but you know the supply is capped and not be edited even if with the favour of users! at least government can barely control the bitcoin.

i don't really care of the drops as well, doesn't matter for the price if ETF is approved, all depends on how buyers think of that. probably this drop will only last a short period then a rise as buying bitcoins again.

you should never rely investing in bitcoin.

bitcoin is not like a company, itself does not give you any kind of interest, nor is it a kind of scam. the problem around bitcoin, is its volatile pricing, which could make you go busted or billionaire within a short period because it is decentralised - no one legitimately backs the value of bitcoin.

hi man, why are you guys not refreshing this thread regularly?
btw the $ per posts to bitcoin is not much anymore, which could be decreasing the competition of this campaign.

i am sure the trend is not gonna resist the rise, because it has been soaring incessantly; thus the price of being $1500 within this month is possible, yet do not forget the competition of mining would affect the bitcoin price: if the fee is too high, more likely the price is trowed down for less volume expected.

+1 all of those to use is risky, you will probably lose everything and even addict to that. as well, this is a form of the use if you wanna risk multiplying it.

i think that you can have a better power efficiency with raspberry pi 3 cluster instead of those mining stick, since Raspberry pi has just 5~6 watts per modest (AFAIK), where there are at least 24GFLOPS per node, should do around ~10 GH/s per node. hope i didn't make it wrong.

which means they wants to let the people using their services to get their transactions confirmed faster than the rest? or even something similar to selfish mining, not even giving priority for high fees yet not in their service? what the shit are those miners doing, this could have ruined the fairness of competition.

progress? can you explain what the progress mean?

i wanna say, normally the transactions with higher fee will be progressed faster than lower one. depends on its priority of the miners. miners might verify random transactions, mainly with larger transaction fees, thus it with lower fees will get a lower chance of priority. bitcoin core is also locked from other client is because to control the size of bitcoin blocks, in order to ensure majority of the client users able to sustain their wallet without migrating anything.

hope i could get the data from the Qt users of how much spaces of their PC for bitcoin core.

that's not all the way true, from me. because there are increase of the world population, would that count?
the problem is, that kind of cryptocurrency must be reliable if most of the cases, such as problems of premine, or its security. you cannot simply hype that currency thus popular, or limit the maximum supply thus better demand.

have been seeing the altcoins such as dogecoin, peercoin, reddcoin, which has unlimited potential supply, however, have been seeing them falling since the end of 2016. so i would wish to ask about something: is the altcoins with that matter unable to sustain? why is those altcoin unpopular?

disclaimer: my PC is not fast enough to synchronise any of the blockchains so i didn't have any Qt wallet, idk if other feature matters.

i have seen worse as well! people who asks investment from others claiming guaranteed profit is very likely a scam. how is it even possible to make you a millionaire without working at all? you're right.

repaid .015 https://blockchain.info/tx/9d3698dacfe3e6a88ead3d0566a9a2cecf8debd71c521242d032227b3a044a7d
.009 + .015 = .024, .046 remaining.

will work longer on bitcoin forum to gain more about it, so i can repay within the end of March.

that's because bitcoin is mainly using a flat fee rather than in percent. resulting  a situation that low-amount transactions have relatively high fees.

---

high transaction fees also encourage the consideration of the necessity upon sending, and to sustain the security of bitcoin by keeping sufficient fees to miners to maintain. lower fees can increase the speed of spending yet less people could sustain the larger blockchain size.

for the people who are concerning about the AMD is challenging the Intel, i want to know how you would feel about the price of high end CPUs between Ryzen or i7. if the hype of AMD is true, some of the people holding high end PC with Intel are mad about it.

i will stand for 1700 with overclocking to 3.3 GHz.

i guess China is not gonna so do the whole bitcoin. their mining equipment would be abandoned if they could not have sufficient profits upon mining. that's why there is a certain alternative to challenge bitcoin - so bitcoin will have less of that burden if some altcoin becomes popular.

bitcoin acceptacne, could have done by simply including a bitcoin core into the screen payment system stores are using, however, all of them would have to accomplish all the blockchain. since part of them would not able to do that, or they were weighting too much of their profit, they decided not. like in Hong Kong, accepting bitcoin could have made instantly - they don't want to.

it is a form of FUD, i guess he wants to buy bitcoins at a lower price by randomly predicting a bad trend of its price.

yeah, block size increasing is one of the solution. however, we are not sure if the RAID works on synchronising the complete blockchain, because you are needing ~150 gigabytes of spaces in order to use bitcoin core. as well, increasing block size remains a problem: the higher bandwidth requirement.

i can only repay .017 on monday, expected full repayment is before the end of march unless Letyouearn has repaid me.