Germany and Spain made it a very nice match. On that basis, they both deserved a draw. Spain took a 1-0 lead, but Germany saw a goal disallowed for offside at the end of the game. There were chances back and forth, it was a very open game. With this result, Spain could even be eliminated in the final round, although they have a very good goal difference, but in theory they could lose to Japan. Great performance by both teams in the last match in summary today.
Spain did not play very well in this match, Spain played a very good game in the first match. But in this match Spain vs Germany, Spain played a very bad game. Spain made a lot of fouls and got 1 yellow cards in this match. This match was a draw. It's really unbelievable. Kari. This match was very hard fought but neither team managed to score over the other. I can't agree with that Spain did not play well in that match cause if you see the match stats then you will see that Spain is ahead in most cases like position, passes , pass accuracy But it is true that Spain scored less than Germany in shots, shots on target but I think Spain performed better than Germany in that match even though the match ended in a draw. If you watch Greece in Euro 2004, you will understand football tactics. You look at the quality and strength of your team to your advantage. At the knockout stages, football possession will not count, scoring goals will Spanish team uses the ability to dribble and get around the pocket to engage passing the ball like in Barcelona, a team with player that can run will absorb the pressure and use counter attack. The more clinical a team is in front of goal matters a lot irrespective of the playing style. |
|
|
|
|
If Spain can retain bisquet in their team and Croatia use modric , why can't Germany still use kross in this tournament. It is not necessary he starts all games but he could start the game in the tournament and help midfield players in his role but coaches are so sentimental lately and Germany are likely to go home early in this world cup. As a result of the low level of preparedness, the favorite teams might be surprised in the group stage
|
|
|
|
|
Most people that preach not putting money on exchanges have their money there. The present analysis around the bottom of the market is attached to where most buy order is, and this is in big size. Is just unfortunate the FTX scam not even hack, and the scammers with billions of dollars theft walk around without threat. It is such a dangerous thing for him cause he has many pain and they take laws to there hands to harm him. Which prosecution by government could prevent.
|
|
|
|
Do you believe that sending someone to jail will cause market movements to switch? It makes no real difference who he is, and he formed so much drama. Already, it has had a massive negative impact on the crypto market; if Sam Bankman-Friedgo is put in jail, the situation will worsen. It will not be good for the overall crypto industry. There is nothing wrong with Bitcoin, but the situation has ended up causing people to panic.
Although I won't place all the blame on FTX, I believe cryptocurrency will continue to experience trust issues with cases like this and bear markets can always have bad reactions to bad news. Bankman has shown such a disregard for the fraud's outcome. 5 senators prevented the probing of his action, after declaring bankrupcy he was still donating and it was observed that the parents acquired some housing properties lately worth hundred of millions of dollars. It seems no one has the courage to probe him. To avoid recurrence, we might need to avoid young developers who are deeply involved in politics. |
|
|
|
We know that CZ is an influential person in the crypto market, but I am sure that he would not be so stupid as to make the crypto market crash. Moreover, CZ has quite a large crypto exchange and ecosystem in several countries, so I think he is not stupid enough to destroy the crypto market and its reputation.
It would be great to have data on social media influence on cryptocurrency market in the last two cycles, even though the personel had changed from Roger Var to Elon Musk (the richest man) each time. Regarding CZ's influence in the market, the size of his exchange market, the communities he controls, and the latest enemies he is accumulating. Can he play a better role as a top social media influencer (with his vast knowledge as a developer) than Elon Musk did recently? |
|
|
|
Starling Bank bans Bitcoin transactions Don't be funny, how can a bank ban Bitcoin transactions when Bitcoin is decentralized and enables transactions in a way that avoids banks? The bank only introduced a restriction on individual deposits, and that is an amount that I don't think is too problematic for ordinary users, because I doubt that £3000 pounds per month is an amount that the majority exceeds. Furthermore, you quote a source that claims that even 47% of banks in the UK have similar restrictions, so why would parliament or anyone else intervene in this case? I would like to know how the ban works. The majority of bitcoin transactions do not happen at banks, so are they also banning peer-to-peer transactions? Is there a way to identify P2P transactions that involve cryptocurrency if the parties don't mention it? |
|
|
|
|
In spite of them not being able to control bitcoin and avoiding volatility of the coin, there are stable coins that anyone can produce. Can you tell me why no country has deemed it appropriate to introduce their stable coins to this market in order to allow digital transactions on blockchain/cryptocurrency? It is at least likely they will be able to control the process and allow fiat exchange, even being able to monitor the coins' transactions in some cases.
|
|
|
|
A few days ago, Elon announced that twitter has just hit a record in users, twitter is still the most popular social network and I see no reason for people to leave it. About the future, it is impossible to say, but in the near future, I believe that there will be no replacement application.
According to world statistic Twitter appeared on the least in this tweet The amount of monthly active users: Facebook: 2.9 billion YouTube: 2.2 billion WhatsApp: 2 billion WeChat: 1.2 billion Instagram: 1.2 billion Tiktok: 732 million Telegram: 700 million Snapchat: 528 million Pinterest: 459 million Reddit: 430 million Twitter: 396 million Link to the statistic ; https://twitter.com/stats_feed/status/1595066583860535297?s=20&t=5XyF1Bnuu7DjZkM3k3MIDwSo how did twiiter get to be the most popular with fewer monthly users? |
|
|
|
In the few months I've been using p2p exchange platforms Binance and Houbi, so far I don't see any problem using it, but many others can also be used, I haven't even tried it yet.
But for now, these two are enough for me because the transaction I do is fast when it comes to withdrawal activity. And I can say that it has been tested and can say if Binance and Houbi are also recommendable.
Can these two platforms be used in Canada, the USA, and the UK? Binance US is known to me, but I can't tell if it's a good P2P platform. |
|
|
|
The stage 2 of the ErosBook ICO Public Sale starts today, November 21. One hundred million EROS are available (20% of the total supply) at a price of $0.02. This stage is active until December 19.
We also approved all the pending claims of the Bounty program. You can view your rewards at the Investor dashboard. Remember that airdrop claims will be approved when the ICO ends.
Although I apologize for asking this question, I find it difficult to believe that some projects are still getting funding at this stage of the market without strong partners and influencers. The previous fund raised is nowhere to be found, so I asked about it. Public sale has progressed to stage 2, which means the first target was reached, how much was raised at stage 1 and what will be raised at stage 2? |
|
|
|
|
Can you tell me about the best P2P platforms currently available in Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom?
considering
- Security
-Speed
-Privacy
-Number of currency
-Acceptability
|
|
|
|
|
Are there any features Telegram will offer that this forum cannot? I found the moderators here to be more tolerant than in many other Telegram groups. The OP does not belong to the forum moderators or work for the forum, and he wants to represent the forum from another platform without permission. What is going to be done to prevent a misrepresentation of the forum and scamming members of a group with the identity of the moderator?
|
|
|
|
No, he won't want to buy Bitcointalk, never.
Because bitcointalk is not a fancy platform to build connections and shill your posts to walls, notifications of other users who are in or not in your connection/ friend/ follower list.
It is different than social media platforms like Facebook or Twitter when your notifications will be spammed with many statuses and tweets from others.
Bitcointalk is not a place for Elon Musk to play with his jokes that he always loves to do.
The thread struck me as a joke. Now that we know what Elon is after, we should know he goes beyond the fame and the money. A fund of that size is not available on Bitcointalk for the world's wealthiest. Like Twitter, how many people use and visit the forum? In the near future, many people will leave Twitter and a similar app will replace it, so Jack Dorsey won't be happy he sold that app to him. I am concerned about how the crypto community will respond if many leave. |
|
|
|
|
It surprised me that the last update had been made after a year. As everyone is searching for why the price went from $0.156121 to $10.7 in a week, there is no news to be found. The coin is on Binance and Bidget, both of which have high scores, as well as controlled wash trading. This coin has traded over $700 million today alone, so you can see the magnitude of the pump. I would appreciate any information on the project if anyone has it
|
|
|
|
Having a safe CEX: proof of solvency and beyond
-Balance lists and Merkle trees: old-school proof-of-solvency
-Improving privacy and robustness with ZK-SNARKs
-Proof of assets
-Plasma and validiums: can we make CEXes non-custodial?
-Conclusions: the future of better exchanges: In the longer-term future, my hope is that we move closer and closer to all exchanges being non-custodial, at least on the crypto side. Wallet recovery would exist, and there may need to be highly centralized recovery options for new users dealing with small amounts, as well as institutions that require such arrangements for legal reasons, but this can be done at the wallet layer rather than within the exchange itself.
This is the link to the writeup= https://hackmd.io/@vbuterin/proof_of_solvencyThere will continue to be a lot of factors to consider regarding safety with CEX and it will remain a very expensive issue that not all exchanges will be able to handle. As a result of his recommendation, Binance may adopt ZK-SNARKS. |
|
|
|
|
Am afraid war might be coming on binance because institutions and governments are beginning to feel CZ is getting too powerful in cryptocurrency. Some inside information from binance establishment said it was more of a power tussle and greed. UK is going after binance at the moment and CZ has a case of $8 billion money laundering. There are indication that the allegations will fuel sending the company out of UAE, after so much investment in the country. My only concern is the negative news are coming from those who are not friends with binance.
|
|
|
|
  How did we get here that ETH staking withdrawal has been suspended indefinitely and people are queit about it? |
|
|
|
What's p2p:
First of all, P2P is the process of performing cryptocurrency transactions directly between two people without middlemen and third party intervention. It allows you to determine your best price.
Advantages of P2P:
Its main advantage is that two people can decide the payment method according to their own convenience. Here the cost is also reduced. Work step by step as per the diagram below:
By referencing exchanges and Binance images of transactions, you rule out the idea of middle men or third parties. Essentially, the exchange is acting as an escrow agent between two parties in order to prevent scams. Likewise, I do not believe that individuals involved can always decide how to make payments. It will require a safe form of transaction within a certain timeframe. It is possible for individuals to have a little deviation but not to go outside the rule; for instance, a request for a transaction fee, or a favorable bank. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
