Bitcoin Forum
July 30, 2024, 02:27:52 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 [221] 222 223 224 225 »
4401  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Mining Bitcion using a FREE Windows OS! on: May 24, 2011, 08:16:01 PM
Wouldn't running a miner on a VM only slow things down? Why not run a bare-metal always-free Linux miner?
4402  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: Modified Kernel for Phoenix 1.4 on: May 24, 2011, 05:23:40 PM
Any chance of getting a kernel optimized for the 6xxx series?
4403  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Is rig building still profitable? on: May 22, 2011, 02:13:59 AM
for me since it costs me $0.24 to generate a bitcoin, I would guess the value of bitcoins to be $0.25 - $1 in the long term.
Is the value of a penny based on the cost to produce the penny? No.

Is the value of gold based on the cost to mine the gold? No.

So why do you assume the value of bitcoins will be equal to the cost to produce them? The value of bitcoins are based mainly on supply and demand.
4404  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty 64bit Headless Bitcoin mining with ATI 11.5 binary driver on: May 22, 2011, 02:01:06 AM
Well I guess my problem isn't due to running headless. When I boot with a monitor and see X (Ubuntu Desktop 10.10) up and running, I still can't aticonfig over ssh. The three lines didn't help either.
4405  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: FPGA mining for fun and profit on: May 22, 2011, 01:40:25 AM
based on the huge difficulty jump today.... I think someone has succeeded in fpga/asic bitcoin flooding Sad

*bell ring*
We have a winner!

Two FPGA clusters went live.
Let me toss out some rough numbers. Please correct me if I'm too far off.

You have about 300 chips doing 200 MHash/s? That's 60 GHash/s you brought online? While that probably puts you in as one of the top miners, that's not a significant cause for the recent network growth.

For someone without piles of existing fpgas sitting around idle: If purchased new, that's $250k in hardware costs bringing in $10k per week in bitcoin value. Half a year to pay off the initial investment (assuming price/difficulty growth remains steady). GPUs would break even in less than half that time.
4406  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty 64bit Headless Bitcoin mining with ATI 11.5 binary driver on: May 22, 2011, 12:27:21 AM
I have a much simpler setup, but I am mining headless successfully (no monitor, keyboard, or mouse plugged in at all). What I can't do is aticonfig. It complains about X not running. Do I have to hack up the /etc/init scripts to get X running without a monitor plugged in?
4407  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: pay-per-share fee on: May 15, 2011, 03:18:00 AM
it's 7% iirc
deepbit.net, 8695 mhps = 50 coins/day
http://www.alloscomp.com/bitcoin/calculator.php
8695 mhps = 21 hours, 31 minutes = 55.77 coins/day
deepbit.net fee ~11%.
Should be 10%
calculator, 7825 mhps = 24 hrs/block
deepbit.net, 7825 mhps = 45 coins per day

50 * .9 = 45

Ok, if you look at it that way, it is 10%.

So how about reducing the fee, say, to 5%?
4408  Bitcoin / Pools / pay-per-share fee on: May 15, 2011, 02:56:32 AM
Nicely working pool. Now that you're ~700 GH/s, what do you think about dropping the huge 10% PPS fee?
it's 7% iirc
deepbit.net, 8695 mhps = 50 coins/day

http://www.alloscomp.com/bitcoin/calculator.php
8695 mhps = 21 hours, 31 minutes = 55.77 coins/day

deepbit.net fee ~11%.
4409  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: Official DiabloMiner GPU Miner Thread (now with Long Poll and BFI_INT support) on: May 15, 2011, 02:43:30 AM
Good work on the new features. I haven't yet found a set of DiabloMiner options to beat Phoenix, but it's definitely neck-and-neck now. DiabloMiner is much easy to install and configure, so that's a big bonus.

Another donation on its way to you.
4410  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [~600 Gh/s Mining Pool] INSTANT PAYOUT,+1% with LP! +0.8% for no failed blocks! on: May 14, 2011, 08:14:52 AM
Nicely working pool. Now that you're ~700 GH/s, what do you think about dropping the huge 10% PPS fee?
4411  Economy / Marketplace / Re: GPU-Cluster/mining venture partners sought on: May 07, 2011, 07:07:45 AM
From my evaluations so far, it is the best technically 'GPU cluster in a cabinet solution' currently on the market suited to mining. They can supply an option to run 5970's.
That solution looks like a very beautiful and expensive solution. If you've seen the typical rigs around this place, price/performance is what matters. Not how cute the hardware looks. I would love to see your cost estimates on that thing.
4412  Economy / Marketplace / Re: The fastest HD 69xx miner. 350 BTC. on: May 06, 2011, 04:10:27 PM
681 with stock everything. 830 MH/s, etc.
4413  Economy / Marketplace / Re: BitCoin Systems - Buy Bitcoin Mining Rigs on: May 06, 2011, 12:01:42 AM
    • Better mhash/s ratio than other mining rigs
    • Better pricing compared to other mining rigs

    You're kidding, right?

    http://www.bitcoinrigs.com/products/Enthusiast-Rig.html
    Dual 5870, 760 mhps = $1400

    http://bitcoinsystems.com/1652.html
    Single 6970, 300 mhps = $1500

    With BitcoinRigs you get double the hashrate at a lower cost.

    Comments, suggestions, questions below.  Smiley

    Suggestion: Drop your prices in half.
    4414  Economy / Marketplace / Re: The fastest HD 69xx miner. 350 BTC. on: May 05, 2011, 09:03:05 AM
    I didn't have the optimal Phoenix settings before. And I was rounding down. Here's an actual shot:

    681.06


    4415  Economy / Marketplace / Re: The fastest HD 69xx miner. 350 BTC. on: May 05, 2011, 07:37:36 AM
    I optimized my Phoenix settings for my 6990 and installed the new 11.4 driver. At stock card settings I now get 680 MH/s, which compares very favorably with your 683 MH/s using 11.3. I have yet to try the downgrade to 11.1 trick.
    4416  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: linuxcoin - LiveOS with everything preinstalled. on: May 04, 2011, 06:56:51 AM
    Once finished I will be selling pre-installed usb flash drives for around 50BTC if that sounds reasonable ?
    $150 for a $6 flash drive loaded with some open source software? No, that doesn't sound reasonable.
    4417  Economy / Marketplace / Re: The fastest HD 69xx miner. 350 BTC. on: May 04, 2011, 02:30:30 AM
    I think I got 2 extra MH/s from downclocking the memory. Everything else is stock.
    4418  Economy / Marketplace / Re: The fastest HD 69xx miner. 350 BTC. on: May 03, 2011, 11:19:40 PM
    • 708 Mhash/sec on a Radeon HD 6990 (stock clock 830MHz: BIOS switch at position 2) -- this speed has been measured with Catalyst 11.1. Catalyst 11.2 and 11.3 contain a performance regression that downgrades the speed to 683 Mhash/s. However because aticonfig in Catalyst 11.1 does not support the HD 6990, I advise users to install Catalyst 11.3 or later, run aticonfig to generate xorg.conf, then downgrade to 11.1 for operating hdminer.
    Very interesting downgrading Catalyst. Using Catalyst 11.3 and Phoenix I get 670 Mhash/s vs. your 683 Mhash/s. Sounds to me that hdminer is only 2% faster, and that the bulk of your performance improvements are in system configuration, and not miner optimizations.
    4419  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: Official DiabloMiner GPU Miner Thread (now with Long Poll support) on: May 01, 2011, 06:55:53 PM
    How about BFI_INT support? That sounds like the main feature that is holding DiabloMiner back performance-wise.
    4420  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Faster than Phoenix on: April 29, 2011, 05:36:48 PM
    With Phoenix on a straight stock 6990 I get 670 mhps.
    Pages: « 1 ... 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 [221] 222 223 224 225 »
    Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!