those kinds of BTC price fluctuations (whether fake outs or not) did not trigger any of my BTC sell orders or my BTC buy orders, so my amount of BTC stayed the same, so the value of my BTC stayed the same, too when the price moved up and down.
I think I see the problem. |
|
|
|
BSVtards whole fucking shitcoin is based on the lies of Craig.
Well, no. BSV is based upon the original Bitcoin protocol. Before 'devs gotta dev' set in, and arguably fucked the whole thing up. |
|
|
|
Tower of Belém Lisbon, Portugal Dang. Solved in five whole minutes. Respect, Pamoldar.  So close and now going to the goods of Belgium ? Already moved on. Perhaps another trip, micgoossens. |
|
|
|
Tower of Belém Lisbon, Portugal Dang. Solved in five whole minutes. Respect, Pamoldar. |
|
|
|
WO Where was I?  |
|
|
|
Well, except for the fact that my work product underlies literally over ninety-five percent of the world's computing infrastructure. At any scale.
LOL baiting you into exposing yourself as a virtue signaling ass is always so easy. Umm hmmm... And what exactly is your contribution to society, nutildah? Intelligent people eventually learn their place. What are you, like twelve years old? |
|
|
|
Well, except for the fact that my work product underlies literally over ninety-five percent of the world's computing infrastructure. At any scale.
You work in a quarry? That would be undermining. WTF is SCNR? |
|
|
|
awww..... you sound so salty.
numbnutz.
Great rebuttal. Where would we be without your contributions to society jbreher? Either exactly in the same place or else possibly better off, is my guess. Well, except for the fact that my work product underlies literally over ninety-five percent of the world's computing infrastructure. At any scale. And your contribution to society is...? Of course, the fact that you do not understand the difference between a protocol and a software instantiation thereof speaks volumes in itself. |
|
|
|
Anyone interested to answer this stupid? But... in the crypto world, they are possible. Take for example bitcoin. People are paying thousands or even million times more for bitcoin than for some altcoins, even though these coins have the same or better utility than bitcoin. Meaning, the same as bitcoin these coins can be transferred easily, fastly, cheaply, safely and transparently to someone. Such coins can be bought for as low as $0.001. Why people in the crypto world pay millions time more for the same thing? Why they behave so irrationally?
Nope. Highly opinionated self righteous noobs can learn from their own damned mistakes. |
|
|
|
Your assertion seems inaccurate to me. Let us follow the thread backwards to this point: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4985868.msg53112807#msg53112807hv_ spake thusly: My advice: Look into the Version 0.1
Set in Stone.
No - there is no Change needed that enables anything new here in protocol level
Note the use of _protocol_. To which BitcoinFX replied: Quite clearly talking about _implementation_. So you're implying that 0.1 isn't an implementation of the protocol but 0.2 and 0.3 are? I’m not implying anything. I am explicitly stating that the client version 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 are all implementations of client code that run the same version of the same protocol. |
|
|
|
...free-to-spend coins in the legacy (pre-SegWit) blockchain...
This is pretty old big blocker FUD. If this would be a real issue, why is there a segwit address with 190000 bitcoin? 35hK24tcLEWcgNA4JxpvbkNkoAcDGqQPsP Are the miners stupid or why don't they grab these AnyOneCanSpend bitcoin? Because they are not stupid. Because it only works once. Because tomorrow, there will be 19000+x BTC in segwit addresses. |
|
|
|
Guys, I've been reading this crazy stuff posted by someone called "Shelby Moore" (whose messages were recently re-posted in the WO thread by user THX 1138), about how all coins held in SegWit addresses will be donated to miners, as they are free-to-spend coins in the legacy (pre-SegWit) blockchain, and only the coins held in legacy addresses will stay intact and belonging to their owners (private key holders).
It is technically possible. Indisputably. Is it likely? Who knows? Then again, we've been discussing this possibility (i.e., sounding this alarm) since before segwit activated. It ain't new knowledge. Well, Shelby's affixing a date to it is more recent. But this vulnerability has been known from the beginning. Me? Yes, I do worry about it. OTOH, less than 1% of my BTC has any segwit anywhere in their current or past. And this possibility is but one reason for this. |
|
|
|
Satoshi released the Bitcoin client up to 0.3.19
You seem to be confusing implementation with protocol. Again. Completely irrelevant. What your illiterate fellow cult member was inferring was that Satoshi's last version of Bitcoin was 0.1, which is simply not true. Focusing on 0.1 as if it were the end-all version of Bitcoin is just a talking point used by Craig, and nothing more. Your assertion seems inaccurate to me. Let us follow the thread backwards to this point: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4985868.msg53112807#msg53112807hv_ spake thusly: My advice: Look into the Version 0.1
Set in Stone.
No - there is no Change needed that enables anything new here in protocol level
Note the use of _protocol_. To which BitcoinFX replied: Quite clearly talking about _implementation_. |
|
|
|
#BITCOIN BLOCK REWARDS WILL BE JUST 1 SATOSHI BY 2140
Ummm... duh? Not like we've not known that since like genesis. We’ll all be dead by 2140
Nonsense. We're Bitcoiners. We have the resources to buy another century or two. |
|
|
|
Satoshi released the Bitcoin client up to 0.3.19
You seem to be confusing implementation with protocol. Again. |
|
|
|
OK boomer.
Is that supposed to be some cutting pejorative? |
|
|
|
According to new IRS rulemaking, coins are received when they are manifest on the blockchain. Don’t move your coins to the new blockchain, ergo you have not received them, ergo no tax due.
Unless of course you want to claim them. That’s a problem of your own making.
I’m amazed that you don’t comprehend how a hard fork airdrop works. I know perfectly well how a hardfork airdrop works, tyvm. I'm amazed you are seemingly relying upon colloquial definitions of words, in the context where the IRS has very specifically defined them. Have you read the actual ruling? https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rr-19-24.pdf"A hard fork occurs when a cryptocurrency undergoes a protocol change resulting in a permanent diversion from the legacy distributed ledger. This may result in the creation of a new cryptocurrency on a new distributed ledger in addition to the legacy cryptocurrency on the legacy distributed ledger. If your cryptocurrency went through a hard fork, but you did not receive any new cryptocurrency, whether through an airdrop (a distribution of cryptocurrency to multiple taxpayers’ distributed ledger addresses) or some other kind of transfer, you don’t have taxable income." (from the associated IRS FAQ, emphasis added) |
|
|
|
I can't make you understand that hearsay is only bad when applied to court room trials.
Absolutely. Because it is not true. You accused a person of nefarious behavior without evidence of such. Kicking s person when they are down is playground bully behavior, and should be discouraged. Period. The definition of "hearsay" isn't something that "is not true"; its something that isn't adequately substantiated. I provided you a chain of links with substantiating evidence, but if that's not adequate for you, again, that's out of my control. Also, who did I kick when they were down? You or the guy who "lost" their coins? If them, I assure you they didn't feel it. Where do you get the idea that I think the definition of hearsay is something that is not true? You accused the person of nefarious behavior, with zero evidence to that effect. |
|
|
|
I can't make you understand that hearsay is only bad when applied to court room trials.
Absolutely. Because it is not true. You accused a person of nefarious behavior without evidence of such. Kicking s person when they are down is playground bully behavior, and should be discouraged. Period. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
