It is the coin that has no improvements, not you. I don't care about you, I'm judging the coin. And this coin, as you admitted, has currently zero improvements.
I quote you "And so you think that the coin will be a better success than if you had waited a "short time" before releasing it to code the "client improvements"?" Is that a technical coin related question, or a personal question? It is a personal question about your feeling. It's still unanswered by the way. If you want your coin to succeed stop lurking on the forum, turn your ego off and code.
lol ego... Look who is talking. If you know a bit psychology you would know that in this situation it's you that got the biggest ego since you feel the need to flame other. I only answer your questions.Not all of them as far as I can see. I supported Namecoin for obvious reasons, i0coin, Devcoin, and more recently Fastcoin because it was a way to see how fucked up can become the blockchain with tiny block time, Quantumcoin because it tested a whole new retarget system, PPcoin, Noirbits, etc.
So what now? Will you say that I have shitloads of them? It's wrong, I only have plenty of DVC, a tiny bit of NMC and nothing more.
No. The only thing you are up to is to make this coin look bad, so good for you, continue on that. Be proud! I got coding todo, not arguing with you. Again, I don't care about that specific coin. It's currently bad because no improvements. Period. As you now said twice, stop arguing and code for your coin. Maybe then it can be worth anything. |
|
|
|
|
Wow
Thanks OP
I'm glad my profile picture is now fully recognized
|
|
|
|
Meaning none.
Ok that's what I thought And so you think that the coin will be a better success than if you had waited a "short time" before releasing it to code the "client improvements"? With the altcoin hype yes. The improvements have already started in the native_i2p branch. What is it you want? Because now you're starting to get personal. It's not about the coin anymore, it's direct questions to me. Do you got a altcoin that you feel threaten about? Or are you just a person that has nothing better to do than flame other people on forums? Anyway, this is here this discussion ends. You're so unserious that you start attacking me as a person, and not flaming the coin as usual trolls do. You're worse, so I won't go down to your level and discuss with you. I'll code instead. It is the coin that has no improvements, not you. I don't care about you, I'm judging the coin. And this coin, as you admitted, has currently zero improvements. If you want your coin to succeed stop lurking on the forum, turn your ego off and code. I supported Namecoin for obvious reasons, i0coin, Devcoin, and more recently Fastcoin because it was a way to see how fucked up can become the blockchain with tiny block time, Quantumcoin because it tested a whole new retarget system, PPcoin, Noirbits, etc. So what now? Will you say that I have shitloads of them? It's wrong, I only have plenty of DVC, a tiny bit of NMC and nothing more. |
|
|
|
|
How about setting a MIN coin usage ?!
We could set a minimum coin usage, ie you can't use any of your bitcoins if you don't move at least 1000BTC
That's an improvement as it avoids de facto the blockchain dust
|
|
|
|
Meaning none.
Ok that's what I thought And so you think that the coin will be a better success than if you had waited a "short time" before releasing it to code the "client improvements"? |
|
|
|
|
onlynet Tor already exists in Bitcoin
Again, tell me what improvement does your coin currently have.
|
|
|
|
How would you feel if you wanted to buy something and the store refused to take your money because it was old and wrinkley? Or, the money police took it away from you and gave its value in new money to someone else?
Absolutely Same for the gold you're keeping somewhere hidden Same for your jewelry you never wear |
|
|
|
The coin should have been released in the start of May when the project started, not now after 2000 alt coins.. So here you say that it was planned to be ready more than a month ago Yet you still don't have anything ready one month after that Did I say it was planned to be ready more than a month ago? Maybe it's mine or your english, but clearly that was not what I said. I said the project started. Started as in the idea came up, we were discussing it and looking on what could be improved etc. NOT as a finished project. So "should have been released" != "was planned to be ready"? Can a native confirm et tell me the difference? The reason the coin couldn't wait with release before the darknet features is because of services like you provide.. And here you say that you can't wait for anything to be ready because there are too many new coins Doesn't make much sense Yes, as you see, it flows over with coins.. The development process should have been done faster, I agree with you on that part. Used too long time discussing specs and features and what goals which is possible and not. And with all this new coins comming up, it was now or never. If you don't like the coin, don't use it. Simple solution. "it was now or never"? Let's reformulate: "it was when there are thousands of coins or never". It's a non-sense. You should have waited for the altcoins hype to stop. And moreover you should have released a coin with actual improvements, not just improvement promises. Tell me what improvement does your coin have right now. A coin without actual improvement won't go anywhere. Period. Also if you can't stand with free market, you should create a bank and start corrupting politics
That's the congress and the people with "protection and free marked overview" behind the central banks job, not mine. What the hell are talking about? Bitcoin is open-source, you copied Bitcoin just like everybody else so yeah there are plenty of other people who did what you're doing and who will continue to do it in the future. |
|
|
|
How do so many people come up with this ridiculous notion independently from each other?  @OP don't mind them and me. It's just that this must be the most asked question on the forums and there have been heated debates when people really couldn't be convinced it would be ridiculous to implement this so some people are fed up with it  It's called the "I missed the early adopter train" syndrome. Which is BS, as everybody with brains know. Just buy and be grateful you were able to know about BTC so early  So those people would want to kill the assets of early-early-adopters? Possible Highly possible indeed |
|
|
|
The thing is I don't get why some people need to add the "forget about your coins if you hoard them" "feature" WHY? Because lost coins are a bad thing? How is it bad? It even makes the remaining ones more valuable Who would do that? Probably no one. For what purpose? The only reason for such a feature to exist is so that anyone who brings it up could be encouraged to use it themselves instead of arguing about it. I'm sure if such a possiblity is introduced they would be whining about why it is not obligatory |
|
|
|
Maybe there should be an optional opcode that allows an output to be claimed by a miner on or after block n.
That way anybody who is worried about this can store their own funds in such an address without forcing it on everbody else.
Who would do that? For what purpose? |
|
|
|
Don't all coins have their own prefix in the address? Like BTC starts with 1, LTC with L and so on? Or is this prefix not considered while deriving keys?
if both coins share the same prefix, then yes.
Even if not the prefix Is the prefix missed out in calculation then? Where you send the coins isn't the address but the hash160 of the public key (ie step 3: 010966776006953D5567439E5E39F86A0D273BEE in the wiki example) The prefix is only added in step 4 See https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=220946.msg2343066#msg2343066 |
|
|
|
The coin should have been released in the start of May when the project started, not now after 2000 alt coins.. So here you say that it was planned to be ready more than a month ago Yet you still don't have anything ready one month after that The reason the coin couldn't wait with release before the darknet features is because of services like you provide.. And here you say that you can't wait for anything to be ready because there are too many new coins Doesn't make much sense Also if you can't stand with free market, you should create a bank and start corrupting politics |
|
|
|
|
Then why names with Tor are specially nice?
|
|
|
|
if both coins share the same prefix, then yes.
Even if not the same prefix |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
