Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2024, 02:54:51 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 »
381  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [120 GH/s] BitMinter.com | New fast server | Voting pro on BIP-16 (P2SH) | on: February 01, 2012, 07:26:46 PM
Uhhh... why are we at >1% stales?
Who invited that CPU-mining botnet in? Wink
382  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: Best router / router firmware to use with cgminer on: February 01, 2012, 07:16:19 PM
supposedly Grin
1653 active WAN connections brought the WRT's CPU usage to 57%...
I'll do something more drastic when I have some time to spare. Stay tuned.
383  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: CGMINER GPU bitforce overclock monitor fanspeed RPC in C linux/windows/osx 2.2.1 on: February 01, 2012, 07:08:11 PM
Are these facts, or is it what you assume?

What I find contradictory is that the higher the intensity, the less responsive the PC becomes. With your explanation it should be the other way around, or am I missing something? After CPU asks for one billion hashes from the GPU, it can sleep for 2 seconds and collect the result, while with asking for only 100 millions it needs to get active after 200ms, right?

I'm not sure what causes the decayed responsivity with higher intensity. For sure it is not a matter of whether a multi GHz CPU is being woken up every 2 seconds or 2 msecs. Nor it should be caused by GPU being dumped with a big chunk of work - 2D and 3D units are independent, loading SPs should generally not impact desktop performance.

What am I missing?
What you are missing is an obvious fact that the higher the intensity, the longer the uninterruptible busy cycles of your GPU are.
Hence, any attempt at communicating with the card is gonna have to wait until the device is done processing it's current batch of data.
The waiting low-level calls cause the parent code to "hang" as well while waiting for a response.
As a result the whole graphic subsystem becomes sluggish and unresponsive.
These are very much the facts.
384  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: Best router / router firmware to use with cgminer on: February 01, 2012, 06:59:43 PM
DAT, unless you need to constantly route >10Mb of traffic over the WAN interface, any cheapo plastic router will do.

My old WRT54GL reflashed with DD-WRT is supposedly able to take care of 4k simultaneous connections...
The Buffalo mentioned recently is a beast. Were I to choose a new router today, I'd choose it over the old WRT routers for its Gb-E and N Wi-Fi.
Still, I've got a hunch that the elderly Linksys ain't going anywhere any time soon.

385  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: Best router / router firmware to use with cgminer on: February 01, 2012, 06:30:07 PM
Even a P2 would of been fine. The only issue is energy usage. I seriously doubt your lappy is satisfied with 5 Watts of power which is plenty for the plastic routers.

Floeti, you are absolutely right with that Buffalo monster, except it's a total overkill as no mining farm will ever come close to such network utilization.
It's a great choice for a power user consuming sick amounts of bandwidth, no doubt about that.

Let's try not to get overboard guys, Gigavps has been running his massive farm over a lowly 6Mb/3Mb pipe.

That cheap WRT flashed with DDwrt/OpenWrt/Tomato will easily take care of all his badwidth and will be able to host a secure VPN server as well.

Gigavps, just be sure to turn the radio off if you're not using it, or at least tune the TX power down, lest your Wi-Fi should present a target.
Even if unable to breach the properly secured WiFi, some tenacious attacks are able to peg the CPU at 100% or even take the whole device down.
Don't ever use the WPS feature, a protocol weakness poses a serious security liability.
Neither is there any reason to choose the ancient and horribly broken WEP encryption.
Just tossin in my 2 Bitcents Smiley
386  Other / Off-topic / Re: Beware of MTgox Yubikey on: February 01, 2012, 02:38:06 PM
That's just appalling...
387  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: (Ubuntu) Tunneling DiabloMiner on: February 01, 2012, 09:01:20 AM
As is there was ever any doubt about that Smiley
Hey, and it's free - as in free speech.

If only GPU manufacturers bothered to compile their utilities for Linux it would be a no-contest.
200MHash/s? Not too shabby. Just do be careful about the thermals on that lappy. Laptops were never designed with this kind of use on the radar and may overheat easily.
I suspect you're doing this as a stopgap until you build an actual rig?
Best of luck.
388  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: low hash rate, mining pool variance/methods on: February 01, 2012, 08:43:44 AM
I disagree with your Calculation of 1.1 BTC a week ...   
I Have 290-310 Mhash  and i get about 1 Bitcoin every 4 days
Hey, who am I to argue with a guy with two dozen posts under his belt... Roll Eyes
389  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: Any wisdom on optimizing 6970's? on: February 01, 2012, 08:31:50 AM
Try that.
Worry about the flashed card, not the whole machine. It's not like it'll blow up in your face or melt down.
Don't flash until you have made (and verified) backups of your existing BIOSes. Use ATIFlash's -s switch for that.
390  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: CGMINER GPU bitforce overclock monitor fanspeed RPC in C linux/windows/osx 2.2.1 on: February 01, 2012, 08:28:47 AM
12.1 drivers and Windows, lovely.
Try intensity = 9 && vectors = 4 && worksize = 64.
391  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Building my 1st rig! Need opinions on my build :D on: February 01, 2012, 12:49:52 AM
That PSU you listed is not exactly up to snuff.
"Efficiency >65%"? Run, efficiency should be >85%, you've gotta pay for all that wasted electricity after all.
No PFC and two 80mm fans make me feel like I'm back in the 1990s,...

Go for something 80+Bronze certified at the very least, like the XFX Core Edition 550W or PC Power & Cooling Silencer Mk III 600W
If you can afford it, choosing a 80+Gold capable device can't possibly be a bad move. Rosewill Capstone 750W is very reasonably priced.

You already know about nVidia, right?
Grab the most powerful AMD card you can afford since you'll only be able to use two cards with that mobo.
If you find mining profitable, you can always purchase a second card later on.
392  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: 3 x 6970 in Windows...Help needed (.5 BTC bounty) on: February 01, 2012, 12:18:02 AM
*shrugs* how 'bout just following a guide like this one?
I never followed any of those guides, thus can't vouch for them but what Inaba wrote looks sensible enough.

Every guide boils down to:
(1) setting up the OS itself. That step is usually very easy and boils down to following the installer. Make sure to set up the ssh access here.
(2) installing AMD drivers and SDK, using "aticonfig --initial  --adapter=all" to generate a valid X configuration.
(3) setting up your miner of choice and its config file.
(4) enabling automation so that the machine can be run unsupervised.
393  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: 3 x 6970 in Windows...Help needed (.5 BTC bounty) on: January 31, 2012, 10:35:43 PM
There is no concept of a share when you're solo mining.
You either have or don't have the correct hash for current difficulty.

In pooled mining, shares are merely being used to measure miners' hash rate, hence their rewards.
394  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [120 GH/s] BitMinter.com | New fast server | Voting pro on BIP-16 (P2SH) | on: January 31, 2012, 09:00:05 PM
So we're at Hetzner now, Doc? Nice, just 8 hops away.
Round trip time of 62 ms is nothing to be scoffed at.
Stales are looking quite promising as well.

Congrats on the expedient and painless migration.
395  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: low hash rate, mining pool variance/methods on: January 31, 2012, 04:53:52 PM
Why do you assume that a bigger pool will be better for you? You'll make a tiny percentage of that pool's hash power and an equally tiny reward per block.
In the long run, variance should not impact your revenue at all.
Pool fees will always impact your revenue directly.

Mining at 220MHash/s your card won't even generate 1.1 BTC per week. That's just over 4 BTC per month. You mustn't expect higher rewards unless difficulty drops significantly.
Make sure those electricity cost calculations are ok.
396  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: 3 x 6970 in Windows...Help needed (.5 BTC bounty) on: January 31, 2012, 04:17:37 PM
Uhmmm... you've got it wrong: the Rv03 has only two pre-installed intake fans as opposed to Rv02's three 180mm fans.
Basically, RTFM  Wink
397  Other / Off-topic / Re: Beware of MTgox Yubikey on: January 31, 2012, 03:33:21 PM
Are you guys seriously blaming cuz because a machine no more work?
No blaming, just pointing out that those are tough little buggers them yubikeys.
Cuz has experienced a very rare, catastrophic usb failure.

I believe MtGox is the only entity to be blamed due lack of a protocol (like contacting the user on a predefined phone number, asking a secret question, and then keeping an eye on the login IP address) for temporarily dropping multifactor authorization.
... Frankly, that's the price you're paying for MtGox's flawed implementation...
I thought I was clear enough on this.
398  Other / Off-topic / Re: Beware of MTgox Yubikey on: January 31, 2012, 12:09:20 PM
To tell you the truth, Cuz, I've deployed Yubikeys in a couple of medium-scale IT systems and the only failures I encountered were user-caused.
You mentioned burning your mobo along with the yubikey by shorting out your USB mouse?

You can always purchase programmable yubikeys directly from the manufacturer.
Whether MtGox will give you the techie details necessary to configure it is another sack of ferrets though.

Frankly, that's the price you're paying for MtGox's flawed implementation: it's unthinkable that they should have no contingency plan in case a yubikey is damaged/misplaced. Being unable to use the device should never irreversibly cut the user off.

I've never been tempted to order the Gox Yubikey, I opt never to keep large amounts of funds there.

a couple generations of yubikeys...
...and the config utililty
399  Bitcoin / Mining support / Re: 3 x 6970 in Windows...Help needed (.5 BTC bounty) on: January 31, 2012, 11:19:41 AM
Eesthetics mostly, I think.
I don't have a huge garage to fill up with rigs and since I can't totally hide them from sight, I want the rigs to look decent.
The days I enjoyed seeing naked PCBs and wires sticking out of open cases have long been gone, along with my teenage years.

The 69xx cards are running at about 77°C with average 55% fan speed. Acceptable temps and bearable noise levels if you know what you're doing.
The Rv02, with its rotated mobo, seems to be just good enough. Mind you, I've yet to see my first mining-related GPU failure.
I'd never use a traditionally designed case, though, as barring some serious modding the middle cards get no airflow worth mentioning.
400  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: 7970 temps increased by 10C after applying new thermal paste? on: January 31, 2012, 02:46:45 AM
hmm.. this is the first I've heard about the curing process (I know, I know, RTFM) can you use the card/cpu while it's curing? Should you put the heatsink on and let it sit for 200 hrs unused?
Quite the contrary, in fact. Curing progresses faster in high temperatures. Just use the machine like it's supposed to be used, the temperatures will slowly drop by a few degrees.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!