Are you going to publish a statement regarding the Labcoin warning, burnside?
Dispite the underlying reasoning for the warning, it's obvious that it had an immediat impact on the market. I suggest to implement clearer rules for stuff like this - maybe something like "if vote ratio changes to (...), a warning is published on the security". This makes it more predictable and minimizes arbitrariness.
Agreed. Just publishing such a warning seems very unprofessional, although your reasons may be good.
|
|
|
I can't imagine he's serious or why anyone would buy this. Also Price is 350$ instead of 325$
|
|
|
USA by the way
how many pp accounts you need ? WTF people sell PP accounts??? If you ask the right people you even get a drivers license or another kind of ID
|
|
|
Unless anyone can think of a very good reason I shouldn't, I'm going to start (soon) including bitcoin withdrawal addresses in the regular asset issuer lists that are emailed out to asset issuers.
Big argument in favor:
- Easier for issuers to continue operations if the site goes dark. (imagine the work involved in say, DMS.MINING if the site goes dark and Deprived has to email all those users.)
Argument against:
- Gives up some confidentiality. Everyone holding ASICMINER direct shares is in this position already, so I don't think anyone will care much.
After the change I'll also put a reminder on the portfolio page to ask people to set their withdrawal address, such that the lists the issuers get are more complete.
Cheers.
Instead of using the withdrawal adress, you could ask the user to set a public bitcoin adress which is then shared with share issuers. (Kinda like BitFunder) That way there can't even be raised confidentiality concerns.
|
|
|
LTC-GAMING: Hard to argue that there are any outright contract violations. I am confused as to where the miniscule divs are coming from though. Contract says they should be coming from the site's revenue...
I guess that's part of his profit from share price manipulation.
|
|
|
I have a newbie question about how btc-tc works. I wonder if there is a special form to purchase shares during IPO phase or I just have to place buy order as usual.
I am confused, because there are buy orders for TAT.NEOBEE already, while its IPO is set to start next Friday. What does this mean? Can I place my buy order at IPO price right now? Will it be binding?
Thanks in advance
There is no real IPO process. An IPO is just the issuer putting all the shares on the market. There are many failed IPOs because the issuer really has no idea how much interest there is until the shares are put on the market. There's something called Book building. Not that I don't agree with you that some IPOs failed, but even with legit operations you sometimes need book building.
|
|
|
Our advice for investors is to just hold on until we post solid proofs and do not sell on unjustified panic waves. We have posted different takes of a part of the mining hardware and a tray of chips, avoid manipulation and keep result oriented.
Labcoin
Take a picture with a phone so we have a geo-tag on it. Like that can't be faked.
|
|
|
Please let me know if/when other issuers violate their contracts. I'll post similar warnings so new buyers don't get sucked in.
LTC-GAMING - should have a warning on it. He still pays out occasional tiny dividends but appears to given up any pretence that he's actually doing anything. There's just occasional pump/dumps on it. He also uses his large amount of shares to manipulate the share price.
|
|
|
Why the fuck can each link only be used once? That screams spam. And also you can't conveniently advertise the site in your signature. Doesn't seem like a bright idea.
|
|
|
Looks like everything should be back to normal now.
-Ukyo
Hey Ukyo, Any reasons why the ActiveMining page takes so long to load? Don't have the issue with any other security! Tom Everytime you load the page, it also loads over 10k entries in the Trade History tab.
|
|
|
Is it possible to have an API call that returns only last 24 hours/48 hours of trades?
At present the only request for transaction history give the entire transaction history - which uses up a ton of bandwith for no purpose when you're only after new trades. I have a bot running that handles the exchanges for DMS. Running it every 2 minutes uses up well over 1 GB of bandwidth per day - which totally scuppered my plan to run that on a seperate computer on a backup mobile bandwith connection (as it far exceeds the bandwith paid for on that connection). And of course that's only going to get worse as time passes if entire history is sent every time (plus something similar will be running on 4 more of my accounts in the not too distant future). And it's wasting bandwidth at the server end too.
I'm requesting a new API call - not a change to the existing one.
You mean just of your own trades? I think I could probably add something like that to the oauth. Yes, please
|
|
|
Its to fund the production and marketing of the energy pil (m-12) I have created... Maybe you can enlighten us with how you're going to produce and market a product with 7.5 BTC. That sounds horribly low and throws up questions if you've miscalculated your venture and if its doomed to fail.
|
|
|
Get out of here. Historically most BTC securities trade happened on MPEx. Some scammers are faking the volumes currently, making that measure not particularly useful, but nevertheless: Bitcoin securities trading happens on MPEx. Always has. Always will..
You should see a doctor, you seem to be hallucinating.
|
|
|
I guess he just shit his pants because the share price dropped once again
|
|
|
There's no slack to cut here. He's making a ton of money off his site and its time that he behaves more professionally. And if that means hiring someone for support/PR he should go for it.
+1 (for the support, PR seems unnecessary?) That depends on the definition. I meant presence in this forum.
|
|
|
WOAH! "Maintenance in progress. Thank you for your patience." This isn't the kind of site that should just shut down for maintenance without notice! Yes it is, this happens sometimes. Did spook me to a bit the first time i saw it. Give him some slack here, it's just one guy, not a big corporation. (yet) Could be he's fixing the slowness, or updating anti-dos measures. There's no slack to cut here. He's making a ton of money off his site and its time that he behaves more professionally. And if that means hiring someone for support/PR he should go for it.
|
|
|
Ponzi would be proud about this. Over 6k BTC is quite the scam.
|
|
|
|