Oh I missed that, great job! |
|
|
|
Omg, a case of Neos marketing! Quick, dial 911!  |
|
|
|
So you told me that I was making assumptions(When I was stating facts, reread), when you've been making the assumptions that all masternode owners set a password and put their coins in a cold wallet?
Are you trying to troll now? What don't you understand that those things that you intentionally misrepresent as mandatory, are Optional.
P.S. setting up a masternode isn't hard at all, it's literally just a wallet.
This is going behind logic. Setting up a MN requires some basic understanding of linux/commands lines/vps/ssh/whatever and also, time. Even If you blind-follow , having no idea what you are doing, any tutorial present on the internets on setting up a MN it will make you take some security measure. Anyway this is a reason why there is a collateral of 1000DRK, it makes you take care of your security otherwise you lose 5000$ at the actual rate. Masternodes are just wallets. They aren't hard to setup, I've temporarily set up one before back in June. All you have to do is just follow the instructions, there's easy instructions if you just google it. You can't say things as optional and present it as fact, which is what they were doing. You can have your 1k dsh on a cold or hot wallet, you can have no password or you can have a password. None of those things are mandatory, they are either/or, optional. Since you are trolling now I am trolling back by selfquoting myself. This is going behind logic. Setting up a MN requires some basic understanding of linux/commands lines/vps/ssh/whatever and also, time. Even If you blind-follow , having no idea what you are doing, any tutorial present on the internets on setting up a MNwill make you take some security measure. Anyway this is a reason why there is a collateral of 1000DRK, it makes you take care of your security otherwise you lose 5000$ at the actual rate. |
|
|
|
So you told me that I was making assumptions(When I was stating facts, reread), when you've been making the assumptions that all masternode owners set a password and put their coins in a cold wallet?
Are you trying to troll now? What don't you understand that those things that you intentionally misrepresent as mandatory, are Optional.
P.S. setting up a masternode isn't hard at all, it's literally just a wallet.
This is going behind logic. Setting up a MN requires some basic understanding of linux/commands lines/vps/ssh/whatever and also, time. Retarded Joe cannot just setup a MN. Even If you blind-follow , having no idea what you are doing, any tutorial present on the internets on setting up a MN it will make you take some security measure. Anyway this is a reason why there is a collateral of 1000DRK, it makes you take care of your security otherwise you lose 5000$ at the actual rate. |
|
|
|
If the server the masternode was hosted on was compromised and the 1k in the hot wallet, then there'd be no moving the node.
You'd must be holding the 1k vin on the same server who's running the daemon. Almost no one (if not on one) is doing it, cause it is extremely stupid. Can't prove it tho |
|
|
|
Is it true that sellers should get their nodes online every 2days at most or their announcement will get deleted?
I have Just read this statement SDC does NOT store offers on the blockchain, you have to have your node up and running at all times to sell your goods. How do we get from ShadowMarket will not being using the blockchain (which I should add is a bad idea) to "you have to have your node up and running at all times to sell your goods"? If you are going to quote something, atleast mention to the user/website/content? there https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=757255.msg10888788#msg10888788 |
|
|
|
uh, fuck you. I have Just read this statement SDC does NOT store offers on the blockchain, you have to have your node up and running at all times to sell your goods. |
|
|
|
|
Is it true that sellers should get their nodes online every 2days at most or their announcement will get deleted?
|
|
|
|
Well it's disappointing to get up this morning and find the thread only talking about 'instamine'. I realise that DASH opponents see good reason to keep this going, but I also think it's a topic that's been done to absolute death with every possible angle having been explored on these forums.
Endless re-iteration is not a characteristic of reasonable debate. In a formal debate both sides generally have a set time to state their case on a topic, after which it would be closed and those witnessing the debate would be left to make up their minds.
Both sides have had endless opportunity to state their 'Instamine' case, so at least in this thread we should close the topic and keep things moving with fresh or unexplored aspects of DASH vs XMR.
A topic that hasn't been fully explored is Masternode security. This is very much 'up in the air', and last night I posted some numbers about the probability of tracing Darksend transactions with Masternode Blinding in place. Perhaps we could discuss that, since these numbers were so critical to the technical arguments against Masternodes/Darksend during the earlier technical debate in this thread.
How many masternodes would have to be in possession for anonymity to be broken with a fair degree of success? Does this number increase or decrease with nodes attacking other nodes? Does metadata collection improve the chances of breaking anonymity? To what measure? Do masternodes add any security to the network? If not, why are they present? Do ring signatures offer greater security? OK, since Masternode blinding has been a major bone of contention in this thread, I did some hunting for posts about the subject. Here's what Evan posted recently:
Probability of following Darksend through
- 4 non-blinded rounds with 10 masternodes* is (10/2300)^4 == 3.5734577849564574e-10
- 4 blinded rounds with 10 masternodes is ((10/2300.0)^20)**4 == 1.1528508353537067e-189
Each round uses 20 random masternodes of 2300, so you must control 20 of 2300 four times in a row. It's super secure
The formula therefore gives the following probabilities with increasing numbers of compromised masternodes: - 3 rounds with 10 masternodes is ((10/2300.0)^20)^3 == 1.9784716837512123e-142 - 4 rounds with 1000 masternodes is ((1000/2300.0)^20)^4 == 1.1528508353537028e-29 - 4 rounds with 2000 masternodes is ((2000/2300)^20)^4 == 1.39371e-05 [...] And this infographic:  Even if you take the super-extreme example of comprimising 2,000 masternodes (over 85% of the network) there is still only a .00139% chance of tracing an individual transaction. |
|
|
|
I need some need to sync the wallet please!
Cheers
bump, I get no block source available (0 active connections) on linux! |
|
|
|
I have searched for an offline maidsafe wallet but couldn't find any, can someone recommand a wallet please?
thanks
You can store it in any BTC address. https://www.omniwallet.org < create a wallet here and then import the private key of the BTC address where you store your MAID. (Dump the privkey of your BTC address by launching the command dumpprivkey <address> on your wallet console) If you want more security through a cold storage you can also setup an armory offline address and then import it on your omniwallet. |
|
|
|
|
I need some need to sync the wallet please!
Cheers
|
|
|
|
Have you guys noticed dash network slow downs lately or is it just me?
Yer I thought that, I have recorded some benchmark update times for the 11.1.25 version from the 7th March, over the weekend I will compare the new Dash indexing and update times with the previous DRK version on a couple of machines and let you how it goes. Previous best on an SSD machine was 1.358 seconds per hour of wallet update time ... Thank you, let us know please. |
|
|
|
|
Have you guys noticed dash network slow downs lately or is it just me?
|
|
|
|
Willing to buy around 1.5btc worth of sys, pm if interested  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
