Not a post in a new coin thread in 6 days. I know now everything is done in discord, but this look a bit as an stinky corpse... Something original and funny would be nice to relaunch the thread, let's me think... A dice game???  Only joking |
|
|
|
|
So you have changed the algo without notice, without block height fork, without anything?? Really good work...
|
|
|
|
I want some time hold my CREA in cold (paper) wallet. I download creativecoin-qt.win64 and in console made "dumpprivkey" one of adress from "receiving adress".
Now I have Adress and Private key.
It's enought for me to have access to my CREA after some time on other computer?
In some weeks there will be a coinswap and you'll have to change your CREA 1.0 to CREA 2.0. Please subscribe to our newsletter https://creaproject.io and we will inform you about this change. Hi Ridjal, Do you have any rough estimation of CREA 2.0 starting point, Q1 2019-Q2 2019...? Something rough but a bit more precise than some weeks. Thank you Hi berron, Recently, the team has begun to perform internal tests, generating users, publishing content, performing most of the interactions that the platform allows in all its sections. After this, we will need a few days to perform the beta test with users, inform everyone about the process of how to make the swap to CREA 2.0 and to leave all the communication ready before the launch of Crea 2.0 and Creary. I am not able to give an exact date but it won't be later than Q1 2019 Thanks for the info and good luck with CREA 2.0. |
|
|
|
I want some time hold my CREA in cold (paper) wallet. I download creativecoin-qt.win64 and in console made "dumpprivkey" one of adress from "receiving adress".
Now I have Adress and Private key.
It's enought for me to have access to my CREA after some time on other computer?
In some weeks there will be a coinswap and you'll have to change your CREA 1.0 to CREA 2.0. Please subscribe to our newsletter https://creaproject.io and we will inform you about this change. Hi Ridjal, Do you have any rough estimation of CREA 2.0 starting point, Q1 2019-Q2 2019...? Something rough but a bit more precise than some weeks. Thank you |
|
|
|
Swap is open. You need to write me in the discord Denlon #7771 your private key (old wallet) and you ethereum address. Current swap rate 1 RBC/XRBC(coin) = 0.0025 XRBC(token)
After a successful swap, I will write: Swap successfully completed you received (amount) XRBC. Please check your ethereum wallet.
The first 10 people who make swap give free 100 XRBC to your token wallet.
I think that is a wrong approach. You could ask for a signed message instead of the privet key. Or if you prefer avoid automatize the project and want something a bit easier you can do like CRAVE. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2547950.msg27106633#msg27106633
But this is crypto, noone ask for a private key  |
|
|
|
Nice for looking for the lowest fee. Thanks. |
|
|
|
Predator is now listed on CoinMiningPool.orgPayout every 60mins / 0.4% mining fee only! How to connect?ccminer -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://coinminingpool.org:3600 -u <PRD_WALLET_ADDRESS> or set your own difficulty: ccminer -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://coinminingpool.org:3600 -u <PRD_WALLET_ADDRESS>-p d=<DIFF> or share your stats for others: ccminer -a neoscrypt -o stratum+tcp://coinminingpool.org:3600 -u <PRD_WALLET_ADDRESS>-p d=<DIFF>,stats
Pool | Discord | Telegram | Twitter
Please, check your pool, trying to hash some PDR for ten minutes on it with no results. My ring seems to work properly in other pools. Salute |
|
|
|
Block Reward: 40 PRD
Block Time: 2.5 Minutes
PoW: 50%
MN: 50%
Not correct. PoW: 45% (18 PDR per block) MN: 55% (22 PDR per block)  |
|
|
|
Thank you! I have shared this link in the Telegram group for mining Smiley Nice, but I miss Zpool, they have 19 miners right now and they allow coin exchange, so you can mine any algo with your gpu, asic... and be paid in CREA. |
|
|
|
I remember informative article regarding comparing PIVX, Zcoin and Monero.
Couldn`t find it now..
It was explaining why it`s illogical that PIVX is so cheap compared to that 2 coins..
PIVX has a bigger marketcap than ZCoin so in fact it's not cheaper. Not Zcoin, but Zcash I should have written. SO, here is the discussion link: https://www.weusecoins.com/anonymous-cryptocurrency-dash-pivx-monero/Are we lacking adaptability to reach their MC? IMHO, we are lacking: 1- Their PR machine, not only due more or less resources, but also due to their longest live in the market. 2- Concentrate more in merchant acceptance. I would love to see PIVx development being centred now in increase the coin security against different types of attacks and merchant adoption. Yes, decentralised exchange and so on are very interesting features, but they probably are not going to be the main points of PIVx technology. OTHO, XMR has very good characteristics from a privacy point of view and a strong users base. For the user concentrated only in privacy is a hard competitor. Only an opinion. Salute |
|
|
|
Same here, tried the advices given by carsen but they didn't worked. And I hate to install wallets not compiled by me  (And I also want to take a look to the new wallet  ) |
|
|
|
When compiling qt for ubuntu 16.04 I am having an error in the object 'build/backtrace.o' To compile I'm simply doing qmake denarius-qt.pro
make Any ideas about the possible mistake?' Thanks and salute You need libevent-dev installed now due to Tor integration: sudo apt-get install libevent-dev Installed and tried to compile with both command line and QT creator. I always found this error: 11:55:55: Running steps for project denarius-qt...
11:55:55: Configuration unchanged, skipping qmake step.
11:55:55: Starting: "/usr/bin/make"
cd /home/hache/denarius/src/leveldb && CC=gcc CXX=g++ /usr/bin/make OPT="-pipe -fpermissive -fstack-protector-all --param ssp-buffer-size=1 -O2" libleveldb.a libmemenv.a
make[1]: Entering directory '/home/hache/denarius/src/leveldb'
make[1]: 'libleveldb.a' is up to date.
make[1]: 'libmemenv.a' is up to date.
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/hache/denarius/src/leveldb'
cd /home/hache/denarius; /bin/sh share/genbuild.sh /home/hache/denarius/build/build.h
gcc -c -pipe -std=c99 -O2 -D_REENTRANT -Wall -W -fPIC -DQT_GUI -DBOOST_THREAD_USE_LIB -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -DQT_DISABLE_DEPRECATED_BEFORE=0 -DUSE_UPNP=1 -DSTATICLIB -DUSE_DBUS -DUSE_IPV6=1 -DUSE_LEVELDB -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -DLINUX -DLINUX -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_PRINTSUPPORT_LIB -DQT_WIDGETS_LIB -DQT_GUI_LIB -DQT_NETWORK_LIB -DQT_DBUS_LIB -DQT_CORE_LIB -Isrc -Isrc/json -Isrc/qt -Isrc/tor -Isrc/qt/plugins/mrichtexteditor -Isrc/leveldb/include -Isrc/leveldb/helpers -isystem /usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/qt5 -isystem /usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/qt5/QtPrintSupport -isystem /usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/qt5/QtWidgets -isystem /usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/qt5/QtGui -isystem /usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/qt5/QtNetwork -isystem /usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/qt5/QtDBus -isystem /usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/qt5/QtCore -Ibuild -Ibuild -I/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/qt5/mkspecs/linux-g++ -o build/backtrace.o src/tor/backtrace.c
Assembler messages:
Fatal error: can't create build/backtrace.o: Permission denied
In file included from src/tor/orconfig.h:13:0,
from src/tor/backtrace.c:16:
src/tor/backtrace.c: In function 'clean_backtrace':
Makefile:6195: recipe for target 'build/backtrace.o' failed
src/tor/orconfig_linux.h:578:44: error: 'REG_RIP' undeclared (first use in this function)
#define PC_FROM_UCONTEXT uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_RIP]
^
src/tor/backtrace.c:88:27: note: in expansion of macro 'PC_FROM_UCONTEXT'
stack[n] = (void*) ctx->PC_FROM_UCONTEXT;
^
src/tor/orconfig_linux.h:578:44: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
#define PC_FROM_UCONTEXT uc_mcontext.gregs[REG_RIP]
^
src/tor/backtrace.c:88:27: note: in expansion of macro 'PC_FROM_UCONTEXT'
stack[n] = (void*) ctx->PC_FROM_UCONTEXT;
^
make: *** [build/backtrace.o] Error 2
11:55:56: The process "/usr/bin/make" exited with code 2.
Error while building/deploying project denarius-qt (kit: Qt 5.5.1 in PATH (System))
When executing step "Make"
11:55:56: Elapsed time: 00:01.
Thanks and salute |
|
|
|
When compiling qt for ubuntu 16.04 I am having an error in the object 'build/backtrace.o' To compile I'm simply doing qmake denarius-qt.pro
make Any ideas about the possible mistake?' Thanks and salute |
|
|
|
Any update on MN issue fix?
when we can expect update?
If anyone can post status here, it would be really good.
v2.5.21 will be released soon, which will require MN transactions to mature for 500 blocks. the fix will activate on block 1.25M in order to give nodes time to update. the commit is here https://github.com/denariuscrypto/denarius/commit/4e066cbcd2c23da37fb353f2d7ab85acb831bfccthis is basically a simple workaround which just increases the MN maturation time so that the particular issue is effectively useless until 500+ MNs exist on the network, it isn't the large update i've been working on (which will be in the v2.6 branch). In v2.6, we are redesigning how the MN selection system works completely; payments are made based on the average DNR earnings of all registered MNs and no MN is allowed to be paid more than any other. The wallet will show you the exact earnings of each of your masternodes, and possibly also the exact earnings of every masternode on the network, so that you can see this info clearly. i apologize for my absence, unfortunately I can't rely on the crypto development to pay my bills and I had to take a new job which has required me to spend a lot of time away from home recently and I felt like there was 'not long left' until I finished up the v2.6 branch, however I've been getting a lot of messages lately to ask me to just do something, so v2.5.21 will be it to those who mined with hashbag.cc - I will try to get it back up and running now! Yup, the commits are up now in the v2.6 branch on the main Github. v2.6 will be a mandatory update that users will need to update to before block 1.25 million. The final versioning will be v2.6 https://github.com/carsenk/denarius/tree/v2.6The release will be coming soon for those to update to with mining pools, masternodes, nodes, explorers, and regular wallets. https://twitter.com/carsenjk/status/1038955904056549377alright so yeah in v2.7 we will be redesigning the MN selection system. v2.6 will be this fix and a few other additions. Hi devs. We are in block 1.22M, but I have seen github master branch continues in the old v2.5.2.0. Can we update our MN's with enkayz fork or carsenk v2.6 branch or we should wait the fork to be included in the main branch?? Thanks and salute |
|
|
|
can anybody confirm if v1.0.0 is the latest version?
stopped getting connections yesterday
the weird thing is that I didn't find /equitrader folder on usual %appdata%/roaming directions
is it on a different location by default?
thanks
EQT-v1.0.0 Correct version. Take a look for peers at https://chainz.cryptoid.info/eqt/Talking about Equitrader and chainz, only 10 days of hosting left. Not looking good Renewed for six months... Much better  |
|
|
|
For inattentive people like me, the unlock wallet for stacking only appears when pushing the padlock icon in the superior right corner. Getting crazy trying to find how to unclok wallet for stacking only...  Salute |
|
|
|
Hi Protus,
Don't you think that this new reward distribution is going to totally dilute the investment of the initial investors? I don't mind to lose some money if it's dedicated to fuck SGAE, but I think it's fair to the investors to make some comments about that point.
Salute
Ah, and another thing, please, make a desktop wallet, some people (like me) prefer to have their private keys in their computer and not share it through internet.
Hi! I do not understand how this distribution could adversely affect investors. On the contrary, this new distribution favors investors for multiple reasons. Mainly because of the shortage of currency and then the coin is actually distributed as a reward between the people who generate value in the system and these are the authors and curators. The blockchain of CREA 2.0 presents a more sustainable and controlled currency issue based on real-time inflation over the total currency issued at that time. At the same time, the reward is distributed to a greater or lesser extent to each and every one of the users of the network. Therefore, the currency will increase its distribution level since it is distributed to a greater number of people, converting all the users of the social network into CREA shareholders. When going from version 1.0 to 2.0, it will go from issuing 18000 CREA per day to 3616 CREA per day. This will radically increase the shortage and difficulty of getting the cryptocurrency. Undoubtedly, the new currency issuance system will bring more value to all the parties that make up the CREA ecosystem.  With the new system in 20 years, some 42 million CREA will have been issued, while with the 1.0 system in 20 years there would have been about 75 million CREA (+ 70% more). To reach the maximum supply of the currency of 115 million coins had to spend about 120 years and now to reach 115 million will take more or less the same. Please, check this article: https://www.creativechain.org/distribution-and-supply-of-cryptocurrency-in-crea-2-0All keys will be encrypted with a password of 32 characters and numbers. Ok, thanks for the info, I was not aware of the change in coin supply per block in the new version, I tought there will be the original fibbonacci from 1.0 plus the DPOS stake, sorry. On the other hand, I continue preferring to have my own encrypted wallet, but well, CREA is not the first coin to work this mode, that's true. Salute |
|
|
|
If deposits are finally reopened in Nova (let's hope they don't update their wallet with its compatibility problems) this could be the moment for dev to restart development and make some cash with this. If not, well, the coin is already dead so nothing is going to happen |
|
|
|
I've been very long time holder, but it came to end today... I know someday I will regret it but it's simply not enough information to keep holding. Wish all the best to everyone and I will keep watching this project.
Cheers!
Let this be a lesson to you, Never bag hold shitcoins with unmotivated blockchain developers, no news updates, no development, no community except for dumpster diving cryptopia bums. The developers said it themselves they had real jobs and its not their main focus. Why would I invest in such a shitcoin, I bag held shitko for too long as well, sold it at 12 cents, I was foollish not to sell at 60 cents. Whoever did I hope you enjoy your lambos. Maybe it was the developers, The developers have a huge stake of the coin supply, I wouldn't be surpised if they are selling off and using this as their additional income. This coin will get delisted in the future at some point. So be glad you got something instead of nothing. Everything is a shitcoin until proven otherwise. Keep with that mentality if you want to survive Developers dont have a huge stake in netko. If you havent noticed there was no premine/instamine with Netko so dont really understand what are your words are based on. Yes, but development has been, well, we can say not existent. I know that it is a loyalty token and well, that risk was there from the beginning, but everyone holding Netko had confidence in that something more was going to be done. Contrary to Lana, Taj or Neva this coin was not promoted as an amusement or a present for someone. The evolution has been disappointing... Salute |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
