I am running a small personal server to remain connected to various IRC networks I am on, but I figured I could offer accounts to others as well, if anyones interested.
An IRC bouncer is a way to keep you connected 24/7 to a network. This makes it possible for others to still send you messages while you are away, you get a buffer playback when you connect so you know what people are talking about, and you can be logged in to same nick from multiple computers as well. It also hides your IP-address from the network as you'll be connecting from my server. SSL is enabled.
0.04BTC/month, or 0.4BTC/year (2 months free).
I'll keep you in mind for when I have a steady income
|
|
|
Solution: start bitcoin-qt with the -rescan flag. How to do it depends on your OS, but you didn't say which one you're using.
I'm using OSX, it's inconvenient, but doable. Takes a while to rescan, huh? Not done yet, but that's got to be it (EDIT: done, worked perfectly). Thanks for the help. I'm not exactly sure of it, but I could almost swear inserting rescan=1 in the bitcoin.conf file and starting bitcoin-qt normally would also work. Must try it. That way I'll be sure and won't forget about it again. It seems the easiest way on OSX is: /path/to/Bitcoin-Qt.app/Contents/MacOS/Bitcoin-Qt --args
|
|
|
Solution: start bitcoin-qt with the -rescan flag. How to do it depends on your OS, but you didn't say which one you're using.
I'm using OSX, it's inconvenient, but doable. Takes a while to rescan, huh? Not done yet, but that's got to be it (EDIT: done, worked perfectly). Thanks for the help.
|
|
|
Quantum computers are just a theoreticall concept
We can't rely on a piece of technology not being created to keep out coins safe. Imagine if bitcoin hadn't grown at this rate, $500 of ASIC could have done a 51% By the way, I love how your address has QR in it, and vice versa
|
|
|
I sent bitcoins to one of my addresses earlier. According to blockchain.info, it's got a positive balance and my one transaction with almost 90 confirmations. When I load that wallet in Bitcoin-Qt, it shows a balance of 0.00, fully synced. Under transactions, it shows no transactions. Why is this happening? EDIT: To clarify, I partially followed this guide: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/How_to_set_up_a_secure_offline_savings_walletI went offline, generated my new wallet, quit Bitcoin-Qt, encrypted the wallet.dat with a third party AES program, and srm'd the original wallet.dat. I know it's not as secure, but for the small amount of funds I planned to have in it, the extra steps weren't worth it. I unencrypted it and got my wallet.dat file, quit Bitcoin-qt, and loaded the wallet, and now I'm here.
|
|
|
These have a bit cropped off the side so you can see them on the forum, but the originals are 1150x175
|
|
|
why not just go to peerbet.com ?
Because it doesn't exist, mainly. EDIT: You mean .org. Hadn't heard of that, looks good.
|
|
|
I've got an idea, but it would require a trusted person to run it:
Three people choose a number 1-3, one number for each. They each send somewhere between .34 and .40 BTC (it would be decided upon ahead of time) to one person running it. Once three people have anted, the person running it would use random.org or a similar true randomness website to choose a number 1-3, and that person would win the bitcoin. Has this been done a lot, or something similar, or am I the first to think of this?
|
|
|
This is where it starts getting retarded. You could listen all the names of every 7bn people alive during the time satoshi was active and one of them is guaranteed to be him...
It's unlikely his name is actually Satoshi. It's probably not even a single person.
|
|
|
Do this in America, and i'll donate regularly.
Last time I checked Mexico was still in America.. I'd say more, it actually was in North America! They've changed their minds, and they're now saying that North and South America are one continent, and Antarctica isn't a continent, but Europe and Asia are somehow still their own, separate continents. Do this in America, and i'll donate regularly.
We've got some sound logic here, folks.
|
|
|
KimDotCom = Satoshi Nakamato . What do you think about it? Whoever Nakamoto is (or are), he is more of a deep, complex problem solver, rather than a problem avoider and surviver Bitcoin was started when MegaUpload was in full swing, he would never have had the time to envision, design, code, and test it. (plus he's kind of a media and attention whore, why would he actively avoid credit on such a great project?)
|
|
|
Ignorant question (not trying to troll):
What would this be good for?
Just looks kind of neat, wallpapers and things like that http://goo.gl/bS1JtI'm reluctant to call it "art", but I do think things like this look good
|
|
|
Lately, I've been experimenting with image corruption (glitching), and I thought you might like it. Post images in this thread (or PM them to me), and I can corrupt it for you. You can also get the script I created here: http://pastebin.com/yLuzCyaNThis is 100% free, donations are not necessary. Original: Corrupted:
|
|
|
I've always noticed that. It's just a "fruity" flavor created, it tastes nothing like watermelon.
|
|
|
Bitcoin is apolitical because it is based on voluntary interactions between people. Math does not have political preferences.
If only politicians could accept that.
|
|
|
Technically, it's more democratic than anything. If 80% of Bitcoin's users want something changed, it will be changed whether the devs or creators like it or not.
Not true. In a democracy, the 20% would be forced to abide by the rules chosen by the 80%. With Bitcoin, the 20% can keep using the old version of the protocol if they so desire. No one can force you to accept changes you do not agree with. Now, the original protocol may end up as an obscure coin that no one else uses, but the new fork may as well. Also, if you have coins which existed before the fork, you can choose to use both versions of the protocol at the same time! But you will be left out of the main "network". If you don't agree with a democratic decision, you can leave and make your own country (in theory)
|
|
|
Bitcoin is a currency and a tool, there is no political ideology behind it though one could certainly argue that politics are fueling Bitcoin to a certain extent. I'm a mixture of anarchist and libertarian beliefs but I am in no way connected to Ron Paul or the tea party. The beauty of Bitcoin is that it is governed by mathematics and not politics, many times I've been very grateful for that when I look at the stupid mob attempts on this forum to get something about it changed.
You also have other alternative currencies springing up you can use like Litecoin because of Bitcoins open source nature, but they haven't gained as much influence as Bitcoin has just yet, what you use is entirely your choice.
Yes, it's certainly got a libertarian appeal. Technically, it's more democratic than anything. If 80% of Bitcoin's users want something changed, it will be changed whether the devs or creators like it or not.
|
|
|
What reliable website can I use to buy btc with credit card?
None, Bitcoin is both a (minor) threat to credit card companies, and just like with the Wikileaks blockade, they love to stay on the government's good side.
|
|
|
|