Correct!

Cow (Clearly me)! I confused the name with the site Hhampuz¹ is promoting from last few weeks. The name looks very similar. However still I do not see anything scammy from the talk the OP started.

This is the script provider I was talking about earlier: https://wagerfly.io
(The demo is v1 I guess)

Edit:
¹Roobet.com

They are possibly using the script from the same developers. In fact I know this script developers, right now I can not remember their name. This is completely fine.

You are saying it like you never saw a gambling site which has ToS :-D

Why a site has to accept especial characters like $¶€$!@|
There are no such rules in the world.
Besides, this might be done possibly to protect some security or something.

You have not brought out any case but wasted our time.


You did not read the thread, did you? :-P

Good job. Flag supported.
For visibility would you add the flag link in your main topic post?
Add it at the end with some the text link:

Flag created: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2171



Good luck again.

If you have the change address then you can.
In case if you are using Electrum here is a tutorial: https://bitcoinelectrum.com/how-to-do-a-manual-child-pays-for-parent-transaction/

If you have RBF  enable then yes you can. Right now to get the next block you need at-least 120 sat/B (this is crazy) but 50 sat/B is still good. This may take few hours to confirm and if you do not have hurry then it worth to wait.


Which client you are using?

It's very possible that our coins are already mixed with illegal coins those were marked on the addresses. You never know.

Does this worry you much?
It doesn't for me.

When we deal with cash, we do not know the source of that cash whether it came from an illegal or legal source one hand before me. I think the Bitcoin hatters are very active to plant the seeds in our head some day we will be in trouble. There will be time when we will not have these centralized exchanges with centralized fiat, there will be a time when we will not have any centralized financial system. Wait for those days.

PS: I am not encouraging those illegal Bitcoin traders by any means. I just think that nothing can stop Bitcoin.

Good to get your response. Sorry that your case has not been responded by sportsbet.io yet but hopefully Steve gives his input soon.

This look better now. For some strange reasons first time someone had to give his amount in a different fashion but yes we can not complain now.

1. Go here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;addflag=832366
2. Check 2nd radio box.

We call this type -2 flag.

Then follow the instruction and use this topic link ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5263445.0 ) for the reference of the flag before hitting the confirm button at the next page.

Good luck.


If you have problem with sportsbet scammed many then please make a different thread about it and keep trolling your issues. Please not here. When I see your post I feel annoyed. And I am 100% confident that a lot of others do feel the same. Stop trolling and annoying the contributors of this topic.

I did not follow-up today but this was meant to happen. Broad was out standing. I feel bad for Stokesi but good to see the balance and competition in English team. As a Test unit they are one of the best now.

W Indies just lost themselves even after all the blessings rain had for them.

What's up with neymarjr12?
I see he was online but did not admit me, asche and others yet. Is he banned or something else?

@neymarjr12 can you https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5263445.msg54880848#msg54880848
And also create a new flag and this will be type 2.
My stupidity that I was suggesting you to create a type 3 earlier.

Ah! mindrust!!

So sportsbet.io decided to give him THE difference between the deposits and withdrawals not the whole. I hope there will be no question about correcting it now.

Cheers,

Multi-accouting, KYC not passed all these full of shit.

Thanks for bringing it. It says "each type" which should mean that neymarjr12 can create a type 2 since he has not created a type 2 yet.

GP can you stay away from trolling in this thread? You are not helping anyone but annoying.

No disrespect but I think we need someone to create some Udemy type course about flag things :-P

/s

I was the one who suggested neymarjr12 to create a flag type 3. Now it seems I misguided him, if it really matters the flag type 2 is valid over flag type 3. I will keep my support on the flag type 3 until there is a flag type 2.

This is not my case nor LFC_Bitcoin's. This is a case between neymarjr12 and sportsbet.io but some reasoning I see here which are convincing for me to ask for more details that was done in PM because it is relevant in this case and LFC_Bitcoin should not have any reason to hide anything if he has really nothing there that can question him.

I am sure they would or will but looking at the easy opposing from the members who opposed the flag so far, and seeing LFC_Bitcoin to add a newbie member account in his trust list which pointed by marlboroza makes this case very uncomfortable for LFC_Bitcoin.

---

I hope now you will not come up with this that everyone is free to add/remove anyone in their trust list. I already know this that yes one can.

Maybe you are right. Yes, I had doubt when I said scam accusation, it was not adding up in my mind :-P

I guess I messed up and meant to say recognized new channel LOL

I am out of sMerit guys. So no merit but I wanted to give few to the OP and rdbase.

Come back with something better like 7 years subscription of pornhub :-P

On a serious note, without having a valid collateral you have no chance to get a single sat.

Cheers,

Since there was not anything to hide (I assume) but a straight forward statement of opposing a flag then LFC_Bitcoin could just post it on that topic instead of privately sending it to some of his selective users.

I am interested to hear more in it from LFC_Bitcoin.

LFC_Bitcoin, can you share us the exact text of the PM that you sent to them?

I, too, think it's okay if he requests only to look at the matter, I emphasize on the word "only".

Maybe sharing will help the case we have in here if there are no personal info attached.

I am not sure but I think one can not create two flag against same user in 6 months or something. I have not checked the Turst topic for long time but I can recall that I have seen something about not allowing to create multiple flag against same user by a same accuser.

Regarding the amount, I think the following line will be very appropriate:

Total amount in question: 0.373 BTC
Wants to offer: x
Amount want to scam: 0.373 BTC - x

I really did not think this amount thing was too hard to figure LOL

Edit: I had to look at the post made my Steve to figure x = 0.102 BTC

That's pretty cleaver. They are using the name of the News Agency and recorded video with live-streaming to create a trustworthy feeling. It's like you are watching live and a newbie or even a semi-experience crypto user will fall for this.



I think this topic needs to move to the scam accusation board and also the video needs to be reported. I will report in very soon.

Day four Test between England vs WI:

https://www.espncricinfo.com/series/19497/game/1225249/england-vs-west-indies-3rd-test-west-indies-in-england-2020

This seems a good sign for WI. Their only hope is to have rain for the whole day and tomorrow too. Is rain going to enforce a draw in this match? :-P

I am waiting for a good odd to catch like last time :-D