*********** THIS IS A PONZI and you may lose your "investment" ***********************
You have been warned.
This "warning" is worthless if you mention in your thread title "(Profit 0.0009BTC guarantee)". I'd suggest you to adjust the title of this thread, as it is heavily misleading. |
|
|
|
-snip-
gonna steal that for the known alts thread. Nice catch you made there. |
|
|
|
Maybe negative feedback was not needed.
Maybe. But then again, there's the way this guy reacts. I don't care about the retaliation feedback to my account, but that he left a negative feedback to The Pharmacist: Shut up Just for this post: Pfffffft. Lock this up dude, the only thing you're getting here is the Sherman Williams treatment which it looks like you already got. Your account isn't worth anything and you're offering 100% interest? Yeah right, my fat black ass.
Oh come on, man. |
|
|
|
|
Your account is literally worthless. All your posts are spam, and even before I left you a feedback, there is no way it would be worth 0.01BTC.
Then there's the fact that you offer 100% interests on a 2 week loan. That seems "too good to be true".
Combining those two together, I think you don't plan to repay any loan you get, you only try to trash your account with a maximum of profit.
P.S.: Thanks for the retaliation feedback (those seem to be trending on me right now).
|
|
|
|
I did not see those two messages until after the deed was done. I apologized for it.
No, what you did was selling your credibility for even the smallest financial gain (in that case 0.004 BTC). Even without those two warning posts, you should have known that what you were doing was wrong. And yet, till today, you seem not to understand it (not even a little), and that's the reason why now, even 6 months later, I don't think you're trustworthy. |
|
|
|
And how do I act? -snip-
Besides retaliating? Well, lets see: I have done nothing seriously wrong. neither of my accounts have done anything wrong nothing has been done that has been wrong/immoral. And don't act all "I didn't know what I was doing", there were clear warnings within the first responses of the thread: Trust is earned, not bought and it can't be forced. Farming trust and reputation will only end badly, and your best bet is to re-evaluate. Rep loans are frowned upon here, as ou can see you have been given negative trust. you need collateral and a reason to take a loan And then, there are your own words: I think rep loans are bad, for the possibility of scam, correct, but the fact that you get immediately flagged for participating? Also worth mentioning is that the guy you gave a feedback after that rep loan later tried to run a ponzi. |
|
|
|
I have done nothing seriously wrong.
I didn't understand rep loans, so I did it w/o knowing.
That's debatable. We could base on Ignorantia legis non excusat. But the fact that both my accounts, both chat and exchange account, are spammed with negatives, it's not cool.''
I will always be marked now, even though I am legit, because of the nasty negative feedback "community" here.
You wont. As feedbacks are added, they are removed also, when given enough reason. But the way you act right now doesn't really support the removal of your feedbacks. |
|
|
|
Besides the fact that neither of my accounts have done anything wrong, they are dual purpose accounts.
No need to fucking spam w/ negative feedbacks when nothing has been done that has been wrong/immoral.
shorena might disagree on that fact. And so do I. Just for a quick reminder: https://archive.is/ysCU5Tell me again, how you did nothing wrong with either of your accounts, please. |
|
|
|
the reason for this address i believe is none of your business. -snip-
Then, I guess we're done here. Unlike you, I have no alts. Feedback wont be removed.
xetsr already stated that his feedback will stay, so will mine. (You can retaliate that as many times as you want. Calling me an alt of mexxer-2, xetsr or who else you imagine me to be connected with.)
xetsr feedback didnt bother me until he doubled it and lutpin deleted his past negative on my profile and added a new one very very recently and both neg is about a topic dead long time back. why revive the dead,i dont know and both would not have a proper explanation.
Your positive trust to your alt stands till today. That topic is not dead. Hence the negatives say aswell. moreover, i showed a way to prove that me and netpyder are not the same person, but seems like both person dont want to go to that line for the simple reason they will be proven wrong.
How about you "go that way" and then we remove the feedback once proven wrong?! You're the one that wants to prove something, not we. resulting is abuse of DT
Leaving feedback is no "abuse of DT". It's what the trust system has been designed for, hence we do it.
Also, nice double post. Next time, just use the edit button. |
|
|
|
can a user, for instance xetsr double his negative feedback about the same subject from his account and alts on a single user with a difference of more than 4months?
So tell me again, why am I an alt of xetsr? I've been called alt of several guys in the past (mostly mexxer, but there have been others in the mix also), but so far none of those guys came up with any reason other than "both left me a neg". On another note, when you open a thread about some person (or in this case 2 persons), it would be appreciated if you PM those persons.
and if needed i can prove that me and netpyder are not connected at all.
That's funny, because my feedback proofs quite the opposite. The 1MkRJqUgQ2UkKNwNV88nhaKXN1vRpwQv1z address is used by both your accounts. https://archive.is/qTwr1#selection-549.22-549.56https://archive.is/GQaGM#selection-489.17-493.34 |
|
|
|
Hi, i don't see myself on the table of participants, i posted on february 06, i have been tweeting and RT constantly, i understand that the campaign is now running bi-weekly.
I PMed everyone who was selected for the new round (also mentioned in this post): Anyways, I've selected the new roster. Will PM everyone who has been enrolled in a bit.
I couldn't enroll all users who applied, so I had to be a bit selective. If you hadn't got a PM, you were not enrolled for the round. That's the reason you are not in the participants list. |
|
|
|
Username: Billyboy402
Bitcoin Address: 1DUoL9Xjkq71pcN4dN5euwKdM3av89JZ6j
Please reply if i'm accepted or not.
Sorry, but denied. Are you guys accepting members again as considering to move if so would my application be accepted here?
We are, if there are open spots (Currently, 1 hero member spot and 1 legendary member spot). For the legendary spot, I currently wait on response from a user who wanted to take it, so I can't give that one away before. |
|
|
|
By the way, do I need to rewrite my post with the proper format or is it good like it is right now?
You can leave it as it is. The suggested format is only one that shows users what information we require (mainly for those new to the thread), and also allows mexxer (or me) to check the connection more quickly. But any other formating works also. It's really just a suggestion. Your post contains all the necessary information, and that's the main point. |
|
|
|
Probably because the account was used as collateral. As discussed via pm. -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Date: 13/03/2015, Friday
This is validium and am in control of this address and am requesting a loan of 0.3 btc from Muhammed Zakir. To be repaid within a week and a half using my account as collateral
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
15LUmGvPLTM3pHMw7qBj7yhjnMhbD9JFKH
H7up/sdhQvFw09nZ2rnN6at13LInHVEYPN95/epfi5EBNtQr/SWr59PeUM9jenHzHSS9kk3Pg50dZFw1OiBmmFw=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- Exactly, Zakir even addresses this in the thread: P.S. Can I change address of your account so you can cover some of the loans with Bitmixer payment?
|
|
|
|
Yes, I see that now, I was in a rush since I was tired, and I posted the same link from where I copied and pasted it from right in the same post. I assumed people would notice that, my bad, thanks bro.  You can still edit the post  I'm kind of scratching my head over this one - has the account been sold or hijacked?
This one is now obsolete with the info provided by owlcatz. Could you delete/edit it please?! |
|
|
|
Next time, include quote-boxes when quoting some text, may it be from the forum or from outside the forum/other sources, and misunderstandings like this are less likely to happen. |
|
|
|
This thread will be used to collect and present references about my past experience with signature, twitter and other campaigns.
I will try to keep always up to date, and when someone considers running a campaign with me,
they can easily check all of my current & past work, aswell as some reviews of the former.
You can also find my listing together with some information in the Overview of Anti-Spam Campaign Managers.
Further, I am included in the following overview threads (outdated, for history's sake):
Campaign Manager Overview / Overview Thread.
I am also listed in the Ranking of Campaign Managers created by Omegasun
  - Crypto.Games Signature Campaign ( Thread) Running for over three years now (more than 160 weeks), paying over 26.75BTC to enrolled users. - BitBlender Signature Campaign ( Thread) Running for 91 weeks now, paying around 26.59BTC to enrolled users. - BitVest.io Signature Campaign ( Thread) Running for two years (103 weeks), paying around 14.63BTC to enrolled users. - 777Coin.com Signature Campaign ( Thread) Running for two years (103 weeks), paying around 10.97BTC to enrolled users.
  - Crypto-News.net Signature Campaign ( Thread) Running for eight weeks, paying around 1.25BTC to enrolled users. - BetKing.io Signature Campaign ( Thread) Running for a total of 3 weeks (14.11.16 to 07.12.16), paying out 2.35BTC to enrolled users. - HEATLedger Signature Campaign ( Thread) Running for a total of 3 weeks (16.07.16 to 06.08.16), paying out 1.05BTC to enrolled users. - OneHash.com Signature Campaign ( Thread) Running for 4 week (12.02.16 to 11.03.16), paying out 0.36BTC to enrolled users. - Ascendancy IPO Signature Campaign ( Thread) Stopped after two weeks, payments of 0.31BTC to all users. - Opair.co Signature Campaign ( Thread) Running for the six weeks, distributing a grand total of 7BTC to enrolled users.- Crypto.Games Twitter Campaign ( Thread) Running for 15 weeks (03.12.15 to 19.03.16), paying out 2.64 btc to enrolled users. - SocialKapital.co Signature Campaign ( Thread) Running for 2 week (15.06.2016 to 29.06.2016), paying 0.2127BTC to enrolled users.
  - E-Coin.io Signature Campaign [PayPerPost] ( Thread) - E-Coin.io Signature Campaign [Fixed] ( Thread)  - Deribit Signature Campaign [Escrow] ( Thread)  - Ophion Signature Campaign [Assistance] ( Thread)
Original Image Sources:
[1] http://img.wallpaperfolder.com/f/508B8F718256/dothraki-game-thrones-minimalistic-jon.jpg
[2] https://heavyeditorial.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/jon-snow-longclaw.jpg
[3] http://winteriscoming.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Jon-and-Ghost.jpeg
[4] http://www.asoiaf-theories.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/ghost-jon-snow.png
[5] https://ccpopculture.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/got-s3-e6-jon-snow-and-ygritte1-e1367900263723.jpg
[6] http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m5ems1iw2F1qi26lwo1_500.gif |
|
|
|
|
As the anonymous cormorant, dingo and ifrit already know, todays post count has been initiated and completed over the last hour.
Payment information has been submitted and the payments will be sent soon.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the headsup.
Crypto-Games is in no way affiliated with this "program" and they ofc don't have any access to our cold-wallet funds.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
