I am sure OP will pay. Don't get discouraged. It will probably be better from next campaign.  Keep sufficient money with an escrow but pay out the money yourself or get the campaign manager to do it. The more middle men you cut out the smoother the process will be.
i think it is a best option put the money with escrow but payout from your extra fund and don't move the money from escrow either you or manager pay directly,so the payment processing can faster Yeah, that is exactly what I meant. Monbux seems to be a busy guy who had been here in last two days but didn't respond anything, he is definitely reliable but he is just too busy. It's almost 10th, the payment has been lated for a week so far.Maybe you can change the escrow for next month term.
Change both the campaign manager and the escrow if you ask me. This is bad for Bitstarz's reputation. It's not Neotox's fault, it seems this campaign works like this: 1.Neotox count the user post and send the list to bitstars.net → 2.bitstars.net confirm the list and send the list to monbux → 3.monbux make the payment Now we stuck in last step, Neotox did a good job everytime, it's not his fault, the issues always happen with second and third step, now again, monbux had been online today but he still didn't reply here, maybe he missed the PM and Neotox or bitstars.net should PM him again. Besides, I will remind him on his escrow thread later. Also, since you're trustworthy now, you could send the funds by yourself instead of using a time-consuming escrow. Yeah, it is not Neotox's fault here. Maybe try a different method to avoid this? monbux holds funds permanently till the campaign is closed. (that is how escrow should work according to link) Neotox counts, sends to bitstarz, who makes the payment? That would be easier and less time consuming. Just my opinion. Thanks |
|
|
|
Fellow posters, its time to end the oppressive conditions in which we are forced to post under. To end this tyranny i bring forth to you a suggestion of weekly bonuses being divided as follows vs current system of top 3 0.10 BTC: The weekly bonus suggestion = 1st - 3rd = 0.06 BTC4th - 7th = 0.03 BTCA vote for this new system is a vote for freedom. There are 43 people in the campaign currently so this gives more people a realistic crack at a bonus should their post quality be decent. You need to speak up or post over at the thread linked below if you want the above bonuses else it wont happen and top 3 posters reign of terror will continue to haunt you in your sleep. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=995029.msg11030258#msg11030258  lol, you could try getting into politics.  |
|
|
|
0.002
13kKYArzTL2AkQ9e4ymHpxPRXdehVdAEDW
Also check your pm's i sent you two different versions lol.
You replied here? Sorry I didn't know, I have another deal. Check PM. ccf5f26e038940a95f1796c2f78bfb30a8a731f1020c663a3d050d87d1b5fa93 (some part of it let it rollover to the next deal ) |
|
|
|
Sorry but i didnt understand this game. We choosing one girl than how it works?
You choose a girl (1 of the 2) and make a donation on her adress. If by the end of the round she gathers more BTC than the other girl you win. Otherwise you lose. Simple  haha easy. its like a blind bet. thanks for info Neither this is game of strategy nor blind betting but this is game of whale with big balance. Tinasun is the only one who can beat anyone because of his balance and can place bet when others can not as he/she has status of ''smart girl''. This game needs to be more transparent winner should not be chosen based on big betting amount.Yeah, How about this: The lowest amount wins. The minimum bet increases as you place a bet. Im thinking of suggesting that too but it will only limit the number of bets per round as no one will choose to bet more on any girl for it will only increase the chance the lose Valid point. There are few other issues too: Creating new accounts to overcome the higher minimum bet. Less fee revenue. On the other hand, what happens when the new minimum bet is 3x your previous bet? Another idea. Winner decided randomly with odds in proportion to the amunt on each. Like 1 BTC : 3 BTC, odds are 25% for first girl and 75% for the second. It also got its advantages and disadvantages. After all, I would say the current set up is more fair. But I didn't like the Smart girl benefits tho. |
|
|
|
Sorry but i didnt understand this game. We choosing one girl than how it works?
You choose a girl (1 of the 2) and make a donation on her adress. If by the end of the round she gathers more BTC than the other girl you win. Otherwise you lose. Simple haha easy. its like a blind bet. thanks for info Neither this is game of strategy nor blind betting but this is game of whale with big balance. Tinasun is the only one who can beat anyone because of his balance and can place bet when others can not as he/she has status of ''smart girl''. This game needs to be more transparent winner should not be chosen based on big betting amount.Yeah, How about this: The lowest amount wins. The minimum bet increases as you place a bet. |
|
|
|
WARNING!
Site owner failing to process/fix my payment, even after PM/email/site comunication. Until this matter is resolved i advise everyone not to
deposit there.
Will remove this once the issue is fixed.
Happened to me too. Wait a week or until OP eventually comes to you... Can you say what the issue is? |
|
|
|
Do grades = bonus or # of posts or both?
We consider post quality first. That will elimiate a few, and get some 10-15 good quality posters. Then we consider, the rating, stricter evaluation, etc. and finally consistency, post count and even boards posted (less relevant though, if we still can't come to a final 3 or 4) to finally decide on it. We consider all criterion possible to get the final three (or 4 as the case may be). If you check some of the posts, you will find that the evaluation and elimination for bonus is a pretty difficult thing to do, with so many good high quality posters in our campaign. The choice is diffcult, so we consider all possible things. Thanks  ndnhc Well Quickseller's posts were exceptionally great, I don't think anyone can achieve his quality of posts. But as far as other winners are concerned, no offense but some of the winner's (not taking names) post quality wasn't that great but I think they were awarded because they made huge numbers of posts and their maximum number of posts were in the relevant* section. It's up to you guys to decide who gets the bonus but as a part of this campaign I expect more fairness to the other members of the campaign, who might have not made too many posts and there posts might have not been in a certain section of the forum but they were by far of better quality than those who were awarded. I know it's a harsh thing to say but I am just saying it as I see it. And I think many others will agree with me but they might not come out and say it. Well, I don't really think that part is true. You are probably looking at the current post of a winner of a bonus of some other week. We will check the boards only in certain cases. You can clearly see that Quickseller does not post (at least not many) in Gambling section. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=18640https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=138744;sa=showPostshttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=210100;sa=showPostshttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=153149;sa=showPosts(P.S. Read the thread too if you like) Yes, may be certain members got bonus because when everything is summed up, we found many users who qualified the bonus. In the absense of any other criterion, we selected it. We don't think excellent English and grammar should only be considered as quality posts, though that is very recommended. If you find any bonus awardees as not fit for it, please review the posts made in the week it was awarded for and shoot me a PM. I will check into it asap. Thanks |
|
|
|
Is quickseller the only one who has makes the bonus consistantly each week? if im quickseller i'd be snap voting against what i suggest haha
If you have different people who make 2nd and 3rd spot each week i think top 7 will work better for consistant overall group quality.
Either way im happy, thanks for your hard work!
Nope. here is the list: Quickseller arallmuus SebastianJu fox19891989 tspacepilot Asuryan180 panju07 Thanks There are a lot of others who just almost made it. I will certainly consider it if I get more votes. Cheers ndnhc |
|
|
|
Monbux seems to be a busy guy who had been here in last two days but didn't respond anything, he is definitely reliable but he is just too busy. It's almost 10th, the payment has been lated for a week so far.Maybe you can change the escrow for next month term.
Change both the campaign manager and the escrow if you ask me. This is bad for Bitstarz's reputation. It's not Neotox's fault, it seems this campaign works like this: 1.Neotox count the user post and send the list to bitstars.net → 2.bitstars.net confirm the list and send the list to monbux → 3.monbux make the payment Now we stuck in last step, Neotox did a good job everytime, it's not his fault, the issues always happen with second and third step, now again, monbux had been online today but he still didn't reply here, maybe he missed the PM and Neotox or bitstars.net should PM him again. Besides, I will remind him on his escrow thread later. Also, since you're trustworthy now, you could send the funds by yourself instead of using a time-consuming escrow. Yeah, it is not Neotox's fault here. Maybe try a different method to avoid this? monbux holds funds permanently till the campaign is closed. (that is how escrow should work according to link) Neotox counts, sends to bitstarz, who makes the payment? That would be easier and less time consuming. Just my opinion. Thanks |
|
|
|
Anyone got experience how support is responding on Satoshi Dice regarding investment questions related to my account there? I sent mail to support more then 7 hours ago and still no answer  . I have blocked my Bitcoins there. Hope that they will solve my problem fast. It appears to be a connectivity issue to the API. We are trying to find out the issue. A quick workaround might be to browse the site in a device that uses another internet connection. Sorry about the trouble! I am not sure if we talking about the same problem now. I explain my issue in the mail I sent to your support (at) satoshidice.com. I include my account and User id information there. If you can speed up the resolution then I will be happy. Edit - yes I understand now. When I log in from another computer I can see my correct ballance. Thank you PS: I would anyway preffer to be contacted by support with at least information they are working on my request. We are double checking too see exactly what happened and will get back to you asap! There is no use emailing them. A few months ago, I send a few emails. Well, never replied yet.  Well, it is fixed now. So, np. Just post on the thread or PM him. It is more likely to be responded. I have invested in the bankroll. Can you sign the cold wallet address please? It will at least help people to trust the site. Thanks |
|
|
|
The withdrawals are one year old. The site used to pay some funds before some 10 months or so. This is the current position of the site: 1. They do not process withdrawals anymore. 2. Their terms are supportive to their acts beyond imagination. 3. They have 888x wager. You deposit, you get a small bonus and 888x wager. It is impossible to wager that much. You will end up wasting your time. 4. 7 days to complete wager or everything is forfeited. 5. Think of a dummy site which only accepts deposits. That is it. Thanks |
|
|
|
"Today is my lucky day... Let us get this casino bankrupt!" |
|
|
|
If we go on splitting it again, say to 6*0.05, it may not serve as a good enough incentive to high quality posters. For instance, if the #1 decreased his quality he might still end up #6 and get the same bonus.
A better way would be to rank them and award the bonus. That is very difficult thing to do, since most of the top posters almost have no difference in their post quality. Actually thats a great idea if you can do that as it would increase quality across the group but not bring down the quality of the very top posters too much. If people cant be separated by quality they could be reward equally more so. What about something like top 7: 1st = 0.08 2nd-3rd = 0.05 4th-7th = 0.03 edit: i see your problem though if you have 2-3 excellent posters, how do you decide. maybe go 1st - 3rd = 0.06 4th - 7th = 0.03 Another thing to address is, if you are the top poster, you wouldn't like this, would you? This might soon get to 0.3 divided among whole posters based on their quality etc. It might be good for those who don't get the bonus, and may be you will say it will be good. But it has the following issues: 1. 0.3 divided among 40+ will make it insignificant amount for most of the participants. 2. It will fail to persuade those who are at the top. 3. Top 3 rewards are kept high so that it works as a reasonable incentive to the quality posters. It helps making healthy competition. The above way won't. For instance, Quickseller made 199 posts, last week. 0.1 is the bonus he deserve. I don't think it is a good idea to lower it to 0.06. 1st to 3rd = 0.1 each is a good bonus IMO. Any votes (for/against)? |
|
|
|
Do grades = bonus or # of posts or both?
We consider post quality first. That will elimiate a few, and get some 10-15 good quality posters. Then we consider, the rating, stricter evaluation, etc. and finally consistency, post count and even boards posted (less relevant though, if we still can't come to a final 3 or 4) to finally decide on it. We consider all criterion possible to get the final three (or 4 as the case may be). If you check some of the posts, you will find that the evaluation and elimination for bonus is a pretty difficult thing to do, with so many good high quality posters in our campaign. The choice is diffcult, so we consider all possible things. Thanks ndnhc |
|
|
|
Do grades = bonus or # of posts or both?
I have no idea, I am guessing the number of posts is the real factor here and also most of the posts the gentlemen I mentioned above made were in Gambling section, so that might be it. If the site owners want top 3 because they want a few amazing posters and their quality might drop if the bonus was moved to top 6, 0.05 etc, then thats something to consider sure.
But 0.05 is not really a Winning prize is it? It's more like a pity bonus. Its just a smallish point, overall i am happy, thanks.
Actually, I am not too happy about my grade. I think I deserve a B+ I dunno i think 0.05 for a 1 week bonus is decent, you get 0.04 per week for some campaigns total. If it were top 6 paid there seems like a more realisitc chance of getting the bonus each week provided you are very active and post good quality It is more to the rating and not the post count, if you remembered sebastianju got half a bonus last week with only 52 posts
For me personally I never thought of it as a bonus, more like a thankyou reward from the campaign for posting quality post in the forum, competition is rising here, more and more participants has got an A rating
The decision to actually split it to 0.1 BTC x 3 was indeed right, 3 weeks ago it was 0.15 BTC for 1 participants, which ofcourse will be hard to get since quickseller is the top candidate for it, although I personally dont mind to split it so that alot more people can get this thankyou bonus from the campaign, with the exception for the posting count to be more stricter Ok thanks for clearing that up and the bonus and campaign is appreciated, i guess if anyone else wants top 6 they should say If we go on splitting it again, say to 6*0.05, it may not serve as a good enough incentive to high quality posters. For instance, if the #1 decreased his quality he might still end up #6 and get the same bonus. A better way would be to rank them and award the bonus. That is very difficult thing to do, since most of the top posters almost have no difference in their post quality. On the other hand, none of the other campaigns, atm, give a bonus totalling around 1.2 BTC a month. Also note that in at least a few weeks, there were 4 winners, 0.1*2 and 0.05*2. If there is extreme difficulty, we usually split the prizes to be more fair to all participants. Thanks Just my opinion. If everyone wants 6x0.05, we can surely make it that. But, that will be discouraging some of the top quality posters here. |
|
|
|
 Like this? Yep. That is it. Thanks Your address? and amount? |
|
|
|
Thanks!
What is needed to get from A to A+?
Super high quality posts. You mean no short ones? I already got myself in the situation that i didnt want to post a post because it was too short... Though i guess that shouldnt be the result. No really. Short posts will be constructive and considered and counted as long as they are great. * Good quality posts * Helpful to OP and readers, Informative * Consistent * Good number of posts. Less important but still might be considered. It is pretty difficult to get A+. All the A's have great quality too. But that leaves out thank you answers to someone who explained something to you. Since this forum doesnt have a thank you button you only have the choice to write a thank you post. If you have no further question or you cant write more without simply bloating the post then the A+ is gone right? lol. You can write a thank you all right. Only it won't be counted. It won't affect your rating/grade. It won't be counted simply because it might be abused by certain users. But if you write a lot of quality posts like you do, one or two won't matter. Ok. I thought such posts might have been the reason. Guess when i have time ill take a look at the posts of A+ posters. Maybe i see then what they are made of. PM'd ya Oops. Sorry for the confusion. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
