Thanks for this thread guys! I was reviewing Arbitao and did not have a good feeling even though the site and WP looked good at first glance! This thread really helped me stay away from this platform! Thanks!
When one searches for arbitao on Google, this thread is on first page. I have seen that they are trying to push it to next page by adding new pages on other websites.
I do not know how much of harm can this do to the project but if I was an investor and saw this thread through Google, I would have left this at the same moment. I feel bad for people who will fall for this because of other promotions.
Actually they added new bounty program.
This is only place on internet where it is mentioned arbitao is scam. I don't know what people expect to see after ICO, magically getting rich over night without doing anything?  Arbitao promised to return here to address Big Ben and other concerns depicting them as a bona fide scam. To date, crickets in spite of them logging into this forum. When looking at the website, all links to social media worked except for the link to Bitcointalk...I wonder why?!?  I was about to pen the same thing along with their Telegram is going crazy blasting dribble to their 360+ subscribers, none of which can enter the dialog --> https://t.me/arbitao |
|
|
|
and you you have any bonus for invest during the ICO?
Yes, but not as lucrative as the bonuses outlined in the OP during our Pre-ICO where PAQs are offered at the base price point of U$10 each, whereupon they'll be offered during our ICO at no less than the base price point of U$25 each, still a generous offering to those who missed the Pre-ICO offering and cheaper than they'll be down the pike, reaching a maximum selling price point of U$500 each which'll take longer to ROI (~70 days). |
|
|
|
No, it's really not. He took out a loan, defaulted with no intention to pay it back
I disagree with this part. I do think he did have an intention to pay the loan, but had issues with getting more money. The partial repayment he made was equal to $250, but the value of BTC had more than doubled. Exactly, and thank you kindly, bud. I repaid the principle in full according to fiat but not according to BTC, thus assuring that DS wasn't out any real money (not meant as a diss toward crypto, of course). Again, to be clear, hilariousetc's PRIVATE PM to me was sound, whereupon I immediately chilled, opting to post said sentiment publicly while quoting him, with apologies, again, for doing such. |
|
|
|
 "Hal, Bruno didn't do anything wrong." "Yeah, he did." "So, this is how it's done inside a BCT courtroom."I was about to post the above when hilariousetc posted, hence the below sentiment, the above reflecting me moving on and accepting my error.
Heeded, and thanks for the reply. I'm not the bad guy either, bud. I promise to chill.
Bruno
I don't think you understand the concept of a private message. They're called private messages for a reason. If I wanted to post it publicly I would have. And good guys don't sell their accounts and act like petulant children threatening all kinds of nonsense when they get called out for their shady behaviour. @h&co / SM : at this point, i think a neutral trust is more relevant than - or + ones (until a solid proof is given).
No, it's really not. He took out a loan, defaulted with no intention to pay it back, and then tried to sell his other Gleb account. This isn't disputed. He's admitted it and the proof has already been posted: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4476580.msg40196552#msg40196552Let me get this fuckin shit right. With motherfuckin apologies for posting your private PM, a couple hours ago, I publicly echoed your sentiment and was ending this episode upon seeing where I fucked up on more than one level. Now you come here to restick it up my fuckin ass. GODDAMN RIGHT I'M FUCKIN PISSED RIGHT NOW. I was cool as a cucumber until you posted the above, ready to move on. And where the fuck was your noble ass when the user posted a private PM depicting that it was the Gleb account that was for sale? And where the fuck is his tag for attempting to purchase accounts? GET THE FUCK OUTTA MY FACE. And how many accounts do you maintain to entrap sellers and buyers of accounts so to advance your fuckin cred? Seriously, dude, I was moving on from this episode. Now that you've opened up my asshole anew, please don't feel like you have to be gentle in sticking your fuckin dick up by ass. GODDAMN IT AM I FUCKIN PISSED RIGHT NOW. |
|
|
|
Hello,
Been made aware of this through a friend. Is there any offers currently going if I invested $200?
Thank you
Yes, there is a 10% premium, thus 22 PAQs opposed to 20 PAQs at U$10 each. Thanks kindly for you interest, bud. Meanwhile, out Telegram is up where Team members discuss stuff: https://t.me/YuTuYapBruno Just waiting on funds clearing on my exchange. Excited to get involved here. Any plans to get some videos on YouTube for us all to share around? Thanks kindly for your anticipated support, bud. Producing a vid is on the short list for tasks needing completion in advancing the cause. While it still in pre-ico period, I think it would be great if there are some bounty campaign held.
A campaign could help to promote the project to get known by more investors.
Noted. Do you have a softcap during the preico? what is it your softcap if you have one?
No definitive softcap set in stone. |
|
|
|
Replying publicly to the following PM ...
Dude, I'm tired and do see where I fucked up upon review in re posting off-topic. I'll lock this and start anew tomorrow [this was in reference to another thread, NOT this one].
Bruno
Maybe get some sleep instead of staying up all night trying to desperately find dirt where there is none. The simple matter of the fact is you fucked up by trying to sell your account along with its reputation to the highest bidder whether you want to admit it or not. Any good you may have done is now invalidated because of that and I'm only looking to protect the community. If you could look at this rationally you would see what a shady thing that is. Anyone could have used your accounts for any sort of illicit behaviour and that would have been your fault. You should have just admitted the mistake you made in trying to sell the account and you might have been able to change people's minds about the whole thing but you're just making things much worse for yourself. The only reason your account isn't painted red by dozens of people right now is because they're scared of you and the dirt you may dig up on them and they know it isn't worth the hassle. Well, I don't have anything to hide and don't back down to bullies and threats, but feel free to waste time on this. Again, please read the rules: If I wanted to be a dick you would have been banned long ago, but I've given you several notifications now of things you have been banned for in the past and that is more than any other mod would have done. I'm not the bad guy here. Rules: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0Heeded, and thanks for the reply. I'm not the bad guy either, bud. I promise to chill. Bruno |
|
|
|
Please enlighten me as to how it's off topic when the subject is that your sig pertains to a site deemed a scam by others that I'm advancing? The thread is about who deleted the Stake thread and for whatever reasons. It's not for anything at all that vaguely relates to stake, and especially not for baseless accusations and wild goose chases. Open up another thread in the correct section if you want to do that but it certainly doesn't belong in here or in Meta. And no, you obviously can't repost a deleted off topic post. So, if I post that such-and-such is a scam and should be tagged by the mods and it's deleted, then I'm forbidden in ever posting such sentiment ever again? That don't seem fair at all. Exactly where I can read such rule that you cited? No, but post it in the right thread. Posting "I like Persian Cats" in what sort of dogs do you like? thread is off topic, but not in a what sort of cats do you like? thread. Post it there, not here and off topic. Dude, I'm tired and do see where I fucked up upon review in re posting off-topic. I'll lock this and start anew tomorrow. Bruno |
|
|
|
I would like to present my own conspiracy theory, our Godless P & S mod has tried to endorse a total scam ICO ran by OP's alt YuTü.Co.in. what is more interesting is the fact that FHF suddenly became interested in joining signature campaigns and suddenly started endorsing a desperate attempt at scamming unsuspected forum members. they are using the "staff" tag under their names left and right to line their own pockets, engaging in account sales, PMing forum members to take part in their scam ass ICO and they think that we're some village idiots.
Enough is enough, suchmoon is also in cahoots with OP and she has tried to help this scammer multiple times. these cartel-like activities must end.
Now on topic, if you have questions, ask them and wait for your answers, when a global mod gives you the answers if you are not satisfied you could PM an admin to ask for more detailed explanation. I would also like to mention that wearing a signature doesn't mean they are endorsing the product or site.
Further more I'd like to point to the fact that OP is an account seller, their alts are: Gleb, YuTü.Co.in, AGLD and more.
Thanks for your wonderful insight, bud. Now comment on my last post above yours or is that too much for your pee brain to absorb? |
|
|
|
But how do we know for sure that Jeff Ownby and Sonny Vleisides of BFL fame are not behind Stake.com? Recall, the general consensus by others on this forum is that the scammer tag thingy was replaced by the trust thingy so to favor BFL. And all them red trusts given to scammers on this forum are NOT indexed by Google, so nobody outside can see them unless they sign up/login. How do we know it isn't operated by Satohsi and I'm the Queen of England? None of this has anything to do with this thread. Open up another if you want to invent conspiracies up or throw shit at a wall to see what sticks. This is the third time I've told you about this now. Please read the rules. That post and reposting it here is completely off topic and there's no good reason to double post and using another known alt account doesn't make it ok either. You've been banned numerous times for trolling, off topic postings and double/triple posting before but it's funny how these have slipped your mind (and none of those bans I had anything to do with before you get any conspiracy theories) but yet you continue. You'll be the one hysterically crying even more conspiracy theories when you get banned yet again for the same behaviour. Not sure how many warnings you need. Please keep it on topic. Thanks. My posts were on-topic, adding the deleted posts on both instances as an extra. Am I not allowed to do that? No, they weren't on topic, not to mention they were all double posts. And no, you obviously can't repost a deleted off topic post. Speaking of not allowing shit, this ... It is not allowed to post somebody's personal information in any other public place, including in signatures. I was 100% doxxed my Josh Zerlan, hence having all my vitals revealed, but nothing was even done in spite of trying to stop the action, thus embracing the dox, hence continuing to display my SSN, DLN, etc. When the smoke cleared, the cocksucker, Josh Zerlan, successfully had a restraining order put on my ass for stalking him, I being the ONLY person involved in the BFL fiasco to be convicted. Go figure. You can report them and they'll be removed or moved to the investigations board. The doxxing rule is fairly new or at least was probably implemented long after your incident. No, I don't see how the plot thickens. Does you making a post that mentions Zipkin or BFL or whoever mean anything and thereof must be investigated? But please, go ahead. I've always enjoyed reading your posts because they're insanely entertaining at least (emphasis on insane), but again, this is completely off topic. Open up a new thread if you want to go on wild goose chases whilst clutching at invisible straws. Thanks. <more was added to the post you quoted, with apologies, for I didn't want to start a new post so to abide by the not posting back-to-back rule which I concur is valid and wanted to stay within compliance in that regard> Meanwhile, the plot thickens ... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=475397.msg5576956#msg5576956https://www.linkedin.com/in/jeffownby/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg9192526#msg9192526"The following domains are in Jeff Ownby's control." Please enlighten me as to how it's off topic when the subject is that your sig pertains to a site deemed a scam by others that I'm advancing? Further, in re ... And no, you obviously can't repost a deleted off topic post. So, if I post that such-and-such is a scam and should be tagged by the mods and it's deleted, then I'm forbidden in ever posting such sentiment ever again? That don't seem fair at all. Exactly where I can read such rule that you cited?
Wait, there's more ... Upon further investigating, there's probably no connection between Jeff Ownby and Mr. Micro, but I found something even more interesting worthy of red trust ... Please pay close attention, for this is some complicated shit ... Micro posted his address here ... King mrbitty 1GyDQ3npFsa72Ute6bXm3wen7U1GEFfpF4
Micro also posted the following ... Micro is so lucky. Everybody clap for Micro. Get the popcorn ready, for shit is about to hit the fan ... Remember that address above? Well ... https://mobile.twitter.com/BTCMICRO/status/447067656516952064https://twitter.com/BTCMICROTo be clear, the topic is why your sig contains an assumed scam site and I've demonstrated that the person behind the site 100% lied as to his connection to PrimeDice aka Stake.com, thus deserves being red tagged and you removing their sig unless, that is, you delete this post under the fucked up auspices that I'm off-topic, thus forbidding me to bringing this subject up ever again by the rule you cited which I'm still waiting for verification. Your move! Ain't this a fun game? |
|
|
|
Just to toss an objective opinion out there: there are bound to be results for every "[casino] scam" google search so there's no point in really trying to put that on blast. The games are provably fair and the site pays out. Also, a lot of the results I'm seeing are crypto sites. Plus, when you get golden sites saying that Stake is a ponzi scheme, I think a lot of these criticisms should be taken with a grain heap of salt. This is, however, not to say that Stake is absolutely legitimate.
But how do we know for sure that Jeff Ownby and Sonny Vleisides of BFL fame are not behind Stake.com? Recall, the general consensus by others on this forum is that the scammer tag thingy was replaced by the trust thingy so to favor BFL. And all them red trusts given to scammers on this forum are NOT indexed by Google, so nobody outside can see them unless they sign up/login. This is the third time I've told you about this now. Please read the rules. That post and reposting it here is completely off topic and there's no good reason to double post and using another known alt account doesn't make it ok either. You've been banned numerous times for trolling, off topic postings and double/triple posting before but it's funny how these have slipped your mind (and none of those bans I had anything to do with before you get any conspiracy theories) but yet you continue. You'll be the one hysterically crying even more conspiracy theories when you get banned yet again for the same behaviour. Not sure how many warnings you need. Please keep it on topic. Thanks. My posts were on-topic, adding the deleted posts on both instances as an extra. Am I not allowed to do that? Speaking of not allowing shit, this ... It is not allowed to post somebody's personal information in any other public place, including in signatures. I was 100% doxxed my Josh Zerlan, hence having all my vitals revealed, but nothing was even done in spite of trying to stop the action, thus embracing the dox, hence continuing to display my SSN, DLN, etc. When the smoke cleared, the cocksucker, Josh Zerlan, successfully had a restraining order put on my ass for stalking him, I being the ONLY person involved in the BFL fiasco to be convicted. Go figure. PS: To be fair, I appreciate the warning of double/triple posting. Seriously, not satire. I'll improve in that regard. PSS: I just remember about the time Josh Zipkin threaten to kill me and that even made the rounds on periodicals, but he wasn't banned. Meanwhile, the plot thickens ... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=475397.msg5576956#msg5576956https://www.linkedin.com/in/jeffownby/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=150803.msg9192526#msg9192526"The following domains are in Jeff Ownby's control." |
|
|
|
So where's the archive of the posts that were deleted? And who put a bug in your ear that a witch hunt was underway? In the trashcan, which any member of staff can see. So, prey tell why you promote an entity that even those that aren't versed in crypto consider it a scam? Proof: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=%22stake.com%22+scamBTW, thanks for deleting the following post of mine. You're the man! A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted. I'm sure you're about to tag it given that nothing gets past you. Probably because every post by the OP in it has been edited to: Remove thread thanks.
Dude, please don't introduce logic into this thread.  <highlighted so that H & Co. doesn't miss it> Further, why are US citizens playing on the site when it's supposedly locked to US players? |
|
|
|
Probably because every post by the OP in it has been edited to: Remove thread thanks.
And I don't believe I trashed it, but good luck on your witch hunt. So where's the archive of the posts that were deleted? And who put a bug in your ear that a witch hunt was underway?  "From the grave, I see popcorn futures rising in spite of the Trade War." |
|
|
|
DarkStar_ tagged Gleb account because the Gage account was the collateral so he knew if he were to tag Gage account then there goes the collateral, you are also asking for negative feedbacks to be removed now for a few times because Gleb is in your hands and as long as it has negative trust it wont worth a buck.
You are trying to side with an account seller while you have been against such behavior yourself.
I mean, I could have tagged the Gage account. It was pointless though, given that it was in my posession and it has not been touched for over a year at that point. I had no intention of selling it either. Do you really think suchmoon is trying to get the negatives removed to resell the account? That seems really pointless. I want to go on record and state that I don't have one iota of a problem with DarkStar. I 100% trust him. <not sarcasm> |
|
|
|
As the Worldcoin ecosystem grows, more and more people are starting to become involved. We have decided, after much deliberation, to reveal our identities to demonstrate our level of professional commitment and personal involvement with the future of Worldcoin. By making Worldcoin Foundation's activities more transparent, we hope to foster trust in the community and promote investor confidence. With this announcement, we would also like to introduce our new website -- completely redone with new branding more closely aligned with the goals of the Foundation. We have also grown our Board from three members to four, and with that, we'd like to welcome Jonas Borchgrevink to the Board. Google Garza's old pal, Jonas Borchgrevink, to what he's up to of late. He's jacking off all over himself over EOS. Surprised he still has any jeez left after spending most of it on WorldCoin. |
|
|
|
When one searches for arbitao on Google, this thread is on first page. I have seen that they are trying to push it to next page by adding new pages on other websites.
I do not know how much of harm can this do to the project but if I was an investor and saw this thread through Google, I would have left this at the same moment. I feel bad for people who will fall for this because of other promotions.
Actually they added new bounty program.
This is only place on internet where it is mentioned arbitao is scam. I don't know what people expect to see after ICO, magically getting rich over night without doing anything? Arbitao promised to return here to address Big Ben and other concerns depicting them as a bona fide scam. To date, crickets in spite of them logging into this forum. |
|
|
|
Dude, I'm tryin' to trick him in answering my questions. Luckily for us he's slow, thus 99% certain he'll still be tricked.
How did you like my second trust thingy review?
You're not helping your case LOL Sure I am. H & Co. needs to be proven that I'm the same character he's known and loved all these years. Nobody else on the planet would be able to accomplish said feat but the RealBruno. PS: I just noticed that this thread was moved to reputation. GULP! More ammo for them naysayers, declaring that the RealBruno would've noticed that when said was accomplished. |
|
|
|
The loan is no longer in default. Which part of this do you find hard to understand? Repaid. Done. Gone. If that's a bad thing then I should be tagged and not Bruno. I can't tag myself though so I'll at least counter Bruno's tags. But don't let logic get in the way of a good rant. Well of course you can't see anything you don't like, the tag on Gleb's accounts is not just for unpaid loans, they're to warn people for his untrustworthy behavior such as selling accounts and also defaulting on loans without having the intention of paying them back which could be considered as selling accounts in disguise. now that you refuse to understand this situation I should tag your sorry ass twice right? Yet no sale or default occurred, which is my opinion stated in my ratings. Tag me as many times as you want. Dude, I'm tryin' to trick him in answering my questions. Luckily for us he's slow, thus 99% certain he'll still be tricked. How did you like my second trust thingy review? |
|
|
|
Amazingly, Investards' memory is shorter than my Lithuanian dick. |
|
|
|
The loan is no longer in default. Which part of this do you find hard to understand? Repaid. Done. Gone. If that's a bad thing then I should be tagged and not Bruno. I can't tag myself though so I'll at least counter Bruno's tags. But don't let logic get in the way of a good rant. Well of course you can't see anything you don't like, the tag on Gleb's accounts is not just for unpaid loans, they're to warn people for his untrustworthy behavior such as selling accounts and also defaulting on loans without having the intention of paying them back which could be considered as selling accounts in disguise. now that you refuse to understand this situation I should tag your sorry ass twice right? Boy, these people are slow. Again, which accounts were sold? For the life of me, I have no records of such. Further, which loan was defaulted on on which account that had no attention of repaying back a loan? These are very simple questions seeking simple answers. Caution: I may be trying to trick you to answer. |
|
|
|
Suchmoon is a trust abuser and is constantly misusing the trust system, she has also tagged me twice with one reference
I tagged you the second time because you refused to read the first reference so I put the context into the feedback itself. Suchmoon first pays a loan on behalf of Gleb and then counters a negative feedback on Gleb's alt account to say that loan was paid, YuTü.Co.in account has done nothing to deserve a counter rating therefore suchmoon felt that since she paid the loan she has now the right to counter a valid negative trust.
The loan is no longer in default. Which part of this do you find hard to understand? Repaid. Done. Gone. If that's a bad thing then I should be tagged and not Bruno. I can't tag myself though so I'll at least counter Bruno's tags. But don't let logic get in the way of a good rant. Hey, can I tag you for interfering with my scam? Okay, it was suggested that I sign an address associated with me, but I replied that I don't think I can do that via blockchain.info where I've generated addressed for the past several years. He provided me this link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2534452.0. Upon review, I think I can now accomplish said task. Please state which address you wish me to sign so that we can once and for all close this episode. Bruno You don't seem to get it. He clearly stated he isn't trusting you no matter who you are now. You don't need to convince anyone. Now start insulting me, it's been a while.  I'll go one better, buddy. See your trust thingy.  Yep, I'm gonna to learnt to love the trust thingy. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
. So tnx PrimeDice for this great birthday present 
