Umm... WTF?









For everything else, there's NFS. Don't leave the network without it.

The number of eight digits shall not be counted, unless proceeding directly to nine digits.

Buying.

Maths is hard.

Try not eating so much of it.

nvm. HM beat me to it.

Indeed.

I have never said (at least as far as I can recall) that BCH is BTC.

And inasmuch as the BCH protocol is a more faithful rendition of the protocol that Satoshi left us with than is BTC, and inasmuch as BCH is more faithful to the Bitcoin white paper (i.e., the actual encoded definition of what it is for something to be Bitcoin, and as encoded by its creator, at that) than is BTC, I at least have a principled leg to stand upon in stating that BCH is Bitcoin.

All you have buttressing any supposed claim of BTC upon that title is popularity. Which can flip on a dime. IOW, no objective basis for the claim.
Well, other than the facts that BTC is SHA256 PoW, and that the BTC chain traces directly back to the Satoshi genesis block.
Which, to belabor the obvious, are not properties exclusively claimed by BTC.

---

This is rich:

'kick my door down'? What is this metaphorical door of which you speak? 'drag him off'? You realize this is not a physical encounter we are having here, right? (I mean, I guess you could try...) 'forking prison'? What is this mythical place? Where be it? What are its (presumably nasty, brutish, and short) attributes? 'censor him'? Go ahead and try, junior. I am secure in my convictions. I stand by my statements, and have nothing to fear by you calling attention to them. Indeed, such will only serve to buttress my arguments. As such, I have nothing to 'lose' by any attempts you make to 'trash' my 'reputation'. Even to any extent that you may think yourself 'successful' to that end.

Incidentally, you sound like a third-grader in that outburst.

---

How magnanimous of you </sarc> We've already seen how unreasonable your 'reasonable' can be.

Though I guess I should be ecstatic you're donning a public veneer of fairness. Woo-hoo! Here - have a merit. The forum doesn't support me awarding you 1/2016 of a merit.

---

No.


No.


No.


No to the noth power.


Indeed. I have committed the tallest unspeakable blasphemies against the high priests and priestesses of the only true religion of BTC. For this, I must be simultaneously drawn and quartered, and burned at the stake. Lest Satoshi himself rain down unimaginable retribution and pestilence against those of insufficient zealotry and misguided mercy.

Maybe. Bernie thinks all it takes for unlimited resources to materialize is for gubmint to decree it to be so. In his mind, costs and production do not exist.

I think the majority of Americans understand that resources are not magic fairy dust that can be conjured out of nothing.

At least I hope so.

What do you think?

The shrieking hordes of belligerent brigading baboons have descended upon me. In blathering rictus of righteous indignation. Because I don't subscribe to their particular sect of the Bitcoin religion.

Nullius even went so far as to post a quote of my quote of Dr. Back's own words as proof that I am a liar. It beggars the imagination. Please follow this if not immediately apparent: I posted verifiable truth, so nullius claims that makes me a liar.

I won't bother a point-by-point. Indeed, I expect chickenshit nullius will delete this post as well in this self-moderated thread. But for as long as it remains up, I suggest the reader go over the items attributed to me above, and ask themselves if these are, or are not actual lies. The reader may also wish to ponder the reason that -- in this thread purportedly purposed with portraying me as phraudulent -- the vast majority of verbiage is not mine, but rather nullius' commentary thereof.

FTFY.

It might work better. Might not.

Another alternative would be to tear down the market distorting regulations that serve nothing but entrenched interests. That might work better, too. Plus, it would have the benefit of being a more moral system, as it would not be predicated upon coercion.


Aye. In either stated alternative.


None come to mind.

Simple. Medicine in the US is a semi-socialized, government-market-distorted clusterfuck that has nothing whatsoever to do with capitalism.

Hell, I chortled. You earned it fair and square on that one.

WO statistics are page count parity and post count parity. Word count parity ain't a thing.

I am richie rich. <joeyvoice> howYouDoin'? </joeyvoice>

I really wanted a Tesla to work for me. But my daily driver of 21 years was a full-size van. Went and looked at the nearest dealership (over an hour away, FFS). Even the X was too small by a large margin.

Ended up with a Denali instead.

To add insult to injury, GMC recently pre-announced a 1000HP Hummer-branded EV. Maybe shoulda waited? Time will tell.

You probably already do.

Well, I guess you could be driving a 1966 Ford Galaxie 500. There must be at least three of those still running somewhere.

Unless something changed recently, you can't do low-latency (i.e., usable) multitrack recording on Android.

Two in a row - you're swinging for the fences today! (<- semi-obligatory tip of the baseball cap to Jimbo's frankly incomprehensible obsession)

Distilled essence of recent Wuhan dead?

Gawd help me for replying....

So you sent me to a particular video in order to 'enlighten' me. The video you sent me to concluded with a decoding of Legarde's numerobasbblespeak saying that a Global Currency Reset is going to happen on 2014 Jul 20. Which obviously did not happen. Surprise. Not.

So now you are saying that the video you recommended contained a false conclusion? Then why use it to buttress your point to begin with?

Question 2: Just so we're clear - are you now claiming that a Global Currency Reset is going to happen on 2021 Jul 20?

And if seven is so special, the why is your nic not uranus7?

OK, that last question was tongue in cheek - no need to answer that one.