Hi there!
I had to leave for some time, sorry for that
I won't have as much time as before but I won't leave for months anymore
The priority is of course to make pywallet able to deal with encrypted wallets
I can't give you any ETA but I'll do my best
Btw, thanks for your pull requests on Github, I'll check and commit them
any progress? do you need help?  Tbh I didn't even start I really need time so yes I need help If someone have some free time and want to help me, please let me know, especially if you are a programmer |
|
|
|
This is what I get, : C:\Users\M7\AppData\Roaming\Bitcoin>pywallet.py --web --port 8989
File "C:\Users\M7\AppData\Roaming\Bitcoin\pywallet.py", line 109
_p = 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFEFFFFFC2FL
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax I think you used Python 3, you should try with Python 2 |
|
|
|
Would some one be interested in creating a 9 letter vanity address for a bounty? If so please PM
Also assuming you make the address for me, I would be able to use it with out too much trouble?
Thanks
It would need to be someone trustworthy, as they would also have access to the private key associated with it, no? Absolutely, it's a huge mistake to use an address if somebody else knows the private key |
|
|
|
|
Hi there!
I had to leave for some time, sorry for that
I won't have as much time as before but I won't leave for months anymore
The priority is of course to make pywallet able to deal with encrypted wallets
I can't give you any ETA but I'll do my best
Btw, thanks for your pull requests on Github, I'll check and commit them
|
|
|
|
|
I don't have the time to read or use these info but they look really awesome -> wiki!
|
|
|
|
|
Wow, it seems my thread got much attention
I quickly read all the posts but can't reply to all, actually I just want one answer: where did CH said he will make weird changes to his client so that it will be impossible to use the open-source one?
If that guy really wants a blockchain split, he could have just asked it here
Also guys, please don't feed them too much
|
|
|
|
|
As kojko proposed in another thread, you can send your wallet to someone savvy you trust
I can try if you want, I am currently developing pywallet so I know what I can try
|
|
|
|
fake send bitcoins  |
|
|
|
I answered that just before his post, you didn't see it or it doesn't answer your question? That's doable but I want to be sure there's a majority of people wanting this change
So in a week I can post a poll and see the results
|
|
|
|
|
This thread is about the only open-source solidcoin client
Please complain else where
|
|
|
|
|
That's doable but I want to be sure there's a majority of people wanting this change
So in a week I can post a poll and see the results
|
|
|
|
|
I'll try it in a few hours
I never compiled anything on windows though so don't wait for it too hardly
Also if anyone wants to contribute just send me pull requests on github
|
|
|
|
|
Anybody reported that already?
|
|
|
|
thanks for your help wolftaur
By looking into the make-unix.txt and comparing it with the installed .deb packages i knoticed i had missing a lot of packages.
It now starts compiling - i think thats what it does,
but i still get some errors.
most of them according to
../obj/nogui/net.o net.cpp
like: net.cpp:1115: error: 'freeUPNPDevlist' had was not declared in this scope
Are you sure you use "USE_UPNP= "? Making a new fork would just make people dislike open source.
It will fork anyway if the majority choose to use this client . Just like democracy you dont get a say if 51% imposes their will.
Only CoinHunter dislikes open source. The rest of us here like it just fine. Why, are you him? No. I merely want to point out that if the majority use this client it doesnt matter what I or CH thinks if you have the support of more than 51% of the miners. Ideally you should make another chain instead of trying to fork this one. Its purely democracy. I don't fork the chain, please stop spreading FUD If I understand it correctly and please correct me if I am wrong, this is NOT a new blockchain but a real open source (under MIT licence) version off RealSolid's solidcoin client.
You understood correctly |
|
|
|
|
For the record, I'd like to state that I don't support solidcoin...
I just hate when a sucker wants to play god
|
|
|
|
|
If you forget that the pool will be forever seen as malicious, yeah great idea
|
|
|
|
Please remove or fix /doc/readme.txt
Thanks, fix'd |
|
|
|
Those who spent their time mining, should be allowed to keep their coins.
It's not about pissing off coinhunter or anyone else. It's about keeping the thousands who have spent their electricity and time mining, with their coins.
What are you talking about? I only forked the client, the network is exactly the same |
|
|
|
How do I get this client?Does it affect my mining of SC? Would I need to do anything differently to the official 1.04?
Basically, the only difference between solidcoin 1.04 and soldcoin 1.04 is that if you use soldcoin it will REALLY piss off the "dev", so no: same coins, same gui, same network, same everything Excluding open-source license Is that the entire goal? To piss him off? For now yes, until there's a real demand for an opensource slc client |
|
|
|
How do I get this client?Does it affect my mining of SC? Would I need to do anything differently to the official 1.04?
Basically, the only difference between solidcoin 1.04 and soldcoin 1.04 is that if you use soldcoin it will REALLY piss off the "dev", so no: same coins, same gui, same network, same everything Excluding open-source license |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
