It has gotten the attention of a wide range of people, including Stake users. A forum member has already created a topic about this. You should also check this tweet. Eddie has replied to the first one by addressing it as a mistake by the dealer. I don't know how the whole gambling community will judge this, but it will surely create a little negative impact on Stake reputation.

If I'm not wrong, then there is really difference between the house edge of different sports event in a sportsbook. Some sportsbook tries to give the best odds for the popular league, where you will notice a big difference on the unpopular league odds and house edge.

Sports bettors always search for better odds with higher betting limit. Some bettors will obviously switch the sportsbook if they notice any reputable betting site with a better odds.

Gamdom team doesn't have the access to the account now with which they have created this thread. The source of this ANN thread images are Imgur, Bitcointalk forum doesn't support this source anymore. Gamdom is very popular casino with a decent number of active users. The in-house crash game doesn't support multiple bets in the same round at most of the casino. Perhaps, Gamdom team isn't going to add this feature.

As 'Peeps Place' has suggested above, you may ignore those cases which are too old and inactive. There are also some accusation where the complainant disappeared after creating the accusation thread without providing any proofs. Those accusations can be ignored in the list. Otherwise, the list will be too big with some inaccurate complainants.

Either the dealer was high, or he has done it intentionally to make everyone lose their bets. It doesn't look like a mistake though. In the second video, they have changed the result despite knowing that what's going on. Weren't those bets voided by Stake team?

Based on the terms they will void such bets


And based on terms 8.4, Stake team will deduct the amount which will be credited to user account for human error or technical error. There is no clause in the terms which clarifies the situation what has happened in the BlackJack rounds of those videos. Those were human error and users have lost their bets for this. Some users would have won their bets if the mistake wasn't made by the dealer.

Weren't you allowed to withdraw your deposit?

It is obvious that his account has been limited on other sportsbook where the odds provider is same. Otherwise, BCgame won't cancel and limit his bet after his first deposit. The user has placed 3 bets in the same event on different outcomes. All of them were cancelled before the start of the match.

Seems like it is getting narrowed when the long texts are in the first column. I just put another column before it to find the solution, I also put the 'vertical line' (|) symbol between other column to give it a better look.

Maybe the status of the accusations with different colour is enough to know the situation. The strikethrough will give the table a messy look.

You are pretty much active in the scam accusation section. Maybe you should try to finalize this topic with a better table format.

Testing the format

|	Thread	|	Complainant	|	Disputed Amount	|	Status
|	BC.game asking me to lose intentionally, then confiscating funds	|	GekkeBelg	|	mBTC88	|	resolved
|	BC GAME LOSES DISPUTE AGAINST ME - AND STILL DOES NOT PAY MY WINNINGS	|	Jannn	|	$3,409	|	resolved
|	BlockDance B.V., BC.Game and its Fraudulent “Operator Verifier”	|	earlypaco	|	$7,111	|	resolved
|	BC.Game cancelled my bonuses and locked my account with $100k+ USD balance	|	-god-	|	$250,000	|	invalid
|	BC.Game - can't withdraw 7.97 BTC	|	dplay	|	BTC7.97	|	resolved
|		|		|		|

How about putting different reasons in the status part? The user '-god-' has come with an invalid complaint where he is guilty for the inconvenience. The accusations can be marked as "resolved, invalid, neutral, unresolved" based on the evidences, response from the casino, activity of the OP, etc.

---

I think I can manage the list by making an appropriate table format, but it will take a bit long time to do that. And I won't be able to do this now as I'm busy in real life. I can do it in the next month when I will have enough free time. Otherwise, 'Pmalek' can also do it in a better way if he has the time to do it now.

They didn't play in the aggressive mode though. They were playing in the defensive mode, but the ball was swinging unexpectedly. Which has caused the collapse in the batting lineup. Pakistan has used the spinners more to create pressure on Australia. They had taken an early wicket, but it wasn't enough. Australia has comfortably faced the balls and won the match easily.

I don't know how have you asked about this to their support team, but I got the same information again by asking about the wagering requirement on deposit. There is no wagering requirement on the bonuses like weekly, monthly, rakeback, etc. Stake doesn't offer any deposit bonus directly, some affiliate partner does it which has some kind of wagering requirement. And there is no wagering requirement on the normal deposit (check the support message).

I'm also surprised by seeing the betting activity of the users in the crash game at BCgame. More than 3k players are playing the Crash game at BCgame now. I have only seen big number of active users (3k to 5k in each round) in the 3rd party provider crash game 'Aviator'. I wasn't surprised by this number of user activity on Aviator game as it is available in a lot of casinos. Where BCgame has reached an impressive mark on their in-house crash game. Maybe they have gotten a big number of active users through their marketing. I have seen the ads (banner) of BC.game in several crypto related websites (except the review making sites).

There is nothing wrong with the Pakistan team. The condition of the pitch changes in such way in the test matches occasionally. Australia has also lost their last 5 wickets within 11 runs. They had lost their 6th wicket before the tea break, then lost the remaining 4 wickets after the tea break. Where Pakistan has lost 7 wickets in the remaining over of day 3. The small target could be difficult for Australia if the pitch condition stays same in the day four.

The spammers are more active than the legit players in the chat of a casino. I have seen similar activities of the spammers in a different casino chat a few days ago. I was looking for some information about the withdrawal by asking it in the chat, where I received 'good luck' in reply from a few many users. Rainbot is the primary thing which attracts those spammers in the chat.

@OP, Bitcointalk doesn't support the image from imgur anymore. Why don't you update the image of your ANN thread by uploading it to a new server (E.g. Talkimg). Also add some details about the wagering contest of Jacksclub in the main post.

It will be really a difficult task to gather that information to add them in the table. You aren't going to get the actual data from the support agent in most of the sportsbook about this. Therefore, you have to do a lot of calculations to confirm the house edge of the sports betting in each casino. Glad to see that you are trying to update the your thread with the latest data and better details. You may add the house edge column too if you can manage the time to do it.

The odds boost is a promotional feature of the bookies. You may ignore this part during the calculation of the house edge if you wish.

I just checked it out, you have to put at least 1 Decoy token in the pot. The pot doesn't accept any number after the decimal points. Based on the information, the winners will be chosen randomly. It is similar to lottery. Your winning chance will increase if you load more Decoy tokens in the pot, but you need the luck to be the winner.

@cafter, The information about the withdrawals in your table isn't accurate. When have you checked the withdrawals data of listed casino for the last time? You have written "Vary for different crypto" in the min withdraw column of some casinos. It won't be bad to remove the min withdrawal column and KYC column from the table. And you can add these two threads at the bottom of the table so that the forum members can see the detailed information about min withdrawal amount and KYC of crypto casinos.

• (Table) Withdrawal Fees and Withdrawal Amounts on Crypto Casinos
• Information of Crypto Casinos License and KYC requirements

BTW, I had provided you some updates a long time ago. You haven't taken any action according to it. Stake has 20% min wagering requirement on the deposited amount to be able to withdraw it.

Stake has already become the most popular casino in the crypto gambling industry. Now they are spending more money on marketing to become wild and to keep the influence. Stake team has increased their budget for marketing a lot in last two years, but they have made a part of the old users disappointed by reducing the bonuses in 2023. Still, Stake is growing too fast with huge number of active users. The reduction of the bonuses hasn't created a big impact on their business for their marketing strategy.

Happy New Year efialtis. I just checked the review of 1xBit on your site. I thought the whole review is filled with negativity of 1xBit services. But you have made a normal review of 1xBit by including it's all services (deposits, withdrawals, support team, VIP program, etc). How you got the motivation to make a full review of them!

I was browsing some pages of BTCGOSU and noticed that YOLOdice and CyberDice is in the "dice sites comparer" list. Both of them have shut down their business a long time ago. Maybe you would like to remove them from the table .

There is no progress of the KYC verification problem of OP. The complaint is active on Casino Guru with the involvement of all parties (OP, Stake representative and Casino Guru team). Stake representative has provided the details again today of the acceptable documents for the level 3 and level 4 KYC verification. But OP said that managing those documents is impossible in his region. Seems like it is going to be a long process, or a never ending process.

Bitcoin price didn’t cross the 45k mark in the December month, and I have lost my bet there. The outcome odds was pretty good for that range. However, the price has reached above $45k today. I'm expecting to see the price above $50k at the end of this month. I can't find out the Bitcoin price betting option of this month in the betting page of Freebitco. Even the cryptocurrency betting option isn't available on the filter. Is there anything wrong?