|
It is incredible how much progress and development Elix has had in just one year from his birth and his listing in the first exchange; unfortunately after a few months this heavy bear market started, which dragged down every coin or token, with good or bad projects, but I am sure at 1000% that when the market will recover then ELIX will do much of many tokens, and will also perform better than its direct competitors such as Salt and Ethlend.
|
|
|
|
Hello. Currently my tokens (XBL) are on myetherwallet.com. I can safely keep them in my wallet myetherwallet.com or is it better to keep tokens on the exchange Cryptopia?
If you want to be ready for the swap, you should keep these tokens in MyEtherWallet. Cryptopia is not likely to be supporting the swap. Hi fox ,so when is going to be the swap? Can you inform holders on this forum in advance ? Is it going to be automatic swap on eth ?? Thank you. We will inform everyone at least a month in advance so they have time to get ready for the swap. The swap will not be automatic, it will require users to take action. We will most likely be integrating our coin swap with Scatter ( https://get-scatter.com/) I believe that what Panda asked was to know the month of when we will be ready for the exchange; also I wanted to ask if XBL will always remain on Cryptopia or we can see it on some bigger and better exchange, because with the new Raffle & Burner we absolutely have to have better visibility in other communities and in the web world. |
|
|
|
Se uno deve dimostrare che tether ha coperture in dollari, è ovvio che deve coinvolgere una banca. Mica è possibile tenere 1 milardo e 800 milioni sotto un materasso. Semmai le stablecoin nel mondo decentralizzato delle cripto non servono a nulla, anche perchè sono agganciate ad una valuta che è in caduta libera nel proprio potere di acquisto da decenni, quindi stable un cavolo. Servono nel trading dove devono supplire, tra l'altro, ai limiti delle valute fiat in termini di rapidità di trasferimento. Al di là dell'ironia della firma, la cosa che stona di più è la mancanza di un destinatario ("Dear sirs" non si può leggere  ) e soprattutto la mancanza del nome e cognome di chi ha firmato . Mi sembra però anche strano che una banca, anche se non tra le più credibili e proveniente da un paese più famoso per le spiagge che per gli istituti di credito, si sia prestata ad un falso. In realtà le stable coin decentralizzate possono funzionare e almeno questa per ora funziona https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/dai/ considera che ha mantenuto stabile il valore anche quando il prezzo dell eth è passato da $1k ai $200  In breve utilizza un sistema di consenso che si basa su MKR, questo serve per comunicare a degli smart contract qual'è l'equivalente di un DAI in ETH per mantenerlo attorno ad $1. Chi partecipa viene pagato in MKR per fornire le informazioni. Qui trovi un thread dove se ne è parlato https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5043840.0In realtà qui la vera "gemma" da avere, per specularci, è Maker ( MKR) perchè per ogni transazione o creazione di Dai che si fa vengono bruciate delle fee in Maker appunto, creando perciò un effetto deflattivo della stessa; e Dai con collaterale in Ethereum è solo l'inizio, la prima parte "dell'esperimento"....successivamente, quando il sistema avrà dimostrato la sua forza e che funziona, soprattutto nelle fasi di forte turbolenza e di ribassi, sicuramente verranno lanciati altri collaterali alla creazione dei Dai, che possono essere altre Coin ma anche commodity o indici. Questo darà un vero slancio alla coin Maker e alle altre coin "impegnate" da collaterale; a proposito lessi un articolo di Rebuffo qualche settimana fa in cui aveva calcola che il 17% di tutti gli Eth prodotti giornalmente vengono "bruciati/bloccati" nei collaterali di Dai. |
|
|
|
Jeff the founder of SAFE will be speaking this week at World Crypto Conference and making a huge tech releated announcement. We also hope to SafeNodes will be part of the announcement.
After a few months from the announcement it seems that finally the SafeNodes are ready for launch, and that is why Safecoin has been increasing in price and volume for about a week. https://twitter.com/SafeCoins/status/1058412184097751042 follow the live now with Jeff Galloway at World Crypto Conference https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3E5h5pWG2QQ |
|
|
|
All those graphs make absolutely no sense, and the question itself is more of rhetoric, as things are driven by huge amount of different unrelated factors, while you take into account only couple of them.
The mining "dump" is the least important of the Bitcoin price drivers, and so the halvings have more of psychological effect, if any at all.
How one could draw all those 'scientific'-looking graphs based on a single unimportant factor and based on the old behavior, especially for such long time period, when
- you don't even know which events can happen during that period in world politics
- you have no idea how strong the USD will be during that period, and whether it will retain its buying power at all
People who talk much about BTC price vs USD, are mostly those who perceive USD as something of big and stable value. Which it is not.
If you necessarily need to talk about Bitcoin price, at least take gold as a base currency.
If we want to be honest with ourselves then all the graphs do not make sense because we are only looking at the past, and there is no guarantee for the future. Moreover, according to me, mining dump is the most important factor for the parabolic growth of bitcoin prices, because up to 27 months ago we had 3600 Btc available every day, while in about 18 months we will have 900 Btc per day, and yet within 10 years we will have ONLY 225 Btc every day; what's even more important is that in 2028, over 97% of all the bitcoins that have ever been available have already been extracted in 2028. There are over 16 million people in the world who have a legacy of over $ 1 million (in 2016) ..... how many of these do you think will want to own at least 1 Btc, and how much will they be willing to pay for it? Finally it is obvious that we can not and have not taken into account events beyond our logical analysis; it is obvious that if a world war breaks out it can change everything, as it is also true that if a solar flare arrives it fry all of them, or even a meteorite that leads us to the stone age, etc. I would say to focus on events and forecasts that we can work out with a certain logic, consistent with the mathematical models and the statistics that we have available today, always considering that the analysis and study of the graphs and past events is not guarantee and certainty for the future. That said, as I said in a previous post, I personally see bitcoin in 10 years from now under $ 100 or over $ 1000000, depending on any event external to it, and unpredictable for any analyst. |
|
|
|
After supporting the first, best known and great of the stablecoin, Tether, the producer Ledger understood the importance and the role that they will have in the crypto world all the new stablecoin and therefore decided to want to integrate others very soon, within the his two flagship devices, the dwarf if the blue. https://www.coindesk.com/hardware-wallet-crypto-ledger-asia-stablecoins-usdt/ |
|
|
|
|
Eidoo has worked hard in a year and has made many steps forward, and many others are in further development.
When everything is complete, Eidoo will be a 360 ° token, in which it will be possible to develop and participate in ICOs, store their own coins and tokens, exchange them with each other, have a debit card linked; and for every operation that is going to be done a part of the Edo will be burned, used as a fee.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi mtnsaa I wanted to ask you if there is a possibility that lykke can be added in the future in some other exchange; I know that the topic has been discussed in the past and that the answer is no, but I still ask if the decisions have changed in the team?
You know that without other exchanges it is almost certain that the value of Lykke will never increase and return to its previous highs.
|
|
|
|
Si, in banca, nella cassetta di sicurezza ho una copia della seed phrase BIP39.
Qui pesa non tanto il fattore sicurezza, ma il fatto che ho istruito i miei cari, nel caso che io non possa farlo, a recuperare i bitcoin con l'aiuto del numero di telefono scritto sopra (la persona cui il numero corrispone ne è a conoscenza ed ha ricevuto la preghiera di fregarsene (di bitcoin) il meno possibile!)
saresti disposto a pagare un servizio, serio e affidabile (fee annuale) che lo faccia al tuo posto? - tenga al sicuro il seed - nel caso di morte del proprietario dia, su segnalazione del proprietario, il contenuto al legittimo quanto saresti disposto a pagare, annualmente? Oggi come oggi, no. È un problema che al momento ho risolto come sopra. Ho ancora troppa poca net-worth in crypto per arrivare a pormi seriamente quella domanda. Sono sicuro sia un argomento molto interessante. Soprattutto se Bitcoin dovesse diffondersi. Al momento l’insieme di chi ah ingenti quantità di Bitcoin e quello dei cypherpunk/nerd è ancora troppo sovrapposti per poter lanciare un servizio commerciale. Guardo comunque con interesse a tutti i servizi custodian, tipo casahodl, per intenderci. E' un servizio che di sicuro sarà offerto in un prossimo futuro dalle banche, le quali, a mio avviso, proporranno un vero e proprio conto custodia Crypto, che si affiancherà al conto corrente e conto deposito titoli; il tutto con i suoi costi e magari livelli di assicurazione e sicurezza, in base appunto al proprio patrimonio custodito o livello che vuoi avere. Oggi un servizio del genere, di custodia intendo, potrebbe essere offerto da un notaio, che si incarichi appunto di custodire chiavi e/o seed al posto del cliente, e avvisi i familiari, o chi per loro, in caso di disgrazia del titolare/cliente. |
|
|
|
With its present value and its likely adoption in the near future, Nimiq is almost given today; when there was the big price growth in the last few days I thought it was ready to leave or enter a big new exchange, but probably it was just a big accumulation of some big investor, or even some Exchange .... anyway it will have been someone who knows something or some partnership that we still do not know and the team still has to declare. |
|
|
|
[edited out]
Written words often lose their true meaning that one person wants to transmit to another, and other times are meticulously analyzed. I surely understand that sometimes any of us might write something that we don't really mean or that our words might get misinterpreted or even analyzed in a way that is much deeper than what we had originally intended. Part of the advantage with engaging in a forum like this is that we can bat around our ideas, and even learn more about our own thoughts and how to express our thoughts in order to attempt to get the effect (or reading) that we want. Furthermore, as long as each of us is attempting to be genuine in our presentation (especially when it comes to our more serious proclamations and predictions) then we will likely figure out the extent to which we might need to hone our own thoughts or our way of presenting or thoughts or if we are largely in agreement with our dialogue opponent. When I said that "bitcoin must" it is obvious that I was referring to the statistics and the historicity of such movements and figures on the charts (in every sphere, stock, commodity, bond, etc.),
I understand that in common parlance people will tend to express ideas (especially about the future) in terms of absolutes when they may consider a matter to be likely or extremely likely, so they don't really mean "must" even though in common parlance people have a tendency to use those kinds of words. Sometimes, I will do that myself as a kind of clarity shortcut, even though I don't mean it to be literal. but it is equally obvious that there is a third choice and / or possibility that it remains lateral for other weeks or even months, but ..... but precisely the statistics and the history of price analysis, of every tradable thing, teaches us that at the end of such a movement, of such a geometric figure , of such a retracement or recovery, etc., there will then be a certain reaction on prices, which is proportionally proportional to the good or the commodity that is being traded (an action will have a different reaction to a bond and compared to a commodity and compared to a cryptocurrency).
Probably, I don't agree with you too much in terms of your own assessment or your reliance on various technical analysis principles, yet even though the possibility of sideways remains implied, it seems to me that the implication that you made in your earlier posts was to mostly give credence to either UP or DOWN - even while there are more variations regarding what can happen, and I think that I do sometimes get a bit perturbed by technical analysis that seem to give greater odds to a certain outcome than such outcome rightfully deserves - in an attempt to suggest that the future is more clear than it is. I am not asserting that you intended to do such, but I am suggesting that some of your earlier word choices had left that impression... and in that regard, your word choices caused me to inquire about what you meant exactly.. hence our exchange of ideas here... and nice to meet you.. .   Since none of us has the crystal sphere, we can only hypothesize movements and oscillations, short and long term, while being more optimistic towards the long term.
Surely, I cannot disagree with this point. What do you expect for the next 4 weeks and instead for the next 4-5 months, until February-March 2019?
Personally, I try NOT to place too much weight into price predictions in either direction, and my strategy continues to be to accumulate BTC on dips and to sell when the price goes up. I did most of my BTC accumulation in 2014, so my practice remains a kind of maintenance and continued accumulation that is incremental rather than extreme (since I have largely already accumulated a relatively comfortable BTC stake) So for me, incrementalism rules the day in my practice, and I assume long term BTC price appreciation with a bit of uncertainty and even emotional detachment from short term BTC price movements. The extent to which I attempt to predict short term BTC price movements is mostly one leg at a time, so perhaps now, I am thinking that there are decent chances for up.. .. at least greater than 50%.. but if the price goes down, I already have orders to buy and if the price goes up I already have orders to sell. Currently, I am selling a bit more than 1% of the value of my holdings for every 10% the BTC price goes up, and I use such generated fiat to buy back, if BTC prices go down. I have optimism that is greater than 50% that both in 4 weeks and in 4-5 months, the BTC price will be higher than it is today, but I really feel little to no need to attempt to predict any greater than that.. .but instead hope that the price goes up... and to continue to recognize a lot of great fundamentals in bitcoin that continue to be develop that continue to make bitcoin long term bullish with no other asset class that even seems to be in the ballpark of competing with bitcoin, even though there are likely powerful forces and manipulators out there who would like to keep BTC prices down for as long and as much as they can, and I remain uncertain about how much success they can muster up in keeping BTC prices down or to get BTC prices to go down in the short (1-4 months) or medium term (4-18 months). You're absolutely right and that's why I try to commit myself here in the forum or in other social networks, for my chances and time. Personally I do not do short trading with Bitcoin or other Coin and Token; it takes too much time, resources and mental strength, that I do not own and I can not venture as if I entered a casino .... I prefer to study other projects calmly and then position myself in the ones I consider best. Finally I think instead that in the next 4-5 months we will find the Bitcoin lower than today, just for those forces you mentioned, and that I do not think will settle for about $ 6,000 (but of course it's just my opinion and feeling ). N.B. by the way .... the sun rises in the East |
|
|
|
https://cryptoslate.com/crypto-community-reacts-to-vays-shorting-bitcoin-at-yearly-low/It looks more solid traders join the opinion BTC will drop to low 5000 area soon. The community negative reaction to this, is just the indication of mass sentiment, and as mass sentiment is usually wrong, it just means the probability of the drop is very high. Well, whether we want it or not, the bear market is not over, as we all already know...  I believe now with BAKKT 12th December, there will be a lot of bull run predictions. I personally have no idea. My call for September bottom failed miserably. Bottom can happen up to mid next year. Latter then that I believe are as tiny chance as to win a lottery. Never as now the market is really uncertain and everyone has his own theory; many declare that there will be a new bottom in the $ 4,000 area while many others have become rally for this BAKKT announcement towards the end of the year. Personally I expect a clear and strong direction of Bitcoin within 2 weeks maximum; there is too much stasis and stillness ... it seems that moment before the storm. I am not unbalanced in saying which direction it will move, but I believe that any movement occurring soon will be a trap, to which a decisive change will follow shortly thereafter. You are familiar with the saying that "the market can remain irrational for longer than you can remain solvent", right? Even though the BTC price has been stuck in a long ass band (consolidation), there is NO "need" for it to have to move within 2 weeks, even if there continues to be a large number of institutional investors buying BTC behind the scenes. You also understand that sometimes very bullish news is spun in the opposite direction in order for BIG money to continue to trick peeps out of their coins. I am NOT disagreeing with your overall thesis that in the longer term there are really decently strong odds that BTC prices are going to have to go UP.. but I am far from relying on any kind of rationality, whether talking about technical analysis or merely questions about why all the buy pressures and happenings are NOT causing the BTC price to go up. In other words, HODL your bitcoin, buy BTC on dips and if anyone is panic selling their BTC, let it be someone else... Hi JayJuanGee, I know that saying but I expect the market to take a lead within the next 2 weeks because at the beginning of November the descending triangle from February to today closes Yeah, but so what? you draw some lines on a chart and the BTC price could go up, down or sideways. It does not have to go either up or down... there is a third option - sideways. ; then Bitcoin will be called soon to a decision that, imho,
I don't have any problem with what you are saying except when you are saying that bitcoin "has to," and it does not "have to" do anything merely because some lines on a chart (and theory) says that it "has to." will initially be a trap that will take us for a few months, while in the end we will have the clear direction of the market, perhaps for the whole 2019.  Finally, in the long run, except for unimaginable and unpredictable shocks, Bitcoin will be loooonger than today, so I hold my bitcoins. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4849889.msg43731865#msg43731865Of course, I have been buying into bitcoin too (I started buying and accumulating in late 2013, and mostly I have not stopped buying BTC), and I believe that bitcoin has really great odds for ongoing upwards price movements, especially long term... .but long term ongoing upwards price pressures does not mean that it "has to" do anything short term, besides going up, down or sideways, which covers all the possible directions. Written words often lose their true meaning that one person wants to transmit to another, and other times are meticulously analyzed. When I said that "bitcoin must" it is obvious that I was referring to the statistics and the historicity of such movements and figures on the charts (in every sphere, stock, commodity, bond, etc.), but it is equally obvious that there is a third choice and / or possibility that it remains lateral for other weeks or even months, but ..... but precisely the statistics and the history of price analysis, of every tradable thing, teaches us that at the end of such a movement, of such a geometric figure , of such a retracement or recovery, etc., there will then be a certain reaction on prices, which is proportionally proportional to the good or the commodity that is being traded (an action will have a different reaction to a bond and compared to a commodity and compared to a cryptocurrency). Since none of us has the crystal sphere, we can only hypothesize movements and oscillations, short and long term, while being more optimistic towards the long term. What do you expect for the next 4 weeks and instead for the next 4-5 months, until February-March 2019? |
|
|
|
|
There could be a lot of turbulence and pressure on sale on Elastos in the coming weeks, especially on November 5 and 20, due to the early release of the Tokens.
The circulation supply will increase from around 7,7 million to over 13 million, after 20 November.
It will be very interesting to see the reaction in prices, because it could really present an unrepeatable opportunity.
|
|
|
|
Even after one whole day PHX is still doing great performance. There were strong buy signals on social media few days ago and few people jumped on time. Actually total generated volume of approximately $150 millions will help to find some more stable and reasonable floor after this phase when correction will start. Those missed before this spike now will have to pick up at slightly higher prices.
I agree. It has been completely unbelievable. 3x as much volume on Binance as the BTC-USDT pair, that is an incredible achievement for any project. If this is how Red Pulse can perform in a bear market, I'm really excited to see what happens in the next Bull Market I'm the only one to think that an explosion of prices, but above all volumes, so violent, sudden, unexpected, without announcements of partnerships or agreements by the team, is not a healthy and good thing for the RedPulse? An average of the volumes in the last 3 months ranging between $ 200k and $ 1m and then suddenly switch to $ 150-170m is not a normal thing! Always remember: when there is a strong pump, unexpected and unexpected, there will always be a strong dump! It is always desirable to have a good and slow and steady rise in prices and volumes, accompanied by communications and announcements from the Dev or the Team! |
|
|
|
In this long article Stellar Lumen is analyzed in detail, from birth through his creator Jed McCaleb, former creator of Mx-Gox and co-founder of Ripple with Chris Larsen; the partnership with IBM, the birth of the StellarTerm decentralized platform, is analyzed and studied; the birth of a new stablecoin anchored on the Stellar blockchain, etc. https://blog.zerononcense.com/2018/10/26/reasons-to-be-extremely-bullish-about-stellar-lumens-xlm/There has been accumulation for several months on the Stellar chart, and sooner or later there will be a huge price explosion, as has happened several times in the past. |
|
|
|
On Monday 8 October 2018, the AFM has shared the results of their investigation with Triaconta and the Foundation. The AFM’s provisional judgment is that Triaconta violates the “Wet financieel toezicht” (Wft) (Financial Supervision Act) by managing an investment fund without a license or exemption granted by the AFM. In order to comply to the AFM’s provisional opinion, we will discontinue our management activities. At the same time, we are launching our new service: Triaconta Bundles! For us, users change little and we have until January 10, 2019 to convert Combicoin into the new packages available; otherwise if you go over this deadline the team and the foundation will convert your Combicoins into Ethereum themselves and send them to your associated wallet. For all the information and details go to https://triaconta.com/en/announcement/Something is not clear, we are talking only about the Combicoin holders? Will the Tria coins be swapped and what will their owners do? Can team representatives answer this question? Any doubt you have can solve it by visiting the Triaconda site and reading in their FAQ. Yesterday came a new email explaining the conversion process of the CombiCoins into a Top30 Bundle. https://triaconta.com/nl/for-combicoin-holders-bundle/ |
|
|
|
https://cryptoslate.com/crypto-community-reacts-to-vays-shorting-bitcoin-at-yearly-low/It looks more solid traders join the opinion BTC will drop to low 5000 area soon. The community negative reaction to this, is just the indication of mass sentiment, and as mass sentiment is usually wrong, it just means the probability of the drop is very high. Well, whether we want it or not, the bear market is not over, as we all already know... I believe now with BAKKT 12th December, there will be a lot of bull run predictions. I personally have no idea. My call for September bottom failed miserably. Bottom can happen up to mid next year. Latter then that I believe are as tiny chance as to win a lottery. Never as now the market is really uncertain and everyone has his own theory; many declare that there will be a new bottom in the $ 4,000 area while many others have become rally for this BAKKT announcement towards the end of the year. Personally I expect a clear and strong direction of Bitcoin within 2 weeks maximum; there is too much stasis and stillness ... it seems that moment before the storm. I am not unbalanced in saying which direction it will move, but I believe that any movement occurring soon will be a trap, to which a decisive change will follow shortly thereafter. You are familiar with the saying that "the market can remain irrational for longer than you can remain solvent", right? Even though the BTC price has been stuck in a long ass band (consolidation), there is NO "need" for it to have to move within 2 weeks, even if there continues to be a large number of institutional investors buying BTC behind the scenes. You also understand that sometimes very bullish news is spun in the opposite direction in order for BIG money to continue to trick peeps out of their coins. I am NOT disagreeing with your overall thesis that in the longer term there are really decently strong odds that BTC prices are going to have to go UP.. but I am far from relying on any kind of rationality, whether talking about technical analysis or merely questions about why all the buy pressures and happenings are NOT causing the BTC price to go up. In other words, HODL your bitcoin, buy BTC on dips and if anyone is panic selling their BTC, let it be someone else... Hi JayJuanGee, I know that saying but I expect the market to take a lead within the next 2 weeks because at the beginning of November the descending triangle from February to today closes; then Bitcoin will be called soon to a decision that, imho, will initially be a trap that will take us for a few months, while in the end we will have the clear direction of the market, perhaps for the whole 2019. Finally, in the long run, except for unimaginable and unpredictable shocks, Bitcoin will be loooonger than today, so I hold my bitcoins. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4849889.msg43731865#msg43731865 |
|
|
|
If ETF and fidelity approved and live btc will launch. Some quality alts like icx and few others will rise with btc. The shutcoins will be left in the dust and worthless
I think people waiting now Bakkt launch in December this year. ETF and Fidelity platform will be launched in next year only. But Im sure, only promising projects will be growing together with BTC If the SEC approved ETF,etc...bitcoin price will moon, follow by pumps of altcoins, including bullshits ones that doesnot produce any business value! If the SEC approves ETF or BAKKT then we will initially have a strong price reaction of Bitcoin that will crush any other coin or token, both value and shitcoin; only afterwards we will have a flow of money that will pass towards the most solid and important projects and coins, among which ICON is in the foreground, while in the end, as always, there will be an influx of money on any shitcoin present on coinmarketcap, triggering the yet another bull run. |
|
|
|
Hello,
it's normal that avast found a malware in the navcoin core wallet downloaded on navcoin website ?
Avast didn't found a malware in the previous version .
Maybe it's a false flag but in crypto world who can i trust ? Is there an admin who can confirm this ?
i don't want to update my wallet with this "alert" ...
Thanks !
I think you should first provide some information before an administrator can help you: such as S.O. are you using, which Navcoin portfolio are you downloading and which version? How do you talk about it could be a portfolio for Windows and maybe the last one, 4.4.0? Often newly released wallets can give "false positives" but if you are downloading from Github you should be pretty sure; otherwise you can wait 1 week to download so that developers can find some bugs. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
