^^^ The pigeon, it struts around the chess board and knocks all the pieces off, then proclaims victory.
Your hand off to a long corrupt authority that points up at the stars as a diversionary tactic when the question of the shape of the earth comes to bear is ridiculous.
Also this holy geoid you keep proclaiming is based unpublished data from the Apollo program, just FYI.
|
|
|
^^^ You've got gaslight for me, how thoughtful. Flat Earth isn't a charade, it was a eureka! moment for me.
|
|
|
^^^ The globe is black magic:
|
|
|
@Filos, Video of the horizon far beyond the 3 mile prediction of the globe taken with a Nikon P900 zoom lens: Simple Flat Earth Distance to the Horizon Test - Part 1 - 1st Test -- https://youtu.be/X8YrYoCyw0gYou sir are a loser, you have words backed by nothing. I show documented empirical evidence replicated by anybody with a good zoom lens that falsifies the globe. I can keep backing this empirical evidence with more empirical evidence, you've got bullshit lies. All you can do is blah blah blah. Ultimate Flat Earth Proof Stationary Flat Earth – The Gyroscope Doesn't Lie -- https://youtu.be/gHkL96uS35Q
|
|
|
^^^ Are you insinuating that because I'm insulting you for being an idiot or a liar, that somehow means I'm wrong?
|
|
|
^^^ "The Gish gallop is a technique used during debating that focuses on overwhelming an opponent with as many arguments as possible, without regard for accuracy or strength of the arguments." -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallopa) liar, b) stupid. Choose one and only one!
|
|
|
^^^ Proof you're a fool or a liar? You're literally disregarding how optics works, you allow the angular resolution limit of specifically the human eye (1 minute) to be falsely attributed to a sphere below your feet. The globe can literally be debunked with a powerful zoom lens (less than 1 minute) such as a Nikon P900 or P1000. Pegging the horizon at a distance far beyond the 3 miles a 6 foot person would see it, with a landmark of known distance, using the zoom lens, this debunks the globe. Image source: https://www.puregrenada.com/explore/scuba-diving/underwater-sculpture-park/
|
|
|
The Copernican revolution gave birth to the foul giant that is atheism and communism, we're gonna need a bigger helicopter.
|
|
|
@notbatman, do you really believe that the Earth is flat or you are just trolling around??
Where does the rain fall? Can you understand that the Earth is measurably and observably flat for as far as the eye can see? Can you understand that a gyroscope proven to maintain its position in space with respect to 15°/h will not respond to the claim that the Earth moves? You can't bullshit a gyroscope, it doesn't respond to lies.
|
|
|
Why is it called a brain? It's because it is a membrane: Source: https://www.chegg.com/ -- Textbook Solutions, Expert Q&ARemember, the airplane flies over the plain in Spain because the air above the plain in Spain is a plane.
|
|
|
^^^ While primarily intended to highlight issues with JPEG compressed images, the ELA is still useful in highlighting issues in a .PNG format image hence the ability of the application to load that format. ... In August 2007, Dr. Neal Krawetz gave a presentation at the Black Hat Briefings computer security conference. The presentation, titled "A Picture's Worth", covered a handful of novel photo analysis algorithms. (A video of the presentation is available from iTunes, search for "Krawetz". The associated white paper and slides are available online.) Using these algorithms, researchers can determine if a picture is real or computer graphics, if it was modified, and even how it was modified. Dr. Krawetz gave variations of this presentation at different conferences between 2007 and 2010. ... Source: http://fotoforensics.com/faq.phpHere's the white paper: https://blackhat.com/presentations/bh-dc-08/Krawetz/Whitepaper/bh-dc-08-krawetz-WP.pdf | archive.orgHere's more from the tutorial: ... Look around the picture and identify the different high-contrast edges, low-contrast edges, surfaces, and textures. Compare those areas with the ELA results. If there are significant differences, then it identifies suspicious areas that may have been digitally altered. ... Source: http://fotoforensics.com/tutorial-ela.phpIn this case the ELA highlights the inconstant background noise behind the stars and other issues. While my use of the fotoforensics software and analysis of the NASA provided image thereof is far from conclusive, there's a preponderance of evidence of fraud with NASA and their claims. This being the case the chances that the provided image is authentic approaches zero. What I mean by "fixed them" is they've anticipated my use of fotoforensics and modified the images accordingly so as not to highlight any inconsistencies. What they didn't anticipate is me pulling a frame from their little video.
|
|
|
^^^ What's the appropriate response when someone is knowingly or unknowing engaging in a criminal conspiracy against you?
All governments without exception are completely and utterly subverted by organized crime and will actively support anybody who promotes this fraud. This being the case my only response is to tell you clowns to put on your oversized cement overshoes and go jump in lake.
|
|
|
^^^ Do you honestly think that's a real photograph? Alarm bells should be going off looking at that...
You can see where the layer the stars are on is, the background noise highlighted by the ELA is inconsistent. I tried analyzing the full size jpeg images but they've fixed them so the analysis is useless. However the frame from the animation still has enough information to show it's a fraudulent composite image.
|
|
|
^^^ How many people are knowingly involved in this criminal conspiracy? HOW THE FUCK WOULD I KNOW YOU SACK OF SHIT!
Flying to China doesn't prove anything other than you're a fucking commy, firing vertically using a chart that has the word curvature in it doesn't prove the surface of the Earth curves, there's no proof there's a reflector on the Moon and, manufactured evidence of Moon rocks doesn't prove anything but fraud.
My proof the Earth's surface doesn't curve using the angular resolution limit of the human eye trumps all of your bullshit.
|
|
|
@spendy, You're nothing but a clown with scripted arguments. A useful idiot isn't "in on it" yet works towards the goals of those few at the top that are.
Keyword: "few".
|
|
|
^^^ Yes all governments are subverted by organized crime and are in collusion. Secrecy is maintained through compartmentalization, "need to know", blackmail and murder. Only folks at the top know the truth, everybody else is a useful idiot. "it's a big club and you ain't in it" -- George Carlin Image source: George Carlin: NASA Apollo Moon Landing Hoax - Mad TV -- https://youtu.be/zKsPZMJWskM?t=106
|
|
|
I just purchased battle.net credit with BTC, still think it's a problem? edit:I can't get my fix.
|
|
|
Filos is so stupid and BADecker so intellectually dishonest, it hurts. I can only imagine the horrific pain Filos experiences when viewing the above image. The concept that the vanishing point, his eye height and the ground could actually form a triangle must be tearing him apart inside... Imagine the poor SOB in a tunnel so long that he couldn't see the light at the end, he'd start balling up.
|
|
|
|