minerals coin - if you have been successful at crypto, and reinvested your profits in hardware thus amassing what is considered a "farm", we do not want you... and if you choose to participate, you would have to be neutered to a portion of your speed... not true, "farms" could participate, they just had play by the same rules as everyone else and limit to 50Mh. Farms could allocate 50mh of their hash to minerals, and point the rest at another coin minerals coin - if you don't have the time to keep up with all the latest announcements, and mine in a multipool, we do no want you... - I dont fully understand this, dev announced multipool about half way through pow stage. Dev launched multipool, but community votes multipool should be launched at the end of POWminerals coin - if you spent years building up a user base, rolling out new features and building trust within the community to create a successful pool, we do not want you... i wonder if any pools approached the minerals dev and said they would be happy to host a pool and play by the coins rules. I doubt this because they were all too busy bagging the coin and its distribution method. bittrex - you know what guys, your rules excluded a huge swath of the community, and rubbed a lot of people the wrong way, so we do not want you... The rules only excluded pool operators, so your suggesting pool operators have a controlling influence over crypto and its community? interesting... |
|
|
|
am i the only one seeing the irony here ? here's a coin whose sole goal was exclusion... exclusion of the pools, exclusion of the exchanges... pretty much total control of every aspect of mining and trading... and now that some of the exchanges have decided to exclude this coin, suddenly there is bitching and moaning ? irony  ))))))) Also you need to get your facts straight. At no point have exchanges been excluded. Early on the dev was happy to give source to exchanges willing to add minerals. How do you think the coin was added to C-Cex?? a sweetheart deal is how it was added to c-cex... small exchange, easy to control volume... like i said, this coin is all about "control"... controlling the participation, controlling the hashrate, and controlling which exchange is allowed to trade this and when, and excluding anyone and everyone that doesn't fit with that model... it was made clear from the beginning, for example, that this coin will not be on bittrex during the pow stage... so they were excluded... if i ran bittrex, right about now i would be giving a very "cold shoulder" response to this coin in public (which is kind of what they're doing), while in private i would be thinking - go screw yourself... This coin is about showing how a coin can have fair distribution if pools are willing to limit mining farms and big hashers. If anything, pools introduce control. why do you think so many coins are threatened by 51% attack. It is because pools, unwilling to limit miners gain 51% of the network. Now isn't 51% a controlling stake in the network? This coin has really opened my eyes to the greed mentality some pools have. I will be staying well clear of these particular pools in the future. this has me more confused then anything i have read so far... if one entity controlling 51 percent of total hash is bad, then how is one entity controlling the entire mining process a "fair distribution" ? Because it prevented large mining farms and big hashes from gaining a controlling stake in the coin. |
|
|
|
am i the only one seeing the irony here ? here's a coin whose sole goal was exclusion... exclusion of the pools, exclusion of the exchanges... pretty much total control of every aspect of mining and trading... and now that some of the exchanges have decided to exclude this coin, suddenly there is bitching and moaning ? irony ))))))) Also you need to get your facts straight. At no point have exchanges been excluded. Early on the dev was happy to give source to exchanges willing to add minerals. How do you think the coin was added to C-Cex?? a sweetheart deal is how it was added to c-cex... small exchange, easy to control volume... like i said, this coin is all about "control"... controlling the participation, controlling the hashrate, and controlling which exchange is allowed to trade this and when, and excluding anyone and everyone that doesn't fit with that model... it was made clear from the beginning, for example, that this coin will not be on bittrex during the pow stage... so they were excluded... if i ran bittrex, right about now i would be giving a very "cold shoulder" response to this coin in public (which is kind of what they're doing), while in private i would be thinking - go screw yourself... This coin is about showing how a coin can have fair distribution if pools are willing to limit mining farms and big hashers. If anything, pools introduce control. why do you think so many coins are threatened by 51% attack. It is because pools, unwilling to limit miners gain 51% of the network. Now isn't 51% a controlling stake in the network? This coin has really opened my eyes to the greed mentality some pools have. I will be staying well clear of these particular pools in the future. |
|
|
|
This coin is absolutely the shittiest coin I have ever come across.
lol, oh boy now the real fudders enter the arena. |
|
|
|
am i the only one seeing the irony here ? here's a coin whose sole goal was exclusion... exclusion of the pools, exclusion of the exchanges... pretty much total control of every aspect of mining and trading... and now that some of the exchanges have decided to exclude this coin, suddenly there is bitching and moaning ? irony ))))))) Also you need to get your facts straight. At no point have exchanges been excluded. Early on the dev was happy to give source to exchanges willing to add minerals. How do you think the coin was added to C-Cex?? |
|
|
|
1. It's not even 6.30am in Seattle now. Richie probably hasn't even woken up yet. And yet there's been more than ten people asking about listing and his suppose promise (which he didn't even make).
2. Don't antagonize exchanges. Criticising exchange owners aren't going to get Mineral listed. Create threads elsewhere if you really want to do so.
3. Read the thread before posting the same question over and over again. For example, the MP payout time has already been replied to last night. But people keep asking the same question over and over again.
+1 Agree, no point getting worked up until the exchanges give a definitive answer. |
|
|
|
|
There are plenty of 100% pre-mine coins which bittrex has added in the past, so how are these coins any less centralized then Minerals during the distribution phase?
I honestly don't believe Bittrex will refuse to add Minerals due to "centralized" distribution, as this would present a high level of double standard and hypocrisy on their behalf.
|
|
|
|
|
Has the dev been in contact with Bittrex? It was my understanding they would add Minerals once the source was made public.
|
|
|
|
|
When did phase 1 funding begin?
what i cant understand is phase 1 funding was at ~25% 1 day ago, and is now ~26%, so a 1% increase in over 24hrs. at this rate there is no way to reach 4500 BTC by the 27th.
|
|
|
|
To some newbies, before we go to Bittrex: before we go to the moon, we have for sure at least 1 price crash- if you dump all you have- it's big, but short crash, and then price will go up fast, so you loose. Try be calm when there is small price drop, then you will have your deserved money.
+1 see it all the time, whales pushing down price to get into the coin. if you down get a trade off in the first 5 mins, before the drop, then wait a couple of days. |
|
|
|
|
I beleive the launch price will be between 1.3 - 1.8 BTC each consider the RK-Box is $649 US @ 450gh and just over 1w/gh
At stock, the miner will be 0.77w/gh, and undervolted it will be 0.58w/gh. So i think Bitmain will factor this, and of course average rise of BTC when calculating ROI pricing.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Put me down for 1 or 2 units depending on price.
|
|
|
|
I'm getting a Runaway Exception error from the windows wallet
EXCEPTION: N5boost12interprocess22interprocess_exceptionE
The system cannot find the file specified
C:\User\Desktop\Minerals-qt.exe is Runaway exception
Any suggestions?
Try running the wallet again right after that error. Sometimes happens when a coin doesn't find what it expects to in %appdata% Nope, the error message just keeps popping up. try removing everything except for wallet.dat and minerals.conf Still getting Runaway Exception >.< strange. The only time I have experienced this (besides first launch) is when wallet isn't closed correctly due to windows crashing. re-downloading block chain has always fixed it. Maybe check your running wallet as administrator. |
|
|
|
I'm getting a Runaway Exception error from the windows wallet
EXCEPTION: N5boost12interprocess22interprocess_exceptionE
The system cannot find the file specified
C:\User\Desktop\Minerals-qt.exe is Runaway exception
Any suggestions?
Try running the wallet again right after that error. Sometimes happens when a coin doesn't find what it expects to in %appdata% Nope, the error message just keeps popping up. try removing everything except for wallet.dat and minerals.conf |
|
|
|
|
well i noticed source is up. Ive had a quick look and all looks fairly standard. nothing hidden like is the original shacoin or asiacoin. I cannot see any reason why Bittrex cannot add this coin now.
good work dev!
I Also noticed zerocoin source is included. Although not fully complete its good to see dev is looking at anon features.
|
|
|
|
|
anyone working on rich list?
|
|
|
|
Thanks for wallet dev. Wallet synced up perfectly, and I transfer all coins from pool to wallet without any issues. All the fudders can leave now  |
|
|
|
|
Its great to see Bitmain have taken their proven work horse design and use it with their next gen miner. I'm wondering how much overclocking room there will be however, as they will ship with second fan and air flow cover standard. This suggest the chips may run hotter then the current gen. I guess we will see.
|
|
|
|
|
Paper wallet might be a good place to start. Maybe set up a bounty?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
