Bitcoin Forum
June 21, 2024, 06:55:37 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 »
41  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3 Discussion and Support Thread. on: December 25, 2014, 06:54:33 PM
What is that number that says activity under your profile Huh?

Help please I am new.


its your post count..
and the S5s plus shipping seem to be the same price as the s3s were with free shipping.. and they are faster and take less power.



The S3 at the time was an industry leader. They were at the forefront of new technology. The S5 is old tech compared to the competition.

They aren't however going to return a positive investment unless you have free power.
42  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S5: The New Standard, 0.51J/G, Shipping on Jan 4th [Sales Open] on: December 25, 2014, 06:50:18 PM

On the viability of S3's, I did not say they were no longer viable, in any case, there's the argument for S1 to S5 kits in the same suggestion (but of-course you conveniently skimmed over that).

I spoke with yoshi (by email) and they are considering an s1-s5 upgrade kit but not until they get some feedback on batch 1. Upgrade kits are not for inexperienced people and poor thermal paste application or nicking something with a screw driver could result in a few loud and disgruntled buyers who can't RMA a diy product that they damaged by improper installation.

My guess is upgrade kits will either have no warranty or be provided only in bulk packs of 5+ so that it isn't being sold to people incapable of correct use.

Lets be honest, the s5's are simply too little too late out of date technology. If underclocking them within the firmware was possible at 12v, they would have been a contender. Over the coming month with expected jumps of 20% or more, it's a loss leader. With no warranty, why would anyone consider this unless of course it was simply as a hobby, knowing you'd lose money anyway.
43  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S5: The New Standard, 0.51J/G, Shipping on Jan 4th [Sales Open] on: December 25, 2014, 06:47:30 PM
[...]
You might want to just go over Dogie's head. Someone else who actually works there might be interested in responding to your ideas directly to get a better resolution for the Bitmaintech customers. Have you contacted anyone else?

I suppose you missed Dogie's announcement that he nowadays works for Bitmain... Huh


Paid to work in the forums vs. an employee on the payroll.

Dogie's "official" status would be lovely to know but let Bitmain clarify that relationship.

Given all the backlash towards his responses in Bitmain threads even if he is helpful I can't see how it is benefiting Bitmain at this time. Seem like many people have been needlessly antagonized by Dogie and many a thread seems to be riddled with Dogie defending himself rather than promoting solutions for Bitmain customers.

====

Here is hoping that those like pekatete look beyond Dogie and get in contact with an actual employee at Bitmain. Having met some of the Bitmain people they are more than willing to learn from errors and will do what is required to fix problems. Here is hoping that the community has not given up on Bitmain they are trying to make things better. Here is also hoping the S5 is a solid machine. I own a couple of S2 still running hard 24/7 on an altcoin.

The problem here is Dogie claims to remain indifferent in how it claims to rate each company. No individual can remain completely unbiased when you are employed by one of them. If you go through many of his posts in other forums, they are usually one liners auto scripted, at times taken out of context. In bitmain forums, he rarely helps anyone to completion. Rather he hands off the problem to bitmain directly, wasting everyone's time.

On top of all this, he has hidden affiliate tags in his amazon links. If you have $1000 in your amazon shopping cart and click any of his links, even if you don't add it to your cart, Dogie will now get a cut of your purchase at checkout for the next 24 hours. Call it what you will, but I can't trust anyone who doesn't admit to this and at the same time, works for one of the major companies.

The final straw, he has insulted way too many people here. No company with any logic would hire him with his lack of community.
44  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S5: The New Standard, 0.51J/G, Shipping on December 27th on: December 23, 2014, 03:09:42 AM
The S5 does have a clear advantage for some people. The fan noise. Some just can't deal with the SP20 noise.

Do we independent or factual noise figures for the S5?

SP20's underclocked are rather quiet. I do agree the noise levels are high if you live near the equator.
45  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S5: The New Standard, 0.51J/G, Shipping on December 27th on: December 23, 2014, 03:07:57 AM

Lets be realistic, every new advancement in technology, history has shown at least a doubling in difficulty. There is no way an S5 will be able to compete even at half the price. Too little, too late.

Wait, I got confused.  Are we talking about ROI, competing or just what it'd take for some of us to pull the trigger?

A. Competing is easy...Bitmain does a fairly decent job as of late. (They use to be very good about allowing an ROI in the early days.)
B.  ROI....wishful thinking.
C.  What it would take to keep playing in the sandbox...a reasonable gross return of bitcoin expended.

YMMV.

I completely agree, Bitmain DID a great job on both previous designs and ROI figures. The games has changed and I still believe the U3, and C1 was the wrong direction. A waste of resources. Not speculating, however if you look at history and extrapolate, with advancements in technology we see some very large jumps in difficulty. Naturally, whilst some will ignore history and repeat the same mistakes, waiting for batch 2 (ie. the more bug free version), we shall see what the true difficulty numbers will be. Just saying don't jump in head first.
46  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S5: The New Standard, 0.51J/G, Shipping on December 27th on: December 23, 2014, 03:02:27 AM
also - will the S5 have a full-frame case again like the s3? None of the pictures show a top cover, or even a bottom cover. I assume its to show off the innards, but if a lid isnt actually included the entire dynamic is changed somewhat.

ps: The Sp20 has all the connections at the front, and could be stacked into a 5x5 grid unlike the antminers, which can only stack side-by-side (becomes an issue if you have limited space or 15+ units)

A great point on the connections. Where is the logic to continuing the same flawed design. The two other major manufacturers have pretty much the same single end connected design.
47  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S5: The New Standard, 0.51J/G, Shipping on December 27th on: December 23, 2014, 02:58:52 AM
Hi Guys,

S5, you don't have to "hack" to achieve 0.51W/GH at higher $/GH, or better noise level



So making adjustments via a web interface is now classified as a "hack".
NO, NO IT'S NOT!
Having to get a power supply at 9V to underclock your S5's is a "hack".
48  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S5: The New Standard, 0.51J/G, Shipping on December 27th on: December 23, 2014, 02:50:00 AM
Not impressed by the tag line: "The absolutely promising bitcoin chip in the market".
Really? I can only hope no advertising buro was paid to come up with that slogan  Shocked

Specs look like a modest step forward. Pretty much leading the pack today, but probably not enough to compete with upcoming AM/BF/SP rigs, but much will depend on their time to market.

Apparently that has changed to ...
"ANTMINER S5: The New Standard, 0.51J/G,"

So apparently it's now the "new standard" of what? something the SP20 has been capable of for months?
49  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S5: The New Standard, 0.51J/G, Shipping on December 27th on: December 23, 2014, 02:45:41 AM
@raskul

Let us look into what we can do for the projection...

If you have your projection, would you please share with us? (Here is fine!)

We'd love to see how our customers see ROI Projections.

Its all speculation as none of us at Bitmain has a crystal ball  Wink  

If you have one for sale and if it cooks me breakfast and make me some tea, too, let me know!!!  love to have one  Grin

Here's my quick and dirty projection:

1155gh/s currently returns an expected .0147btc per day.  Assume no diff change then 90 day return would be 1.323btc. At current rates that's $436 including psu.  Thermalake is the cheapest PSU I currently see for $67. That would make the S5 cost should be $369 to break-even in 90 days with 'free' electricity.  Any value to sell or mine with after that would be used to offset electricity costs and profit.

So basically if it can't gross it's cost in 90 days, I don't expect it to ever ROI.  This is being rather liberal since diff will change and most have to pay something for electricity. I also don't take into account changes in btc price as if it changes, buy and hold makes more sense.


Lets be realistic, every new advancement in technology, history has shown at least a doubling in difficulty. There is no way an S5 will be able to compete even at half the price. Too little, too late.
50  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Antminer S3+ is junk and no support from BITMAIN on: December 23, 2014, 02:34:30 AM
Thanks W00per, that is EXACTLY what I was thinking.  Funny, it felt a lot like my emails to BITMAIN.   Only difference was that theirs always starts with: I'm a bit confused.....

:-)

I ALMOST said:  did you read the post?

Thank you for picking up on that.

PEace, out.

B

It may have felt a lot like your emails to Bitmain since Dogie is a paid employee of bitmain to help english speaking customers. Supposedly. Most of his responses are simple scripted 1 liners. 
51  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S5: The New Standard, 0.51J/G, Shipping on December 27th on: December 22, 2014, 06:17:05 PM
$450 seems little high

with shipping and customs tax on top.

and poor English support. The new SP is far more efficient and what Asicminer has coming.


Underclocked, i'm getting < 0.51w/gh (at the wall) with my SP20 already, and at 1.1TH/s... I see no reason to buy S5 since the SP20 gives that at low clock, and then I have space to move up if I want to.

+1. The SP20 can be clocked to match the S5, and can easily be clocked higher or lower via the UI, not by having to find a reliable&efficient 9V or 6-10V adjustable source.
(friedcat did a similar thing with the prisma - saying if you can feed it 11V its more efficient - but in reality thats easier said than done)

If you assume an MOQ:2 as before, and shipping of ~$100/unit like for the S3 you get two approximate options;
3x SP20 = $1900 shipped, or $630/unit
3x S5 = $1350+shipping (~$300) = $1650, or $550/unit

or
15xSP20 = $8000 shipped = $533 each
20x S5 = $8400 (no info on shipping) = $420 each (plus ~$50 shipping?)

TBH its not bad pricing on both sides, but the spondoolies have FAR more flexibility to adjust for higher hashrate or better efficiency, while the S5 is stuck based on the input voltage.


Worst still, the SP20 has been out for a while, the S5 is just being released. Bitmain wasted too many resources on the U3 and C1. Where bitmaintech used to be at the forefront, they are now on the back foot.

The S5 is coming out way too late to be a serious contender.
52  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S5: The New Standard, 0.51J/G, Shipping on December 27th on: December 22, 2014, 05:24:21 PM
$450 seems little high

with shipping and customs tax on top.

and poor English support. The new SP is far more efficient and what Asicminer has coming.


Underclocked, i'm getting < 0.51w/gh (at the wall) with my SP20 already, and at 1.1TH/s... I see no reason to buy S5 since the SP20 gives that at low clock, and then I have space to move up if I want to.


exactly and likewise here. I'm already matching that efficiency with SP20's and with new offerings due out shortly, bitmain are simply too far behind the curve now. With no underclocking directly available via standard 12v power supplies, it's a fail.

It will be interesting to see what Bitmain's poor choice in employees, ie dogie, will rate it. I'm sure being paid what influence his/hers/its rating.

Bitmain, I have purchased dozens of your products in the first half of the year, but your recent decisions including hiring dogie, sorry, you've made me look elsewhere.
53  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S5: The New Standard, 0.51J/G, Shipping on December 27th on: December 22, 2014, 05:00:44 PM
$450 seems little high

with shipping and customs tax on top.

and poor English support. The new SP is far more efficient and what Asicminer has coming.
54  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: anyone got a spare 1352.254 BTC on: December 20, 2014, 04:50:37 AM
I got a spare $1,352...

No thanks man, those things are, despite being total bad asses, are loud as hell and finicky as fuck.

I got one mining outside @ -5C, those things seem to like being frozen  Grin

The good thing about this is that it host for you so you don't need to care about the loud noise and so on, you just need to care about purely ROI and some luck.

I'd be interested in how often they are replacing burnt out power supplies and costs associated.
55  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: anyone got a spare 1352.254 BTC on: December 20, 2014, 04:49:02 AM
It's getting tougher moving hardware. People are wising up.

New hardware has been announced. Very few will buy old tech that will unprofitable in a month or two.
56  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: anyone got a spare 1352.254 BTC on: December 20, 2014, 04:48:00 AM
What concerns me more is that those miners behind him are actually set up for mining; as in not manufacture, but farming...

Does that mean Bitmain is actually doing "burn-in-testing" on the live net too (before selling it to "us")?!?



of course......

Seems like it... Doesn't it... Huh

Ever since the S1, strange you act like its some big conspiracy. Antminers have been delivered covered in dust on the fans since the beginning.

That is due to Dogie being a paid employee of bitmaintech. He/she will never say negative things about his/her meal ticket.
57  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Reused R values again on: December 10, 2014, 04:34:26 AM
Common decency is back!
58  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [ANN] Spondoolies-Tech - carrier grade, data center ready mining rigs on: December 09, 2014, 06:24:27 PM

One of a few places ... (speculation perhaps but the numbers look legit? We know they are working to get down to 0.2j/gh at 28nm, or lower)
http://www._________________.nl/product/sp50-yukon-bitcoin-miner/



I could give you some negative trust, just because you posted that link (and you still keep it there after a bunch of posts).. what do you think? Should I?

So I asked a legitimate question of which I the answer was given an answer, and you threaten me?

Part of the purpose of this forum is to prevent people being scammed. If you don't talk about these issues, people will fall for it as we've seen in many other posts.

Moving on, it was pointed out to be illegitimate of which I assume spondoolies have already contacted the authorities to take action against that company, therefore protecting their good name.
59  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S3 Discussion and Support Thread. on: December 09, 2014, 06:16:00 PM
I just got 2 S3's to replace some S1's

One is hashing perfectly, the other first climes to about 200 gh/s, and than it drops back down to 10 and sometimes 0.

Anyone had the same issue before?
I've tried another PSU and different pools, but with the same results

How are you powering these miners?

Also, what is the ambient temperature of where they are located?

If you still can't get it working correctly, best to contact bitmain support directly as it's a new unit.
60  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: ANTMINER S4 -B2 on: December 09, 2014, 05:53:23 PM
If you go the bitmain route, stick with the S3's and your own power supplies. Decent ones like evga or corsair.

The spondoolies route, here is a recent video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4FUk6TXK18
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!