|
From Bleutrade support service:
Dear user, there is no specific reason, Bleutrade is undergoing a restructuring phase and our team has made a subjective analysis to remove some currencies. This step will open space for adding new currencies, improving our service and other benefits for our users, we are preparing a series of news in the coming months.
|
|
|
|
|
Dear, user, we are sending this e-mail to report that the following cryptocurrencies will be delisted on April 25th, 2018:
BTA, BTCD, BSTY, CLAM, DGC, DP, DPC, EFL, EXP, MOON, NEOS, NVC, PPC, SLG, SLR, START, WDC, XVP, ZET
From that day on, these coins will not be able to be traded at Bleutrade platform. In case of positive balance, the withdraw may be done within 15 (fifteen) days (until May 10 th, 2018). After this term there is no commitment from Bleutrade to stock remaining balance. So Bleutrade Exchange will be able to definitely exclude the wallets.
I am very surprised by this notice, I am very sorry that this happens right now.
Waiting to know the motivation...
|
|
|
|
Welcome ! Saif Ahmad  |
|
|
|
Hi,
While compiling on Linux, get this:
using:
./configure --with-incompatible-bdb
make
mooncoind: malloc.c:2374: sysmalloc: Assertion `(old_top == (((mbinptr) (((char *) &((av)->bins[((1) - 1) * 2])) - __builtin_offsetof (struct malloc_chunk, fd)))) && old_size == 0) || ((unsigned long) (old_size) >= (unsigned long)((((__builtin_offsetof (struct malloc_chunk, fd_nextsize))+((2 *(sizeof(size_t))) - 1)) & ~((2 *(sizeof(size_t))) - 1))) && ((old_top)->size & 0x1) && ((unsigned long) old_end & pagemask) == 0)' failed.
I have never seen this before when compiling other wallet, will focus on getting the root cause of this error. It seems a serious error whereby memory has been deallocated and so is not available and so the application stops working.
@Taranis67, is it ok for you?
I'm unsure of the urgency to looking at/changing code when that is not the main issue for Moon. Why are you doing this alone? Exchanges, wallet services etc ask us Daemon and Linux wallet to compile faster.... why not? |
|
|
|
My friend Taranis67, I have a good idea: We can wait an official announcement from Mooncoin Foundation. It's very early for any conclusion. But we need to stay positive !  The announcement has already been made. As you have obviously been aware of this movement, can you answer my questions above? My answer is that we can make miracles if we collaborate all together ! We dont need sound bites. I've asked you, where is The collaboration? Trev is new dev starting today in a transparent way, he comes from cointopay.com. Please be patient , we are working to be united. Ask yourself this : mooncoin is a decentralized project? |
|
|
|
Hello fellow mooncoiners, my name is Trev (and I am Dev) and my ambition is to bring Mooncoin further in the roadmap. Focused on developing and introducing new features, I am officially hired by Mooncoin foundation to do this. If you have any questions let me know, still starting up so bear with me. Thanks! Welcome Trev! I hope for a fruitful collaboration with the new Telegram team |
|
|
|
There will be an announcement in Telegram channel regarding new Moon development team on Tuesday, 3rd April. We have been working hard on building a team capable of moving Moon forward. https://t.me/joinchat/HasmPkLxNo3riOE7u5PLBALooking forward to this announcement i hope this brings the community together hopefully big future ahead Telegram Channel The Dev team ... our new Dev team consists not only devs, but marketing/community support team as well as Social Media Team. We will all work together as one team to solve the issues we have and deliver the projects that will come in the future. In total we now have a team of 14 people that have volunteered to give up their time for Moon. I'm sure you'll all agree that is a substantial number... The Dev team consists of... @MichiLumin Michi has already built the Mac wallet for Moon. During out first discussions many weeks ago we talked it over. Michi just went and did it on her own. All credit to her. Alongside Michi we have @derekcc. Derek is well versed in our technology and bring many years experience to Moon. Stan Shingler will be out Advisor/Treasurer. Stan knows Moon's history as well as anyone and can advise all teams re the different projects.... Next we have Marketing/Community Support Team. @Sunn3y has been helping the community with wallet issues etc. She has offered to take on this role going forward. Marketing will help devs create, test, debug as well as produce content for all media outlets. This will include, but not limited to, graphics, video, introductions, YouTube. In this team we have @andiiraw4n @Nguyenp (phuc) @justincawa And team leads @esdrase (Esdras) @P_Sycophant |
|
|
|
Android mobile wallet Il giorno 17 mar 2018, alle ore 23:18, Satowallet Listing < listing@satowallet.com> ha scritto: Hello Good day, Thank you for choosing to list with Satowallet. Our team have looked into your project and will be able to provide full support for your project within 7 days of standard listing payment. We will also be glad to assist with any upcoming development that your project may have, upon prior notice. Payment Address: 38ayLphMhdDXitxH95DUYJwUcmGBg1FafF Payment Amount: 0.1BTC After node compilation. you will be required to sen test deposit into wallet address we will provide to you. Best Regards TXID 4b1419ad4be97ab58f263f07913a4c8d5ba3b45b3be8629b5d4492d47f47a7d9 |
|
|
|
Hi all.
Some good news for a change.
One of the Telegram community has been working on a Mac wallet for Mooncoin.
Final testing is going on just now and hopefully the wallet will be available very soon.
Thanks to Michi for all her hard work on this.
Hey guys. As mark said - Just finished some tests on the Mac mooncoin build. A little background - I've actually been here for a long time (under the username 'michi' - but my account got disabled in the hack; I'm trying to get it back.) So a little bit on the usual trust issue: My background comes from close dev ties with the Dogecoin team, and the source changes I made to make this work are there on my fork of the mooncoin wallet on Github. If you want to know any of my history feel free to ask the Dogecoin community - and you can take a look at my history on Reddit's /r/mooncoin (going back to 2013) and /r/dogecoin - under the user /u/michidragon . (most of the legwork was getting it to compile.) I was only able to test it under El Capitan so far, but it looks like it's working. Remember to add nodes from here: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/moon/#!network - into your 'mooncoin.conf' to bootstrap things faster. Here's the release: https://github.com/michilumin/mooncoincore-wallet/releases/tag/0.13.9-segwit-MacOSFixI've marked it as pre-release, because who knows what could be lurking, but I've done a few transactions back and forth and it all looks good from here. I really appreciate your work, thank you very much 🚀 |
|
|
|
Hello friends of the Moon, I hereby present in ANN the official page of Mooncoin in Brazil that will be the basis of the commercial adoption and registration of businesses that in the future will accept Mooncoin.
mooncoin.com.br
Good morning ! Congratulation for your efforts ! Mooncoin must be one of the first 100 cryptos in coinmarketcap.We can do it !Excellent ! Soon another my donation ... My second donation Friends! https://bchain.info/MOON/tx/4cc5284497bb8d6ab9dc27672acba12a7bf3e27f1d408fd689f3174ffc7ce7aaYour goal is our goal
I intend every Sunday to publish the actions of Mooncoin Brasil during the week, like a weekly report for the team Mooncoin ANN to be able to follow the eventsAnd I every Monday will send to you my donation 🚀  |
|
|
|
That's why I voted for making Mooncoin more secure over and over again. But Mooncoin Foundation and some others blocked that - for example my suggestion of making MOON a PoS/PoW-hybrid coin or implementing another - more complex algo or technology - making it a little harder to attack Mooncoin, instead of spending development-power on MoonWord, SmartLikes and other relatively uninteresting things.
I didn't block anything: you were able to find a dev, convince him, convince the community and implement PoS or Hybrid, or Proof-of-Capthas. Why I'm personally against PoS and exotic algos: Mooncoin is a Proof-of-Work coin (like BTC, DOGE, LTC). It's a time tested model, a golden standard. A network hashrate of Mooncoin now is like a hashrate of DOGE and LTC in 2014-2015. Proof-of-Stake is a completely different model. A lot of coins are Proof-of-Stake, but very few are Proof-of-Work. Proof-of-Stake often works like a pyramid when someone who already has a lot of coins, receives more and more. While with Proof-of-Work - miners mine coins, it costs money to mine a coin, they are not made out of thin air and people have equal opportunities. In the future regulators may also pay some attention not only to ICOs, but also to Proof-of-Stake coins with big percentage rewards, they really may have some pyramidal features in some cases. In a Proof-of-Work model - labour, resources create coins. It's mining. It's a different model. Proof-of-Stake and other algos have a lot of their own security issues. It's untrue to say that Proof-of-Work algo in case of Mooncoin is unsecure while Proof-of-Stake or Hybrid would be secure. No. There was a lot of discussing on that, so even without having so much tech knowledge as coinflow, I can definitely say that other algos have their own security issues. Why not exotic algos: without miners (and pools are focused on Proof-of-Work mining which is simple and available for them, and btw miners are not ready to solve captchas or accept other proof-of-human algos like coinflow suggested earlier) - the network will be weak. Exotic algos have their own (often UNKNOWN) security issues. For example, a creator of Balloon hash algo disclosured on his page that it had potential security issues, unknown vulnerabilities. Also in case of Balloon and other exotic (or simply not tested by Mooncoin) algos, there will be a lack of miners and as a result - a low network hashrate, which will lead to security issues. The same would happen in case of selling of frozen coins, the price would be low, which would lead to low network hashrate and to possible security issues (however even in this case if you keep your coins in the normal wallet or on paper wallets, it's safe, a 51% attack cannot steal your coins). I personally have no idea how to transform a PoW coin into a PoS coin technically. I doubt that this could be done without making a new blockchain from scratch and without a swap. Anyway that would be 100% and even 1000% against Mooncoin's philosophy of decentralisation and simply would be rejected by the consensus. Don't forget that even a fork is a big risk (to say nothing about a swap).
Mooncoin needs a stable and serious development, ironing-out of bugs and strong and friendly support of normal investors by a competent dev, as well as strong efforts to get it listed on further, bigger exchanges. Not a new soldier-of-fortune-feature or short-sighted-speculator-candy every day or week. That's all what it takes. If Mooncoin has achieved this, one could think about new features, if necessary. But first of all, serious investors need stability, honesty and a proven record of development. Everyone can write a white paper or a "roadmap", but developing a stable coin that becomes a "classic" or a "no-brainer" to invest in, needs much more than changing the block-reward or burning coins. Why not burn every coin except of 43, to become the brother of 42-coin? Why not do a swap and set the deadline to next week, so that the result is, that all earlier holders of MOON are out of the game? They would recognize months later, when they look again at their wallet, that their coins are useless then.
What coinflow says: hypothetically Mooncoin with 43 coins of total supply as a brother of 42-coin it is simply NOT POSSIBLE. It would be rejected even if someone announced it. As well as any bad dishonest things. Remember: the consensus in a decentralised project accepts only good things. And it's not me who blocks/blocked that. If you want, just try, find a dev, try to convince a dev, the community etc. If people agree, they will support you. Some responsibility is advised though. People should ask experts first and do a good research. Yes, I'm personally against Proof-of-Stake, but my vote is only = 1. We can endlessly say that Mooncoin needs serious developers etc, but did you try to find anyone? If you tried, you knew that's extremely difficult. A dev must be experienced, honest, he must communicate, he must have courage, and finally he must provide his identity when he is going to code and compile wallets. No one, except barrysty1e (James) agreed in 2015-2016 to become a dev on these conditions. But barry had problems with communicating and completing things. After several months of madness of community in 2017 about barry's communication issues, an user polemarhos888 from Crete, Greece (who also contacted Mr. Valamontes but Mr.Valamontes didn't agree), polemarhos888 said that he found a dev in his town, Vassilis Kritharakis, he started to convince Vassilis to join Mooncoin development, and only after his many efforts Vassilis agreed. He provided his identity and started working, fixing issues first and after that he was going (he didn't even start it unfortunately) to implement new features MoonWord and SmartLikes directly into the wallet. We all know what has happened later. Good afternoon ! All these people need to read this post from Mooncoin Foundation. I will try to help again this community about new developer. But in my opinion, we need more people to help us in this section (new developers). Also, I believe that this coin has huge possibilities. Of course, we need winner mentality to highlight them ! congratulations on the great commitment and the reconstruction of what has happened |
|
|
|
Hello friends of the Moon, I hereby present in ANN the official page of Mooncoin in Brazil that will be the basis of the commercial adoption and registration of businesses that in the future will accept Mooncoin.
mooncoin.com.br
Good morning ! Congratulation for your efforts ! Mooncoin must be one of the first 100 cryptos in coinmarketcap.We can do it !Excellent ! Soon another my donation ... My second donation Friends! https://bchain.info/MOON/tx/4cc5284497bb8d6ab9dc27672acba12a7bf3e27f1d408fd689f3174ffc7ce7aaYour goal is our goal |
|
|
|
Hello friends of the Moon, I hereby present in ANN the official page of Mooncoin in Brazil that will be the basis of the commercial adoption and registration of businesses that in the future will accept Mooncoin.
mooncoin.com.br
Good morning ! Congratulation for your efforts ! Mooncoin must be one of the first 100 cryptos in coinmarketcap.We can do it !Excellent ! Soon another my donation ... |
|
|
|
|
why not? I support all the right, honest and transparent projects that I like from everyone around the world.
Mooncoin is decentralised project ...
|
|
|
|
|
Investors (and exchanges) want to see, active dev, transparent and honest, an active team, a good community, working apps, network etc. Now they see so many lies and untruths, FUD, false public accusations in social media against the main and historical supporters of MOON. Whatever we say and we write remain in the history and in the future all will judge what we have done, all will know who was right, who has been honest or deceitful.
I am repeated, the stolen coins are in good hands (VASSILIS is honest person) now and the situation is better than before (P.VERNON hands). Our dev Vassilis, afraid and without the correct support of some, has left. MF is not active, it is tired ? worn-out, frightened ?by the continuous attacks, also toward the privacy, that is important to safeguard against cybercrimine (MF members are people with at least 1 blns...)
It needs to select 2/3 independent devs now and to reconstitute the main team that supports MOON.
I will keep on supporting this coin and those people that feel like doing. I like the Brazilian team (thank for the express solidarity) and I will support their project.
They have sent me further details on their project, I trust them and I remember you what I have always said: “the use creates the value”.
let's go on!
|
|
|
|
lets bring it up again.
its directly due to the legality of the situation.
Some also say, that burning would be against the law...
thats why THAT conversation is in Limbo.
meanwhile, mooncoin needs to move on, and get more movement.
Not directed at you: If it’s due to the legality of the situation then why not be more open with information rather than just replying ‘we’re meeting with lawyers’. I’d offer that if this process was more transparent then everyone would feel more comfortable. As things stand - everyone has their own theory (mostly negative) about the ultimate goals of those with the stolen coins. It’s hard to get anyone new involved or excited when there is a black cloud hanging over 20% of the total coins available. I sent my report to MF about my meeting with lawyers. Only few words: legal proceeding to burn these coins take no days, but months. |
|
|
|
Hi! Yes those 2 checkpoints added by me but were wrong and I removed them If you check below has 2 other params the number of transactions and the last block unix timestamp which never add in sum! This was a mistake by me... I will add again in some point but 1st i must calculate the amount of transactions until my last checkpoint! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
