I guess you were in a haste to make money from your capital and you did under study the coins you wanted to invest on and jumping in when they were already being dump, therefore, catching a falling knive.

My advise is that, you don't invest what you can not afford to lose. All that glitters is not gold.

Know your customer (KYC) is a very good protective measure to secure investment. The banks do it and when you lose your details, all you need is to provide the duplicate credentials you gave the back at the time of registration and you have your account bank. If the exchanges introduce that too, it will be a nice way to further secure the coin locked with them so that third party won't have access to them.

I so much like this response and this is exactly what you need but your own decision will matter.

You have $100,000 more to invest? Are you kidding me...?

If I have such amount,  I must be certain I fix my eyes on bitcoin. Huh, every body is sure is a profit coin.

They will have access to the internet. If bitcoin becomes the money to use, everybody including the beggars would be internet compliant.

This question is like a thread I saw on this forum too , titled, homeless use bitcoin. Here is the thread-
  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3089825.0

1 BCA is currently at $17.68 . Source CMC. It traded at $12 last week but started an increase by the weekend. This time we are having the mother coin having a good start this week, hopefully, we are expecting a good ground when it gets to other exchanges.

The destruction of bitcoin will be the beginning of another modern coin.  Maybe it could be with the introduction of a national coin either from Asia or America. If it won't be manipulated and has the backing from that continent.

The leading cause from my perspective is the number of transactions clustering the network at the same time whether real transaction or unreal. Whether trier transaction or genuine transaction.

This is a valid suggestion. It will give visitors and intending investors the confidence that the developers are constantly working on their project.



The charge to the website should depend on the product or project. If the project is a very resourceful one. The one that the public desires, you know it will generate more traffic which will affect the price too.



And if we let ourselves to be stopped by the difficulties of life and our world, we won't achieve much  

In ten years time, I foresee many innovations on bitcoin and cryptocurrency. The overtaking moves on bitcoin would be so close but I still see bitcoin still retaining the lead over cryptos as we have it today.

Reasonably, I won't think that the payment of the administrators of the ico would only be based on just the success of the ico, so what if the ico didn't succeed or turns out to be total fraud, what would happen to him? With this reason, I'm thinking a contract would have been signed for payment either with any payment coin like bitcoin or etheruem before he commences work. However, Addition of ico coin is possible as a benefit for working with the company.

Meanwhile, I think the campaign managers here can give a proper response and direction on this educating question raised.

Going by this that I read from the link---

Canada does not have a specific law or regulation that regulates bitcoins.  In an emailed statement to The Wall Street Journal in January 2014, a Canadian official from Canada’s Department of Finance stated that Canada does not consider bitcoins to be legal tender.  The official reportedly stated that “only Canadian bank notes and coins are recognized as legal tender in Canada.  Bitcoin digital ‘currency’ is not legal tender in Canada.” However, the official also stated that the government of Canada would continue to “monitor developments involving virtual currencies.”

It means that Canada has not legalised bitcoin or digital currencies and I don't think they would be looking in the area of tax on it.  Therefore, I believe you can buy and sell since they don't have any specified law against it yes.

I don't think the whole issue of facebook and bitcoin is all about bitcoin itself but just that icos where being fraudulent and taking opportunity of investors. So, bitcoin being at the top was being seen as the number one and was being referred to. Otherwise, bitcoin had know issue with facebook.

Etheruem no doubt has good features and future. The adoption is growing, it has the support of icos and that is a good lift to the team. The team has been working seriously to grow the coin.

Stealing money and transferring to bitcoin has been the major fear of the government. Really, it will be a very safe means for corrupt politicians to make themselves "richer" by hiding stolen money in different wallets, all they need to do keep the different seeds save.

What I see or what I think you wrote in local language, I cant say if you are actually soliciting for some coins or something close to that . It is possible to give out a coin to strangers though.

I recently got to know about how rich and secured coinomi is. It is not open to the public which is the most important. Difficult for hackers if you don't expose your password & seed. Having numerous wallets for different coins plus support for additional tokens is another advantage it has.

Bitcoin might not really be having a good ground this first quarter  but I also presume that it is going to end very well. From the beginning of the 3rd quarter , we are going to begin seeing the strong hold of bitcoin on crypto world.

So are they converting their bitcoin to fiat and running away or they are just leaving their bitcoin there in the wallet? What really could they be doing with the bitcoin they don't want to throw inside the market?

The market is on red because bitcoin is dropping. I guess dumping is going on in chain of more are joining. I believe bitcoin will come back soon when stability in FUD is stabilized, we will smile again.

I think Op has not defaulted by making an observation known. Your comment seem like an attack to him and the forum because if we just pretend like we don't see some of these flagrant abuse of campaign rules, it might still come back to hurt some innocent members when some managers would make a harsh/thread post on that, indicting almost all posters (especially low ranking members + "seniors").

For instance, some members are also in the habit of trying to jump from one particular campaign(when accepted already) to another even with same requirement, pay and opened same  time.
Check yahoo's anger, the first time I read his angry comment   https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3036499.20

I think members should be responsible .