Don't feel bad. When I first distrusted these guys for blatant trust abuse, I didn't know what nationality they were either until they started accusing me of racism.

Sixty-fifth week paid.

You can see a current list of DT1 users here. You'll notice that Last of the V8s isn't on that list. Or this evidence of some even deeper conspiracy?

Sixty-fourth week paid.

Correct. With a trust depth of 1, only DT1 is in effect. A trust depth of at least 2 is needed for DT2. (Higher trust depths are possible, but probably not practical - I don't even want to think about how many untrustworthy users are on DT3.)

Wasn't Blacknavy already removed as a merit source a week ago?

It seems peloso's been busy. Does he really expect that trusting people who distrust him is going make them stop distrusting him, or does he have some even more convoluted motive?

Sixty-third week paid.

Sixty-second week paid.

That person is almost certainly not Bruno and there is no evidence that they control any of Bruno's other accounts.

Um, yes, that is the gist of what I was asking. Are you going to produce evidence for your claim or not?

Funeral homes don't often publish obituaries of people who are still alive.

Not if only one of the accounts have been hacked, and not the others. There is no evidence that Gleb Gamow or YuTü.Co.in are compromised.

What evidence have you that Bruno is indeed alive and that it is not merely the case the Phinnaeus Gage account has been hacked?

Sixty-first week paid.

The Merit Cycling Club has nothing whatsoever to do with DT. It is, and always has been, a jab at those who believe we're conspiring to give each other merit (we aren't), which arose simply because I was bored and tried (perhaps a little too successfully) to make my life more interesting by throwing money at the problem. It's the same problem Freemasons have, except instead of Masonic symbols popping up everywhere, it's gender-confused vulpine cyclists. It's not meant to be taken seriously.

I can confirm that the five of them whom I already knew about and had on my distrust list are almost certainly alts. I don't know about the others.

There are still partially exposed nipples, genitals, and anuses. Why would you think even for a moment that your literally half-arsed censorship actually solved anything?

Sixtieth week paid.

Is this going to be another one of those science-denialist threads that ignores the fact that healthiness is a continuum with no clearly defined upper bound and so there are always ways to improve it, and instead argues that the lack of any absolute standard means that the whole concept of "health" is meaningless and we should therefore just sit around eating chocolate ice-cream all day?



Because that's not really the best way to address the perceived shortage of healthy people.

I know you have a hard time understanding how censorship works, so let me help you out by explaining that it works better when you actually cover everyone's nipples and anogenital regions completely. Don't worry, I'm sure you'll get it right eventually.