But let's assume it goes down to 0.5$ per GH/s (what is pretty close to the limit).
Could you elaborate on how you got to this number?
|
|
|
I'm missing a bitcoin address to throw my coins at.
|
|
|
* 20% interest in several new adult related startups as outlined below.
Does this mean 20% in total or 20% per project? And with 20% interest you mean profit sharing?
|
|
|
This has ponzi written all over it.
|
|
|
We can discuss questions here, such as the fields of my ideas etc.
Please, go ahead.
|
|
|
Today we have Coinsortium which is the only share exchange that lets you invest in the business.
What about HIF?
|
|
|
How could someone even buy shares here?
They already bought the hardware and were then starting an IPO? Why? Are they just generous to give away their profits?
Also they're based in Europe where energy hell isn't cheap. So even assuming their hardware would work profitable, they would be less profitable because of high energy costs.
Let this be a lesson to do your due dilligence before investing in crap like this.
|
|
|
This is golden
You don't want me to bring up your laundry list of mistakes. Bring it on On second thought, no, you're too much of a troll. I really don't know how else to explain it pascal. I take what you say with a grain of salt. And, again, laughing at the suffering of others does not make people respect you. Au contraire, I think you will find it has the opposite effect. If this happened to a newb in the bitcoin scene, I would agree with you. But looking at your past record (like this 33 page masterpiece: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=113708.0), I can only laugh at this.
|
|
|
This is golden
You don't want me to bring up your laundry list of mistakes. Bring it on
|
|
|
So you couldn't sell your shares at IPO price and are now trying to dump them. Maybe you should reconsider your evaluation.
|
|
|
These are not worth .001. IPO flag is on because the asset issuer is a scammer, this whole asset is a sham. The shares were trading at 0.000057BTC before the IPO flag was raised.
We know his name, address, fathers business, one way or another he will have to stick to his word. If he doesn't then it's large scale theft and his parole officer knows about it. It's just a matter of waiting between now and next month. He already owes me a huge amount in dividends so I don't care about the shares. Read the thread, I've had lawyers looking in to it since the minute I called him out for pulling a scam. We also know that of Jon Montroll, look where it got us so far. You seem quite desperate to sell your shares. Maybe you should add something like "and if you buy within the hour, you'll get a couple more worthless shares on top for free!"
|
|
|
If they're currently worth 0.001 BTC, why are you selling at 0.0005?
|
|
|
Great that this thread was moved and no one will care now. Kudos to the mods.
Havelock beeing done several times a day actually is a huge issue and I'd like to hear something from the officials about that.
|
|
|
No, im fully serious. He sounds like he hopes to get his coins back by doing so. I would like to know where he gets his hopes from that this will work.
You poor naive soul. You still don't get it, do you? First, they are not his coins. They are the coins of his creditors. Well, by rights, if not by fact of current circumstance. All evidence available points to the most likely case is that he is in full possession of (what is it - millions of dollars worth?) of other people's bitcoins. Hope, schmope. His hope is that you keep playing the role of apologist, keeping everyone at bay, until he can disappear cleanly. If he is out for punishment and gave up on his coins ok. Then it doesnt matter.
Again, not -his- coins. And 'out for punishment'? Of course he's not out for punishment - he's all for getting away with the theft of millions. I'm starting to consider the possibility that you are not just a starry-eyed fool, but perhaps rather a paid shill on the inside of the thief's system. I sure hope not. I'm sure with "he", he meant ru0chen ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=348468.msg8034746#msg8034746) But you're absolutely right. Aren't there any US citizens also victims of Ukyo who have it easier to sue him? I am sure we could setup a fund for legal fees.
|
|
|
Sebastian, its quite easy. He has absolutely no obligation to pay back to coins unless sued.
He's "available", but still doesn't say where the coins are. Sueing him would force him to talk. If they're lost (either due to high incompetence or because he used the money) we're fucked anyway. Sueing him would force him into pay back or bankruptcy (although there hasn't been a case with bitcoin yet). If he says the coins were stolen, he needs to prove that. It's not like the court would just accept "uh, yeah, they were stolen, ups".
He tried to make it seem that there are legal reasons for the coins beeing unavailable, if beeing sued, he might be able to talk about that.
Also don't forget that he was most likely lieing when telling there were technical issues with withdrawals at the beginning of november. Its quite certain now, that the coins were missing at that point and that this was causing the problems.
Even if he launches new projects to try to pay back his debt. Who says anyone would trust him again and use his services?
|
|
|
Have you looked at MPEx? That is where the serious money is. Another sockpuppet?
|
|
|
I would like to join a lawsuit for weexchange, if there is one, assuming a reasonable cost. I lost most of my BTC, Please contact me here or via PM.
What do you hope to achieve? You're kidding right?
|
|
|
I have noticed since the banning of the MPOE-PR account
Wait, what?
|
|
|
The whole thing is hilarious, even by Crypto::Stocks' standards. The "order book": Very volume. Much unknown! Is cryptostocks actually using the term "Unkown"? So they have no idea what happened to these shares? That makes them even more trustworthy.
|
|
|
|