~
I spoke against a service provider. He gave me feedback. I'm surprised by his feedback! Not only me. He gives feedback to those who have said against him. I think we should do something against this type of service providers. I think he should be tagged.
I'm not exactly sure about tagging. Other than the claim that he is a telegram developer, there is no concrete proof yet that what he is offering is a scam service. Telegram has tagged some accounts before so perhaps we can also report this @daviddeav account to @notoscam and see what happens. I just did. Yeah Telegram is regularly tagging accounts after they get enough reports, but that doesn't help much as those offering shady services can make new account easily. Telegram is basically cesspool. Those that actually hire kind of services that invite people to groups without asking often get their group banned, again if enough people report that kind of behavior. In my opinion, that option to disable people to invite you into some random group should be set as default, as many Telegram users don't know that there is an option to do that. |
|
|
|
Tokens will be credited to users' personal accounts until the end of the IEO, the withdrawal option will be available out 1 month after the IEO end.
Well that's what we want, but please be honest with us, When the IEO ends and when will the HardCap be reached? So we can wait a month to withdraw our tokens from Emirex site. You must answer honestly our questions and concerns. I am surprised that you expect honesty from a project that is using one of those bumping services to fake conversations in their announcement thread. Just check it out, it's full of fake conversations and those quote pyramids. I asked them about that few months ago in their telegram group, and they told me that they will "look into it". Of course they didn't stop, even after i tagged some of those accounts doing that. From my experience, 99% of the projects doing that is a scam, or in a best case scenario money grab. And i don't expect them to be much better in regards to bounty campaign and bounty hunters. |
|
|
|
I just opened that document and I see his prediction there... Maybe you missed it somehow? Although it is hard for that to happen as there were only 2 posts, lol.
Otherwise, maybe he filled the document after seeing your reply (meaning after the time expired)?
Yeah, it wasn't there at the time i wrote that post, i guess he missed that requirement, and he added that part later. At least there are 3 of us now haha, definitely looks better now then it was with only 2 of us predicting. I hope that OP accepts his submission even though deadline passed, as there are only few of us participating, and i surely don't mind. Imho, OP should also share his predictions, just to see his opinion. I really expected more interest for this, people here are not interested in Oscars , or in movies in general? |
|
|
|
Nije BTC analiza - BTC je i dalje na istom resistanceu. Čisto napomena za sve koji prate topic - major altovi su pozitivni u odnosu na BTC a lagano već za sobom povlače i Binance midcapove i neke druge stvari (recimo XTZ). Pratite malo setupe koji nude dobar R:R ratio, mali alt ciklus je već krenuo i ako potraje još koji dan/tjedan, moglo bi biti lijepih dobitaka. Ja tu uvijek ciljam na one koji kasne, recimo Fetch je na supportu a Matic odletio - prvi nudi puno bolji R:R setup. Sretno!  Da skuzio sam da je BTC dominance uglavnom u silaznoj outanji neko vrijeme, tamo negdje od kraja 2019. Bilo bi vrijeme da altovi imaju neki kvalitetan run, samo onda je opet lutrija odabrati dobre altove (bar meni, kod Cryptofrke to je vec rijec o educated guess u najmanju ruku). Kakvo je tvoje misljenje o BNB, jel ima smisla to kupovati kad vidimo kako je splasnuo IEO hajp. Da li Binance chain ima uopce ista za ponuditi u buducnosti? |
|
|
|
First time i found about ARC Iris Hydrogen was few weeks ago, when i was checking group of accounts involved in Ann thread bumping, but at the time i didn't check much about it. I kept seeing their Ann quite active, with bunch of newbies spamming that thread, so i decided to check it out a bit. 📢[ANN]🌟 Arc Iris Hydrogen - Green Coin for Profitable Bitcoin Mining GloballyArchiveArc Iris website Several things seems to me like a warning sign to stay away from this: -First, it is obvious that they are using Ann thread bumping service, as their thread is filled with low activity newbie accounts faking interest and conversations. Out of 350+ posts made there so far, something like 340 were made by newbie accounts, most of them with up to 14 activity. Those accounts are working on several other Ann threads as well. Why would legit project do something like this, especially considering that this tactic doesn't work anymore, and can only draw (negative) attention to the project? -ARC Iris Hydrogen is cloud mining project, and I have yet to see one of those cloud mining companies to be legit. Just this should be enough for everyone to stay away from this, but people still like the idea, especially when buzzwords like "environmentally friendly mining" are used, like in this case and promising huge save in electricity. -ARC Iris team core team (CEO, CFO, COO) is also behind Alpha-X, project that had IEO on P2PB2B in September 2019, but by the looks of their social media, it looks pretty much abandoned, no activity there for months. And now they moved on to yet another project. -In their team, on their website and whitepaper, Kazi Sajib is listed as bounty manager. This person is known on this forum with this bitcointalk account. If you check his Trust, you will see that he was involved in several shady things like wanting to rent high ranking accounts in order to join signature campaign. -Among their advisors is Hamza Khan. He is CEO of known scam Stellar Gold, and advisor of other scams like Cryptoknowmics, and recently discovered AoSPooling, among others. With him, you can usually find Rubab Arshad, another one that doesn't choose much who to advise ( beside Arc Iris she is also in Cryptoknowmics and AoSPooling). My question is, what kind of advice can give you person that is CEO of known scam? -Ridiculously high bonuses and discounts. Base price of their token is $0.1, but currently they have 50% discount, making the price $0.05. On top of that, they offer up to 100% bonus, depending on the amount invested. -In the Testimonials part of their website, their investors share their opinion about the project: "I am excited about this technology and I feel good when I can protect the environment while I create Cryptos through Arc-Iris cloud-mining." by Oliver K. "Environmental protection, high profits and the chance of a significant increase in the value of the ACI-Coins convinced me immediately and I invested in this innovative and grateful project" by Elena Bennet Those two are part of their other project, Alpha-X, and i find it kinda weird that they use them for investor testimonials. tl;dr: Using bumping services Cloud mining Including scammers and shady characters in their team Crazy high bonuses that will probably cause massive dump
My question is, are all these things enough to tag projects like this, or there is not enough proof here that something dodgy is going on here? |
|
|
|
Posto konstantno traju rasprave oko trust sustava, pogotovo oko zloupotrebe, javio se i theymos sa svojim dodatnim objasnjenjem, koji ce cini mi i dalje svatko interpretirati kako njemu pase u tom trenutku. Mislim da ga nije ga lose i ovdje podijeliti. LoyceV's guide seems reasonable.
The system is for handling trade risk, not for flagging people for good/bad posts/personalities/ideas.
In part, the idea of the system is to organically build up & enforce a community consensus on appropriate trading behavior. However, those parts of the consensus which have less agreement should be more difficult to apply than those parts which have widespread agreement, and also subject to change. Everyone agrees that if Alice promises Bob 1 BTC for $8000 and doesn't pay it, that warrants flags & ratings, and it should be very easy to create these flags and ratings. If Alice promotes something without disclosing that she was paid to do so, and the thing later turns out to be a scam, then 65% of the community will call this highly shady behavior, and 35% will call it not a contractual violation and therefore more-or-less fine; it may be possible to make flags and/or ratings stick, but the people doing so should feel as though they are on less solid ground, and maybe the community consensus on this will shift against them (depending on the exact facts of the case, politicking by interested parties, etc.). I refuse to set down a single "correct" philosophy on ethical behavior, since this would permanently divide & diminish the community, and I am not such a wise philosopher that I feel the moral authority to do so.
For ratings and type-1 flags, proactive scam-hunting is good! But as explained above, if you're acting near the edge of community consensus, it should be more difficult. If the community is not overwhelmingly behind you on your scam hunting, then it's probably going to end up creating more drama, division, paranoia, and tribalism than the possible scam-avoidance benefit is worth.
Ratings
- Leave positive ratings if you actively think that trading with this person is safer than with a random person.
- Leave negative ratings if you actively think that trading with the person is less safe than with a random person.
- Unstable behavior could very occasionally be an acceptable reason for leaving negative trust, but if it looks like you're leaving negative trust due to personal disagreements, then that's inappropriate. Ratings are not for popularity contests, virtue signalling, punishing people for your idea of wrongthink, etc.
- Post-flags, ratings have less impact. It's only an orange number. Some amount of "leave ratings first, ask questions later" may be OK. For example, if you thought that YoBit was a serious ongoing scam, the promotion of which was extremely problematic, then it'd be a sane use of the system to immediately leave negative trust for everyone wearing a YoBit signature. (I don't necessarily endorse this viewpoint or this action: various parts of the issue are highly subjective. But while I wouldn't blame people for excluding someone who did this, I wouldn't call it an abuse of the system.)
- Exercise a lot of forgiveness. People shouldn't be "permanently branded" as a result of small mistakes from which we've all moved past. Oftentimes, people get a rating due to unknowingly acting a bit outside of the community's consensus on appropriate behavior, and such ratings may indeed be appropriate. But if they correct the problem and don't seem likely to do it again, remove the rating or replace it with a neutral. Even if someone refuses to agree with the community consensus (ie. they refuse to back down philosophically), if they're willing to refrain from the behavior, their philosophical difference should not be used to justify a rating. For example, in the YoBit mass-ratings example above, ratings should be immediately removed after the person removes the signature, even if they maintain and continue to argue that they didn't do anything wrong. If someone agrees to "follow 'the law' without agreeing to it", that should be enough.
Flags
- Use flags only for very serious and clear-cut things. They're an expression of ostracizing someone from the community due to serious, provable misconduct or really obvious red flags.
- Use type-1 flags when the message which will be shown to newbies/guests is appropriate: "the creator of this topic displays some red flags which make them high-risk. [...] you should proceed with extreme caution."
- Use type-2 and type-3 flags only if the person is absolutely guilty of contractual violations. Imagine a legal system in which there is no law but contract law, and consider if this person would owe damages.
Trust lists
- If you find someone who has sent accurate trust actions and has no inaccurate/inappropriate trust actions, add them to your trust list. Inclusion in trust lists is a more a mark of useful contributions than your trust in them, though at least a little trust is necessary.
- If you think that someone is not using the trust system appropriately, or if you disagree with some of their subjective determinations, exclude them from your trust list. If bad outcomes happen in DT, this is partly the fault/responsibility of: the bad actors themselves; DT1 who include the bad-actors; DT1 who don't exclude the bad-actors; DT1 who include or don't exclude failing DT1; anyone else who includes failing DT1. While it's best to spend some time trying to fix things at the lower levels before escalating it, it's reasonable to complain to any of those people, as I did regarding Lauda that one time, for example. (Of course, the system itself is probably also imperfect, and that's on me.)
|
|
|
|
Don't worry OP, I'am the third participants
Here are my predictions of Oscar 2020 winners:
...
I think that you missed this requirement As i don't see you on the spreadsheet. https://drive.google.com/open?id=1ppr6FA5QTNCYSxMtYnESqHm1AvMHbDa03ZRthot3LM8I didn't see "uncut gems" but thanks I will watch it !
It's definitely worth watching. Just to warn you that film is very fast paced and kinda chaotic with bunch of dialogues going on at the same time, but it serves the purpose. |
|
|
|
Why do you think exchanges are still listing shitcoins? Do you think there are some advantages to having a bunch of shitcoins on an exchange?
Exchanges are willing to list clear scams with fake teams and plagiarized whitepapers, let alone "legit" shitcoins, and only reason is money, and ignorance of average crypto investor. The main problem is not that exchanges place bad coins on their platforms, but that such coins generally enter the market.
Indeed, without proper funding, the project will not have money even to pay for listing on a bad exchange.
I don't think that's necessarily true, that shitcoins are still listed on the exchanges because they managed to raise a lot of funds. Back in 2017 this was probably true, as basically any shit project managed to raise few million USD, but situation changed now, and most of the projects never comes even close to reaching soft cap. Shit projects are now capable of doing IEO and getting listed for a few BTC, and they are willing to invest their own money into it as they know that they will manage to get their money back and make nice profit by unloading their worthless tokens/coins onto clueless traders. |
|
|
|
What happened: Bussiness.club is ponzi where you gain passive income by holding BCT tokens, and income is generated through transaction fees on platform itself. Creator of their Ann is already tagged and flagged for previous promotion of pyramid schemes, and it seems like he is back with new scheme. Ann https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5223011.0Archive https://archive.md/PHqOGWebsite https://business.club/Archive https://archive.ph/aRn6UDomain Name: business.club Registry Domain ID: D605C8D2BDA7240749C165B80FEA9CEC9-NSR Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.epik.com Registrar URL: www.epik.comUpdated Date: 2019-11-11T15:38:13Z Creation Date: 2019-04-12T16:44:54Z Registry Expiry Date: 2022-04-12T16:44:54Z Registrar: Epik Inc. This is their promise of income, ROI is of course ridicolous  They are also promising issuing Visa cards, but cards will be available after getting Malta Financial Services Authority Licence by Blockchain Business Solutions LLC. Additionaly, in order to get the card, you have to hold certain amount of BCT for period of 6 months, luring people to buy their tokens and hold while wiating for that license which they will never get. 
|
|
|
|
Ah I had good memories with playing for almost ten years. But to be honest after all these days now I can see. instead of spending too much time for it I could spend this time for learning some useful skill or a new language. How ever it's too later now.  What a regret ... I spent quite a lot of time playing WoW too, probably around 10 years as well, but i have no regrets, as i really enjoyed the game. You know the saying, time enjoyed wasting is not wasted time at all  . And most of the time i wasn't playing it hardcore, so other aspects of life didn't suffer much. I did not like the classic. Too complicated, too much time is spent on banal logistics, to move from point A to point B. In addition, it takes a huge amount of time to raise a character’s level, which at the current age is a pity to spend on such things. However, I am glad that people have a long-awaited opportunity to play it again.
I played for a 2 months, and then got bored of it, as i simply don't have enough time to play it properly. I can spare maybe 1-2 hours per day max, and you can't do much in that time in Classic WoW. I have experience with various MMOs, but WoW in particular i never played, since i avoid subscription games. Remember that even if you only have time to play 1 day or nearly everyday, you have to pay the whole month the same. Same as with cable tv vs "video on demand" streaming services.
That's they exactly one the reasons i played WoW, because it has subscription, while those free mmorpgs where mostly pay to win, they had some mechanic where those with money could gain advantage and i didn't like that. And of course WoW had huge amount f content compared to those other free mmorpgs I understand that in some countries WoW subscription is not that cheap, but at least now it is possible to buy game time with minimum effort using in game gold, so everyone interested can join, even buy new expansion each year using gold. |
|
|
|
Wolf.Bet opet pocinje sa signature kampanjom. Placa se minimalno 15 a maksimalno 40 postova tjedno. Od toga 7 postova mora biti u gambling dijelu, a max 5 postova se broji u lokalnim boardovima. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5222697.015x Hero Member 0.00015 BTC/post 15x Legendary 0.00020 BTC/post Sto se tice Bitvesta i 777 signature kampanja, izgleda da je CryptopreneurBrainboss novi bounty manager. |
|
|
|
So, here are my predictions of Oscar 2020 winners: Best Picture: 1917 Best Director: Sam Mendes Best Actor In a Leading Role: Joaquin Phoenix Best Actress in a Leading Role: Renée Zellweger Best Actor in a Supporting role:Brad Pitt Best Actress in a Supporting role:Laura Dern Best Original Screenplay: Once Upon a Time in Hollywood Best Adapted Screenplay: Joker Best Foreign Langage Film:Parasite Best Documentary Feature:Honeyland Best Animated Feature: Toy Story 4 Best Documentary Short:St. Louis Superman Short Film Animated:Kitbull Short Film Live action:Brotherhood Music (original Score):1917 – Thomas Newman Music Original Song:(I'm Gonna) Love Me Again" from Rocketman Best Sound Editing:1917 – Oliver Tarney and Rachael Tate Best Sound mixing:1917 – Mark Taylor and Stuart Wilson Production Design:The Irishman – Bob Shaw; Set Decoration: Regina Graves Best Cinematography:1917 – Roger Deakins Best Makeup and Hairstyling:Bombshell – Kazu Hiro, Anne Morgan and Vivian Baker Best Costume Design: Little Women Best Film Editing:Ford v Ferrari – Andrew Buckland and Michael McCusker Best Visual Effects:1917 – Guillaume Rocheron, Greg Butler, and Dominic Tuohy Just to add that I am disappointed that Uncut Gems (2019) didn't get any nominations. Film was finally released via Netflix last friday, and i must say it's one of the best films of 2019, for me top 3 probably. I am not a fan of Adam Sandler, but he kicked ass in the role of self-destructive diamonds merchant, and imho he deserved the nomination for his role. Directors, brothers Safdie also deserved the nomination. |
|
|
|
|
Thank you @Harlot for the nice words and those who nominated me, but in my opinion @Ratimov is the one who is the most deserving member in this contest, and the one i gave my vote ( i only used one).
There are few other candidates that i recognise like @efialtis, @zasada and @PopoJeff that are without doubt quality members but in my opinion @Ratimov really stands out. In this short period of time as a member of this forum, he managed to achieve few feats:
-reaching DT1 meaning he is trusted by other members of this forum
-crazy amount of 12500+ reported posts, that shows dedication and incredible amount of time invested in this forum
-800+ merits in 8 months means quality
All in all, for me there is no doubt, and congrats to rest of the nominees.
|
|
|
|
Ne bih se baš složio sa ovim, kvantiteta obično ne znači kvalitetu. Evo recimo za primjer ovaj post, što je ništa drugo nego shitpost čak i za onu temu gdje se "svađamo".. A naravno da kvantiteta ne znaci nuzno i kvalitetu, zato sam i rekao da ovo cisto sudim po odnosu postova/merita jer nemam pojma kako se pise na tim ostalim boardovima ali nekako sumnjam da je ovaj nas lokalni gori od prosjecnog lokalnog boarda, u kojem sigurno mozes naci i takve postove kao ovaj koji si uzeo za primjer. Evo odnosa postova i merita na nekim lokalnim boardovima, nisam ukljucio one mrtve boardove a ni one najaktivnije. Nas board nekako strsi po tom odnosu post/merit, e sad dal smo mi ispodprosjecan board po kvaliteti postova ili ne, to ne znam. Croatian:Post 1084 Merit 125 Arabic:Post 574 Merit 364 French:Post 2036 Merit 401 India: Post 262, Merit 64 Indonesia: Post 3038, Merit 1253 Italian: Post 1253, Merit 684 Polish: Post 230, Merit 71 Portuguese: Post 1439, Merit 199 Spanish: Post 871, Merit 289 .uostalom, čak je i merit source rekao da mora tražiti postove okolo po forumu: Čekam koliko mogu a ako se dugo nitko ne javi pregledam druge dijelove foruma i nađem tamo postove koje mogu ''nagraditi'' meritom [...] već ipak moram tražiti određeni standard ili kvalitetu ...što onda baš i nije dobra slika, zar ne? Istina, po ovome izgleda da nam ne treba jos jedan merit source, ali Daniel91 uglavnom dijeli merit samo onima koji prijave postove jer je prilicno ogranicen sa kolicinom merita koji moze podijeliti. Ovo je bilo cisto neka moja ideja, da se jos malo dodatno ozivi ovaj nas lokalni dio jer mi je to kvalitetniji i zanimljiviji dio foruma Uzeo sam screenshot mislim 26.1, i tada je pokazivalo takvu situaciju. Sad sam updejtao sa podacima od 1.1 do 31.1 pa mislim da bi sada trebalo pokazivati tocan broj. Nisam te namjerno zakinuo za tvoje merite  1 merit source je sasvim dovoljan za naš podforum. Mi u biti imamo 2, @marloboroza i @Daniel91, nemoj da nam jos smanjuju  |
|
|
|
The game can also be seen on ServusTV. Currently really very exciting and the tournament is definitely won by Thiem! Amazing action and performance of both players. But the Austrian will prevail  An excellent finale so far, as it is supposed to be. Their overall record is 6-5 for Djokovic so as expected this match is close. I also thought that Thiem has it and that it's over after getting 2-1,it looked like he is competely controlling this match, but somehow Djokovic is coming back, he has 5-3 in the 4th set, so it looks like we might see the 5th set. Edit:Djokovic has huge advantage in the 5th set, leads 3-1 and looks great! And it's over, great comeback by Djokovic, he completely dominated last set for his 17th grand slam! |
|
|
|
Nisam znao da i ostali merit sourceri gledaju local boardove. Dobio sam sve skupa 9 merita na onoj BTC analizi od ljudi koji uopće ne znaju hrvatski Nemam pojma zašto uopće to pišem tu, činio mi se dobar random fact za podijeliti. Znaju oni tako udijeliti merit, kad vide na lokalnom boardu da je neki post vec dobio merita, onda i oni uskoce. Kao sto sam spominjao u onoj mjesecnoj analizi neki dan, cini mi se da s obzirom na nasu aktivnost ima komotno mjesta za jos jednog merit sourca. Samo se treba neki etablirani clan prijaviti, pa ko zna. Evo kad se vec prijavljuj scamovi, jedan Fake Ann sa vjerojatno malware walletom. Stara fora, al redovno se netko upeca cim to stalno rade na forumu. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5182222.msg53756186#msg53756186 |
|
|
|
Update : Nitrotoken updated their website, removed those previous fake team members and added new ones. Plagiarized whitepaper is still there. Reason I am updating this is because they have IEO on P2PB2B going on at the moment, and of course that scammy exchange didn't check anything before adding this on their launchpad. Nitrotoken website archive https://archive.md/MlNcX |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
