No. If you aren't self-biased, then you would complain about very similar cases not solely about you. OP is a prime example of this; don't be like OP.

CET is holding more. Your point is exactly what again?

CET. Who would use a NastyShack when they could use Blazed? That should intuitively answer the question.

---

That's what it is turning in to. I wonder who worked for that guy not that long ago. Hm.

Looks like you are completely uninformed. Volume wise, CET does more than anyone else around here, easily. minerjones is part of CET. A lot of collectors avoid OgNasty for obvious reasons. Pointless to talk to you apparently.

PM me once shorena removes my own negative. I mean, I'm I on a permanent ban?

It seems that Quickseller is not interested in denying that. Very interesting indeed...
He is not disputing this claim, so it appears that based on the preponderance of the evidence presented, he is indeed an HIV-positive, crack-addicted paedophile and homosexual prostitute who beats his wife....

---

If it works, then it works both ways I guess.

If you want to resolve that quickly, either: a) Say that you strongly support me. b) Disagree with him on *something*. Voila, you are no longer part of DT.

Then go talk to ShackNasty, who seems to think otherwise. Oh wait, that was just another pathetic smear attempt after falsely self-victimizing himself. Nevermind.

Have you ever considered that one of the major reasons behind this was the competition in the escrow business?

---

Average Joes tend to be predictable.

Yawn. When all of your lies get completely obliterated, you become so predictable.

---

Sigh. The other troll account should just be nuked by someone.

Re, this:

Of course it was due to feedback of others, otherwise it would never have gotten removed. There was feedback about it from day one. Public discussion was unnecessary. I can handle my own stuff, without you and your alts interfering.

Nothing. However, there is something very wrong in trying to insinuate that I'm solely financially desperate when one lives in a shack. Someone who is solely financially motivated would never work for this system (i.e. either never want to be in DT or only work on their own profit while the community suffers; a perfect example or two can be found in here).

It's attempting to mock nullius, thus is very likely to be you rather than someone else.

If you are looking for someone in dire financial straits, you should take a look at OP who was scamming for pennies per escrow deal or the other one living in a shack.

My mental faculties are very fine, and far beyond those of the colluders. Thank you for asking.

Wrong[1]. You are only stating these due to inherent bias from your own negative rating.

---

[1] I literally posted an example of a very old negative that I pulled a few days ago. Naturally, you didn't read this / chose to ignore it and spread lies.

Yes, but that is not the role of the system/position that is being discussed.

I have not. We just fundamentally disagree on what the trust system is/should be at certain points, which is fine.

Yeah, no. All the affected parties have long moved on, along with everyone else. Why don't you dig up the past of the people you are colluding with? Doesn't fit the agenda, does it?

Lie. Everyone who claimed their money was refunded.

No.

Nope.

All of those accounts deserved their negative trust. Creating a new account to spread the lie that I'm a pedophile is not criticism.

Easily debunked. Here's one user that got their rating removed just a few days ago.

OgNasty is inherently biased, has provided no data whatsoever and is therefore wrong. If theymos felt so strongly about the case, he would have either contacted me about the ratings or [1]excluded me already.

Again, a lie. See above.

Yeah, no. I have contacted no DT1 member even though the disgusting collusion was very obvious.

---

I couldn't address more posts in here at once, as I had to address the cheap smear tactics used by Quickseller.
I do expect that SS is going to receive a flurry of raging PMs by Quickseller and their alts now.

Chill Owl. Let the inner cat in you do its thing. Vod is on the right side of morality, unlike OP and *youKnowWho*.

I do not see any basis for someone to agree to exclude Zepher, in any way whatsoever. Therefore, the third you can already exclude. Coincidence that several exclusions were copied at once? Eh.

Try PM-ing and notice either: a) No response. b) Difference in response. Somewhat trivial to confirm or disprove own suspicion.

The amount of stupidity you are showing by posting from your busted alt is astonishing.

---

It's quite sad that OP (i.e. Pathers52) thinks that this affects me in any way. This is how far his sick obsession with me has progressed.

"Prior to editing"? This is very backwards. Are you saying, ratings that were left mistakenly or incorrectly described should not be edited? Most of my ratings represent the following groups: a) Abusers from the alts thread. b) Account traders. c) ICO bumpers. d) Individual scammers. Those are naturally correct (with the exception of the last one, where errors could be made). The rest represents a minor amount of left ratings, thus the rate of invalid ratings can never be high.

You want less spam and less moderation?

Where and who?

I wonder if TC will neg. you for this, and if he does whether otrkid70 will complain about that abuse or keep quiet (and complain about non-existing abuse from others).

No, it is not. My ratings have >= 99% accuracy, probably. The issues lie elsewhere; the fact that you don't recognize this just shows how unfamiliar you are from the (current) forum.

If you consider "more scams = less BS", then that fits OP's agenda perfectly.

Either speak or don't. Insinuating stuff doesn't make you look good.

Just because you fundamentally misunderstand the system, that doesn't mean that it is being abused in any way. Nothing is being cleaned up. The copy-cat exclusion move essentially destroyed eliminated most of the remaining credibility of the system. Another copy-cat move would completely destroy it, which is the ulterior agenda.

Again, nope. You are not even active here, what are you complaining about?

Disagreed. The latter is also a giant mess being gamed, partially by the same people in this thread.

If they are not alts of each other, then no.

You love the idea of this, is what you're saying.


Nobody with 1 inclusion from DT2 can really stand up without being afraid of consequences as of right now. The collusion is clear, and you can get yanked for just disagreeing with one of the two three publicly.

The pest continues with the smear tactics. This is the full quote:


I have consolidated two ratings and retagged you. I just need to rewrite it and start with "Impossible for me to look the other way on Quickseller's behavior any longer.". Give me some time.