The problem with beliefs is that they cannot be disproven. This rules out most of the discussion.

No Bitcoin? Then I think WW3 should be made illegal to start! :-]

Bitcoin is an investment to the future. However, it is not get-rich-quick scheme in nonbitcoins.

Try adding extra space before dash. ie. not "C:\downloads\Ixcoin\ixcoin.exe-addnode=198.154.60.183" but "C:\downloads\Ixcoin\ixcoin.exe -addnode=198.154.60.183".
If it again cannot find the path try "cd\downloads\Ixcoin" and then "ixcoin.exe -addnode=198.154.60.183".

This might work... If you can achieve and maintain "amazing product" monopoly on free market. But I do not think that real monopoly is possible without state cooperation.

What happens when some super rich buys all the land and houses in a country?
(Considering the government does not cooperate with this rich one, that means only way of buying is voluntary exchange and not for example state tolerated blackmailing, bribing authority and police, usage of force, etc.)

You can earn bitcoins simply by providing goods or services which are valuable for other BTC owners.
If you want to take fiat out of equation, replace BTC owners with miners. (You can earn bitcoins simply by providing goods or services which are valuable for miners.) Then enlarge this set by everyone who sells something to the miners. Then enlarge this set by everyone who sells something to anyone mentioned in previous sentence. ... Repeat until you are happy.
If you are still unhappy then I guess you ask and yearn for a system of some fair distribution of bitcoins not determined by individual egoisim and greed of above mentioned iteratively growing set (enlarged by people "rich" in fiat). I hope Bitcoin will never becomes such "fair" system, it will be its death.
What you ask for can be theoretically achieved by forking (cloning) Devcoin with "this time the right group of elites". If it can be indeed achieved practically in larger group than a community then Karel Marx was probably right.

Edit: Concerning your
No one have created a script, a program or even formulated an algorithm which would be able to judge worth of humans achievements. (Although philosophers are trying to formulate such principles for over 2000 years. And as cpt. Picard said, there is no greater challenge than study of philosophy. :-])
As for democratic voting... I always wonder that (most) people understand that two wolves and a sheep can not democratically vote "What is for dinner?". But they do not understand that a horde of starving poor (underpayed, exploited, dying children, fairly deserving, etc.) and one rich hoarder of wheat can not democratically vote "What is for dinner?" either.
(I wonder if they understand that ten thousand wolves and one sheep can not democratically vote either.)

I think BTConomist theories are built on assertion that it is possible to monopolize mining or at least that it is somehow possible for decisively big proportion of miners to collude or to follow common goal which goes against interests of majority of BTC Economy.
I simply do not share this assertion in the longer than short-term.

Personally, I have no problem with that.
I would also expect that your "lesser dividend selection algorithm" will not fail if both dividends are exactly the same to the single Satoshi. :-]. This is my case.

SUP; burnin; ZephramC

Yes it is. But the wallet.dat should be encrypted! Anyone who has access to unencrypted wallet.dat (or is able to decrypt it) have access to your bitcoins in that wallet.
You can encrypt it in the bitcoin program or you can encrypt it independently (or both). Do not loose/forget the password!

Hallo there. Bitcoin is much more than just "making some (USD/EUR/...) cash".
Anyway, good times with using it! :-]

Actually, address LadZydQJxffnw97ac6WYQKBKQLHojQpeTe recieved 2.2 LTC three times in short time.

Even sweeter would buy if the price inclusive Vat under 0.2 BTC.

Well his last post is 17 days ago. But then he was online 2 days ago so I hope he is all right and well.

This has nothing to do with luck. It is just probability.
In the long term you will always loose. In the short term you can make some money if you are smart and understand mathematics.

Interesting.

Actually, a friend of mine bought one extra beer few days ago. I took the beer and sent him bitcent later.
So I payed for beer wit bitcoins. :-]

I am too tired for this philosophical debate. :-]

Looking forward to orders opened.