Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2024, 01:38:40 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 [219] 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 ... 421 »
4361  Other / Meta / Re: PM Limit!! on: November 18, 2012, 05:12:36 AM
Previously, the 10 PMs per hour limit was all that prevented newbies from sending hundreds of spam PMs. But I recently changed the "time between posts/PMs" restriction so that new users have to wait 6 minutes between each post or PM. So the low PMs per hour limit is no longer necessary.
4362  Other / Meta / Re: PM Limit!! on: November 18, 2012, 05:06:59 AM
I increased it to 120.
4363  Other / Meta / Re: [Feature added] Color besides usernames for Ignored by % of established members. on: November 17, 2012, 12:16:55 AM
It would be really nice if there were an update on the toplist, I want to know how I've been doing.

zyk 97
Atlas 68
bulanula 66
smoothie 62
Maria 47
Rarity 46
MPOE-PR 37
cunicula 37
bitlane 36
subSTRATA 34
1nject0r 33
ElectricMucus 32
4364  Other / Meta / Re: Why not a default tag? on: November 16, 2012, 05:36:49 PM
The forum isn't in the business of arbitrating disputes or determining how reputable people are. Someone else should do that. I would prefer that there not even be a scammer tag: it takes up too much time and it's always controversial. But I'm not going to ban anyone for scamming, and leaving proven scammers alone would cause too many naïve people to get scammed.

Use your brain and third-party reputation services to determine who to trust. Do not rely on the forum itself. The forum staff doesn't spend much time on scam accusations, so the forum does a very poor job of keeping up with scammers. A for-profit company should deal with this stuff. Or at least a non-profit organization of people who are actually interested in spending a lot of time to fight scams (unlike me).
4365  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Patrick Harnett - Kraken Fund on: November 16, 2012, 05:20:02 PM
Scammer-tagged. He is obviously guilty of breaking his contracts here and in the MPOE-PR case, and he apparently hasn't been talking to his victims or arranging repayments. The tag can maybe be removed if he negotiates a reasonable repayment plan and makes payments for a while.
4366  Economy / Auctions / Re: Advertise on this forum - Round 59 on: November 16, 2012, 01:17:50 PM
Slots BTC Person
1 15 ssaCEO
1 12 Fireball
4 11 Inaba
2 10 cablepair
4367  Economy / Auctions / Re: Advertise on this forum - Round 59 on: November 15, 2012, 11:10:49 PM
Slots BTC Person
1 15 ssaCEO
4 11 Inaba
3 10 cablepair
4368  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: tmac667 needs a scammer tag! on: November 15, 2012, 09:16:54 PM
Ok I just saw this thread for the first time and I'm pretty surprised at people's reactions, I explained to the 3 people that this applies to the sutuation and offered a compromise. I've done many transactions on this forum before and these are the only 3 'bad' ones. What do you mean you and a couple others fell for it, you think I planned on Netflix invalidating the remaining codes that they sent out? It's not just my codes that aren't working its any codes, so I wouldn't recommend buying from the other guy that's selling them unless his are from a different promotion. I haven't received compensation for the bad codes from my source and although I requested a refund he refused to grant me 1 so the 50% refund I offered you guys is out of pocket. And holy shit I don't send him a 100 pms demanding money, for gods sake it wasn't a $1000 that I lost, I understand that's the price of doing business sometimes.

guranteed to last 6 months
4369  Economy / Auctions / Re: Advertise on this forum - Round 59 on: November 15, 2012, 09:05:05 PM
Slots BTC Person
2 11 ssaCEO
4 10 cablepair
2 10 Inaba

btw - any way to limit this geographically?

No.
4370  Other / Meta / Re: The problem with reporting off topic replies is on: November 15, 2012, 08:55:01 PM
I don't want to make most of that info about reports public. It'd be nice if people got a notification about the outcome of their own reports, but that'd be very difficult to add to SMF.
4371  Economy / Auctions / Re: Advertise on this forum - Round 59 on: November 15, 2012, 08:53:05 PM
2 @ 9

You're a new member, so I'll require a deposit before accepting your bids. I sent you a PM.

sold out?

No... This is an auction.

Slots BTC Person
4 10 cablepair
4 10 Inaba
4372  Other / Meta / Re: The problem with reporting off topic replies is on: November 15, 2012, 04:42:59 PM
So in general: Should I report posts of casual discussion on a loosely related topic which span over about a page?

If the discussion has some relation to the topic specified by the topic post, then it's usually OK. Here's an excerpt from the moderator guidelines:

Off-topic posts

Almost everyone gets posts split/deleted due to off-topicness. It is the most common error. I've made the error myself several times.

Every reply to a topic should be a response to the OP. When someone reads the OP, they should be able to guess more or less what the replies will look like.

It is quite natural for replies to actually only respond to some point of another respondent. For example, you might want to point out a small and trivial error that another poster has made. However, this kind of replying is usually off-topic.

A reply to another reply is on-topic when it contributes to the on-topic discussion. For example, it could build onto or refute the on-topic arguments of an earlier reply.

Posts may contain off-topic remarks in addition to the on-topic arguments. The off-topic remarks can be more substantial than the on-topic remarks, though as a very rough guideline I'd say that for every three paragraphs of off-topic arguments there should be at least one of on-topic arguments. Text that replies to this off-topic text is also off-topic text.

Posts consisting of ad hominem attacks or other useless text are always off-topic.

Sometimes some leeway is given when the topic starter seems to like the off-topic replies.

Bump-only replies are OK if they don't become annoying. Delete these useless replies once more replies have been posted and the bump is no longer necessary.

The phrasing of the topic post gives hints as to how strictly to enforce on-topicness:
- Topics with vague topic posts may cause "chaotic" replies to actually be considered on-topic. Topics that contain no questions are especially prone to this.
- Non-answer replies to a topic consisting of a specific question are likely to be off-topic.
- General topics about a service created by the service creator can contain criticism of the service unless otherwise specified in the OP
- Announcements can generally contain any comments about the service that was announced

Topics in the "off-topic" section still have the same on-topicness rules.

When in doubt, wait until a couple of people have reported the potentially off-topic posts.

The policy about off-topic posts is non-optimal, but I think it's the best we can do with flat (non-threaded) discussions.

Should I report each of them or is reporting the first or the last one sufficient? Also should I report the post from which the discussion deviated from?

Reporting all of them is often helpful. If you're going to report just one post, report the first one which should be deleted.
4373  Other / Meta / Re: The problem with reporting off topic replies is on: November 15, 2012, 04:23:54 PM
If a report isn't acted on within a few days, you can PM me about it and I'll deal with it or tell you why the post shouldn't be deleted.
4374  Economy / Auctions / Re: Advertise on this forum - Round 59 on: November 15, 2012, 06:15:44 AM
4 10 cablepair
4 8 Inaba
4375  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: tmac667 needs a scammer tag! on: November 15, 2012, 03:37:50 AM
If you did business with him via forum PMs: Can I look at the PMs between you and him?
4376  Economy / Auctions / Re: Advertise on this forum - Round 59 on: November 14, 2012, 07:52:26 PM
4 4 Inaba
2 1.5 BitcoinINV
1 1 rate5
1 .5 dustintrammell
4377  Other / Meta / Re: Pirate PMs on: November 14, 2012, 07:51:09 PM
Was a decision ever made on this?

BCB decided that he didn't want to do it anymore.

I might collect donations to have moderators go through them, but I haven't decided yet.
4378  Economy / Auctions / Re: Advertise on this forum - Round 59 on: November 14, 2012, 03:13:00 AM
Notice that I changed the rules:

- I will end the auction at an arbitrary time no more than 12 days from now. (I will probably end the auction 1-3 days before the ads are scheduled to go up.)
4379  Economy / Auctions / Advertise on this forum - Round 59 on: November 14, 2012, 03:11:37 AM
In order to collect more money for the creation of good forum software, the forum is selling ad space in the area beneath the first post of every topic page.

Ads are allowed to contain any non-annoying HTML/CSS style. No images, JavaScript, or animation (no marquee or blinking). Ads must appear 3 or fewer lines tall in my browser. Ads will be prefixed with "Advertisement:". Ad text may not contain lies, misrepresentation, or inappropriate language. Ads may not link directly to any NSFW page. Ads may be rejected for other reasons.

There are 10 total ad slots which are randomly rotated. So one ad slot has a one in ten chance of appearing. Eight of the slots are for sale here. Ads appear only on topic pages with more than one post, and only for people using the default theme.

The ad lasts 7 days starting from when I put it up.

Stats

Exact historical impression counts per slot:
https://bitcointalk.org/adrotate.php?adstats

Info about the current ad slots:
https://bitcointalk.org/adrotate.php?adinfo

Auction rules

Post your bids in this thread. Prices must be stated in BTC per slot. You must state the max number of slots you want. When the auction ends, the highest bidders will have their slots filled until all eight slots are filled.

So if someone bids for 8 slots @ 5 BTC and this is the highest bid, then he'll get all 8 slots. If the two highest bids are 8 slots @ 4 BTC and 1 slot @ 5 BTC, then the first person will get 7 slots and the second person will get 1 slot.

- When you post a bid, the bids in your previous posts are considered to be automatically canceled. You can put multiple bids in one post, however.
- All bid prices must be evenly divisible by 0.25.
- The bidding starts at 0.5.
- I will end the auction at an arbitrary time no more than 12 days from now. (I will probably end the auction 1-3 days before the ads are scheduled to go up.)
- If two people bid at the same price, the person who bid first will have his slots filled first.
- Bids are considered invalid and will be ignored if they do not specify both a price and a max quantity, or if they could not possibly win any slots

If these rules are confusing, look at some of the past forum ad auctions to see how it's done. I also post periodic status updates which should help make things clear.

You must pay for your slots within 24 hours of receiving the payment address. Otherwise your slots may be sold to someone else.
4380  Economy / Auctions / Re: Advertise on this forum - Round 58 on: November 14, 2012, 02:53:40 AM
4@8

This bid is unfortunately too late. The auction ended 30 minutes after it was originally scheduled to end, but you bid 35 minutes after.
Pages: « 1 ... 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 [219] 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 ... 421 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!