I can come to a very sad conclusion: technical analysis is something that does not work here, unfortunately.
Incorrect, you just have to use the right tools.  |
|
|
|
Then there was Operation Northwoods where the documents have come out showing that the CIA wanted to kill Americans and blame it on Cuba to start a war. Every single war has been started with fake news all so some in the Military get to play with their toys no matter how many boys die for their games. The Pentagon just held a follow up press conference with Secretary of Defense James Mattis saying that they’re defending America by attacking Syria over unproven claims that they gassed babies.
Of course nobody believes that this operation has anything to do with protecting American national security interests.
Mattis should have at least been honest and said that they are attacking Syria for the benefit of Jews and Israel.
That’s the real reason for this attack and everyone knows it.
What will we get for bombing Syria besides more debt and a possible long term conflict?
So trump might be starting WWIII, is he insane, or a hostage? |
|
|
|
In hindsight, when the price declined below $10k, that clearly shows breaking a trendline I already had on my chart as shown, and warning that the posited inverted H&S pattern was invalidated. I was so busy researching and composing my new blog, that I wasn’t monitoring the chart carefully and didn’t pay attention to that change in the outlook. Should have been able to sell above $10k, instead of $9400. Also I entirely screwed up by being so distracted that I failed to remember that H&S patterns imply a move of the height of the head from the shoulder, which means the price would have had to move to a new ATH and not only $15k, which I obviously was not expecting and would have caused me to be rule out the H&S pattern! Opportunity missed due to being too overworked. Also I had not been paying attention lately to the rapid acceleration in the enforcement in the USA of FinCEN and SEC regulations which will be detailed in my upcoming blog. Tying that together with the revelation in this blog showing that Bitcoin is likely to return to near 100% of the total crypto market capitalization before the end of this year (it’s already back up to 42% from a low of 32%), it seems that the ICO-issued tokens are about to have a significant portion of their market capitalization erased. Apparently he sold at 9400. What was his price targets moving forward, local and long term bottoms and tops, last update? Here is the last analysis he posted. Has he bought back? Anything since, can anyone get in touch? Thanks. "appears to be a double-top just below $12k. Zooming out to a wider perspective reveals that it’s not that oversold. No support until we hit ~$6300! Looks like we’re headed down to test the top of the blue line channel on one of the charts in the blog. If we don’t bottom above the channel at ~$6300, then the bottom of the channel is ~$3500. Entering the channel would warn that a crypto winter is possible or that the price will not rebound quickly back to the $10+k level. However, I’m reluctant to chase it and panic sell."" Not updated lately, but afaiu in latest analysis (some days ago when price were was ~$8500) he mentioned $6000-$6800 range as bottom (or perhaps even ~$5850 bottom which was on Kraken). If we slice through that then we are likely in a crypto winter. So I'm not sure if he bought back yet, or if he updated analysis afterwards. However, I'm also reluctant to sell. |
|
|
|
It's very good when 90% of market's volume switched off for maintenance for many hours  Just additional kick for pumpers as.... assets  Hey, good theory. Except how is it possible for Bit-z to have such a huge volume? They are FAKING THE VOLUME. Why CMC even lists them? |
|
|
|
On totally falling market biggest exch manipulator switched off:  I'm dumping Hehehehe, just maintenance huh... hehe. NOT an exit scam (smiley face gives it)... so... I'm also dumping... BUT WHERE? |
|
|
|
The guy you’re talking to is claiming to be the real Satoshi. Just an FYI.  Are you so greedy that you had to summon Satoshi himself to FUD Bitcore? I'm ALL IN! |
|
|
|
Nice post. Interesting findings, and some good points. However, is it possible that Hal was not Satoshi because: Since Hal is passed, it seems that the wolves are in the field to bring down bitcoin.
[...]
But this said. again, do not mess with me. I have a lot of patience, but those who did harm in any way my project, my child, who did
try to fool people to claim identity or credits.
Be assured, I will go after you.
All the Best,
Well, You know who I am, if not, that's fine too.
So no, it is not born in the USA, neither the UK or Australia.
Because I knew I was just the initiator, I was depended on the brain of Hal to finetune the project.
Yes my friends, Hal did wrote the first prototype based on my scientific work, using my Handle.
Yes, Hal did cover my back.
|
|
|
|
In hindsight, when the price declined below $10k, that clearly shows breaking a trendline I already had on my chart as shown, and warning that the posited inverted H&S pattern was invalidated. I was so busy researching and composing my new blog, that I wasn’t monitoring the chart carefully and didn’t pay attention to that change in the outlook. Should have been able to sell above $10k, instead of $9400. Also I entirely screwed up by being so distracted that I failed to remember that H&S patterns imply a move of the height of the head from the shoulder, which means the price would have had to move to a new ATH and not only $15k, which I obviously was not expecting and would have caused me to be rule out the H&S pattern! Opportunity missed due to being too overworked. Also I had not been paying attention lately to the rapid acceleration in the enforcement in the USA of FinCEN and SEC regulations which will be detailed in my upcoming blog. Tying that together with the revelation in this blog showing that Bitcoin is likely to return to near 100% of the total crypto market capitalization before the end of this year (it’s already back up to 42% from a low of 32%), it seems that the ICO-issued tokens are about to have a significant portion of their market capitalization erased. |
|
|
|
It’s important to remember that my first quip (at the Martin Armstrong thread at BCT) when this decline accelerated in January was I would expect a drop to $7000 – $8500,
and I quipped privately that I would sell if it rebounded to $15k.
Then in February after some chart analysis during the crash to $5850 intraday low, I wrote that the maximum bounce appeared to be $12k.
I seemed to get swayed by the potential inverted H&S pattern (because trying to multitask too many tasks and not even finding enough time to sleep) and also
I was being influenced by Armstrong’s Socrates system which had written “In Breakout Mode” for Bitcoin.
I need to stick with my initial insights and intuition.
I’ve been warning about ICOs since last year.
|
|
|
|
I second to what you just said because you are not the only one who have noticed that about this guy. Yes, no one can be perfect, but a trader should know that assuming things like this and spreading what the future brings is bullshit. He didn't notice anything. Either he is blatantly lying or he can't comprehend @anonymint's writing. Just like yourself. Again, I provided sources for you, read them, or stop lying. but of course, he is after the few upvotes for the SBD he is getting on steemit.
Lol, hypocrite... You are writing moronic posts for signature scampaigns... |
|
|
|
Whatever the dude says it is still a prediction, no one knows when the pump and dump happens.
He mentions in the post that it's just a possible scenario for the Bitcoin price over the next several years.
and god forbid if one of the thousand things he says comes true! you will never hear the end of it  keep on speculating because one day you will realize everything you predict misses Did you read op? Note that he (@anonymint) advised to buy LTC at $7 because he predicted it would move to $100+. And bitcoin at $700: Any one buying precious metals right now and not Bitcoin @$700 is an idiot.
Want more? Click the links and read.
[...] and it is always too damn long
Very lulzy, it's actually really short if we take into account number of links he provides in his posts. God forbid if you click one. Or even read adjustments... or comments... or even followups... if price reaches $15k in march we may see a big breakout and $30k before 2018 ends can even be a small target.
Tell you what, if price hits $15k in march, you go and open long position, and don't close it pre $30k. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin back to 8 USD. Many investors will lose again.
 |
|
|
|
Perhaps even $10?Reminder: cryptocurrencies are still a new and hyper-volatile asset class, and could drop to near-zero at any time.
Don't put in more money than you can afford to lose. If you're trying to figure out where to store your life savings, traditional assets are still your safest bet.
|
|
|
|
BTC Dominance is up to 41.6% now - do you guys think it will hit 50%?
How about ~100%? |
|
|
|
Post was updated with new sections, so some might want to re-read it. ICO-issued Tokens Will Collapse?
[...]
Both prior paragraphs, project that Bitcoin will become nearly 100% of the total crypto market capitalization again!
[...]
The ICO illegal securities mania probably has everyone thinking that’s the new normal.
The altcoins are extremely overvalued with 99% of them being complete nonsense and scammy money grabs.
There’s going to be a reversion to the reality starting very soon.
|
|
|
|
There are voices (anonymint) telling that Monero has a flaw deep inside, but I was not smart enough to understand his explanation and my logic tells that if there would be a flaw, it would be already exploited, which doesn't happen.
He claimed that Moronero was designed to be a honeypot. So I guess we could say that it's actually being exploited, just not in the way you might think. |
|
|
|
In the analysis, everything was based on the past.
Some charts (TA) is based on the past, yeah. Personally I find it difficult to make chart based only on the future prices. However, his analysis also includes possible future events (ICO crackdown, SegWit donations etc). It's unlikely that bitcoin is going to continue its exponential growth curve, at least for me.
We'll still continue to go up but probably in a generally slower pace over a longer term.
$15k in March is definitely possible, a crash by June again would be possible, but for it to 5x within less than 1 year and reach an ATH isn't believable at least from his evidence.
Doesn't need x5 for new ATHs. Last year it was even x20 at one point anyway, so what's not believable? A $trillion mcap? Make sure you read updated section "ICO-issued Tokens Will Collapse?" in the linked steemit post. Also keep an eye on April 17. You guys are about to have new reality. Reminder: cryptocurrencies are still a new and hyper-volatile asset class, and could drop to near-zero at any time.
Don't put in more money than you can afford to lose. If you're trying to figure out where to store your life savings, traditional assets are still your safest bet.
Goldman Sachs-backed cryptocurrency startup Circle has acquired digital token exchange Poloniex
[...]
expected to grow the Poloniex exchange out to include other non-crypto assets, such as physical goods and financial products such as derivatives.
yeah well some people around here don't forget things easily because they read OPs and it is no secret and you have been calling a big drop ever since price went above $2000 and was stuck at a new resistance above that! and apparently you have a thing for number "8" because it was $800 that you were calling for back then Please note that I'm not @anonymint. I only linked to his analysis on steemit. And I suppose that scandalmonger @BrewMaster didn't forget anything, but is actually making things up, however I don't know why tho, or what's his agenda. I exposed someone similar in the past. Apparently, your allegation is also not true.You guys should read more carefully, and follow any further adjustments to his analysis. I hope that other readers can make reasonable distinction between sourced evidence (truth), and empty claims (i.e. lies). |
|
|
|
Has anyone purchased the 2018 share market report [...]. Curious as to what you think.
Someone said it's interesting and recommends it: For those who can afford $750 like pocket money, I recommend the report. It’s very interesting reading.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
