|
For me, it was always harder to stop when loosing, and it wasn't just matter of money, my bigger issue was the loss itself, as i generally hate loosing, be it in sports, gambling or trading. And I am sure I'm not the only one, whole gambling business works as it is because of people that can't control themselves, whether in wins or losses, that's how they make their profit. If you push your lusk you will eventually run out of it, and if it's not your day, you will get nervous and start making some bad and irrational decisions. Big part of being pro is ability to control that, bur rare are able to do it.
When i first started crypto trading (bare in mind I am not some pro trader, not even close, I just trade a bit, with small portion of portfolio), biggest issue for me was to accept the loss sometimes, as i brought the same "style" from gambling/betting. I would wait for too long, and instead taking 5% loss, i would end up in 30-40% loss. But through some experience, and losses, I managed to learn that lesson.
|
|
|
|
Nemam pojma gdje staviti ovo, a da ne otvaram novu temu, pa evo onda možda najbolje ovdje Član GreatArkansas je napravio Telegram bota za praćenje merita, trust liste i još par stvari povezane sa time. Pa evo ako netko hoće probati https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5224339.0Ima tu korisnih stvari, kao recimo info za broj dobivenih merita u 120 dana, s obzirom da se taj podatak često traži u prijavama za kampanje,pa sa se ne treba ručno brojati. |
|
|
|
One thing I am sure to which is why Clarkson want to attack the rim.
There is no shot blocker.
That was their weakness now that they don't have Capela, however we can't say that Rockets are not effective, this was a close game until it ended by a lucky shot of Bogdanović, yeah I will call that lucky as the percentage of it getting in is low since it's a contested shot. Rockets are fun to watch i must admit, with this lineup, but it ain't easy to play that, and i don't predict them deep playoff run. They might even meet Jazz in the first round of playoff. Regarding Bogdanovic and buzzer beater, yeah it was a tough shot, but i wouldn't call it lucky shot. 1.6 seconds before end of the game, Utah has few options: give ball to Mitchell that is their primary scoring options; give ball to Conley who is having pretty good game as well, and is experienced or maybe even to Clarkson who is on fire, scoring 30 until then. But what Snyder is doing is taking O'Neale off, getting Bogdanovic in and letting him shoot for win. Until then Bogdanovic had bad game, shooting 1/6, but coach knew who is clutch player. After all, he is and excellent shooter, having 42.5 % for 3 pts this season, and he knows how to handle this situations, he has been our (Croatian national team) key player for years, and every time it's tough, he takes the ball. |
|
|
|
That was crazy ending of the game, even better than the one against Bucks earlier this season when he did similar thing. What's even crazier is that just before that, 1.6 seconds before end of game PJ Tucker hit 3 for the lead, and then Bogey hit that clutch 3 with 2 players on him (imho that was foul too and he should have been awarded free throw) and with having one of the worst games of the season. And to shoot like that after scoring only 5 points in whole game, takes some guts. Us in Croatia that are watching him for many years know that, but 'its good to see Snyder trust him too, and giving him the ball in these kind of situation over their main scorer Mitchell. Best FA signing this season, Jazz really nailed this one. |
|
|
|
Thanks @rdbase for organizing this! Gonna give it a try, these are my picks for 2020 Oscars, I hope that I am not too late with my predictions.  |
|
|
|
Gladiator and he is so good acting his character as a villain. I'm taking the outside odds on this one probably Parasite and a couple small bets for the others. 1917 is too much of a favourite to take the risk/reward. Yep, 1917 with 1.65 odds is not the best bet, as you said risk/reward ratio is not good as there are few good candidates that could scoop award like Joker, Parasite, and even Marriage Story. Same goes for best actor/actress and best supporting actor/actress. For them odds are simply too low (below 1.10) to make it worthwhile. In general it is problematic to bet on clear favorites when it comes to Oscar as odds are too low, and surprises are more possible than in for example football or basketball. Even highest amount of nominations doesn't guarantee you most wins, as we saw last year, when Roma won only 3/10, while The Favorite was even worse, winning only 1 Oscar out of 10 nominations. I am curious to see how Joker will end up with 11 nominations. |
|
|
|
Što su zapravo hedge fondovi? Jel to nešto poput investicijskih fondova koje imaju banke? Znam da sam prije dosta godina nešto kemijao oko tih investicijskih fondova. Svakako bi razmislio o tome da dio portfelja stavim u hedge find pa neka ulažu. Ako ništa drugo, sigurno će imati više uspjeha od mene.
Koliko ja znam, to je "rizicnija" vrsta investicijiskih fondova, koja ima vise slobode u poslovanju od klasicnih fondova, tj mogu ulagati u futurese ili recimo shortati neke dionice. Namjenjeni su uglavnom vecim igracima, mislim da prije ulaganja moras dokazati da imas odredjenu kolicinu imovine, pa nemoze bilo tko uloziti u to. Tako da sigurno ima smisla da hedge fondovi bar dijelom ulazu u BTC. Ima ovdje sigurno strucnjaka koji ce to detaljnije i tocnije pojasniti, ovo je neko moje vidjenje. |
|
|
|
Another example of moderation. I left a critical post on a topic translating into Russian the article " How Bitcoin Addresses are generated? Understand the Math behind Bitcoin" Bitcoin is 10 years old, for whom is this translation and for whom the original? What is new in this information? I wrote that this is a litter of the forum. My post did not violate the rules, I wrote it 1 time, without repetition, I did not bother anyone. My opinion has been deleted. Bitcoin is only 10 years old, bunch of new people are constantly coming, so I am sure that they will appreciate this explanation, and the translation to Russian for those that doesn't understand English good enough, as without knowing proper English, you might not understand it properly as text is a bit tehnical. Kudos to @zasada for the effort and time invested. When i think of it, it deserves translation to other languages as well. Afterall, this topic is not aimed just at newbies, there are many others that are into bitcoin for years and probably don't know that and are still learning, and it is far from "ABC book", as you put it. I somehow missed that topic, its actually pretty good and informative, thanks for pointing it out! With that being said, I am not surprised that your comment has been deleted as it brings 0 value. |
|
|
|
I'm surprise the Rockets gave up easily against the Suns, they came from a big win against the Lakers, I understand they are in a back to back game, they maybe tired, they are playing without westbrook but losing by 36 points againts the suns, looks like they didn't come to play.
This game, we saw the real disadvantage of the small ball Rockets, they got out-rebounded by a huge margin.
let's compare the rebounds this game.
Rockets - 29 while Suns - 51.
It was indeed surprising loss, and especially considering they lost by 36 points. I think it was one of those nights where everything went in for Phoenix. They were shooting 15/31 for 3 (48%) and Oubre made creer high 39 pts, while Rockets had 11/48 for 3, that makes it horrendous 22% and they missed Westbrook. And yeah, such high difference between those teams makes it look like Rockets weren't really aggressive and giving 100%. Rockets are usually not a bad rebounding team (they are top 10) , and even though they missed their 2nd best rebounder, still difference is huge We have to keep in mind that those guys play crazy amount of games in regular season, and it takes toll, especially in back to back games, so these kind of games happen. |
|
|
|
@rhomelmabini
Topic is related to bitcointalk, ScamAccusations section and archiving, and yes I have tested and tried all of this methods.
I don't see the reason to move it anywhere.
@rhomelmabini will correct me if I'm wrong, but when he said he reported post as off topic, I think he referred to @Shimmiry and his post about bookmarks, not your topic to be moved someplace else. Maybe Shimmiry doest know more about archive and how it works and why people archive any webpage..
That is why in first post I explained what archiving is and how it works. Yeah, so many people don't read the first post completely, they just see the title, skim over the text and hurry to write a reply. And then we get bookmark post in topic about web archiving. Or maybe he really doesn't understand the difference between those things, as majority of people never really had the need to archive the page. Regarding archiving, 99% of the time i am using either Wayback Machine or Archive.is, those two fits my needs. |
|
|
|
If bounty hunters let this thing happens many new ICO will employ this rule : Hardcap you receive your reward, softcap then thank you for promoting us
If new ICO set this rule for bounty hunters, they should simply not join and boycott this type of bounty campaign, and ICOs will have nothing else to than remove this rule. Regarding Emirex, they supposedly have 1900% ROI !! Does anyone really believe that this is legit, while Emirex is conveniently listed on scammy/relatively unknown exchanges like Coinsbit, Vindax and Coinlim? They are probably pumping their token on those exchanges, faking the volume, in order to lure people to buy EMRX through their IEO for "discounted" price. This is classic behavior of every shady project, extending sale phase indefinitely, and with it bounty campaign too. I really hope that bounty hunters will start valuing their own time, ignore 3rd round of Emirex bounty campaign, and stop supporting this shitcoin projects. |
|
|
|
|
Hi @GazetaBitcoin, I asked others to share their top movies of 2019, not some general list of the best movies ever.
|
|
|
|
Hi, i would like to know why you copied another people's experience from their LinkedIn profiles, and then used them for your own team members? Another thing, your claim of 50-70% monthly profit with forex trading is also highly unrealistic FPCC is a Foreign Exchange Stock Investment Fund company and owns AI technology. It's an inter-floor transaction and bring a huge profit.
Our research areas are AI technology directly integrated into Trade Forex so that they can create best profit for company from 50% to 70% per month. For all interested, here is topic about that in scam accusation board https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5224051.0 |
|
|
|
What happened: FPCC Coin plagiarized their team members experience, taking from LinkedIn profiles of other people. Ann: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5224045.0Archive: https://archive.fo/TcOMbWebsite: https://www.fpcc.world/index.htmlArchive: https://archive.ph/ujqjaDomain Name: fpcc.world Registry Domain ID: 4aae7060785b4dc9868acd2ec17e0b74-DONUTS Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com/ Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com/domains/search.aspx?ci=8990Updated Date: 2020-01-05T10:25:30Z Creation Date: 2019-12-31T10:25:15Z Registry Expiry Date: 2020-12-31T10:25:15Z This is FPCC core team. As i will show, they copied 2/3 team members experience, and they even managed to put wrong explanation under wrong members.  For "James Anderson" they used material from Gentjan Zotaj LinkedIn profile.  For "Cristian Cage" they used material from Mark Musen LinkedIn profile.  Another red flag is that their claim of 50-70% monthly profit with forex trading , thanks to their "AI technology". We all know that this kind of profit is not realistic, and is classic for ponzies that like to hide behind forex trading.
FPCC is a Foreign Exchange Stock Investment Fund company and owns AI technology. It's an inter-floor transaction and bring a huge profit.
Our research areas are AI technology directly integrated into Trade Forex so that they can create best profit for company from 50% to 70% per month.
|
|
|
|
...
This was just a spam, all this was already mentioned in the first post of the thread.
for a change lol,all of them chooses 1917(in which i also love)but there must be another choices and also i love the concept of once upon a time though Brat Pitt seems to be a truly extra(sorry for the word but that is what i find him in movie)while Leo is showing Great acting Brad does nothing.i am a Big fan of Brad from Troy,mr and mrs Smith and in ocean movies and other movies he comes as Main character but in this one?nah
I personally don't think that 1917 is the best film of 2019, but i think it's the one that will most likely win an Oscar. When i made predictions, i went with what i think Academy will choose, rather than who i would like to win. For me Marriage Story was the best one, but i doubt it will win an Oscar for best film. Since i mentioned which one is the best for me in 2019, i might as well mention 9 more that make my top 10 of 2019: 2. Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood-this was the tough call, to decide whether i liked this one or Marriage Story the most. For me this is one of the best Tarantino movies so far, i really enjoyed the film, it was a bit different than usual Tarantino style, and i liked the change. 3. Uncut Gems-i expected a good film, knowing that Safdie brothers are capable directors, but this was even better than i expected. Extremely fast paced and anxious film, that gets us right into the world of a hardcore gambler. It will not be a everyones cup of tea as it is kinda "attack on senses", but it's worth checking it out. 4. Parasite- another very good movie from Bong Joon Ho, and interesting mix of genres. And one more with strong message, like in his previous work. 5. 1917-beautiful film to watch in cinema, i really enjoyed this one. Tehnically perfect, and one of the best war movies i saw since 2001 and Black Hawk Dawn. 6. Joker- I am not a fan of comic based movies, so i liked a bit different take on known villian, with great performance by Phoenix. 7. The Lighthouse-second film by Eggers, guy who made an excellent horror The VVitch few years before.This one is definitely not for everyone, as film is made in style of 1920 German cinema and great F.W Murnau, with a bit of Greek mithology. Dafoe and Pattinson did great job there. 8. JoJo Rabbit- serious theme made in a different way, reminds a bit of Life is Beautiful. Taika Waititi is simply not capable of making a bad film. 9. The Two Popes-i am not really a religious guy, but that didn't stop me from enjoying in this one. Pleasant surprise, and very good Hopkins and Price in leading roles. 10. Doctor Sleep- sequel to Shining, made by the Stephen King book of the same name. We all know that Shining is one of the best horrors ever made, Kubrick's masterpiece, so i must admit that i was really skeptical about this one, but it turned out to be good film, thanks to Flanagan who is an experienced horror movies director(he made few good movies and an excellent series, The Hunting of the Hill House). As long as you don't expect the same style of movie like Shining, you will be good. Few honorable mentions: One Cut of the Dead, Dolemite Is My Name, Togo, The Art of self-defense, Arctic, Dragged Across Concrete, The Kindergarten Teacher, Dogman, Shazam!, Dark Waters, Ford vs Ferrari, The Wild Pear Tree, The Mustang, Birds Of Passage, Pain and Glory..
Anyone else interested to share their top 5/10/whatever while we are waiting for Oscars? I am always on the lookout for new films!  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
