Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 10:47:13 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 »
441  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Announcement] Avalon ASIC Ships on: January 22, 2013, 05:47:58 PM

Case is not empty, treasure is real, keep guessing.

it has something to do with this


If it is running Metro as the UI I'm gonna be pissed. Cheesy
442  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [1423GH] ABCPool PPS - Proxy Pool For High & Steady Mining Rewards on: January 22, 2013, 05:18:13 PM
Are autopayouts not working?
443  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Announcement] Avalon ASIC Development Status [Batch #1] on: January 17, 2013, 08:13:20 PM
Avalons guys don't give a crap about marketing or fanfare. This thing has been in the works for a long time. ngzhang has never been one to talk much. He's no BS straight shooting and he delivers. Look up his profile and read his posts. He doesn't spend most of his time making thing pretty or flaunting his works like BFL or the other. The closest they came to flaunting anything is announcing some slight speed boosts and the countdown clock on the website. He knows his shit. BFL can even decide on packaging even after 3+ months of delays. Heat is a BS excuse, they would have shipped a first gen and then improved it later if they had a real product.
444  Economy / Computer hardware / Re: [WTB] Avalon ASIC batch#1 order on: January 14, 2013, 09:42:03 PM
I'll sell my avalon preorders, BTC200 ea.
445  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: 253 BTC Bet that Butterfly Labs will Not Deliver an ASIC Prior to March 1st on: January 14, 2013, 03:00:06 PM
Whoever bet that is a fool.. I suspect it's Mircea Popescu... good luck winning your bet against when you lose, though.  I'm sure he'll force close the bet and negate all bets after we ship so he doesn't lose the 250 BTC.


so put your BTC where your mouth is if you are so confident in BFL/your employer's competence.
446  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Announcement] Avalon ASIC Development Status [Batch #1] on: January 08, 2013, 04:08:01 PM
I think that since it's the first batch, they should all be sent out as engineering sample or demo units.

447  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [92 GH] MaxBTC.com Pool - Merged NMC, No Fee, DGM, LP, API, SSL, 2FA, Port 80 on: January 02, 2013, 02:09:08 AM
I get  
Quote
Internal server error
Error: Unable to connect to servers

when trying to connect to site.
448  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Current ASIC miners on: December 17, 2012, 05:57:11 PM
No one knows yet. It's all vaporware and promises that have been changing daily or weekly.

On paper BFL looks the best, but as usual their execution is meh and will probably take 3-4 revisions after they ship the first lot to make them work like they say they will. If they don't default and fold.

Basic looks good, but is apparently restarting from scratch, who knows.

Avalon looks to be the first out of the gate. It may not be the most efficient, but it is unique that it's a full stand alone unit. It also has more parts that could fail. But it is also open source so you can tweak things.

Powerwise initially power wont matter, since even the worst asic is not going to pull the power of a gpu rig while doing 10-100x the hashrate. Whoever hits first will "win". Once difficulty rises, power will play a larger role, but again the worst asic rig will only pull the power of a desktop PC. You wont be able to heat your home with them.

The best thing to do is diversify if you can. Avalon is sold in waves and is currently sold out. Basic and BFL will take orders, and make on demand. At this point if you aren't already ordered, you are probably better off sitting on your cash or buy bitcoins. It's going to be a bumpy ride for the next 6 months or so.

I expect asic prices to drop drastically since competition will be fierce, and difficulty skyrocketing. The asics who hit after the "winner" makes it to market may take an incredibly long time to break even. It's a much much poorer investment than gpus were.
449  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [5 GH/s] Project X | PPS:0.00000778518832 | No Fees | FPGA GPU Ready | Get Work on: December 14, 2012, 05:01:48 PM
at least he came back and is talking. So many others just cut and run.
450  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Announcement] Avalon ASIC Development Status [Batch #1] on: December 14, 2012, 03:10:14 PM
or having the whole lot fail and go bankrupt and leave everyone hanging.
451  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Announcement] Avalon ASIC Development Status [Batch #1] on: December 14, 2012, 12:30:21 AM
So I take that picture of the chip layout, print it out on my inkjet printer, glue it to a heatsink, then plug it in to the wall, right? Then I've got gigahashes?

That's essentially how chips are made. Not precisely but they are basically printed on glass and the printing places the circuits and layers are added incrementally.
452  Other / Off-topic / Re: And some more delays in BFL shipment plans / no shipment before 14th Jan 2013 on: December 11, 2012, 05:38:04 PM
Gonna be hilarious when the next batch of chips arrives defective too.

Guess someone got salt in their silicon.
453  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [400GH/s] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: December 06, 2012, 08:50:14 PM
I use a new address every month, just a habit, plus makes it easy to track income.
454  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Announcement] Avalon ASIC Development Status [Batch #1] on: December 06, 2012, 05:59:23 PM
My understanding is that these clock buffer adjustments were made as soon as they figured out their first batch of chips wouldn't work (late October).  They aren't still making any adjustments, they are just waiting on the newly-adjusted chips to arrive.

It is quite a cost, but consider that timing is everything in this ASIC battle.  BFL spending a couple hundred thousand to avoid having to way 4-6 weeks for a sample to be cut and THEN order new wafers and wait for those as well could be a smart move.  Making customers wait another 4-6 weeks could be a reputation killer, and $200k might be a small price to pay to keep their existing preorders and reputation intact.  I'm sure they don't like that they had to spend that much money, but they couldn't wait for new samples before putting in an order for their new wafers - it would kill them as a competitor in this race.  I'm sure they're crossing their fingers that the new chips work just as much as everyone who ordered from them is.  Wink

you don't adjust chips. period.

You can add crap the the board to fix a leak or add voltage or capacitance. That's about it. If there was anything wrong with the chips whatsoever it's a respin at best, and worse a whole redo of the mask. That's 30-90 days of fail.

so everyone who gets a first gen BFL SC before whatever the real problem is fixed is getting a quick fix prototype board at best.
455  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Now it turns on: December 06, 2012, 04:54:26 PM
http://p2pool.info/

Pool stale rate was 20-30% for a long time, miners were getting 10% rejects from the pool, yet we kept getting blocks and getting paid.  What can I say, other than go p2pool.
Getting paid and getting paid your full expected amount is not the same thing. I'd rather be at a pool like BTCOxygen with a 2% fee than get 10% rejects.
I guess he means that if EVERYONE was getting the same 10% rejects, and those 10% reject don't result in a 10% drop in blocks found, then theoretically the rewards still get divided up the same? So as long as you're not the only person getting 10% rejects, then it doesn't matter to your payout? Idk I'm a little confused by that as well.  Huh

you have to understand that p2pool isnt mining the bitcoin chain it's mining an alt chain that essentially merge mines the btc chain. rejects, stales and orphans don't matter as long as the pool is working. You can get a btc block with a stale or orphaned p2pool share. There's a lot of variance because of the share idea, but it works out. As long as you get some shares in before p2pool hits a block you are good. The shares last for several blocks, so if you stop mining you get paid for a while too. It also means it takes a while to build up your sharecount to reach maximum payout.

90% of my work to p2pool is discarded work or rejected shares, because of the 10 second long polling. I still have been making far > 110% PPS and AFAIK no public pool can touch that anymore.
456  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Now it turns on: December 06, 2012, 04:48:40 PM

http://p2pool.info/

Pool stale rate was 20-30% for a long time, miners were getting 10% rejects from the pool, yet we kept getting blocks and getting paid.  What can I say, other than go p2pool.

Getting paid and getting paid your full expected amount is not the same thing. I'd rather be at a pool like BTCOxygen with a 2% fee than get 10% rejects.

If you had been on p2pool the last couple months you'd have made 110%+ over regular PPS rates, without fees mined straight to your wallet.
457  Economy / Services / Re: I'll Pay 5 BTC to Anyone that can build the following. on: December 05, 2012, 10:02:44 PM
You could make a dry pile, that's the closest you can get to "free" energy by using the humidity in the air to power a battery. A big enough one could power 12V devices or even your home if you could make it big enough and keep the efficiency up. They have working dry piles keep voltage for over 100 years.
458  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [Announcement] Avalon ASIC Development Status [Batch #1] on: December 05, 2012, 06:42:07 PM
Can't wait. Also cancel some more orders so I can buy more avalons Cheesy
459  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [400GH/s] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: December 04, 2012, 07:56:51 PM
use the webpage

127.0.0.1:9332  and go to graphs. it should even out over time.
460  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [400GH/s] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool on: December 04, 2012, 07:05:46 PM
you can "merge mine" bitcoins and tell it to submit to litecoin but litecoin will reject every block, probably one every few seconds, you are probably hammering the crap out of your computer trying that.

You have to mine one of the other, they are incompatible.

you run separate instances on different ports, and you can only mine on one or the other with the same worker.

You can have the same gpu or whatever split and mine half on litecoin and half btc, but since btc needs high hashrate and low mem speed, and litecoin needs low rate and high mem speed it's not really feasible.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!