never happen, it is technically feasible to programming by the fucking scammer - bitsta programming skills 0%. root progress 0% for ever! - end time of this fucking story.



BITSTA winner ever ever! AND SAYS U FUCK U!

Yes.  The idea of Bergstake is so powerful for a couple of reasons.  The first is the one mentioned above. The second is they created a "sticky" community on this forum.  Even if everyone that invested in the ICO sells their coins, we have the Bergstake forever.  As long as Breakoutgaming is ongoing, everyone of us will forever have an interest in this project.  None of us will ever say, "I dumped my coins so I have no interest anymore, good luck bagholders" .

Jay's resume alone should warrant thousands of btc for this ICO. So many people missed an opportunity here.  If people did just a little bit of research they would have uncovered talent not seen in any other project on these forums.