Bitcoin Forum
May 17, 2024, 01:14:43 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 [150] 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 ... 291 »
2981  Other / Meta / Re: Forum Feature Request on: July 12, 2013, 08:34:21 AM
Already discussed
2982  Other / Meta / Re: Do you ever click on links in signatures? on: July 12, 2013, 08:29:38 AM
How do you know if something is a paid ad?
Colors + big font + glow + shared by several low activity accounts
2983  Other / Meta / Re: New options in Forum Profile Information page. on: July 12, 2013, 08:26:02 AM
All are old
All three of those options are not found in a default SMF installation.
That doesn't mean they were not old and already discussed.
2984  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Created a new address in bitcoin-qt, and it already contains 0,001 BTC ??? on: July 12, 2013, 07:34:57 AM
Regarding panic: the list of people who know what a collision is AND are incredibly bad at math is very small.
Indeed


Enjoy your stupidity franky: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=246544.msg2614500#msg2614500
2985  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Signing non-standard transaction on: July 11, 2013, 03:42:24 PM
I suggest you to sign it by hand:
Format it correctly (corresponding to the sighash), copy the bytes in your clipboard (using a hex editor), sign it with bitcoin-qt, un-base64 the signature, drop the first byte and divide the remaining 64bytes long string into two 32bytes long ones (r and s) (See edit 1)
Format r and s correctly (DER format), then create the scriptpubkey (see the sighash article on the wiki)

PS1: you can use a tool to sign the transaction more easily, search for jasvet in the dev&tech forum

PS2: I can do it for you if you're not interested in the process but rather in the result

Edit 1: I forgot about the "Bitcoin signing message" prefix... You actually need a tool to sign your bytes
2986  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Removing Blockchain.info Unconfirmed Transactions W/ Out Bitcoin-QT on: July 11, 2013, 03:00:45 PM
I'm not sure about online wallets policies.
I thought blockchain.info would not broadcast 'un-minable' transactions.
Maybe that's wrong. Then you'd need to wait for clients to forget it.

If you can't wait, ask someone to double-spend it for you. (I can't do it before 30 hours)
2987  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Removing Blockchain.info Unconfirmed Transactions W/ Out Bitcoin-QT on: July 11, 2013, 02:37:34 PM
You can double-spend with something else.
On the guide I used bitcoin-qt but you can do it with anything you want. You just have to import the private key (in another blockchaininfo account for example) + spend the transaction.
2988  Other / Meta / Re: [SCAM] Ongoing attempt - Phishing link send around in PM, copy of the forum on: July 11, 2013, 10:06:55 AM
I've adjusted the limits to make spamming more difficult.

Activity   Min. seconds between post actions   Max PM recipients   PMs per hour
036035
1674530
3060560
6030560
1001210120
2001015120
300820120
Hope this will help
2989  Other / Meta / Re: How can I download all posts from a user? on: July 11, 2013, 09:47:23 AM
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=67058;sa=showPosts
   +
Python
   =
Done with less than 20 lines
2990  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: proposal: delete blocks older than 1000 on: July 10, 2013, 08:30:28 PM
We better make the speed of light higher so that optic fibers can allow much faster data transfers
2991  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: Unconfirmed Transactions on Blockchain.info. on: July 10, 2013, 04:45:26 PM
Stickies.......



!!
2992  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: OP_CHECKCOLORVERIFY: soft-fork for native color coin support on: July 10, 2013, 07:23:12 AM
With OP_CHECKCOLORVERIFY you can't use OP_DROP. But as you need it for backward compatibility, you need to use OP_CHECKCOLOR instead. (Which puts a bool on the stack)
2993  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Seeking a team to develop Bitcointalk 2.0 forums (apply within) on: July 10, 2013, 07:15:41 AM
You misunderstood SgtSpike: you wouldn't have to pay to register/post, you would just have to sign a message with a signature whose corresponding address has at least 2BTC
I agree with this

Maybe not in all subforums though
2994  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Is FASTCOIN the future coin of Africa? on: July 10, 2013, 07:10:45 AM




Scamcoin




2995  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Do we need SIGHASH_MULTIPLE for some advance contract? on: July 09, 2013, 09:28:40 PM
I proposed it too: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=212555.0
2996  Other / Off-topic / Re: To: Whoever attempted to buy my dox on: July 09, 2013, 03:33:54 PM
Why would someone want your dox?
2997  Other / Meta / Re: Bitcoin Forums should eliminate 'Scammer' ratings and 'Trust' ratings on: July 08, 2013, 02:45:45 PM
This forum is not satoshipaper.org
2998  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: LTC will go to $15, $25 + on: July 08, 2013, 01:34:51 PM
2999  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Mass Market Appeal Coin - SantaCoin on: July 08, 2013, 01:34:20 PM
Thanks for your input.  I disagree. I think bitcoin has too many things lacking but I give it props for creating a whole new industry.

"I don't see anyone but techies buying coins for their features and most features can be turned on at any point via a hard fork so its not really a big issue."


So which is it?  No one cares about features, and they can always be added later, but bitcoin doesn't have enough features?
Interested in the answer to this
3000  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [XPM] [ANN] Primecoin Release - First Scientific Computing Cryptocurrency on: July 08, 2013, 01:33:15 PM

Quote
This allows secure transactions to be made much more quickly; six confirmations may take fifty minutes in Bitcoin, but they take only six minutes in Primecoin. The underlying mathematics behind why six confirmations is a fairly safe threshold is independent of block confirmation time, so the Primecoin transaction at six confitmations is no less secure
Roll Eyes


Other than that, great article, I finally know about Primecoin. Great alt for once!
Pages: « 1 ... 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 [150] 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 ... 291 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!