|
Do they test the bailouts?
|
|
|
|
Yes I must have missed the news. Link, Lauda?
Bitusher, I'm confused what you are saying. What does Toomim have to do with
Bitfury and how/where is Bitfury attacking Classic's principles?
you are funny Classic REKT |
|
|
|
What do you think Bitcoin classic is? We're forking to 2MB because Core thus far hasn't raised the block limit
and we're tired of waiting. I wouldn't call Blockstream "evil" but I think its safe to say they have their own
agenda.
Get lost. You cannot win. Chinese miners are going to DESTROY your unlimited blocks, period. You have no power over here. Go back to the real world and tell your supervisor that you've failed! Good luck! |
|
|
|
|
Just like they closed Guantanamo !!!!!
All powerful governments are a joke.
|
|
|
|
|
Just like real banknotes, Bitcoins cannot disappear. Until at least one Bitcoiner is running the computer, Bitcoin is here.
They can only become worthless. But this will not happen because they are very rare.
|
|
|
|
In case Blockstream implements something evil, we can always fork the software and circumvent that evilness.
You can put on your tinfoil hat to circumvent that evilness. |
|
|
|
|
I am standing strong behind the consensus as defined by Satoshi Nakamoto.
Long live Bitcoin!
|
|
|
|
Roger Ver is a great guy and wants what is best for bitcoin. Core and him agree on the goals of trying to onramp as many people as possible but Roger Ver isn't as technical and thus doesn't completely understand all the network limitations and tradeoffs at play.
I know. But money corrupts, and public statements may be paid for. That's why we should be careful and double vet anyting. I never believed Visa scale. I never believed about To the Moon. That was the dream of the old generation, we believe in other things like Satoshi. I don't ask for much. I consider every new block a huge victory for us. Gentlemen, If we keep the system running until the next crisis, until the next bailouts, I believe we're all set. |
|
|
|
Ok folks, now I finally understood that Core is the transparent way to go and that Classic has too many shady deals and hidden motives in the background.
Now that being said, how will Core scale to the ever increasing transaction space demand?
Classic atleast has a pattern: from 2mb to 8mb to 16mb so on...
How will Core deal with this problem? The segwit stuff is only a 1 shot thing, it will increase efficiency by say 30%, and save us 30% space.
And then what? What will happen after the real block size becomes 4mb the transaction cost will increase nontheless? It will be no better than the current banking wire's and bitcoin will lose that charm, of cheap TX.
If we discover a real commerce activity, let me repeat: real commerce activity (not graphs that can be faked, or stress tests) overflowing to altcoins, then it's a valid moment to raise Bitcoin block size. Until then, our fees gonna be cheap anyway, because you only have to pay more fee than spammers. Since spammers are cheap asses, spammers are never going to pay a lot fees. For them it's waste of money.
Question 2: What do you guys think about Roger Ver and his alliance with Classic, why is he pushing it so hard?
Simple: Ver, Toomim, Hearn, Jeff Garzik are paid by N.Y Bankers, who try to overtake Bitcoin developement. But chinese miners seem to disagree. |
|
|
|
These are simple questions but the BTC media ignores them. Why?  What about this: The Governments have NO RIGHT, let me repeat: NO RIGHT, to interfere with Bitcoin. |
|
|
|
|
It's Over
Toomim Coin REKT
|
|
|
|
What long-term consequences could this decision have for the speed of transactions when the time comes and it's nearing or surpassing the current cap?
Two words: Fee Market |
|
|
|
8 minutes, thats gotta be a record!
It's over grandpa, It's over.  REKT |
|
|
|
That strange because I was at that same meeting, and no such thing was said. In fact there was unanimous support for Bitcoin Classic from all present, and they said that everyone that wasn't there backed it too.
Good approved and validated sources confirm it.
Toomim Coin Status: REKT |
|
|
|
It is true that with Bitcoin, money really "moves" in the sense that when it changes hands everybody in the network is allowed to know about it. With fiat there is no registry that money is moving at all, only in the private databases of institutions. Very good point indeed.
Interesting point. What's better that everyone can have backups, and check that everything is all right. |
|
|
|
|
now some FUD about Bitcoin Trump ban
|
|
|
|
Oh noes, wallet providers might force us to use cheaper transactions !!!  :D:D |
|
|
|
If we start raising the block size it will be like that in a way: tomorrow 2MB, in one week 4MB, you understand the trick.
Simple and straight to the point. The end result would be simply that users on slow networks will be unable to catch up. |
|
|
|
but when you do wipe away all the social drama of the leaders of camp blockstream or camp gavincoin and just look at the code of a simple and basic 2mb block increase.. you will realise that a 2mb rule will allow segwit to still do what they want to do, still allow miners to just make 1mb blocks..
it wont kill off bitcoin-core..
Hahaha 2mb rule. Where is your 2MB block? Hahahahaha |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
