"We don't need grasshoppers... We need miners..." MaGneT, when are you going to admit that we really do need grasshoppers? I think he's referring to your signature MaGNeT I know and ?... ahh I get it, you don't change sides atm
|
|
|
the "selective" lag problems with bitclockers could appear from more factors than just low QOS account or IP ban, could be geographic location too pool.bitclockers.com 8332 Denver pool2.bitclockers.com 8332 Chicago pool3.bitclockers.com 8332 Czech Republic I shouldnt have any problems with the first two, especially the second.. but i do man you force me do this ... from where you're mining ? give the coast at least or something... like plains of the purple buffalo edit: and the third ?
|
|
|
Just updated to v0.1-11-g689817b and get this error: [17:43:03] received lp from: digbtc Unhandled Error Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Python27\Lib\c00w-bitHopper\bitHopper.py", line 298, in <module> main() File "C:\Python27\Lib\c00w-bitHopper\bitHopper.py", line 294, in main reactor.run() File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\base.py", line 1162, in run self.mainLoop() File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\base.py", line 1171, in mainLoop self.runUntilCurrent() --- <exception caught here> --- File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\base.py", line 793, in runUntilCurrent call.func(*call.args, **call.kw) exceptions.TypeError: pull_lp() takes exactly 3 arguments (2 given) [17:43:05] RPC request [56528000] submitted to DigBTC.net I have to re-install twisted? This error I had never received before. I use AOCLBF 1.77 with phatk 2.0 and bitHopper with --scheduler AltSliceScheduler. And what about bitclockers? I change my ip, register new accaunt, but still have a lag issue with it. give it a try without "--scheduler AltSliceScheduler" edit: the "selective" lag problems with bitclockers could appear from more factors than just low QOS account or IP ban, could be geographic location too
|
|
|
Can someone post the info for digbit? I can't even find their URL
don't have it either, I just thought he was referring to DigBTC.net one of the last pools added edit: name fix update on git
|
|
|
Ive noticed something strange, my pools report constantly higher accepted shares than webui of bithopper ?
example: bithashers atm reporting 800 submitted/accepted shares in bithopper webui but the website reports 1250 accepted shares.
you almost surely deleted bH database... bithashers it's the total shares submitted from signup or round ones ?
|
|
|
The other attack is the offline attack, where the attacker does not publish his blocks until his chain is at least X blocks longer than the public chain. In this attack, 51% is indeed a tipping point, because once he reaches 51% he is assured that if he waits long enough, he will eventually have enough blocks saved up to perform the chain reversion.
But this attack is so easy to detect that it makes no sense to try it. You mean like everyone would notice if 7 blocks get swapped all at once? Yeah, we would notice, but they would be the correct chain then, so what would we do about it? +1 would be nice to know
|
|
|
"We don't need grasshoppers... We need miners..." MaGneT, when are you going to admit that we really do need grasshoppers? I think he's referring to your signature MaGNeT
|
|
|
thanks
|
|
|
paraipanakos i first update c00w client, but the errors remained. only helped to reinstall twisted.
ok thanks for the info, I would recommend that if I see similar errors in logs edit: btw, if you don't mind, what version of twisted for what architecture,32 or 64 ?
|
|
|
please update to last ver. gerOZ , the errors you report have been fixed by c00w already
|
|
|
Thanks for your work.. First feedback..I really don't like the colours of your last screenshot Can you be more specific. Is it the background, graph, text for a particular role? Sure..the background colour looks so old and odd..(for my taste..) @macboy80, credit goes to c00w for making this possible, flower said it maybe implement some separated css styles when he can, keep up the good work the one you just posted reminds me of pyramids, dunes of sahara... wow ... SandBHopper theme
|
|
|
In my version?
not quite the last one, just realized you were few commits ahead, this one is ea45f10 from yesterday (my timezone), had it running the whole night without issues, until this edit: updated and have it running smooth again, it jumped from slush in a blink
|
|
|
Para, where you from? Exact same timezone as me EDIT: nm its under your profile. almost 6 in the morning here keeping an eye on stuff and on hopper too
|
|
|
In my version?
yep, last one edit: here you have it... [05:39:34] triple: 2912606 [05:39:34] RPC request [b01c4000] submitted to Bitcoin.cz [05:39:36] rfc: 937478 [05:39:39] RPC request [getwork] submitted to Bitcoin.cz [05:39:43] slush: 2850671 [05:39:45] writing to database [05:39:55] btcserv: 1171576 [05:40:00] RPC request [getwork] submitted to Bitcoin.cz [05:40:02] nofeemining: 4391413 [05:40:04] triple: 2912865 [05:40:04] btcmonkey: 3159713 [05:40:08] RPC request [4eb61000] submitted to Bitcoin.cz [05:40:11] arsbitcoin: 1090152 [05:40:13] slush: 2865572 [05:40:19] eligius: 919794 [05:40:21] RPC request [getwork] submitted to Bitcoin.cz [05:40:24] RPC request [b9124000] submitted to Bitcoin.cz [05:40:25] btcserv: 1171580 [05:40:26] RPC request [bb135000] submitted to Bitcoin.cz [05:40:35] triple: 2913103 [05:40:35] btcmonkey: 3159733
edit2: just had a strike of luck, they found it and I'm freee
|
|
|
something still fails... mine just sticked with slush for good, 140% atm , I just l left it to see how high could go, better mine with them until the block is found methinks
|
|
|
talked to the guy who found the digbit coin, he is a hopper.. stuck in the newbie section.. 23 shares got him a couple coins.. thats like 1million percent eff. LOL
He sends his thanks to c00w and the new slicing.
lucky guy with the right tool
|
|
|
Dang, and I thought my 14 cents per kwh was bad...
you can say that again
|
|
|
nice thread you have here, and you haven't posted one single proof of what you're saying ...
|
|
|
Errors?
Error with not being able to decode? Solved. Actually solved twice.
Error with pull_lp taking three arguments instead of 2? Solved.
This version should be stable.
Cool , updating now. I hope the error log spamming is anoying you but actually usefull +1 edit: running nice and smooth
|
|
|
got this one a moment ago... [23:22:02] received lp from: rfc None Unhandled error in Deferred: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 388, in errback self._startRunCallbacks(fail) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 455, in _startRunCallbacks self._runCallbacks() File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 542, in _runCallbacks current.result = callback(current.result, *args, **kw) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 1076, in gotResult _inlineCallbacks(r, g, deferred) --- <exception caught here> --- File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 1020, in _inlineCallbacks result = g.send(result) File "/home/alex/bitHopper/work.py", line 66, in jsonrpc_lpcall lp.receive(None,server) File "/home/alex/bitHopper/lp.py", line 30, in receive response = json.loads(body) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/json/__init__.py", line 326, in loads return _default_decoder.decode(s) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/json/decoder.py", line 360, in decode obj, end = self.raw_decode(s, idx=_w(s, 0).end()) exceptions.TypeError: expected string or buffer [23:22:05] RPC request [getwork] submitted to RFCPool.com
and another... [23:22:47] RPC request [getwork] submitted to RFCPool.com [23:22:47] received lp from: rfc {"id":1,"error":null,"result":{"midstate":"d994370bb78db27f23cf47bbdc7a1b332d103d546aa6afc8b93cfcb1e8ce6d6f","target":"ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff00000000","data":"00000001c4347fbccd00e6a3b2a698498b71e39806abefbf2d76472b000007ed000000003c4b7b40c1737bc8b443c762874fc0226d48fa50156f1d9ad4d95134149314e84e3b0da41a08e1e500000000000000800000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000080020000","hash1":"00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000008000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000010000"}} Traceback (most recent call last): File "bitHopper.py", line 296, in <module> main() File "bitHopper.py", line 292, in main reactor.run() File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/base.py", line 1158, in run self.mainLoop() File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/base.py", line 1167, in mainLoop self.runUntilCurrent() --- <exception caught here> --- File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/twisted/internet/base.py", line 789, in runUntilCurrent call.func(*call.args, **call.kw) exceptions.TypeError: pull_lp() takes exactly 3 arguments (2 given) [23:22:47] LP triggered serving miner [23:22:48] RPC request [d6f05000] submitted to RFCPool.com
mining with a phoenix 1.50 here if it matters ... this new feature keeps me ocupied
|
|
|
|