Ja.. ich hatte ja schonmal bei dir Clicks registriert.. da hatte ich dann auch tatsächlich mehr Besucher auf der Seite.. jedoch nur die selbe Anzahl Anmeldungen.. mal sehen, wie es jetzt aussieht..
|
|
|
5k Werbeeinblendungen und 50clicks bestellt...
|
|
|
The thing is... you seem to be assuming that it won't be open source. Why? Just because SC2 was closed source for a period of time? Has RS or any of the developers confirmed anywhere that it will not be open source? Why do you keep making all of these assumptions before the software is even released? Asking for the math and the code for security software is not an unreasonable request. Do you think that it is necessary for a developer to release code in development? It is reasonable to whine about it not being released after a date was given, but it's not like this is the 1st or 10,000th time that's happened. Jesus christ man, you are raging to the world about software that, as far as we know, doesn't even exist. We dont assume wether SC3 will be open source or not and we dont ask for code here.. but k9quaint is right about the following thing: Maths. Every code can be derived from math or put into simple formulas - and thats we would like to see (at least!). It easily proovable that, for example, a private key to a BTC address is impossible to be found with brute force on the current generation (kind?) of computer - and you dont really need any line of code. It is also simply showable that a 51% attack on bitcoin is possible, by simple maths and pseudocode. Yet what we have so far is nothing but some UI shots and claims. We are often enough asked to show proof for our claims (and we do wherever possible.. and where not possible we use proxies or correlations.). We dont meddle with the data available like the blockexplorer that ahimoth hosts. We dont just ridicule every argument of the solidcoin followers - we try to bring up valid points.. yet some people seem to be quite ignorant in understanding the way we argue.
|
|
|
wie ich diese zinsen zahlen kann ? nun ich denke das es dich nicht wirklich interessieren sollte.
("Bold" nachträglich eingefügt) Solche Aussagen gepaart mit den Hohen Zinssätzen haben mich bisher davon abgehalten Geld zu investieren, da ich davon ausgehen muss, dass mein Geld in einem von diesen Löchern verschwindet: 1) Bitscalper-like Verarsche Es gibt gute Zinsen aber plötzlich ist eben alles weg. 2) Teil eines Ponzi Systems Es gibt Zinsen aber plötzlich ist auch hier alles weg 3) Teil von illegalen Machenschaften Kauf ein paar Gramm wasauchimmer auf SR und Verkauf es ein wenig teurer - gibt guten Profit. Dummerweise würde man sich da wahrscheinlich im Falle eines Falles ebenfalls der MIttätetschaft schuldig machen wenns auffliegt. Vom moralischen mal ganz abgesehen.. Geld wäre dann aber auch in jedem Fall weg. Wenn das alles nicht zutrifft frage ich mich jedoch, weshalb do so ein Geheimnis um dein System machst. Hättest du DEN Bot für Gox könntest du das gut mit Zahlen hinterlegen. Wenn du einen Bioladen besitzt und Hafermilch verkaufen würdest, mit den üblichen 50% Gewinn um dann etwas weiterzugeben wäre das auch belegbar und ok (und ich rate jedem mal Hafermilch zu probieren!) - aber dieses Geheimnis, was du um deine Gewinne machst schreckt mich zumindest ab und ich kann auch jeden verstehen der ein wenig skeptisch bei der Sache ist.. Ich möchte dir nicht zu Nahe treten oder dich irgendwie angreifen, aber wenn du deinen "Service" übereinen längeren Zeitraum anbieten willst, solltest du dir überlegen ein wenig transparenter an die Sache zu gehen.
|
|
|
Ich hab haue von PP bekommen, weil ich mein Geld wieder via Visa zurückgezogen habe.. wollte wegen 8Eur keinen Krieg beginnen.. aber ich bin ehrlich beeindruckt von der nutzlosigkeit von Paypals konfliktbeseitigungsteam..
|
|
|
It is funny you have chosen exactly that reply... how about dissecting the quoted post as well? Would love to see your "in depth" analysis of that one..
|
|
|
Well.. those awful lot of claims.. I have seperated them into facts and rumors for a reason. Please.. The first 4 points were facts so far. Please proove me wrong there. The parts about the Botnet are just made by comparing data available at that time. I spend a while on Ahimoth's Block explorer, but it seems he just substitutes the miner IDs for all Solo Miners with just "Solo Miner" - therefore the dickminer IS no longer simply visible. If it was it would be simple to compile a chart where it is possible to spot the correlation between Appearance/Disapperance and DDOSs of Bitcoin Pools. The way it is now it is NOT possible to proof. But not due to the lack of evidence but by obfuscation of evidence.
Also SC2 has shown lack of security in the past. I have to admit, that i dont have a thread at hand right now, but afaik several key scurity mechanisms had been compromised in the past: - Trusted Nodes were mined by "untrusted" miners - People were able to inject falsified Block Timestamps in order to toy with the difficulty
LOLSo you dont even try to argue anymore? Can i understand this refusal to discuss the points i brought up earlier in this thread that, at least, you accept these?
|
|
|
Well.. those awful lot of claims.. I have seperated them into facts and rumors for a reason. Please.. The first 4 points were facts so far. Please proove me wrong there. The parts about the Botnet are just made by comparing data available at that time. I spend a while on Ahimoth's Block explorer, but it seems he just substitutes the miner IDs for all Solo Miners with just "Solo Miner" - therefore the dickminer IS no longer simply visible. If it was it would be simple to compile a chart where it is possible to spot the correlation between Appearance/Disapperance and DDOSs of Bitcoin Pools. The way it is now it is NOT possible to proof. But not due to the lack of evidence but by obfuscation of evidence.
Also SC2 has shown lack of security in the past. I have to admit, that i dont have a thread at hand right now, but afaik several key scurity mechanisms had been compromised in the past: - Trusted Nodes were mined by "untrusted" miners - People were able to inject falsified Block Timestamps in order to toy with the difficulty
|
|
|
Wow Psy, thanks for not only putting me on that list but even putting me on top of it. *edit*
ANd no, i am not BCX, even you should be able to spot that.
|
|
|
That bonus applies to bitcoiners as well, there you are right.. but not the way it does/did for SC users. In bitcoin coin generazion drops from 50 to 25 - not from 32 to 0.X... and not all of a sudden but with a plan in mind.. To be fair, at least the system is inflationary and not restricted so there is no insane amount of control that the early adopters could have over the currency via the supply itself... BUT THEN the CPF exists and throws that out the window. And WHY is there a fee? Does it have any legitimation? And reason to be there? Especially: Who is the benefitor? Maybe those chosen few who have 9/10 of all coins? The legitimacy of the fee is in serious doubt by anyone who isn't eating from the hand of RS. Even by some of those that do. No.. i meant its predecessor. Solidcoin2 was meant to be a CPU only chain until all of a sudden a GPU miner was released with RealSolid being the first one to cheer about it..
Respond to my statements about this. From what it looks like to me is that something is being blown out of proportion here. I think you're looking for a conspiracy where there isn't one. But I can't say for sure because your facts are seemingly hearsay. "if you look at the early blockchain you will notice the dickminer and if you look up for when there was a major drop in hashing speed of the big BTCPools you will notice the dickminer disappeared. Not exactly evidence, but a damn good correlation." provide links and explain this correlation for someone who was not here when this happened. None of this groks for someone not knowing the whole story. I really suggest a sticky thread or something that unbiasedly puts this information together. I'd do it but I wasn't here so I am not intimately familiar with what happened and I won't go off hearsay. You have to understand that people like you pop up about once a week. You haven't been following the conversation since the beginning of Solidcoin and for some reason can't click on a persons post history (Coinhunters) and read what has already been said on the subject. You then claim that the information you have seen so far is incomplete, and you cannot draw any conclusions from it. That statement is true, and you should not draw any conclusions from the small bit of the play you have seen. Unfortunately, some of the best actors deleted their own performances when their true identities were discovered (Viper and Psi). Well said.
|
|
|
1) Early adopter bonus this bonus is for everyone: the early bird catches the worm... even you could have done it... ask some early (happy) bitcoiner
That bonus applies to bitcoiners as well, there you are right.. but not the way it does/did for SC users. In bitcoin coin generazion drops from 50 to 25 - not from 32 to 0.X... and not all of a sudden but with a plan in mind.. 2) MC Fee structure we will see when it's released... but the plan of a small fee of ~ 2 MC$ a year to hold the account seems to me not oversized
And WHY is there a fee? Does it have any legitimation? And reason to be there? Especially: Who is the benefitor? Maybe those chosen few who have 9/10 of all coins? 3) Altering key parameters so far as i know: the one-man-show has come to an end, now there is a developer-team... so with SC, it worked, but i don't think with MC...
We have heard the fairytale of the industries best crypto specialists also in SC2. As it turned out SC2 was only a result of plagiatism hence theft of intellectual property maintained by a one.man show. 4) Realsolid is a known thief this denunciation is not a fact or have you seen his Character Certificate? i leave this uncommented
See my answer to 3. a) + b) botnets and DDOS - no comments
Comment as much as you like, but if you look at the early blockchain you will notice the dickminer and if you look up for when there was a major drop in hashing speed of the big BTCPools you will notice the dickminer disappeared. Not exactly evidence, but a damn good correlation. c) the reaperV13 made obvious to everyone, that LTC is nicely minable by GPUs...
No.. i meant its predecessor. Solidcoin2 was meant to be a CPU only chain until all of a sudden a GPU miner was released with RealSolid being the first one to cheer about it..
|
|
|
yes it is gone.. you paid only 10 clicks.. maybe you meant 1000 views? I only see 10 clicks in my database..
Hm, interestering. I added 1000 views.. will try again
|
|
|
Hm, is my Ad gone? I had 1000 clicks requested for virtualminer.eu (ID 330) - yet it shows no stats and constant refreshing doesnt show the ad :/
|
|
|
as said in some previous posting the line between scamming and "using hideous methods to get someones money" is not clearly defined. Imho it shouldnt be a line but some Mandelbrot but nevertheless - there are strong arguments against SolidCoin / Microcash being honest cryptocurrencies and more likely a scam or at least a scheme to rip off people.
1) Early adopter bonus THis can be said also about bitcoin, though here its not a bonus by design. Whilst the first few million coins were mined in just a few blocks with payouts of - i think - 32coins per block todays coins per block amount is at below 1. That allows early adopters to have a huge share of the overal amount of coins
2) MC Fee structure From what i read so far MC will have a daily fee structure (How does it apply to cold storages btw?) which is given back to users depending on their coins. If you look at 1) you will clearly see a major bonus for those who had been early in the pyramid.. again.
3) Altering key parameters of a blockchain by will. Realsolid is known to have changed the key parameters of solidcoin2 block generation multiple times and hence is not reliable when he says that x or y will never happen. So if he tells you he wont ever be able to spend 12mil pre-mined coins its not exactly a lie, but it is an assumption based on his current mood and can be changed any second.
4) Realsolid is a known thief. (See takedown of SC2 source code)
Those were facts so far.. now for some things that have been discussed over and over but cannot be proven but look right:
a) "8=====D" When SC2 emerged there was a miner with that signature in the blockchain that mined > 75% of all (available) blocks yet never sold them.. evidence at that time was strong that this botnet had the sole function as to keep the price stable... and more.
b) "8====D" and DDOSs "8====D" stopped mining at the exact moments when the Big Five of Bitcoin pools were dossed.. that happened a few times and was visible on Ahimoth's SC2 information page. Once that topic was discussed (massive drop of Hashing speed, disappearance of the Dickminer and DDOS happening at the same time and FOR the same time the SC2 information site was changed.).
c) "Reaper" Out of nothing and without anyone knowing it someone posted a fully functional GPU miner for a solely for CPU designed Blockchain. Call me a tinfoil hat.. but that all looked too artificial since exactly when people came up with the idea that the dickminer was not a botnet but some gpu miner Reaper emerged and brought sc2 to its salvation.. oh and the dickminer finally totally made its last appearance.
Enough Facts and Fiction?
|
|
|
INspired by BCXs Google campaign i would like to see some people involved into the following idea: You can win this game simply creating either a G+ or Facebook page and get as many likes for it as possible. The page with the most likes wins. Following rules also apply: The page has to have a name such as "Microcash is a scam" or similar, it has to has some text about why Solidcoin/Microcash is a scam (of course with non-made up and valid arguments!) and the "likers" should be human beings.. What can you win? Well... since i would like to see many people involved in this and guess some of them have a nice character for donating for this good cause i have set up an address for donations that all will go right into the jackpot: 1LSvRWboutaLtLa3owwW6MYbfiuG4b33RF I would say we leave this running for at least till June 4th and see where we get to.. Just post your pages and we will see who wins
|
|
|
in the "how it works" section you can find this sentence: "You can receive bitcoins twice a day." Like a used car dealer: "You paid for a car, noone said anything about an engine" But ok will keep it in mind. Nice project.
|
|
|
your first point was designed that way..
The coins are bundled up to save the transaction fee.. is it already there?
why banned? what was the reason?
First: OK, thought it was right that way.. nice idea.. Second: Yeah, i just received it after i did post the messge third: Banned is the wrong word. Seems you can earn BTC nly once in 12hrs and you might want to tell users before you make them wait.
|
|
|
I'm surprised that you were able to think of 1% who are not lying, thieving scum! Unless you include dead ones.
1% is optimistical, but in the end i still need someone to vote for.. though i dont know if 1% applies to Microcash or Solidcoin since its reigned by scammers..
|
|
|
Hm.. seems to have worked in general.. just a few things i noticed: 1) Time stops whenever i open another tab or program - but resumes once i click on home again. Is that designed to be that way? 2) I made a withdrawal to 1B49L6KjA5uRs3h9n27cX9DcyXTGU8cnvM some while back.. didnt receive so far. 3) You could tell people their ip is "banned" before they waited their ass off Oh, and i entered virtualminer to the ad pages..
|
|
|
MicroCash is a scam because of the very people behind it. They are proven scammers, liars, sociopaths and delusional nutburgers.
Fuck.. that applies to 99% of the world's politicians.. Oh and yes, that makes microcash a scam.
|
|
|
|