* Limit size of signature, Text size of no more than 3 line and size 10 ?
This is something I would very much like to enforce. I've looked into adding a height restriction, but it requires a lot of modifications to the parseBBC function to accurately determine the signature's height unless I want to ban a lot of markup in signatures (which maybe I do). |
|
|
|
I just rembered the OP of this thread was actually rexcoin. Was that what you meant? They're the same person?
Sorry, I meant "Jackie", not you. |
|
|
|
Conclusive proof of what?
That the OP Jackie is a fraud. |
|
|
|
|
Everyone who donated is a moron. Just the title made me 90% sure this was fake, and I've since received conclusive proof.
|
|
|
|
sorry to get everyone's hackles up.
Looks like I mis-understood the reason for this auction
Good luck to everyone who has purchased an ad slot
please increase my slot to 20 BTC
thank you.
Thank you! .01 why not.
The minimum bid is 0.05. 20 cablepair 2 usagi 2 Akemashite Omedetou 1 PsychoticBoy .88 Pirate Cove .77 Garr255 .5 xchrix .5 Mobius .42 jga .4 tgmarks .3 slush .3 wmx.support .25 wmXchange .25 mc_lovin .21 kano .2 Luceo .2 Grix .2 DeathAndTaxes .17 OneVillain .15 Cryptostocks .14 Kumala .11 kakobrekla .1 TangibleCryptography .1 edd .1 CoinLab .07 FreeMoney .06 Goat .05 Inaba .05 rate5 .05 boonies4u |
|
|
|
me too.
Listen when this auction is over - whatever slots that are remaining out of the 52 - I will pay for them - matching the lowest offered price - and maybe we can just give them out to donators, or vip members or to people who want to advertise something but cant afford them. I don't know you can figure out who they go to.
But I want to support the forum so I am willing to personally match the lowest offered price in this auction for however many slots are left and you can allocate them however you want. I am sure you will give them to good causes.
Thanks for the offer, but I specified in the auction rules that any unsold slots will not be sold and the remaining slots would end up getting a bigger share of the pageviews. |
|
|
|
this thread is awesome
it allows you to see who the cheapest people are on the forum.
Btw I would like to change mine to 3 BTC
thanks theymos
Thanks! I'm surprised by how spread-out the bids are. 3 cablepair 2 usagi 2 Akemashite Omedetou .88 Pirate Cove .77 Garr255 .5 xchrix .42 jga .4 tgmarks .3 slush .3 wmx.support .25 wmXchange .25 mc_lovin .2 Luceo .2 Grix .2 DeathAndTaxes .17 OneVillain .15 Cryptostocks .14 Kumala .11 kakobrekla .1 TangibleCryptography .1 edd .1 CoinLab .1 kano .07 FreeMoney .06 Goat .05 Inaba .05 rate5 .05 boonies4u |
|
|
|
That was one method I seriously considered. I especially liked that it was "non-democratic" in that someone winning a majority vote wouldn't necessarily win. But its tendency to pick "compromise" candidates isn't really what I want. |
|
|
|
|
I still haven't really figured out how to add stuff to the profile settings. I managed to get one checkbox working for that watchlist-related setting using a lot of trial and error. No idea how I'd add a text box for regex.
|
|
|
|
I normally don't like democracy, but I recently decided that a vote was the best way to determine who should moderate the Russian section in addition to LZ. So, before coding the voting page, I did some reading on voting algorithms and ultimately decided on the Majority Judgement algorithm. Do you agree that this is the best voting algorithm, or do you prefer some other algorithm? |
|
|
|
I have activated voting. Go here to vote. You can only vote if you: - Have 5+ posts in the Russian sections - Have spent 4+ hours on the forum. - Registered before September 7. Also, global moderators and administrators can vote. The Majority Judgement voting algorithm is being used. Grade each candidate according to how good you think they are. Multiple candidates can have the same grade. You must grade every candidate. I'm not sure when voting will end. |
|
|
|
Will extra slots get handed out to the top X bidders?
No. If all 52 slots aren't filled, there will just be fewer slots, and every ad will get more pageviews. |
|
|
|
|
There are no other claims?
|
|
|
|
|
2 usagi
2 Akemashite Omedetou
1 cablepair
.88 Pirate Cove
.77 Garr255
.5 xchrix
.42 jga
.4 tgmarks
.3 slush
.3 wmx.support
.25 wmXchange
.25 mc_lovin
.2 Luceo
.2 Grix
.17 OneVillain
.15 Cryptostocks
.14 Kumala
.11 kakobrekla
.1 TangibleCryptography
.1 edd
.1 CoinLab
.07 FreeMoney
.06 Goat
.05 Inaba
.05 rate5
.05 boonies4u
|
|
|
|
What is a signature operation? A transaction? Or is it related to the block hash?
Every CHECKSIG-like script op increases the number of signature operations (sigops) by a certain amount. So: - A standard transaction has one or two sigops - A sendmany transaction has one sigop for each recipient and perhaps one additional sigop - A transaction using multisig counts as 20 sigops per "multisig arrangement" unless you're using P2SH, in which case each public key involved in the multisig counts as one sigop. |
|
|
|
|
The rule that a block may not contain more than 20,000 signature operations. Satoshi was concerned that if this rule change was publicly known, someone would try to make some really expensive blocks before the new rule was scheduled to take effect. However, nowadays a rule change such as this would be very controversial, and this particular rule might cause problems in the future because the limit is quite low.
|
|
|
|
No actually, it's not.
There's your bias right there.
You really think that a foundation with $200,000+ in funding and the support of MtGox, Gavin, BitInstant, etc. will be unimportant to the Bitcoin ecosystem? I wonder why so many people are arguing so vehemently about it, then... If someone else had made one, not Mt. Gox, I doubt it would have stood there.
Possibly true. It is important because it has the backing of several big players. |
|
|
|
|
I don't think it was edited by a moderator.
|
|
|
|
|
The Foundation is very important to the Bitcoin ecosystem, so its main thread should exist in Bitcoin Discussion.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
