Edit for full disclosure: I *run my own* BTCPay server and for a club I am a member of. But, I still use Shopify for their cart & processing and have them linked BitPay for crypto processing, not because I like them but because they are easy to work with and it integrates well.
I have been looking for a btcpay server implementation on shopify and the closest thing I found was this: https://github.com/djseeds/btcpay-shopify-checkoutBut orders have to be manually reviewed as they are not completed automatically. How did you implement it? Sorry if it's OT but just had to ask. |
|
|
|
Strikethrough is used in many ways. Some times to admit that you were wrong, scratch that phrase and come to a different conclusion, other times to be a dumb ass sarcastic. I would assume strikethrough came from the typewriter era. Used to play around with one of those when I was younger. Those were the days...  Youn should make your topic title more useful.
Damn true! Write a normal title that contains sone info about the topic. It's a forum not a diary entry after all |
|
|
|
|
Gold has a market cap of 8 trillion dollars (from what I found). That would mean BTC will have to trade constantly above $50k to get to the same point.
And that is just taking into account that gold is used as collateral for money printing (more or less).
To me feels like comparing apples to oranges.
I would hope BTC replaces actual currencies, not jus used as a store of value. It is a cryptocurrency after all
|
|
|
|
Not sure if it's been released yet.
Seems you may be right. I skimmed that link before but somehow did not fully read the first paragraph... july and august only for spanish and french users. The rest sign up for more info... I'll wait and see than. Anyway, about the fees according to their blog "We don't charge any monthly or annual fees." so it means you can use the Binance card without fees. You just need to pay a one-time cost of 15 USD.
In order to issue physical cards they must partner up with some banks. And I really doubt the only fee is a flat $15 in these circumstances. Seems we'll get the answer after the "closed beta" with spain and france  Thanks guys |
|
|
|
|
Hi guys, I recently saw that Binance started providing debit cards that you load with crypto from your Binance account and use it like any other card in your pocket.
But could not find out anything about the fees they charge.
All I could find is that (they say) there is no monthly or annual fee for the card so I guess there would be a fee per transaction.
Anyone knows a bit more about it?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
The whole list of banned alts is pointless. His first user got banned for some reason and the others were just banned for ban evasion. So it's not like he broke "any other" rule.
I understand the rules but just curious why he got banned the first time?
Considering the current 1 strike policy I would have thought there is some restraint throwing the permaban hammer around.
Maybe for some smaller infractions give 1-2-3-6 months temp bans.
Because this is the reality for more than a few... get banned = register a new account.
Food for thought
|
|
|
|
|
What does theymos have to do with mixer devs
You expect the guy to answer to "when pool?" or "when exchange?" for someone else's project?
Sorry but don't see the point
Maybe an AMaA (Ask Me almost Anything) would be cool but why only theymos?
Maybe I would like to hear what Vitalik has to say about a few things (many would have their own option) and even more would not give a flying f**k about his shitcoin.
That's an idea for a blog, not a forum IMO
|
|
|
|
Makes me wonder, did the "Tulip" sign any BTC address so far? They are claiming so many  Those lawyers must be so happy. Faketoshi is keeping them very busy and will most likely continue in the foreseeable future  Binance hack next? |
|
|
|
Adding thread here so I can keep an eye on it and add malware once it added.
Seems to be a "get your malware from telegram only" kind of ann. I would suggest posting when you are sure as they probably read this thread also |
|
|
|
First of all, sorry if my post will be formatted not very well because I'm on mobile. About reporting such posts, I know what I'm talking about from my personal and other users experience. I don't talk about one liners and similar shitpsts. I'm more about generic posts which you can see in Bitcoin discussion, Speculation or Gambling boards. Usually it's few generic sentences which are related to topic. But in many cases they repeat what was said already or they are talking without much knowledge about subject. Try to report such posts and you will see that mods won't delete it.
I see your point and you maybe right but If the post you report is from a long thread I would assume a mod would need to skim through tens or hundreds of posts to reach the conclusions that it's just a repetitive sig spam. Giving some examples might help I suppose like "low value repeating sig spam please see post 123 125 and 130" Not saying it's the winning strategy but might have a bit more success imo. Don't give up |
|
|
|
There are a lot of services on the market. We opted for this agency, which I will not name to avoid their advertising. After noticing their undesirable actions (false comments, false members etc...) we took the necessary measures. And as you can see about the comments they are stopped.
Unless you have an NDA with them (you don't) you would actually do some good by mentioning the name of that agency. Think about others like yourself that would start business with them and receive the same "undesirable actions". The fake discussion octopus in not new here but would deserve to get some tentacles cut off for all the bad they have done. (pun intended) Good luck with yours IMO refusal to disclose the name of that agency could also suggest close relationship with them or knowing from the start what this "undesirable action" means and implies, and still going for it. Let's keep the forum clean as well... so who are they ? |
|
|
|
|
It's not only about the merchant but also the consumer.
Companies want profit and pioneering is lower on the list. If your potential buyer is not that LN savvy might not be the right time to implement it I assume.
Most need serious market research before they can pitch LN to the board/investors. That's what you get when you have some stubborn old farts with serious equity in the company.
|
|
|
|
|
It's a good initiative but this page will get very big very fast!
This is why all the implementations on the forum have limitations of last 30 days, last 120 days, 200 posts etc
The way I see it being able to scale is with search and filters. By default last 30 days and then filter by username, action, date, time frame etc with a limit of 200-300 rows (maybe add fewer rows with pagination).
IMHO it's great but not scalable unfortunately. It will probably bsod my pc in a few months of growing
|
|
|
|
One more week to go! Will definitely eat a pizza for Laszlo's sake. The guy is surely in the BTC history book! For me personally it's great to read this kind of posts. That's why I think this forum should always remain the same. If a new version comes out, this old version has to be available for people to read this kind of posts where history was made.
There are tons of awesome threads, that's for sure! What ever forum software they will use the database will remain the same. Everything will be migrated and nothing would be lost. Would just be a UI/UX difference |
|
|
|
Worst case on a locked thread all links are auto deactivated and if you click then a warning appears that offsite links on locked topics are risky do you wish to proceed for sure? Maybe that could help.
Still yes locked topics being held down below active topics is a good move just that you will still get people on those threads albeit in a reduced number so that could be a help.
Adding an alert for links in locked thread is an interesting idea.. (I'll be honest, first time I stopped reading before those paragraphs. Might also be an idea to start with the on-topic part next time  ) Both of them (link alert & sorting locked topic below active) would probably fit in more places like ANN boards, Services and several Marketplace boards. Clearly would not stop the spread but agree would decrease it somewhat. |
|
|
|
Perhaps though there should be a separate board for tokens. I see more scams pop up and far more frequently for projects that dont maintain their own designs or at least have their own bc.
There already is a sub-board for tokens: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=240.0 |
|
|
|
|
Or modify again the default sorting so locked threads will be arranged automatically after the non-locked ones regardless of how many bumps or super bumps or mega bumps it receives.
When the thread is locked sent to the bottom of the pack
Does it sounds like a step in the right direction?
|
|
|
|
The same reason why this has 0 value too:  The same reason game developers don't charge for demo games. Their only purpose are to be used in testing stuff like transactions, wallets, implementations etc. Once they would somehow be worth anything the whole system will be reseted and rollback the test blockchain. Happened already a few times. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
