|
Good catch!
Unfortunately due all this DeFi hype we gonna see more and more similar attempts, where scammers make fake team members, plagiarize whitepaper and do whatever is needed to appear legit and scam few bucks from inexperienced and greedy investors willing to invest in just about anything with "defi" in the name.
|
|
|
|
AT the moment KICK is one of the best project, I have some KICK from the last airdrop, they are locked but I also bought other kick on their platform. In the next moment with the new updates we will see good things!
Kickico one of the best projects? You must be kidding, right? Kickico is highly suspicious project with many red flags and I would suggest everyone to avoid it. They airdropped bunch of useless tokens to hundreds of thousands Ethereum wallets, and when some naive people started buying their tokens, they dumped them. This is classic pump and dump scheme. Few months ago I started topic about them in reputation board regarding their dubious practices https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5225828.0 |
|
|
|
Good catch. Scammers are becoming very smart day by day. They buy a domain similar as popular projects and spreading their trap in the internet to steal people's money.
Scammers are also constantly adapting to the current situation. Huge majority of scams were based on Ethereum blockchain, but not with the huge spike in transaction fee, they are switching to others, like Tron in this example. They also count on people being bad at math, as to bunch of people 1% daily profit doesn't seem unrealistic, while it completely unsustainable. |
|
|
|
Hm... Vidim da imam tri Merita iz "deleted" sekcije, odnosno za obrisane postove (nemam pojma koje i ne da mi se istraživati). Ne znam računaju li se ti Meriti i dalje ili se brišu zajedno s postom? Nekako bi mi logično bilo da se računaju jer sam na temelju njih dobio 1.5 sMerit kojeg sam poslao dalje. Naravno da se računaju i ti meriti, bez obzira što je post za koji si ih dobio izbrisan. |
|
|
|
|
Beside seeing your own password, when you think about it it's pretty obvious that guy is just bullshiting you and he doesn't have any "incriminating" stuff. If he really had access to the your computer he would see that you know thing or two about the crypto so he wouldn't explain to you that BTC part, or he would provide more evidence. This is just generic email (except your password) sent to probably thousands of people, and unfortunately some will fall for the this.
|
|
|
|
... tako da on to rucno updatea na trenutno bi-weekly intervalu, tako da ce biti perioda kada stanje merita nece odgovarati stvarnom stanju.
Koliko sam skuzio on uzima podatke sa DdmrDdmr merit dashboarda, a on updejta merit jednom tjedno, tj svaki petak tako da podaci jednostavno ne mogu updejtat na dnevnoj bazi. Ali slazem se, praktican tool, ne bi bilo lose da nekako makne one boardove di nema merit aktivnosti, bilo bi malo preglednije. Za one koji hoce vidjeti jos detaljniji prikaz svoje merit aktivnosti, preporucujem da se baci oko na ovaj prikaz, takodjer sa merit dashboarda. Evo ovako to izgleda kad se ubaci tvoj username:  |
|
|
|
Bitamp kampanja se nastavlja te primaju 6 Full Membera u kampanju, nije losa lova za taj rank, 25 usd tjedno. We have opened up another 6 Full Member slots, so if you are a Full Member who wants to take part - apply now!
The new round starts on Tuesday (the 18th) and the weeks will run from Tuesdays to Mondays, payments to go out on Tuesdays.
|
|
|
|
We refer to articles from many sources. But not copied from others.
Your evidence does not prove that we were fraudulent
There are no references in your whitepaper for anything you took, and I am not surprised that you didn't just copied Binance, but other articles as well. And in that image you provided, changing few words order doesn't mean anything, you still copied without referencing, therefore you plagiarized.
You also apparently don't have actual team members. This is an image file, which means the LinkedIn icons aren't clickable:
I checked few of those names mentioned as their team members, and on their LinkedIn profiles there are no mention of Antodex. By itself that's not proof that they are not related to this project, but still it is a red flag when for example "Chief Technology Officer" Mark Jones doesn't mention it at all. |
|
|
|
Defi IS going to become or has already become the next bubble after the ICO/STO/IEO craze. They could not come up with another Initial blah blah blah offering so changed it into a new thing but essentially the same scam "remastered" version.  Unfortunately people didn't learn anything from ICO bubble, so we got this defi craze now and subsequently bunch of bad and lazy projects like Antodex. We can expect more and more of those in the near future, until all this collapses when enough people loose the money and exit crypto disappointed. So far no funds yet has been poured on their wallet and hope they never gain any out of it.
Their ICO hasn't started yet (it starts on August 24th) so that's why there is no activity yet. I hope it will stay like that even after 24th, but I doubt that will happen, as people get blinded due greed so even bad attempts like this one can fool some of them. |
|
|
|
(looking for archive) I can't find it from your post history ( archive). I think topics moved to trashcan can't be scraped. Here is the link with all posts from that topic, it has been scrapped by LoyceV https://loyce.club/archive/topics/526/5268835.htmlAnd here is the OP post On the one hand, it seems intuitive that to be good at sports betting, a person should know the game and the teams well. On the other hand, when you're a fan of the team but know their chances aren't good, it's hard to bet against them, isn't it? So my question is the following: is it better not to be attached when it comes to sports betting? Do you feel like personal feelings in favor of or against some team can be an obstacle to rational judgements and bets? On the other hand, if a person doesn't have a favorite team or something like that, this person probably isn't big on sports, so probably knows less about the game. What do you think? If I am to guess, it's probably because the mods find your topic unnecessary. I've noticed many topics being locked in the past as part of decluttering that board.
Yeah I guess so too, probably someone reported it as low value, or maybe there are similar topics to that one, so mods deleted it. For me personally doesn't look that bad, or at least not any worse than bunch of other topics on gambling board that are still there. |
|
|
|
What a lazy and bad scam attempt. Team members only referred as "Mr. Vladimir and "Ms Bogdan" etc. On thier website they claim to have 15,000+ members and few offices, but when you check whois, it is obvious that this is freshly made website. Maybe ANN could be reported for plagiarism, so it gets nuked and user banned? Domain:altcript.com
Registrar:NameCheap, Inc.
Registered On:2020-08-03
Expires On:2021-08-03
Updated On: 2020-08-03 Good catch as always witcher_sense , user tagged from my side as well and flag supported! |
|
|
|
Now in a serious note, I think new users should not be allowed to post scam accusations in this forum until they become a high ranked member or have some other type of protection so newbies won't be able to do what they did in the past few weeks.
From automatically supporting all those flags raised by newbies, you gone to another extreme. Newbies are already "handicapped" by lack of reputation so their claims simply don't have the same weight, so something like that would be an overkill. Sure, majority of newbie claims are most likely false accusations, especially if raised against long standing and reputable businesses, but every once in a while there will be a legit complaint. |
|
|
|
How do you feel about that? Do you think it is OK that you just advertised a service for free and weren't selected in the campaign in the end?
Do you think it shouldn't be a requirement (mostly it isn't anyway) to wear an avatar/sig until you are accepted?
I don't think that should be requirement, to wear signature and avatar before you are accepted, but not necessarily for the "free service reason". When they start new campaign, goal for both campaign and manager is to get as best members as possible into the campaign (I guess), and quality members are usually in some other campaign, making them less likely to apply if they could loose their spot in the current campaign. So imho it's not the bad idea to be somewhat more lenient in that regard. But as others said, its always up to manager, and you can choose not to apply if you don't like the rules. |
|
|
|
Za njega vjerujem da ne radi ništa, budući da smo svi vidjeli koji korsisnici su mu u vrhu kampanje, tako da nevezano koliko love dobije, preplaćen je.
On se vodi onom nasom "nemogu me toliko malo platiti koliko ja malo mogu raditi" 
Krenula je druga runda Luckybit twitter kampanje, ali mogu se prijaviti samo oni koji nisu bili u prvoj rundi, pa eto ako netko ima twitter account i oce zaraditi za sladoled Payment Options
1000-2499 Followers 3$ in btc/week
2500-4999 6$ in btc/week
5000+ 12$ in btc/week |
|
|
|
Poor attempt on the side of Hex, and it just exposes what the people behind is, pure greed and scammers.
Yep, can't believe they were so stupid to try bribe someone with real integrity like Andreas Antonopolous. I mean, I would expect from dodgy projects to pay McAfee or someone similarly ridiculous, who would take money without hesitation and shill the fuck out of Hex. They didn't loose much respect as they didn't have much to start with but still stupid move, looking forward to hear their explanation for this. |
|
|
|
Just another generic defi projects IMO. Judging by the names they throw around I'd advice users to treat it with caution. It's usual for scammers to throw names without mentioning or linking anything that could be verified.
That's my problem too. Too many projects are trying to get on DeFi hype train, and while some are certainly legit projects, there will be even more scam attempts. And what's better way to attract people other than mentioning well known and established companies either as partners or as the team previous experience. But you know what they say, extraordinary claim require extraordinary evidence, so it would be good to provide those. |
|
|
|
|
So, who exactly is behind this RAMP DeFi project?
I see that you are mentioning your team consists of experienced professionals in the blockchain and traditional investment sector but then you just mentioned companies like Binance, Blackrock and JP Morgan. While all that sound cool, I would ( and others here I'm sure) like to see more proof regarding that, and that mean your team member names and their social media profile links that confirm your claims.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
