Probably no more so than guaranteed by the second law of thermodynamics (which outright defines the future as the direction of time in which everything is irrevocably screwed up), but we can't take that risk.

Tomorrow's payment may be delayed due to intermittent Internet outages. (Sorry, but time travel only allows me to see the future, not change it. )

Cat cultists have always been welcome in the foxhole, though like the cat, I don't really lead; I just do my own thing and inexplicably get pursued by angry dogs.

I understand that some people are almost as confused about my gender as I am, but am I really so androgynous that you can't even agree on whether I have boobs? (For the record, I don't think I do, but whatever floats your boat. Incidentally, this is reason #46 to #FreeTheNipple.)

(Replying to @cabalism13 in this thread so as not to derail the voting thread any further.)

Sorry, but suchmoon is a bitch, not a vixen.

What are you, the Australian Censorship Board? (Good thing my nudes are hosted in America and Holland, where my lack of appeal to tits men is not illegal.)

In all seriousness, yes, we normally base gender on secondary rather than primary sex characteristics, but a) this forum is more than a tiny bit regressive on that point, and b) my case is slightly more complicated than that in ways that I'm probably better off not elaborating on for reasons relating to point a.

Eighty-third week paid.

I am not a monster! Though I've yet to receive word on whether or not the OP regrets creating me. He certainly doesn't seem to.

Everyone knows the answer to that, too.



Really, what kind of vixen (or fox of any gender, for that matter) would I be if I didn't volunteer my arse?

Each to their own. Personally, I rather enjoy being able to just lie back and let someone else do all the work. (Though admittedly a mere rimjob is very rarely "all the work" I want done.)

Speaking of which, and I know I shouldn't respond to this nonsense, but everyone else knows I just have to ask, whose ass(es) will these slobbering groupies allegedly lick in Lauda's absence?

Lauda and I may have had our disagreements (as all lovers do), but I'm very sorry to see such a fine feline depart from this otherwise toxic community. I'll definitely miss the incredible amount of drama that cat managed to cause and which is sure to disappear with equal suddenness.

And anyone with a metal lathe can make a Sten submachine gun. What's your point?

No, but I have held a case of 12-gauge shotgun shells, which is equally relevant to the discussion of magazine-fed rifles.

Good advice. The last time I called a law enforcement agency to tell them nothing illegal was happening, they told me to quit wasting their time. You'd think they'd be grateful that all their hard work is paying off, but apparently not.

This may come as a surprise to you, but a wide variety of repeating firearms that are not fully automatic, and that require a separate trigger pull for each shot, exist.

What exactly constitutes "rapid fire"? By most definitions I've heard, I've rapid-fired a bolt-action rifle (it's all in the wrist).

Licensed firearms dealers do not deal in illegally modified firearms. If you believe BayAreaCoins is doing so, you should contact the relevant authorities.

It is the civilian version: the model number on the stock is visible in the picture. And I don't rightly understand what your problem is with the 1000 round case of ammo; I can only assume you've never actually fired a gun before and haven't the faintest idea how quickly you can burn through hundreds or even thousands of rounds during target practice even with a single-shot rifle.

Again, if you believe anything illegal is taking place, contact the authorities.

Thanks for dragging me into this, since as an Australian, I must be staunchly against gun rights, and will therefore rush to your defence and explain that I only merited nullius because he articulated his point well even though I don't personally agree with it. Wrong! I'm pro-gun, and shoot occasionally myself, so I know something about it.

Bolded the relevant part of the definition. Since you clearly know nothing about firearms, I'll translate it for you. "Firing device" means the trigger, and "single function" means you press said trigger only once. Thus a machine gun is a gun which fires many bullets just be holding down the trigger, which corresponds to the layman's definition of a machine gun. (The military definition is a bit stricter, and adds the requirement that it be a "crew-served weapon" - at the very least you need an extra man to carry the tens of thousands of rounds of ammo needed to keep it firing continuously for more than a few minutes. Although military-issue rifles are capable of fully-automatic fire and thus are legally considered "machine guns" for purposes of civilian ownership, soldiers don't (and can't) carry enough ammo to usefully employ their rifle as a machine gun. Your idea that a thousand rounds of ammunition is excessive, which is already dubious, is an outright joke in the context of machine guns.)

But possession or use of a machine gun for sporting purposes ("sporting" merely being an archaic word for "fun") is A-OK. No, really, it is: while machine guns are subject to greater restrictions than other firearms, they're not actually illegal to own in the US.

Which, of course, renders the above discussion completely moot, because none of those are machine guns. Those are all semi-automatic firearms (two pistols and three rifles) requiring a separate trigger pull for each shot.

Leaving aside the fact that in one of those pictures, two of the rifles don't even have magazines, those pictures say nothing about how those firearms are stored long-term when not in use. Briefly loading a firearm for purpose of taking a picture of it in loaded condition or even (gasp!) shooting it does not harm the magazines. (Even when a firearm needs to be stored fully loaded for defensive purposes, the magazines can be rotated regularly to mitigate spring fatigue.)

In conclusion, you clearly know nothing about guns or the laws regulating gun sales, and are therefore not entitled to an opinion on such matters until you educate yourself. (Your abuse of the trust system also indicates you have other issues, but that's another topic.)

Actually, he's just riffing on the classic song Down Under by the Australian rock band Men at Work. I'd accuse him of plagiarism, but part of that song was itself plagiarised from another classic Australian song, because what else can you expect from a country founded by criminals?

EDIT: Oh great, now he's doing it with American songs. There's no excuse for that.

I hope you don't trust me just because you've seen me naked. That sort of thinking is why online dating scams are so popular.

That's just the official story if his wife starts asking questions. Unofficially, everyone knows what's really going on.

Eighty-second week paid.

Wow, me too! Only it's even more amazing in my case, since I'm a Libra. Must be the precession of the equinoxes.

What... what is that picture of me doing on a hat? Well, I guess should have seen it coming. It's like my grandma always said: "Grandson/granddaughter, whichever one you are now, don't go posting nude pictures of yourself online, because some shady Etsy seller will make tens of dollars putting them on a T-shirt or something for people to wear and show off your unusual genitalia in public instead of masturbating to them in private the way you intended." She was always giving good advise like that. I'll miss her.

Wow, I didn't know doctors could diagnose patients and recommend pharmaceutical treatment without ever actually examining the patient. My doctor certainly never did that. I guess he's either incompetent or inventing excuses to see me naked.