I'm trying to find a full video of that interview to know what's the discussion that leads Gobert to touch all those mics.
I've been trying to find the same thing, but so far all videos I found start at the moment he is touching the mics and stuff. I think I found that interview from where that short clip is taken, but unfortunately video doesn't show that, like he was making that "joke" at the end, when interview was over. Here is the link https://www.nba.com/jazz/video/search/?ls=channav&query=Rudy%20GobertHe starts talking about Corona virus around 5:50 mark, and weird part is that it looked like he is taking things seriously, and then he did that stunt at the end. Really irresponsible behavior, what else to say..
|
|
|
@cryptofrka S obzirom na ovaj cirkus koji se odigrava mislim da je vrijeme da podijeliš koji graf i da nabacis koje mišljenje di šta i kako Imam nešto u Tetheru, čekati još malo ili nije loše vrijeme za kupiti? Nekako mi se ne cini da bi ovaj mogao samo tako stati.. Kako je krenulo mislim da ova prognoza da ce BTC biti 7400 USD na kraju 3.mjeseca bi mogla cak biti i ok. Iako naravno tih prognoza ima ko blata, tako da ce netko uvijek biti u pravu.
|
|
|
Briefly going through their website I see several red flags here, and if I am you, I would really think before sending them more funds. 1. They are asking you to deposit external funds before withdrawing what you have. This is common practice of many scam exchanges. Huge red flag 2. They claim to be founded in 2017, while this data gives different info. According to this they are founded few months ago. So their claim about having 500,000 customers is pure bs as well. Another huge red flag. Domain: bitmeric.com Registrar: NameSilo, LLC Registered On: 2019-11-17 Expires On: 2020-11-17 Updated On: 2019-11-17 3. They copied some stuff from Bitfinex exchange. Here is an example of basic explanation on their website. This is the first thing when you click "About Us" , and it is copied. Tells you lot about the exchange. Bitmeric And here is Bitfinex On their website, this address is mentioned as contact Kitiou 2, Konia, CY-8300 Paphos / P.O. Box 63099, 8210 Yeroskipou, Cyprus 4. When i checked the address, there is one more identical exchange using the same contact info, registered on the exactly same date. MnetTradeDomain: mnettrade.com Registrar: NameCheap, Inc. Registered On: 2019-11-17 Expires On: 2020-11-17 Updated On: 2019-12-04
|
|
|
I can't easily list the deleted posts (my setup isn't designed for that), but I do have the 768 unedited posts. The topic currently has 543 posts, so 29% has been deleted.This could be legitimate actions like bumps. Thanks LoyceV, this info helps! So basic math gives us 225 deleted posts so far, somehow i thought that number is even higher. But they are not deleted bumps of something like that, as according to my report history, in the last 30 days i had approximately 200 successfully reported MTCore posts. And they keep making new ones as we speak. One more question; this data you shared is from today, or update was made few days ago? Yeah it's all part of the same service, I also keep reporting DEXIVE and AMZ Coin posts, in the last month there must be at least few hundred of them deleted in those 2 threads.
|
|
|
Hi @LoyceV, can you please share your list for 💎🍀👫 [ANN] MTCore - WELCOME TO THE DEMOCRATIC CRYPTOCURRENCY 💎🍀👫 Also, if you can share stats about deleted posts in that thread, I think I saw you sharing that before. I've been looking at that thread for some time, reporting posts (I am sure others reported too) from time to time, and it seems to me that thread had quite a big amount of posts deleted so far, since they are shilling for months, and at the moment they have only 27 pages. Based on the evidence i provided, i think that they are scam, so I would like help from others to try reduce their shilling as much as possible.
|
|
|
Dobra ideja, ali s obzirom da i nema bas aktivnih newbie i Jr Membera na nasem dijelu, mozda da odmah prosiris to i na Member rank? Nekako sumnjam da ce biti vise od 2-3 prijave, ako i toliko. Osim ako imamo dosta lurkera pa im to bude poticaj da se aktiviraju. Njima bi takodjer dobro doslo tih 10 merita, mozda cak i vise nego nekom Jr Member ili Newbie clanu, pogotovo jer imamo tu par aktivnih Member clanova. Bilo bi zanimljivije ako bude vece konkurencije a sigurno i mi ostali budemo uletili sa kojim meritom.
|
|
|
why is this being hyped up by fresh account/newbies? is there something going on with this project? Because this is nothing more than a scam, and behind it is the very well known and experienced scammer. I've been reporting these shill posts for some tine, but they don't give up. I suggest everyone to stay away from this. Here is thread in scam accusation board with more info regarding this. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5231987.0
|
|
|
What happened: MTCore is a scam that is going for some time, with Ann thread active for a few months now. It is a new version of now dead ponzi Bidrace. This is the latest ongoing project from a known scammer Fernandes Severino Joao Filipe, who was involved in high profile scam known as USI Tech. Flag Type 1 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=1450MTCore Ann: 💎🍀👫 [ANN] MTCore - WELCOME TO THE DEMOCRATIC CRYPTOCURRENCY 💎🍀👫 ArchiveMTCore website: https://mtcore.io/en/ArchiveDomain Name: MTCORE.IO Registry Domain ID: D503300000911134559-LRMS Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.rrpproxy.net Registrar URL: http://www.key-systems.netUpdated Date: 2019-07-03T10:21:09Z Creation Date: 2019-04-27T13:53:06Z Registry Expiry Date: 2020-04-27T13:53:06Z Registrar Registration Expiration Date: Registrar: Key-Systems GmbH Registrar IANA ID: 269
USI Tech As i mentioned, person behind this was involved in USI Tech, scam that was going on between 2017-2018, and managed to scam people for millions USD. Here are few articles about USI Tech How USI Tech Pulled off One of the Largest Crypto ScamsThe bitcoin Ponzi scam that won't go awayCrypto Ponzi USI-Tech Gets Banned From Operating in Ontario, Canada
Bidrace - MTCore connection Bidrace is now dead ponzi, with domain sold some time ago, but unfortunately that wasn't the end of them. Their method and company is continued with MTCore. These are Bidrace "package" that were selling to naive investors SourceYou can read more about BidRace in the article below BidRace Review: BID Ponzi points with BDR altcoin exit-scamAnd these are MTCore "packages". To enure constant influx of new investors in order to keep this ponzi alive, according to their webiste The Affiliate committee receives a 40% commission on the software sale when someone they referred buys software. On the MTCore website, under Privacy tab, some info is mentioned about the company behind it. What a surprise, it is Bidrace. According to info from their Website, Bidrace is registered in Spain. Now let's if there is Bidrace company registered in Spain, and who is behind it http://www.infocif.es/ficha-empresa/bidrace-tech-saAs you can see, the name I marked red is the same one that was involved in USI Tech scam. Address checks out as well, both on the website and register same one is mentioned, Gran Via Avenue 84 1şD, 36230 Vigo.
Here is MTCore team. You can see who is at the top of the pyramide.
Last but not the least, their Ann thread is full of newbie shilling this scam, and it is going on for months now. Posts are being reported and deleted, but they keep churning out new ones. At least few hundred posts have been deleted by now.
|
|
|
Most likely fake Ann with malware. All standard red flags are there: - User joined github half an hour ago
- Bitcointalk account used was inactive since September 2018 and this was first post after long break. Probably hacked.
- Self-moderated thread in order to delete all warning messages
User bob891014Archive https://archive.fo/5iGsR
|
|
|
Thanks @dkbit98 for starting this! Considering the fact that our local board is quite active, and one of the few ones without moderator, we could certainly use one. I am certain that any of the nominees would do the job properly so choosing would be an easy job, now we just have to get one. All of the candidates need to be active, high ranked and with passion to make some changes and improvements.
Why are you saying that? Why candidates need to be active and high ranked please? It makes sense to be higher ranked one, as it implies being more experienced and knowledgeable regarding ins&outs of the forum, and specific issues. It doesn't necessarily have to be Legendary account created at the early days of forum or something like that to do the job properly, but some experience is needed, imho. Regarding activity, I think that should be one of the main factors when deciding about moderator. What's the point of having local moderator that will log in every once in a while, delete few posts, move some topics and then go offline again without interacting with other members of the board? Contrary to the popular belief, forum moderator is more than some kind of forum police that will just enforce rules and that's about it (or at least it shouldn't be). Beside doing standard "police" job, good moderator will encourage discussion and point them to certain direction when/if needed, share news&updates, help members (especially new ones) and increase overall activity of the board through various initiatives. I've been active on various forums for almost 20 years, and trust me, good moderator can make a huge difference. Especially now when forums in general ain't as popular as they used to be, unfortunately.
|
|
|
Just a few additional quick comments:
a) The data in the OP is relative to one month only. It gives us a fair bird’s eye view of merit/post in the different local boards, and the number of merits and posts within those sections, but it is subject to noise.
As is pointed out on this thread, some months have strange variations in the number of posts, be it due to deletions, threads being moved, re-indexing process, or me tabulating some figure wrongly. For example, the Spanish local board has -327 posts in the Hardware and Mining childboard. Regardless of the reason (I’ve checked that it is not a tabulation error), the merit/post is wildly affected there by this fact. In general, it is better to have various month’s readings to avoid the noise.
First, thanks for your inputs, they are always appreciated! I wanted to focus mainly on the current situation in local boards, without going too much in the past, but I will certainly add few more stuff for the next monthly overview, like maybe adding some average merit/post ratio in the period of let's say 3 or 6 months, just to average things and give a bit clearer picture. But as previously mentioned, these ratios can very a lot due various reasons, and they shouldn't be taken too seriously. Thanks for this suggestion, it definitely makes more sense, so i updated both Merit and Merit/Post ratio charts according to that data.
|
|
|
Gledano da imamo popriličan broj postova, jasno je je jedini način da to bude bolje ako bude još neki merit source aktivniji. Ja nemam toliko sMerita i ne čuvam ih za 'crne dane' Da, prilicno smo aktivan board, a nasi merit sourcevi nemaju neke prevelike mjesecne iznose sa kojim barataju, tako da smo u tome ograniceni. Neki veci rast u tom pogledu je moguc jedino ako se jos netko prijavi za merit source, pa eventualno theymos odobri. Jako mi je cudno da su rusi iza nas. Njih u cryptu zbilja ima. Jedino ako su veci djiberi od nas pa nedaju merit Ma kod Rusa je kaos, tamo ima gomila shitpostera, bounty huntera, scammera i takve ekipe koja stanca postove kao na traci. Koliko sam skuzio oni imaju board za hyip pizdarije i takve slicne mutne sheme. Tako da u biti nije cudo da su nisko po tom prosjeku. A jos je sada situacija i dobra, gledao sam malo statse i oni su na vrhuncu onog hajpa krajem 2017 i pocetkom 2018 znali imati i po 300k postova mjesecno, sto su nenormalne brojke. Kod nas je ipak situacija puno umjerenija u svakom pogledu. Uostalom, tu merit/post ratio listu i ne treba ozbiljno shvacati jer se situacija dosta mijenja iz mjeseca u mjesec, to sam cisto napravio kao neki dodatak, kad sam vec napravio one dvije.
|
|
|
Pokrenuo sam temu u meti o aktivnosti na lokalnim boardovima, pa sam tom prigodom dodao jos jedan chart, da prikaze merit/post ratio u pojedinim boardovima. Pa evo da ga sheram i ovdje, za one koji mozda ne zalaze tamo a zanima ih kakvi smo u usporedbi sa ostalima. Kao sto sam spominjao u prijasnjim analizama, primjetio sam da smo pri samom dnu po tom omjeru tako da ovaj 'rezultat' i nije iznenadjenje, al eto ima i par gorih od nas .
|
|
|
Also, it looks like this month of February have been the greatest sMerit distribution so far in Pilipinas Section.
Good to hear that, it was one of the best months for our local board as well (3rd best since introduction) merit wise. But it is no surprise, since theymos increased smerit allocation of active merit sources few months ago. Dutch and Arabic are obviously outliers because their low number of posts, but it's difficult to draw conclusions about the other sections. Are the Russian and French sections significantly under-merited, for example, or is it that the Spanish and Indian sections are over-merited?
Yeah, it is hard to draw any conclusions about that without being active in those boards. Deleted posts are also a factor, for example Spanish board had more than 400 posts removed in the mentioned period, therefore affecting merit/post ratio significantly. In January they made 871 posts and shared 292 merits, making it 0.34 merit/post ratio, more than 50% less compared to February. These numbers vary a lot from month to month from what i could notice, that's why I mentioned it shouldn't be taken too seriously. It would much easier to read the graphs if each section retained the same color between graphs.
I agree, and I realized that after i made charts. Simple chart tool i used didn't have that option. I plan to sort that out in the next monthly overview.
|
|
|
The reason behind I posted another warning is changing project name without changing scammer intensions. They don't actully care about any warnings, but using another account, which has no red trust yet, may be considered another try to fool investors. Better be carefull and prevent any attempts of cheating once again.
Yeah I know, i don't disagree with you mate It is always better to be more vigilant in these kinds of obvious scam attempts.
|
|
|
|