Yes this is a crucial part and fact of the evidence, Air force is to be the ready to anything, they have deployments of tactics thatt shoudl be kinda "instant".

But they were told not to interact, this all could have been stopped , there were even jets on air that were told to not get involved.

So why if you country had a chance and knew that and were the planes were why on earth would you pull back your defences that are specially trained for this situations.

if you can't smell the bullcrap that the goverment is given then people who are this blind is part of the terrorism and are terrorists  because they are capable of doing anything if they are told so to do.

I do find it interesting how prevalent "these inside job" theories are, yet we're at 34 pages and I haven't seen any logical theory that actually makes sense yet.

Here's a kind of thought experiment that I came up with, where you put yourself in the shoes of a person in charge of the hypothetical "inside job":

So, your mission is to orchestrate a false flag event, the aim of which is to increase the psychological fear of US (and world) citizens, to help get support for illegal wars and occupation of foreign countries, which will allow the US/The West to become richer and more powerful.

You have 3 factors to think about, which follow in what I consider to be order of importance. (I realize there are more factors involved, but these 3 are the really important ones IMO)

A: Chance of getting caught
B: Amount of psychological impact
C: Cost

So, the ideal false flag attack will score low on A and C, but highly on B.

What type of attack would you set up? Would it have any resemblance to 9/11?

Let's consider the classic hypothetical 9/11 false flag, with planes, explosive charges and a pentagon missile. Now, this event scores highly on B, but also scores incredibly highly on A and C.

If you score according to the 3 factors, then this type of complex attack makes no sense. By including explosive charges and missiles (posing as more planes), the orchestrator would be massively increasing the scores on A and C, without significantly increasing the score for B. It would make much more sense to simplify the plan, and just use planes.

I look forward to hearing your hypothetical false flag attacks!

Not all of the atheist hate religion - me for instance I have nothing against any religion as long as it wants to do me no harm. If anyone crosses that line, there should be right to self defence

It'd sure be nice to have more specifics of how "they" get money and power from doing something like 9/11.

Then you'd actually have some evidence of someone getting money and power from doing something like 9/11.

LOL...

There are differences among people who say they are of the same religion. Look at how many variations of Buddhism or Islam or Christianity there are.

The same holds true for the religion of atheism. The difference is that the different atheism denominations are seldom expressed as such. But there are those atheists who believe in the Big Bang, and there are those who believe that the universe never had a start, but always existed. Different denominations in atheism.