easy money!

TF, I took a loan from you a while ago. Did you keep my ID?

Some questions:

1) Im not sure how your 12% and the BTCJam listing really add up. 12% per months * 12 months = 144% not to mention that 12% of 30 BTC are 3.6BTC and not 4.67032 BTC like shown on BTCJam...
Or is this some kind of partial repayment every month like:

• 1. Month: 30           BTC borrowed + 12% = 33.6 BTC owed - 4.67032 BTC leaves 28.92968 outstanding
• 2. Month: 28.92968  BTC borrowed + 12% = 32.4 BTC owed - 4.67032 BTC leaves 27.72968 outstanding
• ...

2) "I have taken out over 200 BTC in loans" any proof for that? I only see 51.43 repaid at BTCJam

http://coinlenders.com/fees

https://i.imgur.com/wfUlA5f.png

your EOF is showing

This forum is not here to enforce some countries trade laws.

Their published policy is no refunds correct?

People who sent BFL after the fpga fail should have known what they were getting into. I see no reason why they should have a scammers tag at this point. I will be reasonable and listen to evidence however.

Are you trolling? Two definitions of "satoshi" and three definitions of "bitcent", and microbit being 1e-4 or 1e-5 instead of 1e-6 BTC, and millibit being what a microbit actually should be, and being even less than a microbit???

--> Almost none of these proposals makes any sense!

Just stick to standardized units "milli" = 1/1000, "micro" = 1/Million, and "cent" = 1/100, and that's all we need. This is what everyone knows and understands from today's everyday's life of the pre-bitcoin-era (like in mm, mg, ml, mbar units, or µm, µg, or "cent" (EUR/USD), or centimeter).

Making it more complicated and inventing one name for each of the 8 digits after the comma will just cause confusion and will definitely not be adopted.

But actually I did not want to start a thread on naming conventions in general, I was just wondering about whether the particular term "millibitcent" has any reasonable justification, and as it seems, it turned out that it is a nonsense term without justification.

I don't care if someone says "millibit" or "millibitcoin" or "bitmill" or "mBTC" or "BTM", whether one says "microbit" or "microbitcoin" or "µBTC", or whether one says "bitcent" or "bitcoincent" or "centibit" or "cBTC", in all of these cases it is clear what is meant from use of the standardized units, so no need for any "standardization" - let the people decide what turns out to be the most frequent usage. ("Satoshi" is the only bitcoin-era-specific term that adds on top of this)


PS: On naming conventions, I just found this old thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3574.0
(the term "millibitcent" is only shortly mentioned there in the last post of 25 June 2011, again  as 0.1 mBTC instead of 0.01 mBTC)

Wow 

$3192.42 down the drain. So if the address doesn't exist, is it possible that it will be generated in the future? What a lottery that would be!

Why do u say they were free?

I guess someone needs to define at what point is a incompetent operation considered a scam.

Cleaning up the stickies in the Newbies forum might help.  Many of those threads are so long that newbies simply aren't going to read them.  Ten stickies at the top of any forum is too many.  A single "Bitcoin primer" locked sticky with links to notable threads on various issues would be better.

Megathreads get around the problem of 73,000 threads on the same topic, but you still have the issue of the same questions coming up repeatedly because many people won't read threads over 20 pages.  Maybe if we can prune some key threads to a few pages each and link to them we'll have better luck.

To be honest, search sucks and it's not readily apparent to Newbies that if you search from within a forum only that forum will be searched.  

PMs sent out with share transfer, everyone was copied.

- if I "buy" shares from the auction forum, how do I know the person offering the shares actually has shares to sell?