OK. But of course, Ayre runs SQR, which uses Samsung to fab their ASICs directly.

Yes, but currently over 5% more profitable to mine. Which would tend to narrow the gap.

Oh - and it is over 2500x more expensive to transact on BTC than on SV. But who cares about that, right?

(source: coin.dance)

Craig forced his own hand on this one. Ought to be a doozy.

AreYouNotEntertained.png

None of your numbered points concern SV the chain or SV the coin. Merely a couple of people associated with SV.

You so freeking sure there are no unsavory characters in your favorite chain?

Funny. Last time you posted that accusation, I challenged you to find the original from which I was copying. You never provided any such evidence, did you. Lying motherfucking pea-brained asshole.

Up over 85% on the week. Tanking. Unh hunh.

My arguments are most strongly about the folly of intentionally crippling tx capacity. Appeal to authority has nothing to do with it.

I think you're out in the weeds, but I'm not sure I understand what you are trying to convey. The only link from what to SV?

Hawaii and Puerto Rico each seem to have more than 8 varieties of Spam that you can't fund find anywhere else.

Haha. Somebody check my archive.

I have already stated -- multiple times -- I think it unlikely.

Though I would not be altogether astonished beyond belief if conclusive proof is eventually surfaced.

My first visit to Japan, co-workers took me out for a proper night of Japanese co-worker carousing. Was enjoying plenty yummy foods, along with the free-flowing beers, sakes, and highballs. I think they got on a wink-wink tack of 'freak out the foreigner'. Food got odder and odder. No problem. At horse sushi, several others begged off.

Wasn't bad at all. Must have been colt.

Only if she swallows.









(yes, I knew you were fishing for that obvious response)

My daughter-in-law is a kosher vegetarian. With the sole exception of being a bacon fanatic.

I swear to Yehovah.

I like my Lightlife Smart Bacon in Bacon Style.  

Funny. Shelby had been copying me in PM on most of the recent traffic, yet neglected to include me in this one. Whatevs.

That said, it is a reasonable point. However, it kind of flies in the face of the probability that Satoshi -- whomever he/she/they may be -- likely has ownership of something on the order of 1Million BTC, BCH, BSV, BTG, etc... Exercised or not, the option remains a locus of centralization.

Nevermind the fact the Shelby has from time to time reversed tack on things he was adamant were settled gospel. I respect him, his intellect, and his reasoning skills. But I gotta go with what I see, not outsource my vision to others.

Lastly, that bon mot was just a devil's advocate response to vapourminer's flight of fancy.

I am not adamant that Craig is Satoshi. I am adamant that Satoshi is Satoshi. But who Satoshi is, is irrelevant from the standpoint of what a Satoshi might plausibly due to 'rescue' his design. Which of course bears directly upon the hypothetical to which I am responding.

Why would he 'fix' the fork that abandoned his principles (i.e., BCH), when there is a fork that carries his principles forward into the current in its current instantiation (i.e., SV)? The notion seems absurd to me.

Yes, and debatable. If Satoshi thought these could have been reversed before such time as they became economically interesting (certainly we have evidence that he did as far as the blocksize cap is concerned), then they are arguably not protocol changes.

But that's not really what you had in mind with your 'that had bugs, needed feedback', is it?

Well, they're a Necessary Thing. For LN, anyhoo. For everything else, there's Bitcoin.

You keep conflating my reasoned analysis of protocols with a support of personalities associated with those protocols. Please learn to discern the difference.