It is time people start using thousand separators (,) after the decimal place.

That looks like paper currency being digitized.

In some fields Microsoft aka Windows

In others they cant compete aka Zune

More important question:
"... and are you running a Bitcoin wallet on it (which)?"

< Tin Foil Hat Time ?>

Name an actor who played roles in the movie Atlas Shrugged and The Good Wife Bitcoin episode, and once  replied to Amish when he was seeking a place to stay while in California.

This!

I changed my bitcoind copy to not relay the last block if it is small (I use a fixed value here) and my local transaction pool has much more transactions than the number of transactions in this block at the time I received this block.

If I'm the only one doing this, the effect is small. If a lot of people are filtering blocks with this method the small number of bad pool operators will be too late with some blocks and loose this block fee. This is an advantage for miners including user transactions in their blocks and an advantage for the other bitcoin users.

Address sample: 5KhNXwTHccfDWTuKugwBGdRoXk8h7vms16MgE84YX3Vshn5dxf7
I run --web, I see the directory (c:\users...) and name (wallet.dat), I type the path to import file (d:\Temp\test.txt).
It displays "File imported", VERY fast. Like 500 keys per second.

I cannot use bitcoin-qt. The whole problem is - it is too slow. I was hoping, pywallet imports keys faster, as I have a large list: store, customers, list of keys for each etc. It can easily be 10,000, which means overnight processing in bitcoin-qt (it does 1 key per second with rescan set to false).

BTW:
a) should bitcoin-qt be that slow?
b) will pywallet be any faster, if I fix the problem? Because if it does not, I need to look for another solution

5KhNXwTHccfDWTuKugwBGdRoXk8h7vms16MgE84YX3Vshn5dxf7;label, whatever you want

As jackjack stated and assuming the last word of your above post was "blocks", then I guess you're talking about suppressing one tx blocks (zero customer tx) from entry into the chain, which indeed you could do.  I'd be very impressed (verging on deeply disturbed) if you control enough of the network though to do this effectively.  8|

I'm not mining. I operate a bunch of dedicated servers in different locations that run full clients and are optimized to support a large number of connections. The fee is not interesting for me. A miner that is not including transactions is working against my goals. Why should I relay his transactions blocks?